Loading…

Host discrimination in the fruit fly parasitoid Diachasmimorpha longicaudata: evidence from virgin female behaviour and egg distribution patterns

Many parasitoid species discriminate already parasitized hosts, thus avoiding larval competition. However, females incur in superparasitism under certain circumstances. Superparasitism is commonly observed in the artificial rearing of the parasitoid Diachasmimorpha longicaudata, yet host discriminat...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Bulletin of entomological research 2021-04, Vol.111 (2), p.229-237
Main Authors: Devescovi, Francisco, Bachmann, Guillermo E., Nussenbaum, Ana L., Viscarret, Mariana M., Cladera, Jorge L., Segura, Diego F.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c373t-d1d5d82c779f3aaf13f61a4f8e71af476358760f5515a15d534ae31ecf8836443
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c373t-d1d5d82c779f3aaf13f61a4f8e71af476358760f5515a15d534ae31ecf8836443
container_end_page 237
container_issue 2
container_start_page 229
container_title Bulletin of entomological research
container_volume 111
creator Devescovi, Francisco
Bachmann, Guillermo E.
Nussenbaum, Ana L.
Viscarret, Mariana M.
Cladera, Jorge L.
Segura, Diego F.
description Many parasitoid species discriminate already parasitized hosts, thus avoiding larval competition. However, females incur in superparasitism under certain circumstances. Superparasitism is commonly observed in the artificial rearing of the parasitoid Diachasmimorpha longicaudata, yet host discrimination has been previously suggested in this species. Here, we addressed host discrimination in virgin D. longicaudata females in a comprehensive way by means of direct and indirect methods, using Ceratitis capitata and Anastrepha fraterculus which are major fruit fly pests in South America. Direct methods relied on the description of the foraging behaviour of females in arenas with parasitized and non-parasitized host larvae. In the indirect methods, healthy larvae were offered to single females and the egg distributions were compared to a random distribution. We found that D. longicaudata was able to recognize parasitized host from both host species, taking 24 h since a first parasitization for A. fraterculus and 48 h for C. capitata. Indirect methods showed females with different behaviours for both host species: complete discrimination, non-random (with superparasitism), and random distributions. A larger percentage of females reared and tested on A. fraterculus incurred in superparasitism, probably associated with higher fecundity. In sum, we found strong evidence of host discrimination in D. longicaudata, detecting behavioural variability associated with the host species, the time since the first parasitization and the fecundity of the females.
doi_str_mv 10.1017/S0007485320000589
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2444376367</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><cupid>10_1017_S0007485320000589</cupid><sourcerecordid>2444376367</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c373t-d1d5d82c779f3aaf13f61a4f8e71af476358760f5515a15d534ae31ecf8836443</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kcFu1DAQhi0EotvCA3BBlrhwCcSxHTvcUKEUqRIH4BzNxuOsq8QOtrNSH4M3xqELSCBOtjXf___jGUKesfoVq5l6_bmuayW05E251FJ3D8iOCSWrplX1Q7LbytVWPyPnKd2Wp-hE95ic8aYTspFsR75fh5SpcWmIbnYesgueOk_zAamNq8vUTnd0gQjJ5eAMfedgOECa3RzicgA6BT-6AVYDGd5QPDqDfti0YaZHF8fiZXGGCekeD3B0YY0UvKE4jltsjm6__gxdIGeMPj0hjyxMCZ-ezgvy9er9l8vr6ubTh4-Xb2-qgSueK8OMNLoZlOosB7CM25aBsBoVAytUy6VWbW2lZBKYNJILQM5wsFrzVgh-QV7e-y4xfFsx5X4uU8BpAo9hTX0jClRsWlXQF3-ht-UbvnRXqK7tlGaaFYrdU0MMKUW0_VJmCvGuZ3W_7av_Z19F8_zkvO5nNL8VvxZUAH4yhXkfnRnxT_b_bX8AUhGhpw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2496978181</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Host discrimination in the fruit fly parasitoid Diachasmimorpha longicaudata: evidence from virgin female behaviour and egg distribution patterns</title><source>Cambridge Journals Online</source><creator>Devescovi, Francisco ; Bachmann, Guillermo E. ; Nussenbaum, Ana L. ; Viscarret, Mariana M. ; Cladera, Jorge L. ; Segura, Diego F.</creator><creatorcontrib>Devescovi, Francisco ; Bachmann, Guillermo E. ; Nussenbaum, Ana L. ; Viscarret, Mariana M. ; Cladera, Jorge L. ; Segura, Diego F.