Loading…
Coated glass capillaries as SPME devices for DART mass spectrometry
Rationale Solid‐phase microextraction (SPME) provides high‐throughput sample cleanup and pre‐concentration. Here we demonstrate coated glass capillaries (CGCs) as SPME devices for specific applications in direct analysis in real time (DART) mass spectrometry, referred to as “CGC‐DART”, for rapid scr...
Saved in:
Published in: | Rapid communications in mass spectrometry 2020-12, Vol.34 (23), p.e8946-n/a |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3326-f0141e8ddd887d04d4b66f4924f6ca3e313fa649ef36ac4083ca234b099e701f3 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3326-f0141e8ddd887d04d4b66f4924f6ca3e313fa649ef36ac4083ca234b099e701f3 |
container_end_page | n/a |
container_issue | 23 |
container_start_page | e8946 |
container_title | Rapid communications in mass spectrometry |
container_volume | 34 |
creator | Cody, Robert Maleknia, Simin D. |
description | Rationale
Solid‐phase microextraction (SPME) provides high‐throughput sample cleanup and pre‐concentration. Here we demonstrate coated glass capillaries (CGCs) as SPME devices for specific applications in direct analysis in real time (DART) mass spectrometry, referred to as “CGC‐DART”, for rapid screening of environmental contaminants at low parts‐per‐trillion detection limits and with accurate identification of analytes.
Methods
The extraction is performed in a one‐step process in minutes by dipping the CGC in solutions containing the analytes, and then placing the CGC in a DART source for analysis. CGCs are disposable and relatively inexpensive in comparison with SPME devices, and can be prepared with hydrophobic, hydrophilic or mixed‐mode materials similar to SPME. CGCs were prepared by adsorption coating with incubation of capillaries in saturated solutions of octadecylamine or covalent activation of silanes.
Results
Quantitation is shown with perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA) at 1 ppt to 100 ppb, with the lowest detection at 500 parts‐per quadrillion (ppq) in tap water. One‐step extraction of contaminated groundwater from Northern Queensland, Australia, revealed perfluorooctane sulfonate (PFOS) and perfluorohexanesulfonamide as well as C4–C8 perfluoroalkyl carboxylic acids. A soil sample taken near a former military air base (New Hampshire, USA) revealed the presence of perfluorononanoic acid (PFNA) at 1 ppb and traces of perfluoroheptanoic acid.
Conclusions
CGC‐DART enabled one‐step extraction of PFASs in minutes with mL sample volumes at low concentrations as shown for the standards and contaminated soil and water samples. DART‐MS combined with Kendrick mass defect analysis enabled accurate identification of PFASs without chromatography steps, as fluorinated compounds are mass deficient and easily distinguished over background signal. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1002/rcm.8946 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2442227993</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2442227993</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3326-f0141e8ddd887d04d4b66f4924f6ca3e313fa649ef36ac4083ca234b099e701f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp10E1LAzEQgOEgCtYq-BNy9LJ18tHs5ljW-gEtSq3nkCYTWdl112Sr9N-7tYInT8PAwzC8hFwymDAAfh1dMym0VEdkxEDnGXDBjskI9JRlkunilJyl9AbA2JTDiJRla3v09LW2KVFnu6qubawwUZvo89NyTj1-Vm7YQxvpzWy1ps1epg5dH9sG-7g7JyfB1gkvfueYvNzO1-V9tni8eyhni8wJwVUWgEmGhfe-KHIP0suNUkFqLoNyVqBgIlglNQahrJNQCGe5kBvQGnNgQYzJ1eFuF9uPLabeNFVyODz8ju02GS4l5zzXWvxRF9uUIgbTxaqxcWcYmH0nM3Qy-04DzQ70q6px968zq3L5478BtE9oAg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2442227993</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Coated glass capillaries as SPME devices for DART mass spectrometry</title><source>Wiley-Blackwell Read & Publish Collection</source><creator>Cody, Robert ; Maleknia, Simin D.</creator><creatorcontrib>Cody, Robert ; Maleknia, Simin D.</creatorcontrib><description>Rationale
Solid‐phase microextraction (SPME) provides high‐throughput sample cleanup and pre‐concentration. Here we demonstrate coated glass capillaries (CGCs) as SPME devices for specific applications in direct analysis in real time (DART) mass spectrometry, referred to as “CGC‐DART”, for rapid screening of environmental contaminants at low parts‐per‐trillion detection limits and with accurate identification of analytes.
