Loading…
Host discrimination in the fruit fly parasitoid Diachasmimorpha longicaudata: evidence from virgin female behaviour and egg distribution patterns
Many parasitoid species discriminate already parasitized hosts, thus avoiding larval competition. However, females incur in superparasitism under certain circumstances. Superparasitism is commonly observed in the artificial rearing of the parasitoid Diachasmimorpha longicaudata, yet host discriminat...
Saved in:
Published in: | Bulletin of entomological research 2021-04, Vol.111 (2), p.229-237 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c373t-d1d5d82c779f3aaf13f61a4f8e71af476358760f5515a15d534ae31ecf8836443 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c373t-d1d5d82c779f3aaf13f61a4f8e71af476358760f5515a15d534ae31ecf8836443 |
container_end_page | 237 |
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 229 |
container_title | Bulletin of entomological research |
container_volume | 111 |
creator | Devescovi, Francisco Bachmann, Guillermo E. Nussenbaum, Ana L. Viscarret, Mariana M. Cladera, Jorge L. Segura, Diego F. |
description | Many parasitoid species discriminate already parasitized hosts, thus avoiding larval competition. However, females incur in superparasitism under certain circumstances. Superparasitism is commonly observed in the artificial rearing of the parasitoid Diachasmimorpha longicaudata, yet host discrimination has been previously suggested in this species. Here, we addressed host discrimination in virgin D. longicaudata females in a comprehensive way by means of direct and indirect methods, using Ceratitis capitata and Anastrepha fraterculus which are major fruit fly pests in South America. Direct methods relied on the description of the foraging behaviour of females in arenas with parasitized and non-parasitized host larvae. In the indirect methods, healthy larvae were offered to single females and the egg distributions were compared to a random distribution. We found that D. longicaudata was able to recognize parasitized host from both host species, taking 24 h since a first parasitization for A. fraterculus and 48 h for C. capitata. Indirect methods showed females with different behaviours for both host species: complete discrimination, non-random (with superparasitism), and random distributions. A larger percentage of females reared and tested on A. fraterculus incurred in superparasitism, probably associated with higher fecundity. In sum, we found strong evidence of host discrimination in D. longicaudata, detecting behavioural variability associated with the host species, the time since the first parasitization and the fecundity of the females. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1017/S0007485320000589 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2444376367</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><cupid>10_1017_S0007485320000589</cupid><sourcerecordid>2444376367</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c373t-d1d5d82c779f3aaf13f61a4f8e71af476358760f5515a15d534ae31ecf8836443</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kcFu1DAQhi0EotvCA3BBlrhwCcSxHTvcUKEUqRIH4BzNxuOsq8QOtrNSH4M3xqELSCBOtjXf___jGUKesfoVq5l6_bmuayW05E251FJ3D8iOCSWrplX1Q7LbytVWPyPnKd2Wp-hE95ic8aYTspFsR75fh5SpcWmIbnYesgueOk_zAamNq8vUTnd0gQjJ5eAMfedgOECa3RzicgA6BT-6AVYDGd5QPDqDfti0YaZHF8fiZXGGCekeD3B0YY0UvKE4jltsjm6__gxdIGeMPj0hjyxMCZ-ezgvy9er9l8vr6ubTh4-Xb2-qgSueK8OMNLoZlOosB7CM25aBsBoVAytUy6VWbW2lZBKYNJILQM5wsFrzVgh-QV7e-y4xfFsx5X4uU8BpAo9hTX0jClRsWlXQF3-ht-UbvnRXqK7tlGaaFYrdU0MMKUW0_VJmCvGuZ3W_7av_Z19F8_zkvO5nNL8VvxZUAH4yhXkfnRnxT_b_bX8AUhGhpw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2496978181</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Host discrimination in the fruit fly parasitoid Diachasmimorpha longicaudata: evidence from virgin female behaviour and egg distribution patterns</title><source>Cambridge Journals Online</source><creator>Devescovi, Francisco ; Bachmann, Guillermo E. ; Nussenbaum, Ana L. ; Viscarret, Mariana M. ; Cladera, Jorge L. ; Segura, Diego F.</creator><creatorcontrib>Devescovi, Francisco ; Bachmann, Guillermo E. ; Nussenbaum, Ana L. ; Viscarret, Mariana M. ; Cladera, Jorge L. ; Segura, Diego F.