Gender Differences in Authorship in Urology: a Five-year Review of Publications in Five High-impact Journals

• Published in: Urology (Ridgewood, N.J.) N.J.), 2021-04, Vol.150, p.9-15
• Main Authors: Whitley, Jorge A., Holt, Sarah K., Nelson, Deborah, Kieran, Kathleen
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Authorship; Female; Humans; Journal Impact Factor; Male; Periodicals as Topic - statistics & numerical data; Physicians, Women - statistics & numerical data; Publishing - statistics & numerical data; Sex Distribution; Time Factors; United States; Urology
• ISSN: 0090-4295; 1527-9995
• DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2020.07.080

To describe the proportions of peer-reviewed manuscripts authored by women in 5 high-impact, widely available urology journals, and to compare these to the proportion of women in urology. About 9% of attending urologists and 25% of urology residents are women. We hypothesized that women comprised fewer than 25% of first authors and fewer than 10% of last/senior authors. We searched peer-reviewed original manuscripts in the Journal of Urology, Journal of Pediatric Urology, Neurourology and Urodynamics, Urology, and Urologic Oncology from January 2014 to June 2019. First and last author gender identity was recorded. Observed and expected proportions and temporal trends were compared, with findings considered statistically significant at P < .05. Of 8653 multiple-author papers, 2275 (26.3%) had women as first authors, paralleling the current proportion of women in training (P = .98). Women were senior/last authors in 1255 (14.5%) papers; this was higher than the current proportion of female urologists in practice (P < .0001) for all journals but NAU (P = .59). Only 527 (6.1%) of multiple-author papers had both female first and last authors whereas 5640 (65.3%) of papers had both male first and last authors. The first author was more likely female when the senior author was female (OR = 2.34, 95% CI: 2.06-2.65); most female-first and -last authored manuscripts were published in subspecialty journals and those utilizing double-blind peer review. The proportion of female first- and senior-authored manuscripts is significantly higher than the proportion of women in urology, and may reflect differential subspecialty choices and mentorship opportunities for women.