Loading…
Nurses’ communication difficulties when providing end-of-life care in the oncology setting: a cross-sectional study
Purpose To (1) examine the communication difficulties nurses experience when providing end-of-life (EOL) care, (2) establish the correlation between communication difficulties across various stakeholders and (3) determine the impact sociodemographic factors has on the communication difficulties expe...
Saved in:
Published in: | Supportive care in cancer 2021-05, Vol.29 (5), p.2787-2794 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c442t-d5ecce34b555c5ace2180765fcf7ad19771702e08f3f09327a6256a57100bc5e3 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c442t-d5ecce34b555c5ace2180765fcf7ad19771702e08f3f09327a6256a57100bc5e3 |
container_end_page | 2794 |
container_issue | 5 |
container_start_page | 2787 |
container_title | Supportive care in cancer |
container_volume | 29 |
creator | Toh, Shao Wei Hollen, Valerie Tantiana Ang, Elaine Lee, Yee Mei Devi, M. Kamala |
description | Purpose
To (1) examine the communication difficulties nurses experience when providing end-of-life (EOL) care, (2) establish the correlation between communication difficulties across various stakeholders and (3) determine the impact sociodemographic factors has on the communication difficulties experienced.
Methods
124/178 (69.7%) nurses from oncology wards of a tertiary hospital were recruited. Sociodemographic survey and three validated subscales: Communication with Patient and Family (CPF), Explanation to Family (EF) and Reassessment of Current Treatment and Nursing Care (RCTNC) were used to collect the data. Data were analysed with Independent Samples
T
test, One-Way Analysis of Variance and Pearson’s correlation coefficient.
Results
Mean score was highest for CPF (8.75 ± 2.24) and lowest for RCTNC (6.32 ± 2.26). Positive correlations were found between CPF with EF (
r
= 0.613,
p
< 0.001), CPF with RCTNC (
r
= 0.243,
p
= 0.007) and EF with RCTNC (
r
= 0.370,
p
< 0.001). Age (
p
= 0.048), years of experience (
p
= 0.001), religion (
p
= 0.034) and EOL care training received (
p
= 0.040) were significant factors for CPF subscale while age (
p
= 0.011), years of experience (
p
= 0.001), educational qualification (
p
= 0.003) and EOL care training received (
p
= 0.026) were the significant factors for EF subscale.
Conclusion
Nurses experienced more communication difficulties with patients and families than with the healthcare team. When nurses experience communication difficulties with the healthcare team, they also tend to experience communication difficulties with patients and families and when providing explanations to families. Nurses experienced greater communication difficulties when they are younger, are non-graduates, have less years of experience, adopted a religion or did not receive training in EOL care.
Trial registration
Clinical
Trials.gov
Identifier: 2019/00680 (Domain Specific Review Board) |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s00520-020-05787-1 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2447542762</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A656117113</galeid><sourcerecordid>A656117113</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c442t-d5ecce34b555c5ace2180765fcf7ad19771702e08f3f09327a6256a57100bc5e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kc9qFTEUxoMo9lp9ARcScNNNav5O7rgrxX9Q6qauQ27m5DZlJqlJRrk7X6Ov55OY8VZLRUo4BJLf9-XkfAi9ZPSYUarfFEoVp4QupfRaE_YIrZgUgmgh-sdoRXvJiBRKHaBnpVxRyrRW_Ck6ELzvNVt3KzSfz7lA-fnjBrs0TXMMztaQIh6C98HNYw1Q8PdLiPg6p29hCHGLIQ4keTIGD9jZDDhEXC8Bp-jSmLY7XKDWBr7FFrucSiEF3OJqR1zqPOyeoyfejgVe3O6H6Mv7dxenH8nZ5w-fTk_OiJOSVzIocA6E3CilnLIOOFtT3SnvvLYD67VmmnKgay887QXXtuOqs0q38WycAnGIjva-rfevM5RqplAcjKONkOZiuJRaSa473tDX_6BXac6t40YpKtpjrNN31NaOYEL0qWbrFlNz0qmOMc2YaNTxf6i2BpiCSxF8aOf3BHwv-D2tDN5c5zDZvDOMmiVrs8_a0KWWrA1role3Hc-bCYa_kj_hNkDsgdKu4hby3ZcesP0F2L-0ZQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2503197167</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Nurses’ communication difficulties when providing end-of-life care in the oncology setting: a cross-sectional study</title><source>Social Science Premium Collection</source><source>Sociology Collection</source><source>Springer Link</source><creator>Toh, Shao Wei ; Hollen, Valerie Tantiana ; Ang, Elaine ; Lee, Yee Mei ; Devi, M. Kamala</creator><creatorcontrib>Toh, Shao Wei ; Hollen, Valerie Tantiana ; Ang, Elaine ; Lee, Yee Mei ; Devi, M. Kamala</creatorcontrib><description>Purpose
To (1) examine the communication difficulties nurses experience when providing end-of-life (EOL) care, (2) establish the correlation between communication difficulties across various stakeholders and (3) determine the impact sociodemographic factors has on the communication difficulties experienced.
