Loading…

Uterine preservation in pelvic organ prolapse and urinary stress incontinence using robot-assisted laparoscopic surgery. Case report

INTRODUCTIONTo report a case of uterine preservation in pelvic organ prolapse robot-assisted laparoscopic surgery. PRESENTATION OF CASEThe patient is a 42-year old Caucasian woman with pelvic organ prolapse. She previously had undergone a pelvic floor reconstruction with vaginal surgical approach, s...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:International journal of surgery case reports 2020, Vol.77S, p.S143-S146
Main Authors: Cucinella, Gaspare, Culmone, Silvia, Guastella, Ettore, Gentile, Francesco, De Maria, Francesca, Granà, Roberto, Carlisi, Bruno, Rotolo, Stefano, Calagna, Gloria
Format: Report
Language:English
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites
container_end_page S146
container_issue
container_start_page S143
container_title International journal of surgery case reports
container_volume 77S
creator Cucinella, Gaspare
Culmone, Silvia
Guastella, Ettore
Gentile, Francesco
De Maria, Francesca
Granà, Roberto
Carlisi, Bruno
Rotolo, Stefano
Calagna, Gloria
description INTRODUCTIONTo report a case of uterine preservation in pelvic organ prolapse robot-assisted laparoscopic surgery. PRESENTATION OF CASEThe patient is a 42-year old Caucasian woman with pelvic organ prolapse. She previously had undergone a pelvic floor reconstruction with vaginal surgical approach, she had suffered from anorexia nervosa and she had two childbirths with vaginal deliveries. The woman was treated with robotic-assisted laparoscopic sacrohysteropexy and retropubic colposuspension. DISCUSSIONData suggest that abdominal surgery, typically with an abdominal sacralcolpopexy, provides better objective anatomic outcomes, than vaginal procedures, despite the longer operating times and grater delay in the resumption of activities which can be mitigated by the use of laparoscopic or robotic surgery. Several studies about vaginal approaches suggest that uterus-preserving surgery with vaginal procedures have similar success rates, less blood loss and shorter surgical time compared with hysterectomy. A multicenter study compared laparoscopic sacrohysteropexy with vaginal mesh hysteropexy reported similar one-year cure rates, improvement in pelvic floor symptoms, improvement in sexual function, and satisfaction rates. CONCLUSIONWe found robotic-assisted laparoscopic sacrohysteropexy to be a feasible and successful procedure. Combining robotic retropubic colposuspension to sacrohysteropexy is a safe and efficient approach for the treatment of stress urinary incontinence. Further studies are needed to define the standard surgical steps and confirm the efficacy and the advantages of this procedure.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.ijscr.2020.08.055
format report
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2445437322</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2445437322</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-proquest_miscellaneous_24454373223</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqVjbtOBDEMRSMEEivYL6BxSTMh8TzYfgXiA6BehawZZRSSYGdW2p4PJwUFLW7sK517rNSdNdoaOz0sOiziWaNBo81Om3G8UBtEazqcLF7-ua_VVmQxbXrcTYgb9f1WiUMiKExCfHI15AQhQaF4Ch4yz64FztEVIXDpCGvjHZ9BaqtIY31OtSmSJ1glpBk4v-faOZEglY7Qqo6z-FyaUFaeic8a9q75mErmequuPlwU2v7uG3X__PS6f-na36-VpB4-g3iK0SXKqxxwGMahf-wR-3-gP6fCYIg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>report</recordtype><pqid>2445437322</pqid></control><display><type>report</type><title>Uterine preservation in pelvic organ prolapse and urinary stress incontinence using robot-assisted laparoscopic surgery. Case report</title><source>ScienceDirect</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Cucinella, Gaspare ; Culmone, Silvia ; Guastella, Ettore ; Gentile, Francesco ; De Maria, Francesca ; Granà, Roberto ; Carlisi, Bruno ; Rotolo, Stefano ; Calagna, Gloria</creator><creatorcontrib>Cucinella, Gaspare ; Culmone, Silvia ; Guastella, Ettore ; Gentile, Francesco ; De Maria, Francesca ; Granà, Roberto ; Carlisi, Bruno ; Rotolo, Stefano ; Calagna, Gloria</creatorcontrib><description>INTRODUCTIONTo report a case of uterine preservation in pelvic organ prolapse robot-assisted laparoscopic surgery. PRESENTATION OF CASEThe patient is a 42-year old Caucasian woman with pelvic organ prolapse. She previously had undergone a pelvic floor reconstruction with vaginal surgical approach, she had suffered from anorexia nervosa and she had two childbirths with vaginal deliveries. The woman was treated with robotic-assisted laparoscopic sacrohysteropexy and retropubic colposuspension. DISCUSSIONData suggest that abdominal surgery, typically with an abdominal sacralcolpopexy, provides better objective anatomic outcomes, than vaginal procedures, despite the longer operating times and grater delay in the resumption of activities which can be mitigated by the use of laparoscopic or robotic surgery. Several studies about vaginal approaches suggest that uterus-preserving surgery with vaginal procedures have similar success rates, less blood loss and shorter surgical time compared with hysterectomy. A multicenter study compared laparoscopic sacrohysteropexy with vaginal mesh hysteropexy reported similar one-year cure rates, improvement in pelvic floor symptoms, improvement in sexual function, and satisfaction rates. CONCLUSIONWe found robotic-assisted laparoscopic sacrohysteropexy to be a feasible and successful procedure. Combining robotic retropubic colposuspension to sacrohysteropexy is a safe and efficient approach for the treatment of stress urinary incontinence. Further studies are needed to define the standard surgical steps and confirm the efficacy and the advantages of this procedure.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2210-2612</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2210-2612</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.ijscr.2020.08.055</identifier><language>eng</language><ispartof>International journal of surgery case reports, 2020, Vol.77S, p.S143-S146</ispartof><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>780,784,4490,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Cucinella, Gaspare</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Culmone, Silvia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Guastella, Ettore</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gentile, Francesco</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>De Maria, Francesca</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Granà, Roberto</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carlisi, Bruno</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rotolo, Stefano</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Calagna, Gloria</creatorcontrib><title>Uterine preservation in pelvic organ prolapse and urinary stress incontinence using robot-assisted laparoscopic surgery. Case report</title><title>International journal of surgery case reports</title><description>INTRODUCTIONTo report a case of uterine preservation in pelvic organ prolapse robot-assisted laparoscopic surgery. PRESENTATION OF CASEThe patient is a 42-year old Caucasian woman with pelvic organ prolapse. She previously had undergone a pelvic floor reconstruction with vaginal surgical approach, she had suffered from anorexia nervosa and she had two childbirths with vaginal deliveries. The woman was treated with robotic-assisted laparoscopic sacrohysteropexy and retropubic colposuspension. DISCUSSIONData suggest that abdominal surgery, typically with an abdominal sacralcolpopexy, provides better objective anatomic outcomes, than vaginal procedures, despite the longer operating times and grater delay in the resumption of activities which can be mitigated by the use of laparoscopic or robotic surgery. Several studies about vaginal approaches suggest that uterus-preserving surgery with vaginal procedures have similar success rates, less blood loss and shorter surgical time compared with hysterectomy. A multicenter study compared laparoscopic sacrohysteropexy with vaginal mesh hysteropexy reported similar one-year cure rates, improvement in pelvic floor symptoms, improvement in sexual function, and satisfaction rates. CONCLUSIONWe found robotic-assisted laparoscopic sacrohysteropexy to be a feasible and successful procedure. Combining robotic retropubic colposuspension to sacrohysteropexy is a safe and efficient approach for the treatment of stress urinary incontinence. Further studies are needed to define the standard surgical steps and confirm the efficacy and the advantages of this procedure.</description><issn>2210-2612</issn><issn>2210-2612</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>report</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>report</recordtype><recordid>eNqVjbtOBDEMRSMEEivYL6BxSTMh8TzYfgXiA6BehawZZRSSYGdW2p4PJwUFLW7sK517rNSdNdoaOz0sOiziWaNBo81Om3G8UBtEazqcLF7-ua_VVmQxbXrcTYgb9f1WiUMiKExCfHI15AQhQaF4Ch4yz64FztEVIXDpCGvjHZ9BaqtIY31OtSmSJ1glpBk4v-faOZEglY7Qqo6z-FyaUFaeic8a9q75mErmequuPlwU2v7uG3X__PS6f-na36-VpB4-g3iK0SXKqxxwGMahf-wR-3-gP6fCYIg</recordid><startdate>20200101</startdate><enddate>20200101</enddate><creator>Cucinella, Gaspare</creator><creator>Culmone, Silvia</creator><creator>Guastella, Ettore</creator><creator>Gentile, Francesco</creator><creator>De Maria, Francesca</creator><creator>Granà, Roberto</creator><creator>Carlisi, Bruno</creator><creator>Rotolo, Stefano</creator><creator>Calagna, Gloria</creator><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20200101</creationdate><title>Uterine