Loading…

Fracture resistance of CAD/CAM occlusal veneers: A systematic review of laboratory studies

The purpose of this systematic review was to summarize scientific evidence that evaluates in vitro fracture and fatigue strength of occlusal veneers in different thicknesses, CAD/CAM materials, and under different aging methodologies. An electronic search of 3 English databases (The National Library...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of the mechanical behavior of biomedical materials 2020-10, Vol.110, p.103948-103948, Article 103948
Main Authors: Albelasy, Eman H., Hamama, Hamdi H., Tsoi, James K.H., Mahmoud, Salah H.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c359t-567b855d6fea4abd67a93cfd2077eeea272dbc5478ef9659aba539d930168f373
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c359t-567b855d6fea4abd67a93cfd2077eeea272dbc5478ef9659aba539d930168f373
container_end_page 103948
container_issue
container_start_page 103948
container_title Journal of the mechanical behavior of biomedical materials
container_volume 110
creator Albelasy, Eman H.
Hamama, Hamdi H.
Tsoi, James K.H.
Mahmoud, Salah H.
description The purpose of this systematic review was to summarize scientific evidence that evaluates in vitro fracture and fatigue strength of occlusal veneers in different thicknesses, CAD/CAM materials, and under different aging methodologies. An electronic search of 3 English databases (The National Library of Medicine (MEDLINE/PubMed), ScienceDirect, and EBSCOhost) was conducted. Laboratory studies published between September 2009 and October 2019 that evaluated fracture or fatigue strength of CAD/CAM occlusal veneers and used human teeth were selected. The included studies were individually evaluated for the risk of bias following a predetermined criterion. The outcomes assessed included the types of the restorative material, the thickness of the veneers, and aging methods. A total of 12 studies fulfilled the inclusion criteria. Most of the included studies (86%) evaluated the fracture strength of occlusal veneers. Two studies evaluated fatigue resistance. There was a significant relationship between the choice of materials and fracture strength. Polymeric materials performed better in fatigue testing in comparison to ceramics. Lithium silicate-based glass ceramics showed more favorable outcomes in a thickness of 0.7–1.0 mm. Fracture resistance values in all the included studies exceeded maximum bite forces in the posterior region. The outcomes of this systematic review suggest that occlusal veneers can withstand bite forces in the posterior region, whereas the measurement of thickness should be standardized in order to have a fair comparison. Further research needs to be conducted to evaluate the longevity of this type of restorations clinically.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2020.103948
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2444875784</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S1751616120305014</els_id><sourcerecordid>2444875784</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c359t-567b855d6fea4abd67a93cfd2077eeea272dbc5478ef9659aba539d930168f373</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE1LxDAQhoMorl-_QJAevXRNmqZJBQ_L-gmKF714CWkyhSztVjOpsv_erLt69DTD8LwzzEPIKaNTRll1sZgu-qbppwUt1hNel2qHHDAlVU6Zorupl4LlFavYhBwiLiitKFVqn0x4UQtZlPSAvN0GY-MYIAuAHqNZWsiGNpvPri_ms6dssLYb0XTZJywBAl5mswxXGKE30dsU-vTwtQ50phmCiUNYZRhH5wGPyV5rOoSTbT0ir7c3L_P7_PH57mE-e8wtF3XMRSUbJYSrWjClaVwlTc1t6woqJQCYQhausaKUCtq6ErVpjOC1q3lyoFou-RE53-x9D8PHCBh179FC15klDCPqoixLJYVUZUL5BrVhQAzQ6vfgexNWmlG9lqoX-keqXkvVG6kpdbY9MDY9uL_Mr8UEXG0ASG8mIUGj9ZBMOh_ARu0G_--Bbyr4iUk</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2444875784</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Fracture resistance of CAD/CAM occlusal veneers: A systematic review of laboratory studies</title><source>ScienceDirect Freedom Collection 2022-2024</source><creator>Albelasy, Eman H. ; Hamama, Hamdi H. ; Tsoi, James K.H. ; Mahmoud, Salah H.</creator><creatorcontrib>Albelasy, Eman H. ; Hamama, Hamdi H. ; Tsoi, James K.H. ; Mahmoud, Salah H.</creatorcontrib><description>The purpose of this systematic review was to summarize scientific evidence that evaluates in vitro fracture and fatigue strength of occlusal veneers in different thicknesses, CAD/CAM materials, and under different aging methodologies. An electronic search of 3 English databases (The National Library of Medicine (MEDLINE/PubMed), ScienceDirect, and EBSCOhost) was conducted. Laboratory studies published between September 2009 and October 2019 that evaluated fracture or fatigue strength of CAD/CAM occlusal veneers and used human teeth were selected. The included studies were individually evaluated for the risk of bias following a predetermined criterion. The outcomes assessed included the types of the restorative material, the thickness of the veneers, and aging methods. A total of 12 studies fulfilled the inclusion criteria. Most of the included studies (86%) evaluated the fracture strength of occlusal veneers. Two studies evaluated fatigue resistance. There was a significant relationship between the choice of materials and fracture strength. Polymeric materials performed better in fatigue testing in comparison to ceramics. Lithium silicate-based glass ceramics showed more favorable outcomes in a thickness of 0.7–1.0 mm. Fracture resistance values in all the included studies exceeded maximum bite forces in the posterior region. The outcomes of this systematic review suggest that occlusal veneers can withstand bite forces in the posterior region, whereas the measurement of thickness should be standardized in order to have a fair comparison. Further research needs to be conducted to evaluate the longevity of this type of restorations clinically.