Loading…

Full-Endoscopic Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion Via an Interlaminar Approach Versus Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion: A Preliminary Retrospective Study

Minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MIS-TLIF) has been performed as a minimally invasive surgery for lumbar degenerative disease, but previous MIS-TLIF methods have shown limitations by their own characters. In this study, we developed a newly interbody fusion technique of ful...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:World neurosurgery 2020-12, Vol.144, p.e475-e482
Main Authors: Li, Yawei, Dai, Yuliang, Wang, Bing, Li, Lei, Li, Pengzhi, Xu, Jietao, Jiang, Bin, Lü, Guohua
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MIS-TLIF) has been performed as a minimally invasive surgery for lumbar degenerative disease, but previous MIS-TLIF methods have shown limitations by their own characters. In this study, we developed a newly interbody fusion technique of full-endoscopic posterior lumbar interbody fusion (FE-PLIF) via an interlaminar approach, presented its preliminary clinical results in comparison with MIS-TLIF procedure. This study retrospectively reviewed 52 patients who underwent FE-PLIF (n = 22) or MIS-TLIF (n = 30) surgery between October 2018 and February 2019. Patient demographics, intraoperative parameters, and perioperative complications were collated. Clinical and radiologic outcomes were evaluated at each follow-up for up to 12 months. FE-PLIF demonstrated a longer operation time, less blood loss, and shorter hospitalization duration than MIS-TLIF. The visual analog scale (VAS) score for leg pain in both groups and for back pain in FE-PLIF group significantly improved at 1 week, while the VAS score for back pain in MIS-TLIF group significantly improved at 3 months. No significant difference in the VAS and Oswestry disability index scores was found between the groups at 3 months and 12 months. Fusion rates of definite grades were not significantly different between the groups (73.3% vs. 70.0%, P > 0.05). All patients who suffered from cage subsidence or nonunion were asymptomatic and did not require revision surgery during the follow-up. The FE-PLIF interlaminar approach is a safe and effective interbody fusion technique with less surgical trauma and similar outcomes compared to MIS-TLIF. However, this technique still requires technical advancements to improve efficiency and reduce technical complexity.
ISSN:1878-8750
1878-8769
DOI:10.1016/j.wneu.2020.08.204