Loading…

Combined Inhibition of EGFR and VEGF Pathways in Patients with EGFR-Mutated Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Purpose of Review Dual inhibition of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) and vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) pathways could potentiate improved outcomes in patients with metastatic EGFR-mutated non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The purpose of this systematic review and meta-analysis...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Current oncology reports 2020-09, Vol.22 (12), p.119-119, Article 119
Main Authors: Peravali, Monica, Wang, Haijun, Kim, Chul, Veytsman, Irina
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c347t-7336bb48f0499cfdcc8d781e09cbaf53b00cec93412c37f7ebb37f9948c1a7523
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c347t-7336bb48f0499cfdcc8d781e09cbaf53b00cec93412c37f7ebb37f9948c1a7523
container_end_page 119
container_issue 12
container_start_page 119
container_title Current oncology reports
container_volume 22
creator Peravali, Monica
Wang, Haijun
Kim, Chul
Veytsman, Irina
description Purpose of Review Dual inhibition of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) and vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) pathways could potentiate improved outcomes in patients with metastatic EGFR-mutated non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The purpose of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to compare the efficacy of an EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) plus a VEGF inhibitor with EGFR TKI alone for the treatment of EGFR-mutated NSCLC. Recent Findings We systematically searched for randomized controlled trials (RCT) that involved patients with EGFR-mutated metastatic NSCLC treated with combination therapy versus EGFR TKI alone. In a pooled analysis of 5 studies, treatment with the combination therapy was associated with statistically significant improvements in progression-free survival (hazard ratio [HR] 0.63, 95% CI [0.54, 0.75]) when compared with control. However, pooled data from 4 studies revealed no statistically significant differences between the 2 groups for overall survival (HR 1.00, 95% CI [0.68, 1.52]) and the objective response rate (relative risk [RR] 1.05, 95% CI [0.97, 1.14]). Summary In patients with metastatic EGFR-mutated NSCLC, treatment with EGFR TKI plus VEGF inhibition provided significant improvements in progression-free survival, but not in overall survival or objective response rate, when compared with treatment with EGFR TKI alone.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s11912-020-00981-0
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2444376991</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2444376991</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c347t-7336bb48f0499cfdcc8d781e09cbaf53b00cec93412c37f7ebb37f9948c1a7523</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kUFvEzEQhS0EoqXwBzggH7kYxmsnXnOLVm2plAJqaa-W7Z1tXGW9Ze1tlB_R_4yTlB65eEby955G7xHykcMXDqC-Js41rxhUwAB0zRm8Isd8JiSbV3P9erdXggml4Yi8S-keCgk1vCVHotJyppU6Jk_N0LsQsaUXcRVcyGGIdOjo6fnZFbWxpbdlo79sXm3sNtEQd3vAmBPdhLzac-xyyjYXix9DZNe9Xa9pg-VZTvGONjZ6HL_RBb3epox9UXt6hY8BN3v_S8yWLaJdb1NI78mbzq4TfnieJ-Tm7PR3850tf55fNIsl80KqzJQQc-dk3YHU2net93Wrao6gvbPdTDgAj14LySsvVKfQuTK0lrXnVpVQTsjng-_DOPyZMGXTh-TLzTbiMCVTSSmFmmvNC1odUD8OKY3YmYcx9HbcGg5mV4M51GBKuGZfg4Ei-vTsP7ke2xfJv9wLIA5AKl_xDkdzP0xjSSH9z_YvYX6SSA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2444376991</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Combined Inhibition of EGFR and VEGF Pathways in Patients with EGFR-Mutated Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis</title><source>Springer Nature</source><creator>Peravali, Monica ; Wang, Haijun ; Kim, Chul ; Veytsman, Irina</creator><creatorcontrib>Peravali, Monica ; Wang, Haijun ; Kim, Chul ; Veytsman, Irina</creatorcontrib><description>Purpose of Review Dual inhibition of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) and vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) pathways could potentiate improved outcomes in patients with metastatic EGFR-mutated non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The purpose of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to compare the efficacy of an EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) plus a VEGF inhibitor with EGFR TKI alone for the treatment of EGFR-mutated NSCLC. Recent Findings We systematically searched for randomized controlled trials (RCT) that involved patients with EGFR-mutated metastatic NSCLC treated with combination therapy versus EGFR TKI alone. In a