Loading…

Transversus abdominis plane block versus thoracic epidural analgesia in colorectal surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Background The efficacy of transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block compared with thoracic epidural analgesia (TEA) in abdominal surgery has been controversial. We conducted this systematic review and meta-analysis to assess outcomes of TAP block and TEA in a procedure-specific manner in colorectal s...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Langenbeck's archives of surgery 2021-03, Vol.406 (2), p.273-282
Main Authors: Hamid, Hytham K. S., Marc-Hernández, Artur, Saber, Alan A.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c347t-105555a7be9673b86cfe0ed6e2e1bbaedb6c0ecc5ac467fdd2c3d00b4049d5ee3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c347t-105555a7be9673b86cfe0ed6e2e1bbaedb6c0ecc5ac467fdd2c3d00b4049d5ee3
container_end_page 282
container_issue 2
container_start_page 273
container_title Langenbeck's archives of surgery
container_volume 406
creator Hamid, Hytham K. S.
Marc-Hernández, Artur
Saber, Alan A.
description Background The efficacy of transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block compared with thoracic epidural analgesia (TEA) in abdominal surgery has been controversial. We conducted this systematic review and meta-analysis to assess outcomes of TAP block and TEA in a procedure-specific manner in colorectal surgery. Methods A systematic literature search of the PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Scopus databases was conducted through July 10, 2020, to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing TAP block with TEA in colorectal surgery. Primary outcomes were pain scores at rest and movement at 24 h postoperatively. Secondary outcomes included postoperative pain scores at 0–2 and 48 h, opioid consumption, postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV), functional recovery, hospital stay, and adverse events. Results Six RCTs with 568 patients were included. Methodological quality of these RCTs ranged from moderate to high. TAP block provided comparable pain control, lower 24 h and total opioid consumption, shorter time to ambulation and urinary catheter time, and lower incidence of sensory disturbance and postoperative hypotension compared with TEA. Meanwhile, the 48-h opioid consumption, PONV incidence, and hospital stay were similar between groups. When laparoscopic surgery was the only surgical approach employed, TAP block provided additional benefits of shorter time to first flatus and lower incidence of PONV compared with TEA. Conclusions Perhaps more germane to minimally invasive procedures, TAP block is equivalent to TEA in terms of postoperative pain control and provides better functional recovery with lower incidence of adverse events in patients undergoing colorectal surgery.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s00423-020-01995-9
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2446661860</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2446661860</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c347t-105555a7be9673b86cfe0ed6e2e1bbaedb6c0ecc5ac467fdd2c3d00b4049d5ee3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE1P3DAQhi3Uiq_yBzggH3sJjGPH2XBDqC2VkHqhZ8sfs2BI4sWTgPbIP6-XXTjWF1ue93mleRg7FXAuANoLAlC1rKCGCkTXNVW3xw6Fkk1Vq0Z8-XwrecCOiB4BQLed2mcHsu5atQB5yN7ush3pBTPNxK0LaYhjJL7q7Yjc9ck_8d1wekjZ-ug5rmKYs-25HW1_jxQtjyP3qU8Z_VT-ac73mNeX3HJa04SDnQqW8SXia4ECH3Cy1YZeU6Rv7OvS9oQnu_uY_f354-76prr98-v39dVt5aVqp0pAU45tHXa6lW6h_RIBg8YahXMWg9Me0PvGeqXbZQi1lwHAKVBdaBDlMfu-7V3l9DwjTWaI5LHfbJpmMsWT1losNJRovY36nIgyLs0qx8HmtRFgNurNVr0p6s27etMV6GzXP7sBwyfy4boE5DZAZTQWQ-YxzblYoP_V_gOZmZNd</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2446661860</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Transversus abdominis plane block versus thoracic epidural analgesia in colorectal surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis</title><source>Springer Nature</source><creator>Hamid, Hytham K. S. ; Marc-Hernández, Artur ; Saber, Alan A.</creator><creatorcontrib>Hamid, Hytham K. S. ; Marc-Hernández, Artur ; Saber, Alan A.</creatorcontrib><description>Background The efficacy of transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block compared with thoracic epidural analgesia (TEA) in abdominal surgery has been controversial. We conducted this systematic review and meta-analysis to assess outcomes of TAP block and TEA in a procedure-specific manner in colorectal surgery. Methods A systematic literature search of the PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Scopus databases was conducted through July 10, 2020, to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing TAP block with TEA in colorectal surgery. Primary outcomes were pain scores at rest and movement at 24 h postoperatively. Secondary outcomes included postoperative pain scores at 0–2 and 48 h, opioid consumption, postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV), functional recovery, hospital stay, and adverse events. Results Six RCTs with 568 patients were included. Methodological quality of these RCTs ranged from moderate to high. TAP block provided comparable pain control, lower 24 h and total opioid consumption, shorter time to ambulation and urinary catheter time, and lower incidence of sensory disturbance and postoperative hypotension compared with TEA. Meanwhile, the 48-h opioid consumption, PONV incidence, and hospital stay were similar between groups. When laparoscopic surgery was the only surgical approach employed, TAP block provided additional benefits of shorter time to first flatus and lower incidence of PONV compared with TEA. Conclusions Perhaps more germane to minimally invasive procedures, TAP block is equivalent to TEA in terms of postoperative pain control and provides better functional recovery with lower incidence of adverse events in patients undergoing colorectal surgery.