Loading…

Pancreas adenocarcinoma CT texture analysis: comparison of 3D and 2D tumor segmentation techniques

Purpose To determine equivalency of multi-slice 3D CTTA and single slice 2D CTTA of pancreas adenocarcinoma. Methods This retrospective study was research ethics board approved. Untreated pancreas adenocarcinomas were segmented on CT in 128 consecutive patients. Tumor segmentation was compared using...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Abdominal imaging 2021-03, Vol.46 (3), p.1027-1033
Main Authors: Kulkarni, Ameya, Carrion-Martinez, Ivan, Dhindsa, Kiret, Alaref, Amer A., Rozenberg, Radu, van der Pol, Christian B.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Purpose To determine equivalency of multi-slice 3D CTTA and single slice 2D CTTA of pancreas adenocarcinoma. Methods This retrospective study was research ethics board approved. Untreated pancreas adenocarcinomas were segmented on CT in 128 consecutive patients. Tumor segmentation was compared using two techniques: 3D segmentation by contouring all visible tumor in a 3D volume, and 2D segmentation using only a single axial image. First-order CTTA features including mean, minimum, maximum Hounsfield units (HU), standard deviation, skewness, kurtosis, entropy, and second-order gray-level co-occurrence matrix (GLCM) features homogeneity, contrast, correlation, entropy and dissimilarity were extracted. Median values were compared using the Mann–Whitney U test with Holm–Bonferroni correction. Kendall’s Rank Correlation Tau assessed for correlation, and agreement was calculated using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) using a two-way model with single rating and absolute agreement. Statistical significance defined as P  
ISSN:2366-004X
2366-0058
DOI:10.1007/s00261-020-02759-1