Loading…

Intraarterial Versus Intravenous Tirofiban as an Adjunct to Endovascular Thrombectomy for Acute Ischemic Stroke

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE:This study aimed to evaluate the treatment effect of intraarterial versus intravenous tirofiban during endovascular thrombectomy in acute ischemic stroke. METHODS:This study retrospectively examined 503 patients with acute ischemic stroke with large vessel occlusion who receiv...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Stroke (1970) 2020-10, Vol.51 (10), p.2925-2933
Main Authors: Yang, Jianhong, Wu, Yuefei, Gao, Xiang, Bivard, Andrew, Levi, Christopher R., Parsons, Mark W., Lin, Longting
Format: Article
Language:English
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE:This study aimed to evaluate the treatment effect of intraarterial versus intravenous tirofiban during endovascular thrombectomy in acute ischemic stroke. METHODS:This study retrospectively examined 503 patients with acute ischemic stroke with large vessel occlusion who received endovascular thrombectomy within 24 hours of stroke onset. Patients were divided into 3 groupsno tirofiban (n=354), intraarterial tirofiban (n=79), and intravenous tirofiban (n=70). The 3 groups were compared in terms of recanalization rate, symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage, in-hospital death rate, 3-month death, and 3-month outcomes measured by modified Rankin Scale score (good clinical outcome of 0–2, poor outcome of 5–6). The comparison was statistically assessed by propensity score matching, followed by Freidman rank-sum test and pairwise Wilcoxon signed-rank test with Bonferroni correction. RESULTS:The propensity score matching resulted in 92 matched triplets. Compared with the no-tirofiban group, the intravenous tirofiban group showed significantly increased recanalization (96.7% versus 64.1%, P
ISSN:0039-2499
1524-4628
DOI:10.1161/STROKEAHA.120.029994