Loading…
Interpretive description: A flexible qualitative methodology for medical education research
Background Qualitative research approaches are increasingly integrated into medical education research to answer relevant questions that quantitative methodologies cannot accommodate. However, researchers have found that traditional qualitative methodological approaches reflect the foundations and o...
Saved in:
Published in: | Medical education 2021-03, Vol.55 (3), p.336-343 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4230-6ad882b8dc18a8b1c7c0ea503f726b2772efe0e3a2cfbb8bfbe04c5ec56e27653 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4230-6ad882b8dc18a8b1c7c0ea503f726b2772efe0e3a2cfbb8bfbe04c5ec56e27653 |
container_end_page | 343 |
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 336 |
container_title | Medical education |
container_volume | 55 |
creator | Thompson Burdine, Julie Thorne, Sally Sandhu, Gurjit |
description | Background
Qualitative research approaches are increasingly integrated into medical education research to answer relevant questions that quantitative methodologies cannot accommodate. However, researchers have found that traditional qualitative methodological approaches reflect the foundations and objectives of disciplines whose aims are recognizably different from the medical education domain of inquiry (Thorne, 2016, Interpretive description. New York, NY: Routledge). Interpretive description (ID), a widely used qualitative research method within nursing, offers an accessible and theoretically flexible approach to analysing qualitative data within medical education research. ID is an appropriate methodological alternative for medical education research, as it can address complex experiential questions while producing practical outcomes. It allows for the advancement of knowledge surrounding educational experience without sacrificing methodological integrity that long‐established qualitative approaches provide.
Purpose
In this paper, we present interpretive description as a useful research methodology for qualitative approaches within medical education. We then provide a toolkit for medical education researchers interested in incorporating interpretive description into their study design. We propose a coherent set of strategies for identifying analytical frameworks, sampling, data collection, analysis, rigour and the limitations of ID for medical education research. We conclude by advocating for the interpretive description approach as a viable and flexible methodology for medical education research.
In the latest "Research Approaches" article, Thompson‐Burdine et al. introduce us to Interpretive Description as a means for addressing complex experiential questions while producing practical outcomes. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/medu.14380 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2445972512</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2445972512</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4230-6ad882b8dc18a8b1c7c0ea503f726b2772efe0e3a2cfbb8bfbe04c5ec56e27653</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp90LtOwzAUBmALgaAUFh4ARWJBSAFf4sRhq6BcJBALnRgi2zkBI6cudgL07XFJYWDAi-Wjz7-OfoQOCD4l8Zy1UPenJGMCb6ARYTlPaUnZJhphhkWKCcE7aDeEV4xxwTOxjXYYLfMCZ3SEnm7nHfiFh868Q1JD0N4sOuPm58kkaSx8GmUheeulNZ38Ni10L6521j0vk8b5-K6NljaJS2i5-pl4CCC9ftlDW420AfbX9xjNrqaPFzfp3cP17cXkLtUZZTjNZS0EVaLWREihiC40BskxawqaK1oUFBrAwCTVjVJCNQpwpjlongMtcs7G6HjIXXj31kPoqtYEDdbKObg-VDTLeFlQTmikR3_oq-v9PG4XlShLHmUe1cmgtHcheGiqhTet9MuK4GpVebWqvPquPOLDdWSv4viX_nQcARnAh7Gw_Cequp9ezobQLyrHjTo</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2489954596</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Interpretive description: A flexible qualitative methodology for medical education research</title><source>Wiley-Blackwell Read & Publish Collection</source><creator>Thompson Burdine, Julie ; Thorne, Sally ; Sandhu, Gurjit</creator><creatorcontrib>Thompson Burdine, Julie ; Thorne, Sally ; Sandhu, Gurjit</creatorcontrib><description>Background
Qualitative research approaches are increasingly integrated into medical education research to answer relevant questions that quantitative methodologies cannot accommodate. However, researchers have found that traditional qualitative methodological approaches reflect the foundations and objectives of disciplines whose aims are recognizably different from the medical education domain of inquiry (Thorne, 2016, Interpretive description. New York, NY: Routledge). Interpretive description (ID), a widely used qualitative research method within nursing, offers an accessible and theoretically flexible approach to analysing qualitative data within medical education research. ID is an appropriate methodological alternative for medical education research, as it can address complex experiential questions while producing practical outcomes. It allows for the advancement of knowledge surrounding educational experience without sacrificing methodological integrity that long‐established qualitative approaches provide.