pooled analysis of 5 studies, treatment with the combination therapy was associated with statistically significant improvements in progression-free survival (hazard ratio [HR] 0.63, 95% CI [0.54, 0.75]) when compared with control. However, pooled data from 4 studies revealed no statistically significant differences between the 2 groups for overall survival (HR 1.00, 95% CI [0.68, 1.52]) and the objective response rate (relative risk [RR] 1.05, 95% CI [0.97, 1.14]). Summary In patients with metastatic EGFR-mutated NSCLC, treatment with EGFR TKI plus VEGF inhibition provided significant improvements in progression-free survival, but not in overall survival or objective response rate, when compared with treatment with EGFR TKI alone.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1523-3790</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1534-6269</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s11912-020-00981-0</identifier><identifier>PMID: 32945977</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: Springer US</publisher><subject>Lung Cancer (H Borghaei ; Medicine ; Medicine &amp; Public Health ; Oncology ; Section Editor ; Topical Collection on Lung Cancer</subject><ispartof>Current oncology reports, 2020-09, Vol.22 (12), p.119-119, Article 119</ispartof><rights>Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2020</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c347t-7336bb48f0499cfdcc8d781e09cbaf53b00cec93412c37f7ebb37f9948c1a7523</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c347t-7336bb48f0499cfdcc8d781e09cbaf53b00cec93412c37f7ebb37f9948c1a7523</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32945977$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Peravali, Monica</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Haijun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Chul</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Veytsman, Irina</creatorcontrib><title>Combined Inhibition of EGFR and VEGF Pathways in Patients with EGFR-Mutated Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis</title><title>Current oncology reports</title><addtitle>Curr Oncol Rep</addtitle><addtitle>Curr Oncol Rep</addtitle><description>Purpose of Review Dual inhibition of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) and vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) pathways could potentiate improved outcomes in patients with metastatic EGFR-mutated non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The purpose of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to compare the efficacy of an EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) plus a VEGF inhibitor with EGFR TKI alone for the treatment of EGFR-mutated NSCLC. Recent Findings We systematically searched for randomized controlled trials (RCT) that involved patients with EGFR-mutated metastatic NSCLC treated with combination therapy versus EGFR TKI alone. In a pooled analysis of 5 studies, treatment with the combination therapy was associated with statistically significant improvements in progression-free survival (hazard ratio [HR] 0.63, 95% CI [0.54, 0.75]) when compared with control. However, pooled data from 4 studies revealed no statistically significant differences between the 2 groups for overall survival (HR 1.00, 95% CI [0.68, 1.52]) and the objective response rate (relative risk [RR] 1.05, 95% CI [0.97, 1.14]). Summary In patients with metastatic EGFR-mutated NSCLC, treatment with EGFR TKI plus VEGF inhibition provided significant improvements in progression-free survival, but not in overall survival or objective response rate, when compared with treatment with EGFR TKI alone.</description><subject>Lung Cancer (H Borghaei</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine &amp; Public Health</subject><subject>Oncology</subject><subject>Section Editor</subject><subject>Topical Collection on Lung Cancer</subject><issn>1523-3790</issn><issn>1534-6269</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kUFvEzEQhS0EoqXwBzggH7kYxmsnXnOLVm2plAJqaa-W7Z1tXGW9Ze1tlB_R_4yTlB65eEby955G7xHykcMXDqC-Js41rxhUwAB0zRm8Isd8JiSbV3P9erdXggml4Yi8S-keCgk1vCVHotJyppU6Jk_N0LsQsaUXcRVcyGGIdOjo6fnZFbWxpbdlo79sXm3sNtEQd3vAmBPdhLzac-xyyjYXix9DZNe9Xa9pg-VZTvGONjZ6HL_RBb3epox9UXt6hY8BN3v_S8yWLaJdb1NI78mbzq4TfnieJ-Tm7PR3850tf55fNIsl80KqzJQQc-dk3YHU2net93Wrao6gvbPdTDgAj14LySsvVKfQuTK0lrXnVpVQTsjng-_DOPyZMGXTh-TLzTbiMCVTSSmFmmvNC1odUD8OKY3YmYcx9HbcGg5mV4M51GBKuGZfg4Ei-vTsP7ke2xfJv9wLIA5AKl_xDkdzP0xjSSH9z_YvYX6SSA</recordid><startdate>20200918</startdate><enddate>20200918</enddate><creator>Peravali, Monica</creator><creator>Wang, Haijun</creator><creator>Kim, Chul</creator><creator>Veytsman, Irina</creator><general>Springer