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1751-6161</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1878-0180</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2020.103948</identifier><identifier>PMID: 32957240</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Netherlands: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Bite Force ; CAD/CAM ; Ceramics ; Computer-Aided Design ; Dental materials ; Dental Porcelain ; Dental Stress Analysis ; Dental Veneers ; Flexural Strength ; Humans ; Laboratories ; Materials Testing ; Occlusal veneers ; Onlay ; Overlay</subject><ispartof>Journal of the mechanical behavior of biomedical materials, 2020-10, Vol.110, p.103948-103948, Article 103948</ispartof><rights>2020 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c359t-567b855d6fea4abd67a93cfd2077eeea272dbc5478ef9659aba539d930168f373</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c359t-567b855d6fea4abd67a93cfd2077eeea272dbc5478ef9659aba539d930168f373</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-0698-7155 ; 0000-0003-0405-9686 ; 0000-0003-3205-345X</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32957240$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Albelasy, Eman H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hamama, Hamdi H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tsoi, James K.H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mahmoud, Salah H.</creatorcontrib><title>Fracture resistance of CAD/CAM occlusal veneers: A systematic review of laboratory studies</title><title>Journal of the mechanical behavior of biomedical materials</title><addtitle>J Mech Behav Biomed Mater</addtitle><description>The purpose of this systematic review was to summarize scientific evidence that evaluates in vitro fracture and fatigue strength of occlusal veneers in different thicknesses, CAD/CAM materials, and under different aging methodologies. An electronic search of 3 English databases (The National Library of Medicine (MEDLINE/PubMed), ScienceDirect, and EBSCOhost) was conducted. Laboratory studies published between September 2009 and October 2019 that evaluated fracture or fatigue strength of CAD/CAM occlusal veneers and used human teeth were selected. The included studies were individually evaluated for the risk of bias following a predetermined criterion. The outcomes assessed included the types of the restorative material, the thickness of the veneers, and aging methods. A total of 12 studies fulfilled the inclusion criteria. Most of the included studies (86%) evaluated the fracture strength of occlusal veneers. Two studies evaluated fatigue resistance. There was a significant relationship between the choice of materials and fracture strength. Polymeric materials performed better in fatigue testing in comparison to ceramics. Lithium silicate-based glass ceramics showed more favorable outcomes in a thickness of 0.7–1.0 mm. Fracture resistance values in all the included studies exceeded maximum bite forces in the posterior region. The outcomes of this systematic review suggest that occlusal veneers can withstand bite forces in the posterior region, whereas the measurement of thickness should be standardized in order to have a fair comparison. Further research needs to be conducted to evaluate the longevity of this type of restorations clinically.</description><subject>Bite Force</subject><subject>CAD/CAM</subject><subject>Ceramics</subject><subject>Computer-Aided Design</subject><subject>Dental materials</subject><subject>Dental Porcelain</subject><subject>Dental Stress Analysis</subject><subject>Dental Veneers</subject><subject>Flexural Strength</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Laboratories</subject><subject>Materials Testing</subject><subject>Occlusal veneers</subject><subject>Onlay</subject><subject>Overlay</subject><issn>1751-6161</issn><issn>1878-0180</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kE1LxDAQhoMorl-_QJAevXRNmqZJBQ_L-gmKF714CWkyhSztVjOpsv_erLt69DTD8LwzzEPIKaNTRll1sZgu-qbppwUt1hNel2qHHDAlVU6Zorupl4LlFavYhBwiLiitKFVqn0x4UQtZlPSAvN0GY-MYIAuAHqNZWsiGNpvPri_ms6dssLYb0XTZJywBAl5mswxXGKE30dsU-vTwtQ50phmCiUNYZRhH5wGPyV5rOoSTbT0ir7c3L_P7_PH57mE-e8wtF3XMRSUbJYSrWjClaVwlTc1t6woqJQCYQhausaKUCtq6ErVpjOC1q3lyoFou-RE53-x9D8PHCBh179FC15klDCPqoixLJYVUZUL5BrVhQAzQ6vfgexNWmlG9lqoX-keqXkvVG6kpdbY9MDY9uL_Mr8UEXG0ASG8mIUGj9ZBMOh_ARu0G_--Bbyr4iUk</recordid><startdate>202010</startdate><enddate>202010</enddate><creator>Albelasy, Eman H.</creator><creator>Hamama, Hamdi H.</creator><creator>Tsoi, James K.H.</creator><creator>Mahmoud, Salah H.</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0698-7155</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0405-9686</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3205-345X</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202010</creationdate><title>Fracture resistance of CAD/CAM occlusal veneers: A systematic review of laboratory studies</title><author>Albelasy, Eman H. ; Hamama, Hamdi H. ; Tsoi, James K.H. ; Mahmoud, Salah H.