Loading…

Nurses’ communication difficulties when providing end-of-life care in the oncology setting: a cross-sectional study

Purpose To (1) examine the communication difficulties nurses experience when providing end-of-life (EOL) care, (2) establish the correlation between communication difficulties across various stakeholders and (3) determine the impact sociodemographic factors has on the communication difficulties expe...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Supportive care in cancer 2021-05, Vol.29 (5), p.2787-2794
Main Authors: Toh, Shao Wei, Hollen, Valerie Tantiana, Ang, Elaine, Lee, Yee Mei, Devi, M. Kamala
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c442t-d5ecce34b555c5ace2180765fcf7ad19771702e08f3f09327a6256a57100bc5e3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c442t-d5ecce34b555c5ace2180765fcf7ad19771702e08f3f09327a6256a57100bc5e3
container_end_page 2794
container_issue 5
container_start_page 2787
container_title Supportive care in cancer
container_volume 29
creator Toh, Shao Wei
Hollen, Valerie Tantiana
Ang, Elaine
Lee, Yee Mei
Devi, M. Kamala
description Purpose To (1) examine the communication difficulties nurses experience when providing end-of-life (EOL) care, (2) establish the correlation between communication difficulties across various stakeholders and (3) determine the impact sociodemographic factors has on the communication difficulties experienced. Methods 124/178 (69.7%) nurses from oncology wards of a tertiary hospital were recruited. Sociodemographic survey and three validated subscales: Communication with Patient and Family (CPF), Explanation to Family (EF) and Reassessment of Current Treatment and Nursing Care (RCTNC) were used to collect the data. Data were analysed with Independent Samples T test, One-Way Analysis of Variance and Pearson’s correlation coefficient. Results Mean score was highest for CPF (8.75 ± 2.24) and lowest for RCTNC (6.32 ± 2.26). Positive correlations were found between CPF with EF ( r = 0.613, p < 0.001), CPF with RCTNC ( r = 0.243, p = 0.007) and EF with RCTNC ( r = 0.370, p < 0.001). Age ( p = 0.048), years of experience ( p = 0.001), religion ( p = 0.034) and EOL care training received ( p = 0.040) were significant factors for CPF subscale while age ( p = 0.011), years of experience ( p = 0.001), educational qualification ( p = 0.003) and EOL care training received ( p = 0.026) were the significant factors for EF subscale. Conclusion Nurses experienced more communication difficulties with patients and families than with the healthcare team. When nurses experience communication difficulties with the healthcare team, they also tend to experience communication difficulties with patients and families and when providing explanations to families. Nurses experienced greater communication difficulties when they are younger, are non-graduates, have less years of experience, adopted a religion or did not receive training in EOL care. Trial registration Clinical Trials.gov Identifier: 2019/00680 (Domain Specific Review Board)
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s00520-020-05787-1
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2447542762</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A656117113</galeid><sourcerecordid>A656117113</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c442t-d5ecce34b555c5ace2180765fcf7ad19771702e08f3f09327a6256a57100bc5e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kc9qFTEUxoMo9lp9ARcScNNNav5O7rgrxX9Q6qauQ27m5DZlJqlJRrk7X6Ov55OY8VZLRUo4BJLf9-XkfAi9ZPSYUarfFEoVp4QupfRaE_YIrZgUgmgh-sdoRXvJiBRKHaBnpVxRyrRW_Ck6ELzvNVt3KzSfz7lA-fnjBrs0TXMMztaQIh6C98HNYw1Q8PdLiPg6p29hCHGLIQ4keTIGD9jZDDhEXC8Bp-jSmLY7XKDWBr7FFrucSiEF3OJqR1zqPOyeoyfejgVe3O6H6Mv7dxenH8nZ5w-fTk_OiJOSVzIocA6E3CilnLIOOFtT3SnvvLYD67VmmnKgay887QXXtuOqs0q38WycAnGIjva-rfevM5RqplAcjKONkOZiuJRaSa473tDX_6BXac6t40YpKtpjrNN31NaOYEL0qWbrFlNz0qmOMc2YaNTxf6i2BpiCSxF8aOf3BHwv-D2tDN5c5zDZvDOMmiVrs8_a0KWWrA1role3Hc-bCYa_kj_hNkDsgdKu4hby3ZcesP0F2L-0ZQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2503197167</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Nurses’ communication difficulties when providing end-of-life care in the oncology setting: a cross-sectional study</title><source>Social Science Premium Collection</source><source>Sociology Collection</source><source>Springer Link</source><creator>Toh, Shao Wei ; Hollen, Valerie Tantiana ; Ang, Elaine ; Lee, Yee Mei ; Devi, M. Kamala</creator><creatorcontrib>Toh, Shao Wei ; Hollen, Valerie Tantiana ; Ang, Elaine ; Lee, Yee Mei ; Devi, M. Kamala</creatorcontrib><description>Purpose To (1) examine the communication difficulties nurses experience when providing end-of-life (EOL) care, (2) establish the correlation between communication difficulties across various stakeholders and (3) determine the impact sociodemographic factors has on the communication difficulties experienced. Methods 124/178 (69.7%) nurses