Methods
The extraction is performed in a one‐step process in minutes by dipping the CGC in solutions containing the analytes, and then placing the CGC in a DART source for analysis. CGCs are disposable and relatively inexpensive in comparison with SPME devices, and can be prepared with hydrophobic, hydrophilic or mixed‐mode materials similar to SPME. CGCs were prepared by adsorption coating with incubation of capillaries in saturated solutions of octadecylamine or covalent activation of silanes.
Results
Quantitation is shown with perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA) at 1 ppt to 100 ppb, with the lowest detection at 500 parts‐per quadrillion (ppq) in tap water. One‐step extraction of contaminated groundwater from Northern Queensland, Australia, revealed perfluorooctane sulfonate (PFOS) and perfluorohexanesulfonamide as well as C4–C8 perfluoroalkyl carboxylic acids. A soil sample taken near a former military air base (New Hampshire, USA) revealed the presence of perfluorononanoic acid (PFNA) at 1 ppb and traces of perfluoroheptanoic acid.
Conclusions
CGC‐DART enabled one‐step extraction of PFASs in minutes with mL sample volumes at low concentrations as shown for the standards and contaminated soil and water samples. DART‐MS combined with Kendrick mass defect analysis enabled accurate identification of PFASs without chromatography steps, as fluorinated compounds are mass deficient and easily distinguished over background signal.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0951-4198</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1097-0231</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/rcm.8946</identifier><language>eng</language><ispartof>Rapid communications in mass spectrometry, 2020-12, Vol.34 (23), p.e8946-n/a</ispartof><rights>2020 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3326-f0141e8ddd887d04d4b66f4924f6ca3e313fa649ef36ac4083ca234b099e701f3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3326-f0141e8ddd887d04d4b66f4924f6ca3e313fa649ef36ac4083ca234b099e701f3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-7846-5081 ; 0000-0002-6624-8530</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Cody, Robert</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Maleknia, Simin D.</creatorcontrib><title>Coated glass capillaries as SPME devices for DART mass spectrometry</title><title>Rapid communications in mass spectrometry</title><description>Rationale
Solid‐phase microextraction (SPME) provides high‐throughput sample cleanup and pre‐concentration. Here we demonstrate coated glass capillaries (CGCs) as SPME devices for specific applications in direct analysis in real time (DART) mass spectrometry, referred to as “CGC‐DART”, for rapid screening of environmental contaminants at low parts‐per‐trillion detection limits and with accurate identification of analytes.
Methods
The extraction is performed in a one‐step process in minutes by dipping the CGC in solutions containing the analytes, and then placing the CGC in a DART source for analysis. CGCs are disposable and relatively inexpensive in comparison with SPME devices, and can be prepared with hydrophobic, hydrophilic or mixed‐mode materials similar to SPME. CGCs were prepared by adsorption coating with incubation of capillaries in saturated solutions of octadecylamine or covalent activation of silanes.
Results
Quantitation is shown with perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA) at 1 ppt to 100 ppb, with the lowest detection at 500 parts‐per quadrillion (ppq) in tap water. One‐step extraction of contaminated groundwater from Northern Queensland, Australia, revealed perfluorooctane sulfonate (PFOS) and perfluorohexanesulfonamide as well as C4–C8 perfluoroalkyl carboxylic acids. A soil sample taken near a former military air base (New Hampshire, USA) revealed the presence of perfluorononanoic acid (PFNA) at 1 ppb and traces of perfluoroheptanoic acid.
