Loading…
Personality, Attitude, and Demographic Correlates of Academic Dishonesty: A Meta-Analysis
Over a century of research has focused on the relationship between student characteristics and academic dishonesty. Here we conduct a meta-analysis of this extensive literature across three broad domains: personality, academic attitudes, and historical information including demographic and prior acc...
Saved in:
Published in: | Psychological bulletin 2020-11, Vol.146 (11), p.1042-1058 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a382t-712af110a6a1447fae0288cdf2c7c5a8f6c3151cecb3afa61860037626dd2e8a3 |
---|---|
cites | |
container_end_page | 1058 |
container_issue | 11 |
container_start_page | 1042 |
container_title | Psychological bulletin |
container_volume | 146 |
creator | Lee, Samuel D. Kuncel, Nathan R. Gau, Jacob |
description | Over a century of research has focused on the relationship between student characteristics and academic dishonesty. Here we conduct a meta-analysis of this extensive literature across three broad domains: personality, academic attitudes, and historical information including demographic and prior accomplishments. After analyzing correlations from over 27,000 participants across 75 samples, several relationships stand out. Although measures of conscientiousness (ρ¯ = −.25) and agreeableness (ρ¯ = −.13) from the popular five-factor model demonstrate important relationships with dishonesty, equal or greater effects were found for specific personality scales including impulsivity (ρ¯ = .39) and psychopathy (ρ¯ = .40). Both morality (ρ¯ = −.24) and academic self-efficacy (ρ¯ = −.28) were related to less dishonest behavior but demonstrated substantially smaller effects than measures of neutralization (ρ¯ = .43), a tendency to justify and deflect immoral behavior as reasonable given the circumstances. Hypotheses were developed and results are framed by two competing models of academic dishonesty.
Public Significance Statement
This study examined how the personality, values, and demographic characteristics of students are related to engaging in academically dishonest behaviors during college. Many characteristics are related to academic dishonesty with the impulsivity, morality, and a tendency to justify inappropriate behavior as being understandable demonstrating the largest reliable effects. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1037/bul0000300 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2440901715</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2440706960</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a382t-712af110a6a1447fae0288cdf2c7c5a8f6c3151cecb3afa61860037626dd2e8a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp90U2L1TAUBuAginMd3fgDpOBGZDrmJGnSuit3_IIRXejCVTg3PXU6tE0nSRf99-ZyRwUXZhM4PLyc5GXsOfBL4NK8Oawjz0dy_oDtoJFNCaqqHrJdnslSNLw5Y09ivM3GVFo-ZmdS1I3htdmxH18pRD_jOKTtomhTGtLa0UWBc1dc0eR_BlxuBlfsfQg0YqJY-L5oHXY05fHVEG_8TDFtb4u2-EwJyzaHbXGIT9mjHsdIz-7vc_b9_btv-4_l9ZcPn_btdYmyFqk0ILAH4KgRlDI9Ehd17bpeOOMqrHvtJFTgyB0k9qih1vlZRgvddYJqlOfs1Sl3Cf5uzavYaYiOxhFn8mu0QinecDBQZfryH3rr15D3Paqq0aoyAP9XihuuG82zen1SLvgYA_V2CcOEYbPA7bEW-7eWjF_cR66Hibo_9HcPGVyeAC5ol7g5DGlwI0W35n-f0zHMgtIWIIcrIX8BTT2V_A</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2440706960</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Personality, Attitude, and Demographic Correlates of Academic Dishonesty: A Meta-Analysis</title><source>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</source><source>APA PsycArticles</source><creator>Lee, Samuel D. ; Kuncel, Nathan R. ; Gau, Jacob</creator><contributor>Albarracín, Dolores ; Johnson, Blair T</contributor><creatorcontrib>Lee, Samuel D. ; Kuncel, Nathan R. ; Gau, Jacob ; Albarracín, Dolores ; Johnson, Blair T</creatorcontrib><description>Over a century of research has focused on the relationship between student characteristics and academic dishonesty. Here we conduct a meta-analysis of this extensive literature across three broad domains: personality, academic attitudes, and historical information including demographic and prior accomplishments. After analyzing correlations from over 27,000 participants across 75 samples, several relationships stand out. Although measures of conscientiousness (ρ¯ = −.25) and agreeableness (ρ¯ = −.13) from the popular five-factor model demonstrate important relationships with dishonesty, equal or greater effects were found for specific personality scales including impulsivity (ρ¯ = .39) and psychopathy (ρ¯ = .40). Both morality (ρ¯ = −.24) and academic self-efficacy (ρ¯ = −.28) were related to less dishonest behavior but demonstrated substantially smaller effects than measures of neutralization (ρ¯ = .43), a tendency to justify and deflect immoral behavior as reasonable given the circumstances. Hypotheses were developed and results are framed by two competing models of academic dishonesty.