from oncology wards of a tertiary hospital were recruited. Sociodemographic survey and three validated subscales: Communication with Patient and Family (CPF), Explanation to Family (EF) and Reassessment of Current Treatment and Nursing Care (RCTNC) were used to collect the data. Data were analysed with Independent Samples T test, One-Way Analysis of Variance and Pearson’s correlation coefficient. Results Mean score was highest for CPF (8.75 ± 2.24) and lowest for RCTNC (6.32 ± 2.26). Positive correlations were found between CPF with EF ( r = 0.613, p &lt; 0.001), CPF with RCTNC ( r = 0.243, p = 0.007) and EF with RCTNC ( r = 0.370, p &lt; 0.001). Age ( p = 0.048), years of experience ( p = 0.001), religion ( p = 0.034) and EOL care training received ( p = 0.040) were significant factors for CPF subscale while age ( p = 0.011), years of experience ( p = 0.001), educational qualification ( p = 0.003) and EOL care training received ( p = 0.026) were the significant factors for EF subscale. Conclusion Nurses experienced more communication difficulties with patients and families than with the healthcare team. When nurses experience communication difficulties with the healthcare team, they also tend to experience communication difficulties with patients and families and when providing explanations to families. Nurses experienced greater communication difficulties when they are younger, are non-graduates, have less years of experience, adopted a religion or did not receive training in EOL care. Trial registration Clinical Trials.gov Identifier: 2019/00680 (Domain Specific Review Board)</description><identifier>ISSN: 0941-4355</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1433-7339</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s00520-020-05787-1</identifier><identifier>PMID: 32997186</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg</publisher><subject>Adult ; Age ; Analysis ; Cancer ; Communication ; Cross-Sectional Studies ; Female ; Humans ; Male ; Medicine ; Medicine &amp; Public Health ; Neoplasms - therapy ; Nurse patient relationships ; Nurses ; Nursing ; Nursing care ; Nursing Research ; Oncology ; Original Article ; Pain Medicine ; Palliative care ; Palliative treatment ; Patients ; Questionnaires ; Recruiting ; Rehabilitation Medicine ; Religion ; Sociodemographics ; Terminal Care - methods ; Verbal communication ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>Supportive care in cancer, 2021-05, Vol.29 (5), p.2787-2794</ispartof><rights>Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2020</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2021 Springer</rights><rights>Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2020.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c442t-d5ecce34b555c5ace2180765fcf7ad19771702e08f3f09327a6256a57100bc5e3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c442t-d5ecce34b555c5ace2180765fcf7ad19771702e08f3f09327a6256a57100bc5e3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-0225-6494</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2503197167/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2503197167?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,21394,21395,27924,27925,33611,33612,34530,34531,43733,44115,74221,74639</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32997186$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Toh, Shao Wei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hollen, Valerie Tantiana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ang, Elaine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, Yee Mei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Devi, M. Kamala</creatorcontrib><title>Nurses’ communication difficulties when providing end-of-life care in the oncology setting: a cross-sectional study</title><title>Supportive care in cancer</title><addtitle>Support Care Cancer</addtitle><addtitle>Support Care Cancer</addtitle><description>Purpose To (1) examine the communication difficulties nurses experience when providing end-of-life (EOL) care, (2) establish the correlation between communication difficulties across various stakeholders and (3) determine the impact sociodemographic factors has on the communication difficulties experienced. Methods 124/178 (69.7%) nurses from oncology wards of a tertiary hospital were recruited. Sociodemographic survey and three validated subscales: Communication with Patient and Family (CPF), Explanation to Family (EF) and Reassessment of Current Treatment and Nursing Care (RCTNC) were used to collect the data. Data were analysed with Independent Samples T test, One-Way Analysis of Variance and Pearson’s correlation coefficient. Results Mean score was highest for CPF (8.75 ± 2.24) and lowest for RCTNC (6.32 ± 2.26). Positive correlations were found between CPF with EF ( r = 0.613, p &lt; 0.001), CPF with RCTNC ( r = 0.243, p = 0.007) and EF with RCTNC ( r = 0.370, p &lt; 0.001). Age ( p = 0.048), years of experience ( p = 0.001), religion ( p = 0.034) and EOL care training received ( p = 0.040) were significant factors for CPF subscale while age ( p = 0.011), years of experience ( p = 0.001), educational qualification ( p = 0.003) and EOL care training received ( p = 0.026) were the significant factors for EF subscale. Conclusion Nurses experienced more communication difficulties with patients and families than with the healthcare team. When nurses experience communication difficulties with the healthcare team, they also tend to experience communication difficulties with patients and families and when providing explanations to families. Nurses experienced greater communication difficulties when they are younger, are non-graduates, have less years of experience, adopted a religion or did not receive training in EOL care. Trial registration Clinical Trials.gov Identifier: 2019/00680 (Domain Specific Review Board)</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Age</subject><subject>Analysis</subject><subject>Cancer</subject><subject>Communication</subject><subject>Cross-Sectional Studies</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine &amp; Public Health</subject><subject>Neoplasms - therapy</subject><subject>Nurse patient relationships</subject><subject>Nurses</subject><subject>Nursing</subject><subject>Nursing care</subject><subject>Nursing Research</subject><subject>Oncology</subject><subject>Original Article</subject><subject>Pain Medicine</subject><subject>Palliative care</subject><subject>Palliative treatment</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Questionnaires</subject><subject>Recruiting</subject><subject>Rehabilitation Medicine</subject><subject>Religion</subject><subject>Sociodemographics</subject><subject>Terminal Care - methods</subject><subject>Verbal communication</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>0941-4355</issn><issn>1433-7339</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ALSLI</sourceid><sourceid>HEHIP</sourceid><sourceid>M2R</sourceid><sourceid>M2S</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kc9qFTEUxoMo9lp9ARcScNNNav5O7rgrxX9Q6qauQ27m5DZlJqlJRrk7X6Ov55OY8VZLRUo4BJLf9-XkfAi9ZPSYUarfFEoVp4QupfRaE_YIrZgUgmgh-sdoRXvJiBRKHaBnpVxRyrRW_Ck6ELzvNVt3KzSfz7lA-fnjBrs0TXMMztaQIh6C98HNYw1Q8PdLiPg6p29hCHGLIQ4keTIGD9jZDDhEXC8Bp-jSmLY7XKDWBr7FFrucSiEF3OJqR1zqPOyeoyfejgVe3O6H6Mv7dxenH8nZ5w-fTk_OiJOSVzIocA6E3CilnLIOOFtT3SnvvLYD67VmmnKgay887QXXtuOqs0q38WycAnGIjva-rfevM5RqplAcjKONkOZiuJRaSa473tDX_6BXac6t40YpKtpjrNN31NaOYEL0qWbrFlNz0qmOMc2YaNTxf6i2BpiCSxF8aOf3BHwv-D2tDN5c5zDZvDOMmiVrs8_a0KWWrA1role3Hc-bCYa_kj_hNkDsgdKu4hby3ZcesP0F2L-0ZQ</recordid><startdate>20210501</startdate><enddate>20210501</enddate><creator>Toh, Shao Wei</creator><creator>Hollen, Valerie Tantiana</creator><creator>Ang, Elaine</creator><creator>Lee, Yee Mei</creator><creator>Devi, M. Kamala</creator><general>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</general><general>Springer</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88J</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HEHIP</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2R</scope><scope>M2S</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0225-6494</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20210501</creationdate><title>Nurses’ communication difficulties when providing end-of-life care in the oncology setting: a cross-sectional study</title><author>Toh, Shao Wei ; Hollen, Valerie Tantiana ; Ang, Elaine ; Lee, Yee Mei ; Devi, M. Kamala</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c442t-d5ecce34b555c5ace2180765fcf7ad19771702e08f3f09327a6256a57100bc5e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Age</topic><topic>Analysis</topic><topic>Cancer</topic><topic>Communication</topic><topic>Cross-Sectional Studies</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine &amp; Public Health</topic><topic>Neoplasms - therapy</topic><topic>Nurse patient relationships</topic><topic>Nurses</topic><topic>Nursing</topic><topic>Nursing care</topic><topic>Nursing Research</topic><topic>Oncology</topic><topic>Original Article</topic><topic>Pain Medicine</topic><topic>Palliative care</topic><topic>Palliative treatment</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Questionnaires</topic><topic>Recruiting</topic><topic>Rehabilitation Medicine</topic><topic>Religion</topic><topic>Sociodemographics</topic><topic>Terminal Care - methods</topic><topic>Verbal communication</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Toh, Shao Wei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hollen, Valerie Tantiana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ang, Elaine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, Yee Mei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Devi, M. Kamala</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Social Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Sociology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>PML(ProQuest