US</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20200918</creationdate><title>Combined Inhibition of EGFR and VEGF Pathways in Patients with EGFR-Mutated Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis</title><author>Peravali, Monica ; Wang, Haijun ; Kim, Chul ; Veytsman, Irina</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c347t-7336bb48f0499cfdcc8d781e09cbaf53b00cec93412c37f7ebb37f9948c1a7523</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Lung Cancer (H Borghaei</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine &amp; Public Health</topic><topic>Oncology</topic><topic>Section Editor</topic><topic>Topical Collection on Lung Cancer</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Peravali, Monica</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Haijun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Chul</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Veytsman, Irina</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Current oncology reports</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Peravali, Monica</au><au>Wang, Haijun</au><au>Kim, Chul</au><au>Veytsman, Irina</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Combined Inhibition of EGFR and VEGF Pathways in Patients with EGFR-Mutated Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis</atitle><jtitle>Current oncology reports</jtitle><stitle>Curr Oncol Rep</stitle><addtitle>Curr Oncol Rep</addtitle><date>2020-09-18</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>22</volume><issue>12</issue><spage>119</spage><epage>119</epage><pages>119-119</pages><artnum>119</artnum><issn>1523-3790</issn><eissn>1534-6269</eissn><abstract>Purpose of Review Dual inhibition of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) and vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) pathways could potentiate improved outcomes in patients with metastatic EGFR-mutated non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The purpose of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to compare the efficacy of an EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) plus a VEGF inhibitor with EGFR TKI alone for the treatment of EGFR-mutated NSCLC. Recent Findings We systematically searched for randomized controlled trials (RCT) that involved patients with EGFR-mutated metastatic NSCLC treated with combination therapy versus EGFR TKI alone. In a pooled analysis of 5 studies, treatment with the combination therapy was associated with statistically significant improvements in progression-free survival (hazard ratio [HR] 0.63, 95% CI [0.54, 0.75]) when compared with control. However, pooled data from 4 studies revealed no statistically significant differences between the 2 groups for overall survival (HR 1.00, 95% CI [0.68, 1.52]) and the objective response rate (relative risk [RR] 1.05, 95% CI [0.97, 1.14]). Summary In patients with metastatic EGFR-mutated NSCLC, treatment with EGFR TKI plus VEGF inhibition provided significant improvements in progression-free survival, but not in overall survival or objective response rate, when compared with treatment with EGFR TKI alone.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>Springer US</pub><pmid>32945977</pmid><doi>10.1007/s11912-020-00981-0</doi><tpages>1</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1523-3790
ispartof Current oncology reports, 2020-09, Vol.22 (12), p.119-119, Article 119
issn 1523-3790
1534-6269
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2444376991
source Springer Nature
subjects Lung Cancer (H Borghaei
Medicine
Medicine & Public Health
Oncology
Section Editor
Topical Collection on Lung Cancer
title Combined Inhibition of EGFR and VEGF Pathways in Patients with EGFR-Mutated Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-06T05%3A11%3A50IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Combined%20Inhibition%20of%20EGFR%20and%20VEGF%20Pathways%20in%20Patients%20with%20EGFR-Mutated%20Non-Small%20Cell%20Lung%20Cancer:%20A%20Systematic%20Review%20and%20Meta-Analysis&rft.jtitle=Current%20oncology%20reports&rft.au=Peravali,%20Monica&rft.date=2020-09-18&rft.volume=22&rft.issue=12&rft.spage=119&rft.epage=119&rft.pages=119-119&rft.artnum=119&rft.issn=1523-3790&rft.eissn=1534-6269&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s11912-020-00981-0&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2444376991%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c347t-7336bb48f0499cfdcc8d781e09cbaf53b00cec93412c37f7ebb37f9948c1a7523%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2444376991&rft_id=info:pmid/32945977&rfr_iscdi=true