</creatorcontrib><description>Many parasitoid species discriminate already parasitized hosts, thus avoiding larval competition. However, females incur in superparasitism under certain circumstances. Superparasitism is commonly observed in the artificial rearing of the parasitoid Diachasmimorpha longicaudata, yet host discrimination has been previously suggested in this species. Here, we addressed host discrimination in virgin D. longicaudata females in a comprehensive way by means of direct and indirect methods, using Ceratitis capitata and Anastrepha fraterculus which are major fruit fly pests in South America. Direct methods relied on the description of the foraging behaviour of females in arenas with parasitized and non-parasitized host larvae. In the indirect methods, healthy larvae were offered to single females and the egg distributions were compared to a random distribution. We found that D. longicaudata was able to recognize parasitized host from both host species, taking 24 h since a first parasitization for A. fraterculus and 48 h for C. capitata. Indirect methods showed females with different behaviours for both host species: complete discrimination, non-random (with superparasitism), and random distributions. A larger percentage of females reared and tested on A. fraterculus incurred in superparasitism, probably associated with higher fecundity. In sum, we found strong evidence of host discrimination in D. longicaudata, detecting behavioural variability associated with the host species, the time since the first parasitization and the fecundity of the females.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0007-4853</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1475-2670</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1017/S0007485320000589</identifier><identifier>PMID: 32945251</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press</publisher><subject>Animals ; Ceratitis capitata - parasitology ; Diachasmimorpha longicaudata ; Discrimination ; Distribution ; Distribution patterns ; Eggs ; Fecundity ; Feeding Behavior ; Female ; Females ; Fertility ; Foraging ; Foraging behavior ; Fruit flies ; Fruits ; Geographical distribution ; Herbivores ; Host-Parasite Interactions ; Individual rearing ; Larva - parasitology ; Larvae ; Methods ; Parasitoids ; Pests ; Research Paper ; Species ; Superparasitism ; Tephritidae - parasitology ; Wasps - physiology ; Yeast</subject><ispartof>Bulletin of entomological research, 2021-04, Vol.111 (2), p.229-237</ispartof><rights>Copyright © The Author(s), 2020. Published by Cambridge University Press.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c373t-d1d5d82c779f3aaf13f61a4f8e71af476358760f5515a15d534ae31ecf8836443</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c373t-d1d5d82c779f3aaf13f61a4f8e71af476358760f5515a15d534ae31ecf8836443</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-2927-9028</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S0007485320000589/type/journal_article$$EHTML$$P50$$Gcambridge$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,72960</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32945251$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Devescovi, Francisco</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bachmann, Guillermo E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nussenbaum, Ana L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Viscarret, Mariana M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cladera, Jorge L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Segura, Diego F.</creatorcontrib><title>Host discrimination in the fruit fly parasitoid Diachasmimorpha longicaudata: evidence from virgin female behaviour and egg distribution patterns</title><title>Bulletin of entomological research</title><addtitle>Bull. Entomol. Res</addtitle><description>Many parasitoid species discriminate already parasitized hosts, thus avoiding larval competition. However, females incur in superparasitism under certain circumstances. Superparasitism is commonly observed in the artificial rearing of the parasitoid Diachasmimorpha longicaudata, yet host discrimination has been previously suggested in this species. Here, we addressed host discrimination in virgin D. longicaudata females in a comprehensive way by means of direct and indirect methods, using Ceratitis capitata and Anastrepha fraterculus which are major fruit fly pests in South America. Direct methods relied on the description of the foraging behaviour of females in arenas with parasitized and non-parasitized host larvae. In the indirect methods, healthy larvae were offered to single females and the egg distributions were compared to a random distribution. We found that D. longicaudata was able to recognize parasitized host from both host species, taking 24 h since a first parasitization for A. fraterculus and 48 h for C. capitata. Indirect methods showed females with different behaviours for both host species: complete discrimination, non-random (with superparasitism), and random distributions. A larger percentage of females reared and tested on A. fraterculus incurred in superparasitism, probably associated with higher fecundity. In sum, we found strong evidence of host discrimination in D. longicaudata, detecting behavioural variability associated with the host species, the time since the first parasitization and the fecundity of the females.