Medical Library)</collection><collection>Social Science Database</collection><collection>Sociology Database</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Supportive care in cancer</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Toh, Shao Wei</au><au>Hollen, Valerie Tantiana</au><au>Ang, Elaine</au><au>Lee, Yee Mei</au><au>Devi, M. Kamala</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Nurses’ communication difficulties when providing end-of-life care in the oncology setting: a cross-sectional study</atitle><jtitle>Supportive care in cancer</jtitle><stitle>Support Care Cancer</stitle><addtitle>Support Care Cancer</addtitle><date>2021-05-01</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>29</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>2787</spage><epage>2794</epage><pages>2787-2794</pages><issn>0941-4355</issn><eissn>1433-7339</eissn><abstract>Purpose To (1) examine the communication difficulties nurses experience when providing end-of-life (EOL) care, (2) establish the correlation between communication difficulties across various stakeholders and (3) determine the impact sociodemographic factors has on the communication difficulties experienced. Methods 124/178 (69.7%) nurses from oncology wards of a tertiary hospital were recruited. Sociodemographic survey and three validated subscales: Communication with Patient and Family (CPF), Explanation to Family (EF) and Reassessment of Current Treatment and Nursing Care (RCTNC) were used to collect the data. Data were analysed with Independent Samples T test, One-Way Analysis of Variance and Pearson’s correlation coefficient. Results Mean score was highest for CPF (8.75 ± 2.24) and lowest for RCTNC (6.32 ± 2.26). Positive correlations were found between CPF with EF ( r = 0.613, p &lt; 0.001), CPF with RCTNC ( r = 0.243, p = 0.007) and EF with RCTNC ( r = 0.370, p &lt; 0.001). Age ( p = 0.048), years of experience ( p = 0.001), religion ( p = 0.034) and EOL care training received ( p = 0.040) were significant factors for CPF subscale while age ( p = 0.011), years of experience ( p = 0.001), educational qualification ( p = 0.003) and EOL care training received ( p = 0.026) were the significant factors for EF subscale. Conclusion Nurses experienced more communication difficulties with patients and families than with the healthcare team. When nurses experience communication difficulties with the healthcare team, they also tend to experience communication difficulties with patients and families and when providing explanations to families. Nurses experienced greater communication difficulties when they are younger, are non-graduates, have less years of experience, adopted a religion or did not receive training in EOL care. Trial registration Clinical Trials.gov Identifier: 2019/00680 (Domain Specific Review Board)</abstract><cop>Berlin/Heidelberg</cop><pub>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</pub><pmid>32997186</pmid><doi>10.1007/s00520-020-05787-1</doi><tpages>8</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0225-6494</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0941-4355
ispartof Supportive care in cancer, 2021-05, Vol.29 (5), p.2787-2794
issn 0941-4355
1433-7339
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2447542762
source Social Science Premium Collection; Sociology Collection; Springer Link
subjects Adult
Age
Analysis
Cancer
Communication
Cross-Sectional Studies
Female
Humans
Male
Medicine
Medicine & Public Health
Neoplasms - therapy
Nurse patient relationships
Nurses
Nursing
Nursing care
Nursing Research
Oncology
Original Article
Pain Medicine
Palliative care
Palliative treatment
Patients
Questionnaires
Recruiting
Rehabilitation Medicine
Religion
Sociodemographics
Terminal Care - methods
Verbal communication
Young Adult
title Nurses’ communication difficulties when providing end-of-life care in the oncology setting: a cross-sectional study
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-04T17%3A31%3A41IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Nurses%E2%80%99%20communication%20difficulties%20when%20providing%20end-of-life%20care%20in%20the%20oncology%20setting:%20a%20cross-sectional%20study&rft.jtitle=Supportive%20care%20in%20cancer&rft.au=Toh,%20Shao%20Wei&rft.date=2021-05-01&rft.volume=29&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=2787&rft.epage=2794&rft.pages=2787-2794&rft.issn=0941-4355&rft.eissn=1433-7339&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s00520-020-05787-1&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA656117113%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c442t-d5ecce34b555c5ace2180765fcf7ad19771702e08f3f09327a6256a57100bc5e3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2503197167&rft_id=info:pmid/32997186&rft_galeid=A656117113&rfr_iscdi=true