Methods
124/178 (69.7%) nurses from oncology wards of a tertiary hospital were recruited. Sociodemographic survey and three validated subscales: Communication with Patient and Family (CPF), Explanation to Family (EF) and Reassessment of Current Treatment and Nursing Care (RCTNC) were used to collect the data. Data were analysed with Independent Samples
T
test, One-Way Analysis of Variance and Pearson’s correlation coefficient.
Results
Mean score was highest for CPF (8.75 ± 2.24) and lowest for RCTNC (6.32 ± 2.26). Positive correlations were found between CPF with EF (
r
= 0.613,
p
< 0.001), CPF with RCTNC (
r
= 0.243,
p
= 0.007) and EF with RCTNC (
r
= 0.370,
p
< 0.001). Age (
p
= 0.048), years of experience (
p
= 0.001), religion (
p
= 0.034) and EOL care training received (
p
= 0.040) were significant factors for CPF subscale while age (
p
= 0.011), years of experience (
p
= 0.001), educational qualification (
p
= 0.003) and EOL care training received (
p
= 0.026) were the significant factors for EF subscale.
Conclusion
Nurses experienced more communication difficulties with patients and families than with the healthcare team. When nurses experience communication difficulties with the healthcare team, they also tend to experience communication difficulties with patients and families and when providing explanations to families. Nurses experienced greater communication difficulties when they are younger, are non-graduates, have less years of experience, adopted a religion or did not receive training in EOL care.
Trial registration
Clinical
Trials.gov
Identifier: 2019/00680 (Domain Specific Review Board)</description><identifier>ISSN: 0941-4355</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1433-7339</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s00520-020-05787-1</identifier><identifier>PMID: 32997186</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg</publisher><subject>Adult ; Age ; Analysis ; Cancer ; Communication ; Cross-Sectional Studies ; Female ; Humans ; Male ; Medicine ; Medicine & Public Health ; Neoplasms - therapy ; Nurse patient relationships ; Nurses ; Nursing ; Nursing care ; Nursing Research ; Oncology ; Original Article ; Pain Medicine ; Palliative care ; Palliative treatment ; Patients ; Questionnaires ; Recruiting ; Rehabilitation Medicine ; Religion ; Sociodemographics ; Terminal Care - methods ; Verbal communication ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>Supportive care in cancer, 2021-05, Vol.29 (5), p.2787-2794</ispartof><rights>Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2020</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2021 Springer</rights><rights>Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2020.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c442t-d5ecce34b555c5ace2180765fcf7ad19771702e08f3f09327a6256a57100bc5e3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c442t-d5ecce34b555c5ace2180765fcf7ad19771702e08f3f09327a6256a57100bc5e3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-0225-6494</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2503197167/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2503197167?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,21394,21395,27924,27925,33611,33612,34530,34531,43733,44115,74221,74639</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32997186$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Toh, Shao Wei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hollen, Valerie Tantiana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ang, Elaine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, Yee Mei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Devi, M. Kamala</creatorcontrib><title>Nurses’ communication difficulties when providing end-of-life care in the oncology setting: a cross-sectional study</title><title>Supportive care in cancer</title><addtitle>Support Care Cancer</addtitle><addtitle>Support Care Cancer</addtitle><description>Purpose
To (1) examine the communication difficulties nurses experience when providing end-of-life (EOL) care, (2) establish the correlation between communication difficulties across various stakeholders and (3) determine the impact sociodemographic factors has on the communication difficulties experienced.