Public Significance Statement
This study examined how the personality, values, and demographic characteristics of students are related to engaging in academically dishonest behaviors during college. Many characteristics are related to academic dishonesty with the impulsivity, morality, and a tendency to justify inappropriate behavior as being understandable demonstrating the largest reliable effects.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0033-2909</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1939-1455</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1037/bul0000300</identifier><identifier>PMID: 32897087</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: American Psychological Association</publisher><subject>Academic misconduct ; Adult ; Agreeableness ; Antisocial personality disorder ; Antisocial Personality Disorder - psychology ; Attitude ; Attitudes ; Cheating ; Conscientiousness ; Deception ; Demographic Characteristics ; Demography ; Dishonesty ; Female ; Five factor model ; Human ; Humans ; Impulsive Behavior ; Impulsivity ; Integrity ; Male ; Meta-analysis ; Morality ; Morals ; Neutralization ; Personality ; Psychopathy ; Self Efficacy ; Student Attitudes ; Student Characteristics ; Students - psychology ; Systematic review ; Values ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>Psychological bulletin, 2020-11, Vol.146 (11), p.1042-1058</ispartof><rights>2020 American Psychological Association</rights><rights>2020, American Psychological Association</rights><rights>Copyright American Psychological Association Nov 2020</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a382t-712af110a6a1447fae0288cdf2c7c5a8f6c3151cecb3afa61860037626dd2e8a3</citedby><orcidid>0000-0001-8610-6890</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,30999,33223</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32897087$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><contributor>Albarracín, Dolores</contributor><contributor>Johnson, Blair T</contributor><creatorcontrib>Lee, Samuel D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kuncel, Nathan R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gau, Jacob</creatorcontrib><title>Personality, Attitude, and Demographic Correlates of Academic Dishonesty: A Meta-Analysis</title><title>Psychological bulletin</title><addtitle>Psychol Bull</addtitle><description>Over a century of research has focused on the relationship between student characteristics and academic dishonesty. Here we conduct a meta-analysis of this extensive literature across three broad domains: personality, academic attitudes, and historical information including demographic and prior accomplishments. After analyzing correlations from over 27,000 participants across 75 samples, several relationships stand out. Although measures of conscientiousness (ρ¯ = −.25) and agreeableness (ρ¯ = −.13) from the popular five-factor model demonstrate important relationships with dishonesty, equal or greater effects were found for specific personality scales including impulsivity (ρ¯ = .39) and psychopathy (ρ¯ = .40). Both morality (ρ¯ = −.24) and academic self-efficacy (ρ¯ = −.28) were related to less dishonest behavior but demonstrated substantially smaller effects than measures of neutralization (ρ¯ = .43), a tendency to justify and deflect immoral behavior as reasonable given the circumstances. Hypotheses were developed and results are framed by two competing models of academic dishonesty.
Public Significance Statement
This study examined how the personality, values, and demographic characteristics of students are related to engaging in academically dishonest behaviors during college. Many characteristics are related to academic dishonesty with the impulsivity, morality, and a tendency to justify inappropriate behavior as being understandable demonstrating the largest reliable effects.</description><subject>Academic misconduct</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Agreeableness</subject><subject>Antisocial personality disorder</subject><subject>Antisocial Personality Disorder - psychology</subject><subject>Attitude</subject><subject>Attitudes</subject><subject>Cheating</subject><subject>Conscientiousness</subject><subject>Deception</subject><subject>Demographic Characteristics</subject><subject>Demography</subject><subject>Dishonesty</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Five factor model</subject><subject>Human</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Impulsive Behavior</subject><subject>Impulsivity</subject><subject>Integrity</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Meta-analysis</subject><subject>Morality</subject><subject>Morals</subject><subject>Neutralization</subject><subject>Personality</subject><subject>Psychopathy</subject><subject>Self Efficacy</subject><subject>Student Attitudes</subject><subject>Student Characteristics</subject><subject>Students - psychology</subject><subject>Systematic review</subject><subject>Values</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>0033-2909</issn><issn>1939-1455</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><sourceid>8BJ</sourceid><recordid>eNp90U2L1TAUBuAginMd3fgDpOBGZDrmJGnSuit3_IIRXejCVTg3PXU6tE0nSRf99-ZyRwUXZhM4PLyc5GXsOfBL4NK8Oawjz0dy_oDtoJFNCaqqHrJdnslSNLw5Y09ivM3GVFo-ZmdS1I3htdmxH18pRD_jOKTtomhTGtLa0UWBc1dc0eR_BlxuBlfsfQg0YqJY-L5oHXY05fHVEG_8TDFtb4u2-EwJyzaHbXGIT9mjHsdIz-7vc_b9_btv-4_l9ZcPn_btdYmyFqk0ILAH4KgRlDI9Ehd17bpeOOMqrHvtJFTgyB0k9qih1vlZRgvddYJqlOfs1Sl3Cf5uzavYaYiOxhFn8mu0QinecDBQZfryH3rr15D3Paqq0aoyAP9XihuuG82zen1SLvgYA_V2CcOEYbPA7bEW-7eWjF_cR66Hibo_9HcPGVyeAC5ol7g5DGlwI0W35n-f0zHMgtIWIIcrIX8BTT2V_A</recordid><startdate>20201101</startdate><enddate>20201101</enddate><creator>Lee, Samuel D.</creator><creator>Kuncel, Nathan R.