</creatorcontrib><description>Many parasitoid species discriminate already parasitized hosts, thus avoiding larval competition. However, females incur in superparasitism under certain circumstances. Superparasitism is commonly observed in the artificial rearing of the parasitoid Diachasmimorpha longicaudata, yet host discrimination has been previously suggested in this species. Here, we addressed host discrimination in virgin D. longicaudata females in a comprehensive way by means of direct and indirect methods, using Ceratitis capitata and Anastrepha fraterculus which are major fruit fly pests in South America. Direct methods relied on the description of the foraging behaviour of females in arenas with parasitized and non-parasitized host larvae. In the indirect methods, healthy larvae were offered to single females and the egg distributions were compared to a random distribution. We found that D. longicaudata was able to recognize parasitized host from both host species, taking 24 h since a first parasitization for A. fraterculus and 48 h for C. capitata. Indirect methods showed females with different behaviours for both host species: complete discrimination, non-random (with superparasitism), and random distributions. A larger percentage of females reared and tested on A. fraterculus incurred in superparasitism, probably associated with higher fecundity. In sum, we found strong evidence of host discrimination in D. longicaudata, detecting behavioural variability associated with the host species, the time since the first parasitization and the fecundity of the females.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0007-4853</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1475-2670</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1017/S0007485320000589</identifier><identifier>PMID: 32945251</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press</publisher><subject>Animals ; Ceratitis capitata - parasitology ; Diachasmimorpha longicaudata ; Discrimination ; Distribution ; Distribution patterns ; Eggs ; Fecundity ; Feeding Behavior ; Female ; Females ; Fertility ; Foraging ; Foraging behavior ; Fruit flies ; Fruits ; Geographical distribution ; Herbivores ; Host-Parasite Interactions ; Individual rearing ; Larva - parasitology ; Larvae ; Methods ; Parasitoids ; Pests ; Research Paper ; Species ; Superparasitism ; Tephritidae - parasitology ; Wasps - physiology ; Yeast</subject><ispartof>Bulletin of entomological research, 2021-04, Vol.111 (2), p.229-237</ispartof><rights>Copyright © The Author(s), 2020. Published by Cambridge University Press.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c373t-d1d5d82c779f3aaf13f61a4f8e71af476358760f5515a15d534ae31ecf8836443</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c373t-d1d5d82c779f3aaf13f61a4f8e71af476358760f5515a15d534ae31ecf8836443</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-2927-9028</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S0007485320000589/type/journal_article$$EHTML$$P50$$Gcambridge$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,72960</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32945251$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Devescovi, Francisco</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bachmann, Guillermo E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nussenbaum, Ana L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Viscarret, Mariana M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cladera, Jorge L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Segura, Diego F.</creatorcontrib><title>Host discrimination in the fruit fly parasitoid Diachasmimorpha longicaudata: evidence from virgin female behaviour and egg distribution patterns</title><title>Bulletin of entomological research</title><addtitle>Bull. Entomol. Res</addtitle><description>Many parasitoid species discriminate already parasitized hosts, thus avoiding larval competition. However, females incur in superparasitism under certain circumstances. Superparasitism is commonly observed in the artificial rearing of the parasitoid Diachasmimorpha longicaudata, yet host discrimination has been previously suggested in this species. Here, we addressed host discrimination in virgin D. longicaudata females in a comprehensive way by means of direct and indirect methods, using Ceratitis capitata and Anastrepha fraterculus which are major fruit fly pests in South America. Direct methods relied on the description of the foraging behaviour of females in arenas with parasitized and non-parasitized host larvae. In the indirect methods, healthy larvae were offered to single females and the egg distributions were compared to a random distribution. We found that D. longicaudata was able to recognize parasitized host from both host species, taking 24 h since a first parasitization for A. fraterculus and 48 h for C. capitata. Indirect methods showed females with different behaviours for both host species: complete discrimination, non-random (with superparasitism), and random distributions. A larger percentage of females reared and tested on A. fraterculus incurred in superparasitism, probably associated with higher fecundity. In sum, we found strong evidence of host discrimination in D. longicaudata, detecting behavioural variability associated with the host species, the time since the first parasitization and the fecundity of the females.