Loading…

Personality, Attitude, and Demographic Correlates of Academic Dishonesty: A Meta-Analysis

Over a century of research has focused on the relationship between student characteristics and academic dishonesty. Here we conduct a meta-analysis of this extensive literature across three broad domains: personality, academic attitudes, and historical information including demographic and prior acc...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Psychological bulletin 2020-11, Vol.146 (11), p.1042-1058
Main Authors: Lee, Samuel D., Kuncel, Nathan R., Gau, Jacob
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a382t-712af110a6a1447fae0288cdf2c7c5a8f6c3151cecb3afa61860037626dd2e8a3
cites
container_end_page 1058
container_issue 11
container_start_page 1042
container_title Psychological bulletin
container_volume 146
creator Lee, Samuel D.
Kuncel, Nathan R.
Gau, Jacob
description Over a century of research has focused on the relationship between student characteristics and academic dishonesty. Here we conduct a meta-analysis of this extensive literature across three broad domains: personality, academic attitudes, and historical information including demographic and prior accomplishments. After analyzing correlations from over 27,000 participants across 75 samples, several relationships stand out. Although measures of conscientiousness (ρ¯ = −.25) and agreeableness (ρ¯ = −.13) from the popular five-factor model demonstrate important relationships with dishonesty, equal or greater effects were found for specific personality scales including impulsivity (ρ¯ = .39) and psychopathy (ρ¯ = .40). Both morality (ρ¯ = −.24) and academic self-efficacy (ρ¯ = −.28) were related to less dishonest behavior but demonstrated substantially smaller effects than measures of neutralization (ρ¯ = .43), a tendency to justify and deflect immoral behavior as reasonable given the circumstances. Hypotheses were developed and results are framed by two competing models of academic dishonesty. Public Significance Statement This study examined how the personality, values, and demographic characteristics of students are related to engaging in academically dishonest behaviors during college. Many characteristics are related to academic dishonesty with the impulsivity, morality, and a tendency to justify inappropriate behavior as being understandable demonstrating the largest reliable effects.
doi_str_mv 10.1037/bul0000300
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2440901715</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2440706960</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a382t-712af110a6a1447fae0288cdf2c7c5a8f6c3151cecb3afa61860037626dd2e8a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp90U2L1TAUBuAginMd3fgDpOBGZDrmJGnSuit3_IIRXejCVTg3PXU6tE0nSRf99-ZyRwUXZhM4PLyc5GXsOfBL4NK8Oawjz0dy_oDtoJFNCaqqHrJdnslSNLw5Y09ivM3GVFo-ZmdS1I3htdmxH18pRD_jOKTtomhTGtLa0UWBc1dc0eR_BlxuBlfsfQg0YqJY-L5oHXY05fHVEG_8TDFtb4u2-EwJyzaHbXGIT9mjHsdIz-7vc_b9_btv-4_l9ZcPn_btdYmyFqk0ILAH4KgRlDI9Ehd17bpeOOMqrHvtJFTgyB0k9qih1vlZRgvddYJqlOfs1Sl3Cf5uzavYaYiOxhFn8mu0QinecDBQZfryH3rr15D3Paqq0aoyAP9XihuuG82zen1SLvgYA_V2CcOEYbPA7bEW-7eWjF_cR66Hibo_9HcPGVyeAC5ol7g5DGlwI0W35n-f0zHMgtIWIIcrIX8BTT2V_A</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2440706960</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Personality, Attitude, and Demographic Correlates of Academic Dishonesty: A Meta-Analysis</title><source>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</source><source>APA PsycArticles</source><creator>Lee, Samuel D. ; Kuncel, Nathan R. ; Gau, Jacob</creator><contributor>Albarracín, Dolores ; Johnson, Blair T</contributor><creatorcontrib>Lee, Samuel D. ; Kuncel, Nathan R. ; Gau, Jacob ; Albarracín, Dolores ; Johnson, Blair T</creatorcontrib><description>Over a century of research has focused on the relationship between student characteristics and academic dishonesty. Here we conduct a meta-analysis of this extensive literature across three broad domains: personality, academic attitudes, and historical information including demographic and prior accomplishments. After analyzing correlations from over 27,000 participants across 75 samples, several relationships stand out. Although measures of conscientiousness (ρ¯ = −.25) and agreeableness (ρ¯ = −.13) from the popular five-factor model demonstrate important relationships with dishonesty, equal or greater effects were found for specific personality scales including impulsivity (ρ¯ = .39) and psychopathy (ρ¯ = .40). Both morality (ρ¯ = −.24) and academic self-efficacy (ρ¯ = −.28) were related to less dishonest behavior but demonstrated substantially smaller effects than measures of neutralization (ρ¯ = .43), a tendency to justify and deflect immoral behavior as reasonable given the circumstances. Hypotheses were developed and results are framed by two competing models of academic dishonesty. Public Significance Statement This study examined how the personality, values, and demographic characteristics of students are related to engaging in academically dishonest behaviors during college. Many characteristics are related to academic dishonesty with the impulsivity, morality, and a tendency to justify inappropriate behavior as being understandable demonstrating the largest reliable effects.