</description><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Ceratitis capitata - parasitology</subject><subject>Diachasmimorpha longicaudata</subject><subject>Discrimination</subject><subject>Distribution</subject><subject>Distribution patterns</subject><subject>Eggs</subject><subject>Fecundity</subject><subject>Feeding Behavior</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Females</subject><subject>Fertility</subject><subject>Foraging</subject><subject>Foraging behavior</subject><subject>Fruit flies</subject><subject>Fruits</subject><subject>Geographical distribution</subject><subject>Herbivores</subject><subject>Host-Parasite Interactions</subject><subject>Individual rearing</subject><subject>Larva - parasitology</subject><subject>Larvae</subject><subject>Methods</subject><subject>Parasitoids</subject><subject>Pests</subject><subject>Research Paper</subject><subject>Species</subject><subject>Superparasitism</subject><subject>Tephritidae - parasitology</subject><subject>Wasps - physiology</subject><subject>Yeast</subject><issn>0007-4853</issn><issn>1475-2670</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kcFu1DAQhi0EotvCA3BBlrhwCcSxHTvcUKEUqRIH4BzNxuOsq8QOtrNSH4M3xqELSCBOtjXf___jGUKesfoVq5l6_bmuayW05E251FJ3D8iOCSWrplX1Q7LbytVWPyPnKd2Wp-hE95ic8aYTspFsR75fh5SpcWmIbnYesgueOk_zAamNq8vUTnd0gQjJ5eAMfedgOECa3RzicgA6BT-6AVYDGd5QPDqDfti0YaZHF8fiZXGGCekeD3B0YY0UvKE4jltsjm6__gxdIGeMPj0hjyxMCZ-ezgvy9er9l8vr6ubTh4-Xb2-qgSueK8OMNLoZlOosB7CM25aBsBoVAytUy6VWbW2lZBKYNJILQM5wsFrzVgh-QV7e-y4xfFsx5X4uU8BpAo9hTX0jClRsWlXQF3-ht-UbvnRXqK7tlGaaFYrdU0MMKUW0_VJmCvGuZ3W_7av_Z19F8_zkvO5nNL8VvxZUAH4yhXkfnRnxT_b_bX8AUhGhpw</recordid><startdate>202104</startdate><enddate>202104</enddate><creator>Devescovi, Francisco</creator><creator>Bachmann, Guillermo E.</creator><creator>Nussenbaum, Ana L.</creator><creator>Viscarret, Mariana M.</creator><creator>Cladera, Jorge L.</creator><creator>Segura, Diego F.</creator><general>Cambridge University Press</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QR</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88A</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BKSAR</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>H95</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PCBAR</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2927-9028</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202104</creationdate><title>Host discrimination in the fruit fly parasitoid Diachasmimorpha longicaudata: evidence from virgin female behaviour and egg distribution patterns</title><author>Devescovi, Francisco ; Bachmann, Guillermo E. ; Nussenbaum, Ana L. ; Viscarret, Mariana M. ; Cladera, Jorge L. ; Segura, Diego F.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c373t-d1d5d82c779f3aaf13f61a4f8e71af476358760f5515a15d534ae31ecf8836443</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Ceratitis capitata - parasitology</topic><topic>Diachasmimorpha longicaudata</topic><topic>Discrimination</topic><topic>Distribution</topic><topic>Distribution patterns</topic><topic>Eggs</topic><topic>Fecundity</topic><topic>Feeding Behavior</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Females</topic><topic>Fertility</topic><topic>Foraging</topic><topic>Foraging behavior</topic><topic>Fruit flies</topic><topic>Fruits</topic><topic>Geographical distribution</topic><topic>Herbivores</topic><topic>Host-Parasite Interactions</topic><topic>Individual rearing</topic><topic>Larva - parasitology</topic><topic>Larvae</topic><topic>Methods</topic><topic>Parasitoids</topic><topic>Pests</topic><topic>Research Paper</topic><topic>Species</topic><topic>Superparasitism</topic><topic>Tephritidae - parasitology</topic><topic>Wasps - physiology</topic><topic>Yeast</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Devescovi, Francisco</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bachmann, Guillermo E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nussenbaum, Ana L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Viscarret, Mariana M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cladera, Jorge L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Segura, Diego F.