</description><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Ceratitis capitata - parasitology</subject><subject>Diachasmimorpha longicaudata</subject><subject>Discrimination</subject><subject>Distribution</subject><subject>Distribution patterns</subject><subject>Eggs</subject><subject>Fecundity</subject><subject>Feeding Behavior</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Females</subject><subject>Fertility</subject><subject>Foraging</subject><subject>Foraging behavior</subject><subject>Fruit flies</subject><subject>Fruits</subject><subject>Geographical distribution</subject><subject>Herbivores</subject><subject>Host-Parasite Interactions</subject><subject>Individual rearing</subject><subject>Larva - parasitology</subject><subject>Larvae</subject><subject>Methods</subject><subject>Parasitoids</subject><subject>Pests</subject><subject>Research Paper</subject><subject>Species</subject><subject>Superparasitism</subject><subject>Tephritidae - parasitology</subject><subject>Wasps - physiology</subject><subject>Yeast</subject><issn>0007-4853</issn><issn>1475-2670</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kcFu1DAQhi0EotvCA3BBlrhwCcSxHTvcUKEUqRIH4BzNxuOsq8QOtrNSH4M3xqELSCBOtjXf___jGUKesfoVq5l6_bmuayW05E251FJ3D8iOCSWrplX1Q7LbytVWPyPnKd2Wp-hE95ic8aYTspFsR75fh5SpcWmIbnYesgueOk_zAamNq8vUTnd0gQjJ5eAMfedgOECa3RzicgA6BT-6AVYDGd5QPDqDfti0YaZHF8fiZXGGCekeD3B0YY0UvKE4jltsjm6__gxdIGeMPj0hjyxMCZ-ezgvy9er9l8vr6ubTh4-Xb2-qgSueK8OMNLoZlOosB7CM25aBsBoVAytUy6VWbW2lZBKYNJILQM5wsFrzVgh-QV7e-y4xfFsx5X4uU8BpAo9hTX0jClRsWlXQF3-ht-UbvnRXqK7tlGaaFYrdU0MMKUW0_VJmCvGuZ3W_7av_Z19F8_zkvO5nNL8VvxZUAH4yhXkfnRnxT_b_bX8AUhGhpw</recordid><startdate>202104</startdate><enddate>202104</enddate><creator>Devescovi, Francisco</creator><creator>Bachmann, Guillermo E.</creator><creator>Nussenbaum, Ana L.</creator><creator>Viscarret, Mariana M.</creator><creator>Cladera, Jorge L.</creator><creator>Segura, Diego F.</creator><general>Cambridge University Press</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QR</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88A</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BKSAR</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>H95</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PCBAR</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2927-9028</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202104</creationdate><title>Host discrimination in the fruit fly parasitoid Diachasmimorpha longicaudata: evidence from virgin female behaviour and egg distribution patterns</title><author>Devescovi, Francisco ; Bachmann, Guillermo E. ; Nussenbaum, Ana L. ; Viscarret, Mariana M. ; Cladera, Jorge L. ; Segura, Diego F.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c373t-d1d5d82c779f3aaf13f61a4f8e71af476358760f5515a15d534ae31ecf8836443</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Ceratitis capitata - parasitology</topic><topic>Diachasmimorpha longicaudata</topic><topic>Discrimination</topic><topic>Distribution</topic><topic>Distribution patterns</topic><topic>Eggs</topic><topic>Fecundity</topic><topic>Feeding Behavior</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Females</topic><topic>Fertility</topic><topic>Foraging</topic><topic>Foraging behavior</topic><topic>Fruit flies</topic><topic>Fruits</topic><topic>Geographical distribution</topic><topic>Herbivores</topic><topic>Host-Parasite Interactions</topic><topic>Individual rearing</topic><topic>Larva - parasitology</topic><topic>Larvae</topic><topic>Methods</topic><topic>Parasitoids</topic><topic>Pests</topic><topic>Research Paper</topic><topic>Species</topic><topic>Superparasitism</topic><topic>Tephritidae - parasitology</topic><topic>Wasps - physiology</topic><topic>Yeast</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Devescovi, Francisco</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bachmann, Guillermo E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nussenbaum, Ana L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Viscarret, Mariana M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cladera, Jorge L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Segura, Diego F.