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0033-2909</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1939-1455</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1037/bul0000300</identifier><identifier>PMID: 32897087</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: American Psychological Association</publisher><subject>Academic misconduct ; Adult ; Agreeableness ; Antisocial personality disorder ; Antisocial Personality Disorder - psychology ; Attitude ; Attitudes ; Cheating ; Conscientiousness ; Deception ; Demographic Characteristics ; Demography ; Dishonesty ; Female ; Five factor model ; Human ; Humans ; Impulsive Behavior ; Impulsivity ; Integrity ; Male ; Meta-analysis ; Morality ; Morals ; Neutralization ; Personality ; Psychopathy ; Self Efficacy ; Student Attitudes ; Student Characteristics ; Students - psychology ; Systematic review ; Values ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>Psychological bulletin, 2020-11, Vol.146 (11), p.1042-1058</ispartof><rights>2020 American Psychological Association</rights><rights>2020, American Psychological Association</rights><rights>Copyright American Psychological Association Nov 2020</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a382t-712af110a6a1447fae0288cdf2c7c5a8f6c3151cecb3afa61860037626dd2e8a3</citedby><orcidid>0000-0001-8610-6890</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,30999,33223</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32897087$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><contributor>Albarracín, Dolores</contributor><contributor>Johnson, Blair T</contributor><creatorcontrib>Lee, Samuel D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kuncel, Nathan R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gau, Jacob</creatorcontrib><title>Personality, Attitude, and Demographic Correlates of Academic Dishonesty: A Meta-Analysis</title><title>Psychological bulletin</title><addtitle>Psychol Bull</addtitle><description>Over a century of research has focused on the relationship between student characteristics and academic dishonesty. Here we conduct a meta-analysis of this extensive literature across three broad domains: personality, academic attitudes, and historical information including demographic and prior accomplishments. After analyzing correlations from over 27,000 participants across 75 samples, several relationships stand out. Although measures of conscientiousness (ρ¯ = −.25) and agreeableness (ρ¯ = −.13) from the popular five-factor model demonstrate important relationships with dishonesty, equal or greater effects were found for specific personality scales including impulsivity (ρ¯ = .39) and psychopathy (ρ¯ = .40). Both morality (ρ¯ = −.24) and academic self-efficacy (ρ¯ = −.28) were related to less dishonest behavior but demonstrated substantially smaller effects than measures of neutralization (ρ¯ = .43), a tendency to justify and deflect immoral behavior as reasonable given the circumstances. Hypotheses were developed and results are framed by two competing models of academic dishonesty. Public Significance Statement This study examined how the personality, values, and demographic characteristics of students are related to engaging in academically dishonest behaviors during college. Many characteristics are related to academic dishonesty with the impulsivity, morality, and a tendency to justify inappropriate behavior as being understandable demonstrating the largest reliable effects.</description><subject>Academic misconduct</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Agreeableness</subject><subject>Antisocial personality disorder</subject><subject>Antisocial Personality Disorder - psychology</subject><subject>Attitude</subject><subject>Attitudes</subject><subject>Cheating</subject><subject>Conscientiousness</subject><subject>Deception</subject><subject>Demographic Characteristics</subject><subject>Demography</subject><subject>Dishonesty</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Five factor model</subject><subject>Human</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Impulsive Behavior</subject><subject>Impulsivity</subject><subject>Integrity</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Meta-analysis</subject><subject>Morality</subject><subject>Morals</subject><subject>Neutralization</subject><subject>Personality</subject><subject>Psychopathy</subject><subject>Self Efficacy</subject><subject>Student Attitudes</subject><subject>Student Characteristics</subject><subject>Students - psychology</subject><subject>Systematic review</subject><subject>Values</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>0033-2909</issn><issn>1939-1455</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><sourceid>8BJ</sourceid><recordid>eNp90U2L1TAUBuAginMd3fgDpOBGZDrmJGnSuit3_IIRXejCVTg3PXU6tE0nSRf99-ZyRwUXZhM4PLyc5GXsOfBL4NK8Oawjz0dy_oDtoJFNCaqqHrJdnslSNLw5Y09ivM3GVFo-ZmdS1I3htdmxH18pRD_jOKTtomhTGtLa0UWBc1dc0eR_BlxuBlfsfQg0YqJY-L5oHXY05fHVEG_8TDFtb4u2-EwJyzaHbXGIT9mjHsdIz-7vc_b9_btv-4_l9ZcPn_btdYmyFqk0ILAH4KgRlDI9Ehd17bpeOOMqrHvtJFTgyB0k9qih1vlZRgvddYJqlOfs1Sl3Cf5uzavYaYiOxhFn8mu0QinecDBQZfryH3rr15D3Paqq0aoyAP9XihuuG82zen1SLvgYA_V2CcOEYbPA7bEW-7eWjF_cR66Hibo_9HcPGVyeAC5ol7g5DGlwI0W35n-f0zHMgtIWIIcrIX8BTT2V_A</recordid><startdate>20201101</startdate><enddate>20201101</enddate><creator>Lee, Samuel D.</creator><creator>Kuncel, Nathan R.