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c359t-567b855d6fea4abd67a93cfd2077eeea272dbc5478ef9659aba539d930168f373</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Bite Force</topic><topic>CAD/CAM</topic><topic>Ceramics</topic><topic>Computer-Aided Design</topic><topic>Dental materials</topic><topic>Dental Porcelain</topic><topic>Dental Stress Analysis</topic><topic>Dental Veneers</topic><topic>Flexural Strength</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Laboratories</topic><topic>Materials Testing</topic><topic>Occlusal veneers</topic><topic>Onlay</topic><topic>Overlay</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Albelasy, Eman H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hamama, Hamdi H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tsoi, James K.H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mahmoud, Salah H.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of the mechanical behavior of biomedical materials</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Albelasy, Eman H.</au><au>Hamama, Hamdi H.</au><au>Tsoi, James K.H.</au><au>Mahmoud, Salah H.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Fracture resistance of CAD/CAM occlusal veneers: A systematic review of laboratory studies</atitle><jtitle>Journal of the mechanical behavior of biomedical materials</jtitle><addtitle>J Mech Behav Biomed Mater</addtitle><date>2020-10</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>110</volume><spage>103948</spage><epage>103948</epage><pages>103948-103948</pages><artnum>103948</artnum><issn>1751-6161</issn><eissn>1878-0180</eissn><abstract>The purpose of this systematic review was to summarize scientific evidence that evaluates in vitro fracture and fatigue strength of occlusal veneers in different thicknesses, CAD/CAM materials, and under different aging methodologies. An electronic search of 3 English databases (The National Library of Medicine (MEDLINE/PubMed), ScienceDirect, and EBSCOhost) was conducted. Laboratory studies published between September 2009 and October 2019 that evaluated fracture or fatigue strength of CAD/CAM occlusal veneers and used human teeth were selected. The included studies were individually evaluated for the risk of bias following a predetermined criterion. The outcomes assessed included the types of the restorative material, the thickness of the veneers, and aging methods. A total of 12 studies fulfilled the inclusion criteria. Most of the included studies (86%) evaluated the fracture strength of occlusal veneers. Two studies evaluated fatigue resistance. There was a significant relationship between the choice of materials and fracture strength. Polymeric materials performed better in fatigue testing in comparison to ceramics. Lithium silicate-based glass ceramics showed more favorable outcomes in a thickness of 0.7–1.0 mm. Fracture resistance values in all the included studies exceeded maximum bite forces in the posterior region. The outcomes of this systematic review suggest that occlusal veneers can withstand bite forces in the posterior region, whereas the measurement of thickness should be standardized in order to have a fair comparison. Further research needs to be conducted to evaluate the longevity of this type of restorations clinically.</abstract><cop>Netherlands</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>32957240</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.jmbbm.2020.103948</doi><tpages>1</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0698-7155</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0405-9686</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3205-345X</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1751-6161
ispartof Journal of the mechanical behavior of biomedical materials, 2020-10, Vol.110, p.103948-103948, Article 103948
issn 1751-6161
1878-0180
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2444875784
source ScienceDirect Freedom Collection 2022-2024
subjects Bite Force
CAD/CAM
Ceramics
Computer-Aided Design
Dental materials
Dental Porcelain
Dental Stress Analysis
Dental Veneers
Flexural Strength
Humans
Laboratories
Materials Testing
Occlusal veneers
Onlay
Overlay
title Fracture resistance of CAD/CAM occlusal veneers: A systematic review of laboratory studies
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-28T05%3A55%3A20IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Fracture%20resistance%20of%20CAD/CAM%20occlusal%20veneers:%20A%20systematic%20review%20of%20laboratory%20studies&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20the%20mechanical%20behavior%20of%20biomedical%20materials&rft.au=Albelasy,%20Eman%20H.&rft.date=2020-10&rft.volume=110&rft.spage=103948&rft.epage=103948&rft.pages=103948-103948&rft.artnum=103948&rft.issn=1751-6161&rft.eissn=1878-0180&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.jmbbm.2020.103948&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2444875784%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c359t-567b855d6fea4abd67a93cfd2077eeea272dbc5478ef9659aba539d930168f373%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2444875784&rft_id=info:pmid/32957240&rfr_iscdi=true