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Chemoreception Abstracts</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Biology Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric &amp; Aquatic Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 1: Biological Sciences &amp; Living Resources</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Biological Sciences</collection><collection>Agriculture Science Database</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>ProQuest_Research Library</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric &amp; Aquatic Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Bulletin of entomological research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Devescovi, Francisco</au><au>Bachmann, Guillermo E.</au><au>Nussenbaum, Ana L.</au><au>Viscarret, Mariana M.</au><au>Cladera, Jorge L.</au><au>Segura, Diego F.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Host discrimination in the fruit fly parasitoid Diachasmimorpha longicaudata: evidence from virgin female behaviour and egg distribution patterns</atitle><jtitle>Bulletin of entomological research</jtitle><addtitle>Bull. Entomol. Res</addtitle><date>2021-04</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>111</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>229</spage><epage>237</epage><pages>229-237</pages><issn>0007-4853</issn><eissn>1475-2670</eissn><abstract>Many parasitoid species discriminate already parasitized hosts, thus avoiding larval competition. However, females incur in superparasitism under certain circumstances. Superparasitism is commonly observed in the artificial rearing of the parasitoid Diachasmimorpha longicaudata, yet host discrimination has been previously suggested in this species. Here, we addressed host discrimination in virgin D. longicaudata females in a comprehensive way by means of direct and indirect methods, using Ceratitis capitata and Anastrepha fraterculus which are major fruit fly pests in South America. Direct methods relied on the description of the foraging behaviour of females in arenas with parasitized and non-parasitized host larvae. In the indirect methods, healthy larvae were offered to single females and the egg distributions were compared to a random distribution. We found that D. longicaudata was able to recognize parasitized host from both host species, taking 24 h since a first parasitization for A. fraterculus and 48 h for C. capitata. Indirect methods showed females with different behaviours for both host species: complete discrimination, non-random (with superparasitism), and random distributions. A larger percentage of females reared and tested on A. fraterculus incurred in superparasitism, probably associated with higher fecundity. In sum, we found strong evidence of host discrimination in D. longicaudata, detecting behavioural variability associated with the host species, the time since the first parasitization and the fecundity of the females.</abstract><cop>Cambridge, UK</cop><pub>Cambridge University Press</pub><pmid>32945251</pmid><doi>10.1017/S0007485320000589</doi><tpages>9</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2927-9028</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0007-4853
ispartof Bulletin of entomological research, 2021-04, Vol.111 (2), p.229-237
issn 0007-4853
1475-2670
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2444376367
source Cambridge Journals Online
subjects Animals
Ceratitis capitata - parasitology
Diachasmimorpha longicaudata
Discrimination
Distribution
Distribution patterns
Eggs
Fecundity
Feeding Behavior
Female
Females
Fertility
Foraging
Foraging behavior
Fruit flies
Fruits
Geographical distribution
Herbivores
Host-Parasite Interactions
Individual rearing
Larva - parasitology
Larvae
Methods
Parasitoids
Pests
Research Paper
Species
Superparasitism
Tephritidae - parasitology
Wasps - physiology
Yeast
title Host discrimination in the fruit fly parasitoid Diachasmimorpha longicaudata: evidence from virgin female behaviour and egg distribution patterns
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-03T21%3A32%3A19IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Host%20discrimination%20in%20the%20fruit%20fly%20parasitoid%20Diachasmimorpha%20longicaudata:%20evidence%20from%20virgin%20female%20behaviour%20and%20egg%20distribution%20patterns&rft.jtitle=Bulletin%20of%20entomological%20research&rft.au=Devescovi,%20Francisco&rft.date=2021-04&rft.volume=111&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=229&rft.epage=237&rft.pages=229-237&rft.issn=0007-4853&rft.eissn=1475-2670&rft_id=info:doi/10.1017/S0007485320000589&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2444376367%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c373t-d1d5d82c779f3aaf13f61a4f8e71af476358760f5515a15d534ae31ecf8836443%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2496978181&rft_id=info:pmid/32945251&rft_cupid=10_1017_S0007485320000589&rfr_iscdi=true