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1435-2443</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1435-2451</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s00423-020-01995-9</identifier><identifier>PMID: 32974803</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg</publisher><subject>Abdominal Surgery ; Cardiac Surgery ; General Surgery ; Medicine ; Medicine &amp; Public Health ; Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses ; Thoracic Surgery ; Traumatic Surgery ; Vascular Surgery</subject><ispartof>Langenbeck's archives of surgery, 2021-03, Vol.406 (2), p.273-282</ispartof><rights>Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2020</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c347t-105555a7be9673b86cfe0ed6e2e1bbaedb6c0ecc5ac467fdd2c3d00b4049d5ee3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c347t-105555a7be9673b86cfe0ed6e2e1bbaedb6c0ecc5ac467fdd2c3d00b4049d5ee3</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-8068-0154</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32974803$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Hamid, Hytham K. S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Marc-Hernández, Artur</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Saber, Alan A.</creatorcontrib><title>Transversus abdominis plane block versus thoracic epidural analgesia in colorectal surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis</title><title>Langenbeck's archives of surgery</title><addtitle>Langenbecks Arch Surg</addtitle><addtitle>Langenbecks Arch Surg</addtitle><description>Background The efficacy of transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block compared with thoracic epidural analgesia (TEA) in abdominal surgery has been controversial. We conducted this systematic review and meta-analysis to assess outcomes of TAP block and TEA in a procedure-specific manner in colorectal surgery. Methods A systematic literature search of the PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Scopus databases was conducted through July 10, 2020, to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing TAP block with TEA in colorectal surgery. Primary outcomes were pain scores at rest and movement at 24 h postoperatively. Secondary outcomes included postoperative pain scores at 0–2 and 48 h, opioid consumption, postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV), functional recovery, hospital stay, and adverse events. Results Six RCTs with 568 patients were included. Methodological quality of these RCTs ranged from moderate to high. TAP block provided comparable pain control, lower 24 h and total opioid consumption, shorter time to ambulation and urinary catheter time, and lower incidence of sensory disturbance and postoperative hypotension compared with TEA. Meanwhile, the 48-h opioid consumption, PONV incidence, and hospital stay were similar between groups. When laparoscopic surgery was the only surgical approach employed, TAP block provided additional benefits of shorter time to first flatus and lower incidence of PONV compared with TEA. Conclusions Perhaps more germane to minimally invasive procedures, TAP block is equivalent to TEA in terms of postoperative pain control and provides better functional recovery with lower incidence of adverse events in patients undergoing colorectal surgery.</description><subject>Abdominal Surgery</subject><subject>Cardiac Surgery</subject><subject>General Surgery</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine &amp; Public Health</subject><subject>Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses</subject><subject>Thoracic Surgery</subject><subject>Traumatic Surgery</subject><subject>Vascular Surgery</subject><issn>1435-2443</issn><issn>1435-2451</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kE1P3DAQhi3Uiq_yBzggH3sJjGPH2XBDqC2VkHqhZ8sfs2BI4sWTgPbIP6-XXTjWF1ue93mleRg7FXAuANoLAlC1rKCGCkTXNVW3xw6Fkk1Vq0Z8-XwrecCOiB4BQLed2mcHsu5atQB5yN7ush3pBTPNxK0LaYhjJL7q7Yjc9ck_8d1wekjZ-ug5rmKYs-25HW1_jxQtjyP3qU8Z_VT-ac73mNeX3HJa04SDnQqW8SXia4ECH3Cy1YZeU6Rv7OvS9oQnu_uY_f354-76prr98-v39dVt5aVqp0pAU45tHXa6lW6h_RIBg8YahXMWg9Me0PvGeqXbZQi1lwHAKVBdaBDlMfu-7V3l9DwjTWaI5LHfbJpmMsWT1losNJRovY36nIgyLs0qx8HmtRFgNurNVr0p6s27etMV6GzXP7sBwyfy4boE5DZAZTQWQ-YxzblYoP_V_gOZmZNd</recordid><startdate>20210301</startdate><enddate>20210301</enddate><creator>Hamid, Hytham K. S.</creator><creator>Marc-Hernández, Artur</creator><creator>Saber, Alan A.