Purpose
In this paper, we present interpretive description as a useful research methodology for qualitative approaches within medical education. We then provide a toolkit for medical education researchers interested in incorporating interpretive description into their study design. We propose a coherent set of strategies for identifying analytical frameworks, sampling, data collection, analysis, rigour and the limitations of ID for medical education research. We conclude by advocating for the interpretive description approach as a viable and flexible methodology for medical education research.
In the latest "Research Approaches" article, Thompson‐Burdine et al. introduce us to Interpretive Description as a means for addressing complex experiential questions while producing practical outcomes.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0308-0110</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1365-2923</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/medu.14380</identifier><identifier>PMID: 32967042</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</publisher><subject>Medical education ; Medical research ; Research methodology</subject><ispartof>Medical education, 2021-03, Vol.55 (3), p.336-343</ispartof><rights>2020 John Wiley & Sons Ltd and The Association for the Study of Medical Education</rights><rights>2020 John Wiley & Sons Ltd and The Association for the Study of Medical Education.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2021 John Wiley & Sons Ltd and The Association for the Study of Medical Education</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4230-6ad882b8dc18a8b1c7c0ea503f726b2772efe0e3a2cfbb8bfbe04c5ec56e27653</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4230-6ad882b8dc18a8b1c7c0ea503f726b2772efe0e3a2cfbb8bfbe04c5ec56e27653</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-8974-7597</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32967042$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Thompson Burdine, Julie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thorne, Sally</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sandhu, Gurjit</creatorcontrib><title>Interpretive description: A flexible qualitative methodology for medical education research</title><title>Medical education</title><addtitle>Med Educ</addtitle><description>Background
Qualitative research approaches are increasingly integrated into medical education research to answer relevant questions that quantitative methodologies cannot accommodate. However, researchers have found that traditional qualitative methodological approaches reflect the foundations and objectives of disciplines whose aims are recognizably different from the medical education domain of inquiry (Thorne, 2016, Interpretive description. New York, NY: Routledge). Interpretive description (ID), a widely used qualitative research method within nursing, offers an accessible and theoretically flexible approach to analysing qualitative data within medical education research. ID is an appropriate methodological alternative for medical education research, as it can address complex experiential questions while producing practical outcomes. It allows for the advancement of knowledge surrounding educational experience without sacrificing methodological integrity that long‐established qualitative approaches provide.
Purpose
In this paper, we present interpretive description as a useful research methodology for qualitative approaches within medical education. We then provide a toolkit for medical education researchers interested in incorporating interpretive description into their study design. We propose a coherent set of strategies for identifying analytical frameworks, sampling, data collection, analysis, rigour and the limitations of ID for medical education research. We conclude by advocating for the interpretive description approach as a viable and flexible methodology for medical education research.
In the latest "Research Approaches" article, Thompson‐Burdine et al. introduce us to Interpretive Description as a means for addressing complex experiential questions while producing practical outcomes.</description><subject>Medical education</subject><subject>Medical research</subject><subject>Research methodology</subject><issn>0308-0110</issn><issn>1365-2923</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp90LtOwzAUBmALgaAUFh4ARWJBSAFf4sRhq6BcJBALnRgi2zkBI6cudgL07XFJYWDAi-Wjz7-OfoQOCD4l8Zy1UPenJGMCb6ARYTlPaUnZJhphhkWKCcE7aDeEV4xxwTOxjXYYLfMCZ3SEnm7nHfiFh868Q1JD0N4sOuPm58kkaSx8GmUheeulNZ38Ni10L6521j0vk8b5-K6NljaJS2i5-pl4CCC9ftlDW420AfbX9xjNrqaPFzfp3cP17cXkLtUZZTjNZS0EVaLWREihiC40BskxawqaK1oUFBrAwCTVjVJCNQpwpjlongMtcs7G6HjIXXj31kPoqtYEDdbKObg-VDTLeFlQTmikR3_oq-v9PG4XlShLHmUe1cmgtHcheGiqhTet9MuK4GpVebWqvPquPOLDdWSv4viX_nQcARnAh7Gw_Cequp9ezobQLyrHjTo</recordid><startdate>202103</startdate><enddate>202103</enddate><creator>Thompson Burdine, Julie</creator><creator>Thorne, Sally</creator><creator>Sandhu, Gurjit</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8974-7597</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202103</creationdate><title>Interpretive description: A flexible qualitative methodology for medical education research</title><author>Thompson Burdine, Julie ; Thorne, Sally ; Sandhu, Gurjit</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4230-6ad882b8dc18a8b1c7c0ea503f726b2772efe0e3a2cfbb8bfbe04c5ec56e27653</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Medical education</topic><topic>Medical research</topic><topic>Research methodology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Thompson Burdine, Julie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thorne, Sally</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sandhu, Gurjit</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Medical education</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Thompson Burdine, Julie</au><au>Thorne, Sally</au><au>Sandhu, Gurjit</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Interpretive description: A flexible qualitative methodology for medical education research</atitle><jtitle>Medical education</jtitle><addtitle>Med Educ</addtitle><date>2021-03</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>55</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>336</spage><epage>343</epage><pages>336-343</pages><issn>0308-0110</issn><eissn>1365-2923</eissn><abstract>Background
Qualitative research approaches are increasingly integrated into medical education research to answer relevant questions that quantitative methodologies cannot accommodate. However, researchers have found that traditional qualitative methodological approaches reflect the foundations and objectives of disciplines whose aims are recognizably different from the medical education domain of inquiry (Thorne, 2016, Interpretive description. New York, NY: Routledge). Interpretive description (ID), a widely used qualitative research method within nursing, offers an accessible and theoretically flexible approach to analysing qualitative data within medical education research. ID is an appropriate methodological alternative for medical education research, as it can address complex experiential questions while producing practical outcomes. It allows for the advancement of knowledge surrounding educational experience without sacrificing methodological integrity that long‐established qualitative approaches provide.
Purpose
In this paper, we present interpretive description as a useful research methodology for qualitative approaches within medical education. We then provide a toolkit for medical education researchers interested in incorporating interpretive description into their study design. We propose a coherent set of strategies for identifying analytical frameworks, sampling, data collection, analysis, rigour and the limitations of ID for medical education research. We conclude by advocating for the interpretive description approach as a viable and flexible methodology for medical education research.
In the latest "Research Approaches" article, Thompson‐Burdine et al. introduce us to Interpretive Description as a means for addressing complex experiential questions while producing practical outcomes.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</pub><pmid>32967042</pmid><doi>10.1111/medu.14380</doi><tpages>8</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8974-7597</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0308-0110 |
ispartof | Medical education, 2021-03, Vol.55 (3), p.336-343 |
issn | 0308-0110 1365-2923 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2445972512 |
source | Wiley-Blackwell Read & Publish Collection |
subjects | Medical education Medical research Research methodology |
title | Interpretive description: A flexible qualitative methodology for medical education research |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-03T07%3A18%3A11IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Interpretive%20description:%20A%20flexible%20qualitative%20methodology%20for%20medical%20education%20research&rft.jtitle=Medical%20education&rft.au=Thompson%20Burdine,%20Julie&rft.date=2021-03&rft.volume=55&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=336&rft.epage=343&rft.pages=336-343&rft.issn=0308-0110&rft.eissn=1365-2923&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/medu.14380&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2445972512%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4230-6ad882b8dc18a8b1c7c0ea503f726b2772efe0e3a2cfbb8bfbe04c5ec56e27653%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2489954596&rft_id=info:pmid/32967042&rfr_iscdi=true |