Loading…

Effect of angular velocity on active muscle stiffness in vivo

We previously reported that active muscle stiffness could be evaluated in vivo. However, we were not able to investigate active muscle stiffness as more than 250 deg·s−1 due to the limitation of the torque motor of dynamometer. The aim of the present study was to investigate the effect of angular ve...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of biomechanics 2020-10, Vol.111, p.110007-110007, Article 110007
Main Authors: Kubo, Keitaro, Ikebukuro, Toshihiro, Yata, Hideaki
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c462t-30ed259f75f3cc11e2bfc1cfe3cbb8796b77c702c01b5c57b248882c3285b79c3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c462t-30ed259f75f3cc11e2bfc1cfe3cbb8796b77c702c01b5c57b248882c3285b79c3
container_end_page 110007
container_issue
container_start_page 110007
container_title Journal of biomechanics
container_volume 111
creator Kubo, Keitaro
Ikebukuro, Toshihiro
Yata, Hideaki
description We previously reported that active muscle stiffness could be evaluated in vivo. However, we were not able to investigate active muscle stiffness as more than 250 deg·s−1 due to the limitation of the torque motor of dynamometer. The aim of the present study was to investigate the effect of angular velocities (including higher angular velocities of more than 250 deg·s−1) on active muscle stiffness. Eighteen males volunteered for this study. Active muscle stiffness of the medial gastrocnemius muscle was calculated according to changes in the estimated muscle force and fascicle length during fast lengthening at five different angular velocities (100, 200, 300, 500, and 600 deg·s−1). Electromyographic activities of the lateral gastrocnemius muscle (LG) and soleus muscle (SOL) were evaluated over two different phases: before the stretch (mEMGa) and after the stretch (mMEGb). Active muscle stiffness was higher at 300 than at 100 deg·s−1, but decreased as the angular velocity increased from 300 to 600 deg·s−1. There were no differences in mEMGa and mEMGb values among the five angular velocities, whereas mEMGb values were higher than mEMGa for all angular velocities. In conclusion, active muscle stiffness was highest at 300 deg·s−1 and decreased at both slower and faster angular velocities.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2020.110007
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2446662916</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0021929020304309</els_id><sourcerecordid>2446662916</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c462t-30ed259f75f3cc11e2bfc1cfe3cbb8796b77c702c01b5c57b248882c3285b79c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkE1r3DAQhkVI6W7S_oVFkEsv3ujDlqxDISWkSSCQS3sW1uyolbGtrWQb8u_rzW566CWngeF53xkeQjacbTnj6rrdti7EHuH3VjCxLDljTJ-RNa-1LISs2TlZMyZ4YYRhK3KRc3sgSm0-kpUURvPSyDX5euc9wkijp83wa-qaRGfsIoTxhcaBNjCGGWk_ZeiQ5jF4P2DONAx0DnP8RD74psv4-TQvyc_vdz9uH4qn5_vH229PBZRKjIVkuBOV8bryEoBzFM4DB48SnKu1UU5r0EwA466CSjtR1nUtQIq6ctqAvCRfjr37FP9MmEfbhwzYdc2AccpWlKVSShiuFvTqP7SNUxqW714poRRn9UKpIwUp5pzQ230KfZNeLGf2INi29k2wPQi2R8FLcHOqn1yPu3-xN6MLcHMEcPExB0w2Q8ABcBfSItruYnjvxl9bPo3e</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2446266108</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Effect of angular velocity on active muscle stiffness in vivo</title><source>ScienceDirect Freedom Collection</source><creator>Kubo, Keitaro ; Ikebukuro, Toshihiro ; Yata, Hideaki</creator><creatorcontrib>Kubo, Keitaro ; Ikebukuro, Toshihiro ; Yata, Hideaki</creatorcontrib><description>We previously reported that active muscle stiffness could be evaluated in vivo. However, we were not able to investigate active muscle stiffness as more than 250 deg·s−1 due to the limitation of the torque motor of dynamometer. The aim of the present study was to investigate the effect of angular velocities (including higher angular velocities of more than 250 deg·s−1) on active muscle stiffness. Eighteen males volunteered for this study. Active muscle stiffness of the medial gastrocnemius muscle was calculated according to changes in the estimated muscle force and fascicle length during fast lengthening at five different angular velocities (100, 200, 300, 500, and 600 deg·s−1). Electromyographic activities of the lateral gastrocnemius muscle (LG) and soleus muscle (SOL) were evaluated over two different phases: before the stretch (mEMGa) and after the stretch (mMEGb). Active muscle stiffness was higher at 300 than at 100 deg·s−1, but decreased as the angular velocity increased from 300 to 600 deg·s−1. There were no differences in mEMGa and mEMGb values among the five angular velocities, whereas mEMGb values were higher than mEMGa for all angular velocities. In conclusion, active muscle stiffness was highest at 300 deg·s−1 and decreased at both slower and faster angular velocities.