</creator><creator>Gau, Jacob</creator><general>American Psychological Association</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7RZ</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8610-6890</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20201101</creationdate><title>Personality, Attitude, and Demographic Correlates of Academic Dishonesty: A Meta-Analysis</title><author>Lee, Samuel D. ; Kuncel, Nathan R. ; Gau, Jacob</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a382t-712af110a6a1447fae0288cdf2c7c5a8f6c3151cecb3afa61860037626dd2e8a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Academic misconduct</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Agreeableness</topic><topic>Antisocial personality disorder</topic><topic>Antisocial Personality Disorder - psychology</topic><topic>Attitude</topic><topic>Attitudes</topic><topic>Cheating</topic><topic>Conscientiousness</topic><topic>Deception</topic><topic>Demographic Characteristics</topic><topic>Demography</topic><topic>Dishonesty</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Five factor model</topic><topic>Human</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Impulsive Behavior</topic><topic>Impulsivity</topic><topic>Integrity</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Meta-analysis</topic><topic>Morality</topic><topic>Morals</topic><topic>Neutralization</topic><topic>Personality</topic><topic>Psychopathy</topic><topic>Self Efficacy</topic><topic>Student Attitudes</topic><topic>Student Characteristics</topic><topic>Students - psychology</topic><topic>Systematic review</topic><topic>Values</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Lee, Samuel D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kuncel, Nathan R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gau, Jacob</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>PsycArticles (via ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Psychological bulletin</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Lee, Samuel D.</au><au>Kuncel, Nathan R.</au><au>Gau, Jacob</au><au>Albarracín, Dolores</au><au>Johnson, Blair T</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Personality, Attitude, and Demographic Correlates of Academic Dishonesty: A Meta-Analysis</atitle><jtitle>Psychological bulletin</jtitle><addtitle>Psychol Bull</addtitle><date>2020-11-01</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>146</volume><issue>11</issue><spage>1042</spage><epage>1058</epage><pages>1042-1058</pages><issn>0033-2909</issn><eissn>1939-1455</eissn><abstract>Over a century of research has focused on the relationship between student characteristics and academic dishonesty. Here we conduct a meta-analysis of this extensive literature across three broad domains: personality, academic attitudes, and historical information including demographic and prior accomplishments. After analyzing correlations from over 27,000 participants across 75 samples, several relationships stand out. Although measures of conscientiousness (ρ¯ = −.25) and agreeableness (ρ¯ = −.13) from the popular five-factor model demonstrate important relationships with dishonesty, equal or greater effects were found for specific personality scales including impulsivity (ρ¯ = .39) and psychopathy (ρ¯ = .40). Both morality (ρ¯ = −.24) and academic self-efficacy (ρ¯ = −.28) were related to less dishonest behavior but demonstrated substantially smaller effects than measures of neutralization (ρ¯ = .43), a tendency to justify and deflect immoral behavior as reasonable given the circumstances. Hypotheses were developed and results are framed by two competing models of academic dishonesty.
Public Significance Statement
This study examined how the personality, values, and demographic characteristics of students are related to engaging in academically dishonest behaviors during college. Many characteristics are related to academic dishonesty with the impulsivity, morality, and a tendency to justify inappropriate behavior as being understandable demonstrating the largest reliable effects.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>American Psychological Association</pub><pmid>32897087</pmid><doi>10.1037/bul0000300</doi><tpages>17</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8610-6890</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0033-2909 |
ispartof | Psychological bulletin, 2020-11, Vol.146 (11), p.1042-1058 |
issn | 0033-2909 1939-1455 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2440901715 |
source | Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS); APA PsycArticles |
subjects | Academic misconduct Adult Agreeableness Antisocial personality disorder Antisocial Personality Disorder - psychology Attitude Attitudes Cheating Conscientiousness Deception Demographic Characteristics Demography Dishonesty Female Five factor model Human Humans Impulsive Behavior Impulsivity Integrity Male Meta-analysis Morality Morals Neutralization Personality Psychopathy Self Efficacy Student Attitudes Student Characteristics Students - psychology Systematic review Values Young Adult |
title | Personality, Attitude, and Demographic Correlates of Academic Dishonesty: A Meta-Analysis |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-21T04%3A24%3A01IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Personality,%20Attitude,%20and%20Demographic%20Correlates%20of%20Academic%20Dishonesty:%20A%20Meta-Analysis&rft.jtitle=Psychological%20bulletin&rft.au=Lee,%20Samuel%20D.&rft.date=2020-11-01&rft.volume=146&rft.issue=11&rft.spage=1042&rft.epage=1058&rft.pages=1042-1058&rft.issn=0033-2909&rft.eissn=1939-1455&rft_id=info:doi/10.1037/bul0000300&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2440706960%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a382t-712af110a6a1447fae0288cdf2c7c5a8f6c3151cecb3afa61860037626dd2e8a3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2440706960&rft_id=info:pmid/32897087&rfr_iscdi=true |