Conclusions
CGC‐DART enabled one‐step extraction of PFASs in minutes with mL sample volumes at low concentrations as shown for the standards and contaminated soil and water samples. DART‐MS combined with Kendrick mass defect analysis enabled accurate identification of PFASs without chromatography steps, as fluorinated compounds are mass deficient and easily distinguished over background signal.</description><issn>0951-4198</issn><issn>1097-0231</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp10E1LAzEQgOEgCtYq-BNy9LJ18tHs5ljW-gEtSq3nkCYTWdl112Sr9N-7tYInT8PAwzC8hFwymDAAfh1dMym0VEdkxEDnGXDBjskI9JRlkunilJyl9AbA2JTDiJRla3v09LW2KVFnu6qubawwUZvo89NyTj1-Vm7YQxvpzWy1ps1epg5dH9sG-7g7JyfB1gkvfueYvNzO1-V9tni8eyhni8wJwVUWgEmGhfe-KHIP0suNUkFqLoNyVqBgIlglNQahrJNQCGe5kBvQGnNgQYzJ1eFuF9uPLabeNFVyODz8ju02GS4l5zzXWvxRF9uUIgbTxaqxcWcYmH0nM3Qy-04DzQ70q6px968zq3L5478BtE9oAg</recordid><startdate>20201215</startdate><enddate>20201215</enddate><creator>Cody, Robert</creator><creator>Maleknia, Simin D.</creator><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7846-5081</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6624-8530</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20201215</creationdate><title>Coated glass capillaries as SPME devices for DART mass spectrometry</title><author>Cody, Robert ; Maleknia, Simin D.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3326-f0141e8ddd887d04d4b66f4924f6ca3e313fa649ef36ac4083ca234b099e701f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Cody, Robert</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Maleknia, Simin D.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Rapid communications in mass spectrometry</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Cody, Robert</au><au>Maleknia, Simin D.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Coated glass capillaries as SPME devices for DART mass spectrometry</atitle><jtitle>Rapid communications in mass spectrometry</jtitle><date>2020-12-15</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>34</volume><issue>23</issue><spage>e8946</spage><epage>n/a</epage><pages>e8946-n/a</pages><issn>0951-4198</issn><eissn>1097-0231</eissn><abstract>Rationale
Solid‐phase microextraction (SPME) provides high‐throughput sample cleanup and pre‐concentration. Here we demonstrate coated glass capillaries (CGCs) as SPME devices for specific applications in direct analysis in real time (DART) mass spectrometry, referred to as “CGC‐DART”, for rapid screening of environmental contaminants at low parts‐per‐trillion detection limits and with accurate identification of analytes.
Methods
The extraction is performed in a one‐step process in minutes by dipping the CGC in solutions containing the analytes, and then placing the CGC in a DART source for analysis. CGCs are disposable and relatively inexpensive in comparison with SPME devices, and can be prepared with hydrophobic, hydrophilic or mixed‐mode materials similar to SPME. CGCs were prepared by adsorption coating with incubation of capillaries in saturated solutions of octadecylamine or covalent activation of silanes.
Results
Quantitation is shown with perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA) at 1 ppt to 100 ppb, with the lowest detection at 500 parts‐per quadrillion (ppq) in tap water. One‐step extraction of contaminated groundwater from Northern Queensland, Australia, revealed perfluorooctane sulfonate (PFOS) and perfluorohexanesulfonamide as well as C4–C8 perfluoroalkyl carboxylic acids. A soil sample taken near a former military air base (New Hampshire, USA) revealed the presence of perfluorononanoic acid (PFNA) at 1 ppb and traces of perfluoroheptanoic acid.
Conclusions
CGC‐DART enabled one‐step extraction of PFASs in minutes with mL sample volumes at low concentrations as shown for the standards and contaminated soil and water samples. DART‐MS combined with Kendrick mass defect analysis enabled accurate identification of PFASs without chromatography steps, as fluorinated compounds are mass deficient and easily distinguished over background signal.</abstract><doi>10.1002/rcm.8946</doi><tpages>7</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7846-5081</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6624-8530</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0951-4198 |
ispartof | Rapid communications in mass spectrometry, 2020-12, Vol.34 (23), p.e8946-n/a |
issn | 0951-4198 1097-0231 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2442227993 |
source | Wiley-Blackwell Read & Publish Collection |
title | Coated glass capillaries as SPME devices for DART mass spectrometry |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-25T19%3A31%3A27IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Coated%20glass%20capillaries%20as%20SPME%20devices%20for%20DART%20mass%20spectrometry&rft.jtitle=Rapid%20communications%20in%20mass%20spectrometry&rft.au=Cody,%20Robert&rft.date=2020-12-15&rft.volume=34&rft.issue=23&rft.spage=e8946&rft.epage=n/a&rft.pages=e8946-n/a&rft.issn=0951-4198&rft.eissn=1097-0231&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/rcm.8946&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2442227993%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3326-f0141e8ddd887d04d4b66f4924f6ca3e313fa649ef36ac4083ca234b099e701f3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2442227993&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |