Loading…
Validation of DSM-5 clinician-rated measures of personality pathology
The American Psychiatric Association supported the development of several instruments to assess personality pathology according to the (5th ed.; ) Section III. These instruments include self- and informant report forms as well as clinician-rated measures of personality traits and impairment. To date...
Saved in:
Published in: | Psychological assessment 2021-01, Vol.33 (1), p.84-89 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | The American Psychiatric Association supported the development of several instruments to assess personality pathology according to the
(5th ed.;
) Section III. These instruments include self- and informant report forms as well as clinician-rated measures of personality traits and impairment. To date, the psychometric properties of the
Section III clinician-rated measures have received limited investigation. The objective of the current investigation was to evaluate the convergence between self-report and clinician-rated measures of
personality pathology in a diagnostically heterogeneous psychiatric patient sample. A total of 201 outpatients with current psychiatric symptoms were recruited from a psychiatric hospital patient research registry. Participants completed both clinician-rated and self-reported measures of personality pathology. Self-reported personality traits converged with clinician-rated personality traits, with medium to large effect sizes. Current and Section III personality disorder criteria demonstrated significant convergence, most with medium to large effect sizes. Self-reported and clinician-rated personality impairment correlated with small to medium effect sizes. The current investigation incorporates a multi-informant assessment of personality in a psychiatric outpatient sample. These results provide evidence for the validity of the scores of the clinician-rated instruments used to implement this model. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2021 APA, all rights reserved). |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1040-3590 1939-134X |
DOI: | 10.1037/pas0000960 |