</creator><general>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8068-0154</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20210301</creationdate><title>Transversus abdominis plane block versus thoracic epidural analgesia in colorectal surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis</title><author>Hamid, Hytham K. S. ; Marc-Hernández, Artur ; Saber, Alan A.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c347t-105555a7be9673b86cfe0ed6e2e1bbaedb6c0ecc5ac467fdd2c3d00b4049d5ee3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Abdominal Surgery</topic><topic>Cardiac Surgery</topic><topic>General Surgery</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine &amp; Public Health</topic><topic>Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses</topic><topic>Thoracic Surgery</topic><topic>Traumatic Surgery</topic><topic>Vascular Surgery</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hamid, Hytham K. S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Marc-Hernández, Artur</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Saber, Alan A.</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Langenbeck's archives of surgery</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hamid, Hytham K. S.</au><au>Marc-Hernández, Artur</au><au>Saber, Alan A.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Transversus abdominis plane block versus thoracic epidural analgesia in colorectal surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis</atitle><jtitle>Langenbeck's archives of surgery</jtitle><stitle>Langenbecks Arch Surg</stitle><addtitle>Langenbecks Arch Surg</addtitle><date>2021-03-01</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>406</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>273</spage><epage>282</epage><pages>273-282</pages><issn>1435-2443</issn><eissn>1435-2451</eissn><abstract>Background The efficacy of transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block compared with thoracic epidural analgesia (TEA) in abdominal surgery has been controversial. We conducted this systematic review and meta-analysis to assess outcomes of TAP block and TEA in a procedure-specific manner in colorectal surgery. Methods A systematic literature search of the PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Scopus databases was conducted through July 10, 2020, to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing TAP block with TEA in colorectal surgery. Primary outcomes were pain scores at rest and movement at 24 h postoperatively. Secondary outcomes included postoperative pain scores at 0–2 and 48 h, opioid consumption, postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV), functional recovery, hospital stay, and adverse events. Results Six RCTs with 568 patients were included. Methodological quality of these RCTs ranged from moderate to high. TAP block provided comparable pain control, lower 24 h and total opioid consumption, shorter time to ambulation and urinary catheter time, and lower incidence of sensory disturbance and postoperative hypotension compared with TEA. Meanwhile, the 48-h opioid consumption, PONV incidence, and hospital stay were similar between groups. When laparoscopic surgery was the only surgical approach employed, TAP block provided additional benefits of shorter time to first flatus and lower incidence of PONV compared with TEA. Conclusions Perhaps more germane to minimally invasive procedures, TAP block is equivalent to TEA in terms of postoperative pain control and provides better functional recovery with lower incidence of adverse events in patients undergoing colorectal surgery.</abstract><cop>Berlin/Heidelberg</cop><pub>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</pub><pmid>32974803</pmid><doi>10.1007/s00423-020-01995-9</doi><tpages>10</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8068-0154</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1435-2443
ispartof Langenbeck's archives of surgery, 2021-03, Vol.406 (2), p.273-282
issn 1435-2443
1435-2451
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2446661860
source Springer Nature
subjects Abdominal Surgery
Cardiac Surgery
General Surgery
Medicine
Medicine & Public Health
Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses
Thoracic Surgery
Traumatic Surgery
Vascular Surgery
title Transversus abdominis plane block versus thoracic epidural analgesia in colorectal surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-08T04%3A07%3A25IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Transversus%20abdominis%20plane%20block%20versus%20thoracic%20epidural%20analgesia%20in%20colorectal%20surgery:%20a%20systematic%20review%20and%20meta-analysis&rft.jtitle=Langenbeck's%20archives%20of%20surgery&rft.au=Hamid,%20Hytham%20K.%20S.&rft.date=2021-03-01&rft.volume=406&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=273&rft.epage=282&rft.pages=273-282&rft.issn=1435-2443&rft.eissn=1435-2451&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s00423-020-01995-9&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2446661860%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c347t-105555a7be9673b86cfe0ed6e2e1bbaedb6c0ecc5ac467fdd2c3d00b4049d5ee3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2446661860&rft_id=info:pmid/32974803&rfr_iscdi=true