preservation in pelvic organ prolapse and urinary stress incontinence using robot-assisted laparoscopic surgery. Case report</title><author>Cucinella, Gaspare ; Culmone, Silvia ; Guastella, Ettore ; Gentile, Francesco ; De Maria, Francesca ; Granà, Roberto ; Carlisi, Bruno ; Rotolo, Stefano ; Calagna, Gloria</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-proquest_miscellaneous_24454373223</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>reports</rsrctype><prefilter>reports</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Cucinella, Gaspare</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Culmone, Silvia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Guastella, Ettore</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gentile, Francesco</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>De Maria, Francesca</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Granà, Roberto</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carlisi, Bruno</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rotolo, Stefano</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Calagna, Gloria</creatorcontrib><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Cucinella, Gaspare</au><au>Culmone, Silvia</au><au>Guastella, Ettore</au><au>Gentile, Francesco</au><au>De Maria, Francesca</au><au>Granà, Roberto</au><au>Carlisi, Bruno</au><au>Rotolo, Stefano</au><au>Calagna, Gloria</au><format>book</format><genre>unknown</genre><ristype>RPRT</ristype><atitle>Uterine preservation in pelvic organ prolapse and urinary stress incontinence using robot-assisted laparoscopic surgery. Case report</atitle><jtitle>International journal of surgery case reports</jtitle><date>2020-01-01</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>77S</volume><spage>S143</spage><epage>S146</epage><pages>S143-S146</pages><issn>2210-2612</issn><eissn>2210-2612</eissn><abstract>INTRODUCTIONTo report a case of uterine preservation in pelvic organ prolapse robot-assisted laparoscopic surgery. PRESENTATION OF CASEThe patient is a 42-year old Caucasian woman with pelvic organ prolapse. She previously had undergone a pelvic floor reconstruction with vaginal surgical approach, she had suffered from anorexia nervosa and she had two childbirths with vaginal deliveries. The woman was treated with robotic-assisted laparoscopic sacrohysteropexy and retropubic colposuspension. DISCUSSIONData suggest that abdominal surgery, typically with an abdominal sacralcolpopexy, provides better objective anatomic outcomes, than vaginal procedures, despite the longer operating times and grater delay in the resumption of activities which can be mitigated by the use of laparoscopic or robotic surgery. Several studies about vaginal approaches suggest that uterus-preserving surgery with vaginal procedures have similar success rates, less blood loss and shorter surgical time compared with hysterectomy. A multicenter study compared laparoscopic sacrohysteropexy with vaginal mesh hysteropexy reported similar one-year cure rates, improvement in pelvic floor symptoms, improvement in sexual function, and satisfaction rates. CONCLUSIONWe found robotic-assisted laparoscopic sacrohysteropexy to be a feasible and successful procedure. Combining robotic retropubic colposuspension to sacrohysteropexy is a safe and efficient approach for the treatment of stress urinary incontinence. Further studies are needed to define the standard surgical steps and confirm the efficacy and the advantages of this procedure.</abstract><doi>10.1016/j.ijscr.2020.08.055</doi></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2210-2612
ispartof International journal of surgery case reports, 2020, Vol.77S, p.S143-S146
issn 2210-2612
2210-2612
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2445437322
source ScienceDirect; PubMed Central
title Uterine preservation in pelvic organ prolapse and urinary stress incontinence using robot-assisted laparoscopic surgery. Case report
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-28T02%3A07%3A08IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=unknown&rft.atitle=Uterine%20preservation%20in%20pelvic%20organ%20prolapse%20and%20urinary%20stress%20incontinence%20using%20robot-assisted%20laparoscopic%20surgery.%20Case%20report&rft.jtitle=International%20journal%20of%20surgery%20case%20reports&rft.au=Cucinella,%20Gaspare&rft.date=2020-01-01&rft.volume=77S&rft.spage=S143&rft.epage=S146&rft.pages=S143-S146&rft.issn=2210-2612&rft.eissn=2210-2612&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.ijscr.2020.08.055&rft_dat=%3Cproquest%3E2445437322%3C/proquest%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-proquest_miscellaneous_24454373223%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2445437322&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true