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0021-9290</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-2380</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2020.110007</identifier><identifier>PMID: 32971493</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Angular velocity ; Ankle ; Ankle Joint ; Electromyography ; Fascicle ; Gastrocnemius muscle ; In vivo methods and tests ; Male ; Mechanical properties ; Medial gastrocnemius muscle ; Muscle, Skeletal ; Muscles ; Range of motion ; Soleus muscle ; Stiffness ; Stretch reflex ; Tendons ; Torque ; Torque motors ; Ultrasonic imaging ; Ultrasonography ; Variance analysis ; Velocity</subject><ispartof>Journal of biomechanics, 2020-10, Vol.111, p.110007-110007, Article 110007</ispartof><rights>2020 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.</rights><rights>2020. Elsevier Ltd</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c462t-30ed259f75f3cc11e2bfc1cfe3cbb8796b77c702c01b5c57b248882c3285b79c3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c462t-30ed259f75f3cc11e2bfc1cfe3cbb8796b77c702c01b5c57b248882c3285b79c3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32971493$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kubo, Keitaro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ikebukuro, Toshihiro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yata, Hideaki</creatorcontrib><title>Effect of angular velocity on active muscle stiffness in vivo</title><title>Journal of biomechanics</title><addtitle>J Biomech</addtitle><description>We previously reported that active muscle stiffness could be evaluated in vivo. However, we were not able to investigate active muscle stiffness as more than 250 deg·s−1 due to the limitation of the torque motor of dynamometer. The aim of the present study was to investigate the effect of angular velocities (including higher angular velocities of more than 250 deg·s−1) on active muscle stiffness. Eighteen males volunteered for this study. Active muscle stiffness of the medial gastrocnemius muscle was calculated according to changes in the estimated muscle force and fascicle length during fast lengthening at five different angular velocities (100, 200, 300, 500, and 600 deg·s−1). Electromyographic activities of the lateral gastrocnemius muscle (LG) and soleus muscle (SOL) were evaluated over two different phases: before the stretch (mEMGa) and after the stretch (mMEGb). Active muscle stiffness was higher at 300 than at 100 deg·s−1, but decreased as the angular velocity increased from 300 to 600 deg·s−1. There were no differences in mEMGa and mEMGb values among the five angular velocities, whereas mEMGb values were higher than mEMGa for all angular velocities. In conclusion, active muscle stiffness was highest at 300 deg·s−1 and decreased at both slower and faster angular velocities.</description><subject>Angular velocity</subject><subject>Ankle</subject><subject>Ankle Joint</subject><subject>Electromyography</subject><subject>Fascicle</subject><subject>Gastrocnemius muscle</subject><subject>In vivo methods and tests</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Mechanical properties</subject><subject>Medial gastrocnemius muscle</subject><subject>Muscle, Skeletal</subject><subject>Muscles</subject><subject>Range of motion</subject><subject>Soleus muscle</subject><subject>Stiffness</subject><subject>Stretch reflex</subject><subject>Tendons</subject><subject>Torque</subject><subject>Torque motors</subject><subject>Ultrasonic imaging</subject><subject>Ultrasonography</subject><subject>Variance analysis</subject><subject>Velocity</subject><issn>0021-9290</issn><issn>1873-2380</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkE1r3DAQhkVI6W7S_oVFkEsv3ujDlqxDISWkSSCQS3sW1uyolbGtrWQb8u_rzW566CWngeF53xkeQjacbTnj6rrdti7EHuH3VjCxLDljTJ-RNa-1LISs2TlZMyZ4YYRhK3KRc3sgSm0-kpUURvPSyDX5euc9wkijp83wa-qaRGfsIoTxhcaBNjCGGWk_ZeiQ5jF4P2DONAx0DnP8RD74psv4-TQvyc_vdz9uH4qn5_vH229PBZRKjIVkuBOV8bryEoBzFM4DB48SnKu1UU5r0EwA466CSjtR1nUtQIq6ctqAvCRfjr37FP9MmEfbhwzYdc2AccpWlKVSShiuFvTqP7SNUxqW714poRRn9UKpIwUp5pzQ230KfZNeLGf2INi29k2wPQi2R8FLcHOqn1yPu3-xN6MLcHMEcPExB0w2Q8ABcBfSItruYnjvxl9bPo3e</recordid><startdate>20201009</startdate><enddate>20201009</enddate><creator>Kubo, Keitaro</creator><creator>Ikebukuro, Toshihiro</creator><creator>Yata, Hideaki</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier Limited</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>7TS</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20201009</creationdate><title>Effect of angular velocity on active muscle stiffness in vivo</title><author>Kubo, Keitaro ; Ikebukuro, Toshihiro ; Yata, Hideaki</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c462t-30ed259f75f3cc11e2bfc1cfe3cbb8796b77c702c01b5c57b248882c3285b79c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Angular velocity</topic><topic>Ankle</topic><topic>Ankle