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Chemoreception Abstracts</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Biology Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 1: Biological Sciences & Living Resources</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Biological Sciences</collection><collection>Agriculture Science Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>ProQuest_Research Library</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Bulletin of entomological research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Devescovi, Francisco</au><au>Bachmann, Guillermo E.</au><au>Nussenbaum, Ana L.</au><au>Viscarret, Mariana M.</au><au>Cladera, Jorge L.</au><au>Segura, Diego F.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Host discrimination in the fruit fly parasitoid Diachasmimorpha longicaudata: evidence from virgin female behaviour and egg distribution patterns</atitle><jtitle>Bulletin of entomological research</jtitle><addtitle>Bull. Entomol. Res</addtitle><date>2021-04</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>111</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>229</spage><epage>237</epage><pages>229-237</pages><issn>0007-4853</issn><eissn>1475-2670</eissn><abstract>Many parasitoid species discriminate already parasitized hosts, thus avoiding larval competition. However, females incur in superparasitism under certain circumstances. Superparasitism is commonly observed in the artificial rearing of the parasitoid Diachasmimorpha longicaudata, yet host discrimination has been previously suggested in this species. Here, we addressed host discrimination in virgin D. longicaudata females in a comprehensive way by means of direct and indirect methods, using Ceratitis capitata and Anastrepha fraterculus which are major fruit fly pests in South America. Direct methods relied on the description of the foraging behaviour of females in arenas with parasitized and non-parasitized host larvae. In the indirect methods, healthy larvae were offered to single females and the egg distributions were compared to a random distribution. We found that D. longicaudata was able to recognize parasitized host from both host species, taking 24 h since a first parasitization for A. fraterculus and 48 h for C. capitata. Indirect methods showed females with different behaviours for both host species: complete discrimination, non-random (with superparasitism), and random distributions. A larger percentage of females reared and tested on A. fraterculus incurred in superparasitism, probably associated with higher fecundity. In sum, we found strong evidence of host discrimination in D. longicaudata, detecting behavioural variability associated with the host species, the time since the first parasitization and the fecundity of the females.</abstract><cop>Cambridge, UK</cop><pub>Cambridge University Press</pub><pmid>32945251</pmid><doi>10.1017/S0007485320000589</doi><tpages>9</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2927-9028</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0007-4853 |
ispartof | Bulletin of entomological research, 2021-04, Vol.111 (2), p.229-237 |
issn | 0007-4853 1475-2670 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2444376367 |
source | Cambridge Journals Online |
subjects | Animals Ceratitis capitata - parasitology Diachasmimorpha longicaudata Discrimination Distribution Distribution patterns Eggs Fecundity Feeding Behavior Female Females Fertility Foraging Foraging behavior Fruit flies Fruits Geographical distribution Herbivores Host-Parasite Interactions Individual rearing Larva - parasitology Larvae Methods Parasitoids Pests Research Paper Species Superparasitism Tephritidae - parasitology Wasps - physiology Yeast |
title | Host discrimination in the fruit fly parasitoid Diachasmimorpha longicaudata: evidence from virgin female behaviour and egg distribution patterns |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-03T21%3A32%3A19IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Host%20discrimination%20in%20the%20fruit%20fly%20parasitoid%20Diachasmimorpha%20longicaudata:%20evidence%20from%20virgin%20female%20behaviour%20and%20egg%20distribution%20patterns&rft.jtitle=Bulletin%20of%20entomological%20research&rft.au=Devescovi,%20Francisco&rft.date=2021-04&rft.volume=111&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=229&rft.epage=237&rft.pages=229-237&rft.issn=0007-4853&rft.eissn=1475-2670&rft_id=info:doi/10.1017/S0007485320000589&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2444376367%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c373t-d1d5d82c779f3aaf13f61a4f8e71af476358760f5515a15d534ae31ecf8836443%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2496978181&rft_id=info:pmid/32945251&rft_cupid=10_1017_S0007485320000589&rfr_iscdi=true |