</creator><creator>Gau, Jacob</creator><general>American Psychological Association</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7RZ</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8610-6890</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20201101</creationdate><title>Personality, Attitude, and Demographic Correlates of Academic Dishonesty: A Meta-Analysis</title><author>Lee, Samuel D. ; Kuncel, Nathan R. ; Gau, Jacob</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a382t-712af110a6a1447fae0288cdf2c7c5a8f6c3151cecb3afa61860037626dd2e8a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Academic misconduct</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Agreeableness</topic><topic>Antisocial personality disorder</topic><topic>Antisocial Personality Disorder - psychology</topic><topic>Attitude</topic><topic>Attitudes</topic><topic>Cheating</topic><topic>Conscientiousness</topic><topic>Deception</topic><topic>Demographic Characteristics</topic><topic>Demography</topic><topic>Dishonesty</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Five factor model</topic><topic>Human</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Impulsive Behavior</topic><topic>Impulsivity</topic><topic>Integrity</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Meta-analysis</topic><topic>Morality</topic><topic>Morals</topic><topic>Neutralization</topic><topic>Personality</topic><topic>Psychopathy</topic><topic>Self Efficacy</topic><topic>Student Attitudes</topic><topic>Student Characteristics</topic><topic>Students - psychology</topic><topic>Systematic review</topic><topic>Values</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Lee, Samuel D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kuncel, Nathan R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gau, Jacob</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>PsycArticles (via ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Psychological bulletin</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Lee, Samuel D.</au><au>Kuncel, Nathan R.</au><au>Gau, Jacob</au><au>Albarracín, Dolores</au><au>Johnson, Blair T</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Personality, Attitude, and Demographic Correlates of Academic Dishonesty: A Meta-Analysis</atitle><jtitle>Psychological bulletin</jtitle><addtitle>Psychol Bull</addtitle><date>2020-11-01</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>146</volume><issue>11</issue><spage>1042</spage><epage>1058</epage><pages>1042-1058</pages><issn>0033-2909</issn><eissn>1939-1455</eissn><abstract>Over a century of research has focused on the relationship between student characteristics and academic dishonesty. Here we conduct a meta-analysis of this extensive literature across three broad domains: personality, academic attitudes, and historical information including demographic and prior accomplishments. After analyzing correlations from over 27,000 participants across 75 samples, several relationships stand out. Although measures of conscientiousness (ρ¯ = −.25) and agreeableness (ρ¯ = −.13) from the popular five-factor model demonstrate important relationships with dishonesty, equal or greater effects were found for specific personality scales including impulsivity (ρ¯ = .39) and psychopathy (ρ¯ = .40). Both morality (ρ¯ = −.24) and academic self-efficacy (ρ¯ = −.28) were related to less dishonest behavior but demonstrated substantially smaller effects than measures of neutralization (ρ¯ = .43), a tendency to justify and deflect immoral behavior as reasonable given the circumstances. Hypotheses were developed and results are framed by two competing models of academic dishonesty. Public Significance Statement This study examined how the personality, values, and demographic characteristics of students are related to engaging in academically dishonest behaviors during college. Many characteristics are related to academic dishonesty with the impulsivity, morality, and a tendency to justify inappropriate behavior as being understandable demonstrating the largest reliable effects.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>American Psychological Association</pub><pmid>32897087</pmid><doi>10.1037/bul0000300</doi><tpages>17</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8610-6890</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0033-2909
ispartof Psychological bulletin, 2020-11, Vol.146 (11), p.1042-1058
issn 0033-2909
1939-1455
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2440901715
source Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS); APA PsycArticles
subjects Academic misconduct
Adult
Agreeableness
Antisocial personality disorder
Antisocial Personality Disorder - psychology
Attitude
Attitudes
Cheating
Conscientiousness
Deception
Demographic Characteristics
Demography
Dishonesty
Female
Five factor model
Human
Humans
Impulsive Behavior
Impulsivity
Integrity
Male
Meta-analysis
Morality
Morals
Neutralization
Personality
Psychopathy
Self Efficacy
Student Attitudes
Student Characteristics
Students - psychology
Systematic review
Values
Young Adult
title Personality, Attitude, and Demographic Correlates of Academic Dishonesty: A Meta-Analysis
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-21T04%3A24%3A01IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Personality,%20Attitude,%20and%20Demographic%20Correlates%20of%20Academic%20Dishonesty:%20A%20Meta-Analysis&rft.jtitle=Psychological%20bulletin&rft.au=Lee,%20Samuel%20D.&rft.date=2020-11-01&rft.volume=146&rft.issue=11&rft.spage=1042&rft.epage=1058&rft.pages=1042-1058&rft.issn=0033-2909&rft.eissn=1939-1455&rft_id=info:doi/10.1037/bul0000300&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2440706960%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a382t-712af110a6a1447fae0288cdf2c7c5a8f6c3151cecb3afa61860037626dd2e8a3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2440706960&rft_id=info:pmid/32897087&rfr_iscdi=true