Joint</topic><topic>Electromyography</topic><topic>Fascicle</topic><topic>Gastrocnemius muscle</topic><topic>In vivo methods and tests</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Mechanical properties</topic><topic>Medial gastrocnemius muscle</topic><topic>Muscle, Skeletal</topic><topic>Muscles</topic><topic>Range of motion</topic><topic>Soleus muscle</topic><topic>Stiffness</topic><topic>Stretch reflex</topic><topic>Tendons</topic><topic>Torque</topic><topic>Torque motors</topic><topic>Ultrasonic imaging</topic><topic>Ultrasonography</topic><topic>Variance analysis</topic><topic>Velocity</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kubo, Keitaro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ikebukuro, Toshihiro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yata, Hideaki</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Calcium &amp; Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>Mechanical &amp; Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Physical Education Index</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Complete (ProQuest Database)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>PML(ProQuest Medical Library)</collection><collection>ProQuest_Research Library</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Journals</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of biomechanics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kubo, Keitaro</au><au>Ikebukuro, Toshihiro</au><au>Yata, Hideaki</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Effect of angular velocity on active muscle stiffness in vivo</atitle><jtitle>Journal of biomechanics</jtitle><addtitle>J Biomech</addtitle><date>2020-10-09</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>111</volume><spage>110007</spage><epage>110007</epage><pages>110007-110007</pages><artnum>110007</artnum><issn>0021-9290</issn><eissn>1873-2380</eissn><abstract>We previously reported that active muscle stiffness could be evaluated in vivo. However, we were not able to investigate active muscle stiffness as more than 250 deg·s−1 due to the limitation of the torque motor of dynamometer. The aim of the present study was to investigate the effect of angular velocities (including higher angular velocities of more than 250 deg·s−1) on active muscle stiffness. Eighteen males volunteered for this study. Active muscle stiffness of the medial gastrocnemius muscle was calculated according to changes in the estimated muscle force and fascicle length during fast lengthening at five different angular velocities (100, 200, 300, 500, and 600 deg·s−1). Electromyographic activities of the lateral gastrocnemius muscle (LG) and soleus muscle (SOL) were evaluated over two different phases: before the stretch (mEMGa) and after the stretch (mMEGb). Active muscle stiffness was higher at 300 than at 100 deg·s−1, but decreased as the angular velocity increased from 300 to 600 deg·s−1. There were no differences in mEMGa and mEMGb values among the five angular velocities, whereas mEMGb values were higher than mEMGa for all angular velocities. In conclusion, active muscle stiffness was highest at 300 deg·s−1 and decreased at both slower and faster angular velocities.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>32971493</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.jbiomech.2020.110007</doi><tpages>1</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0021-9290
ispartof Journal of biomechanics, 2020-10, Vol.111, p.110007-110007, Article 110007
issn 0021-9290
1873-2380
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2446662916
source ScienceDirect Freedom Collection
subjects Angular velocity
Ankle
Ankle Joint
Electromyography
Fascicle
Gastrocnemius muscle
In vivo methods and tests
Male
Mechanical properties
Medial gastrocnemius muscle
Muscle, Skeletal
Muscles
Range of motion
Soleus muscle
Stiffness
Stretch reflex
Tendons
Torque
Torque motors
Ultrasonic imaging
Ultrasonography
Variance analysis
Velocity
title Effect of angular velocity on active muscle stiffness in vivo
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-25T13%3A35%3A55IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Effect%20of%20angular%20velocity%20on%20active%20muscle%20stiffness%20in%20vivo&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20biomechanics&rft.au=Kubo,%20Keitaro&rft.date=2020-10-09&rft.volume=111&rft.spage=110007&rft.epage=110007&rft.pages=110007-110007&rft.artnum=110007&rft.issn=0021-9290&rft.eissn=1873-2380&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.jbiomech.2020.110007&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2446662916%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c462t-30ed259f75f3cc11e2bfc1cfe3cbb8796b77c702c01b5c57b248882c3285b79c3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2446266108&rft_id=info:pmid/32971493&rfr_iscdi=true