Methods
124/178 (69.7%) nurses from oncology wards of a tertiary hospital were recruited. Sociodemographic survey and three validated subscales: Communication with Patient and Family (CPF), Explanation to Family (EF) and Reassessment of Current Treatment and Nursing Care (RCTNC) were used to collect the data. Data were analysed with Independent Samples
T
test, One-Way Analysis of Variance and Pearson’s correlation coefficient.
Results
Mean score was highest for CPF (8.75 ± 2.24) and lowest for RCTNC (6.32 ± 2.26). Positive correlations were found between CPF with EF (
r
= 0.613,
p
< 0.001), CPF with RCTNC (
r
= 0.243,
p
= 0.007) and EF with RCTNC (
r
= 0.370,
p
< 0.001). Age (
p
= 0.048), years of experience (
p
= 0.001), religion (
p
= 0.034) and EOL care training received (
p
= 0.040) were significant factors for CPF subscale while age (
p
= 0.011), years of experience (
p
= 0.001), educational qualification (
p
= 0.003) and EOL care training received (
p
= 0.026) were the significant factors for EF subscale.
Conclusion
Nurses experienced more communication difficulties with patients and families than with the healthcare team. When nurses experience communication difficulties with the healthcare team, they also tend to experience communication difficulties with patients and families and when providing explanations to families. Nurses experienced greater communication difficulties when they are younger, are non-graduates, have less years of experience, adopted a religion or did not receive training in EOL care.
Trial registration
Clinical
Trials.gov
Identifier: 2019/00680 (Domain Specific Review Board)</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Age</subject><subject>Analysis</subject><subject>Cancer</subject><subject>Communication</subject><subject>Cross-Sectional Studies</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine & Public Health</subject><subject>Neoplasms - therapy</subject><subject>Nurse patient relationships</subject><subject>Nurses</subject><subject>Nursing</subject><subject>Nursing care</subject><subject>Nursing Research</subject><subject>Oncology</subject><subject>Original Article</subject><subject>Pain Medicine</subject><subject>Palliative care</subject><subject>Palliative treatment</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Questionnaires</subject><subject>Recruiting</subject><subject>Rehabilitation Medicine</subject><subject>Religion</subject><subject>Sociodemographics</subject><subject>Terminal Care - methods</subject><subject>Verbal communication</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>0941-4355</issn><issn>1433-7339</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ALSLI</sourceid><sourceid>HEHIP</sourceid><sourceid>M2R</sourceid><sourceid>M2S</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kc9qFTEUxoMo9lp9ARcScNNNav5O7rgrxX9Q6qauQ27m5DZlJqlJRrk7X6Ov55OY8VZLRUo4BJLf9-XkfAi9ZPSYUarfFEoVp4QupfRaE_YIrZgUgmgh-sdoRXvJiBRKHaBnpVxRyrRW_Ck6ELzvNVt3KzSfz7lA-fnjBrs0TXMMztaQIh6C98HNYw1Q8PdLiPg6p29hCHGLIQ4keTIGD9jZDDhEXC8Bp-jSmLY7XKDWBr7FFrucSiEF3OJqR1zqPOyeoyfejgVe3O6H6Mv7dxenH8nZ5w-fTk_OiJOSVzIocA6E3CilnLIOOFtT3SnvvLYD67VmmnKgay887QXXtuOqs0q38WycAnGIjva-rfevM5RqplAcjKONkOZiuJRaSa473tDX_6BXac6t40YpKtpjrNN31NaOYEL0qWbrFlNz0qmOMc2YaNTxf6i2BpiCSxF8aOf3BHwv-D2tDN5c5zDZvDOMmiVrs8_a0KWWrA1role3Hc-bCYa_kj_hNkDsgdKu4hby3ZcesP0F2L-0ZQ</recordid><startdate>20210501</startdate><enddate>20210501</enddate><creator>Toh, Shao Wei</creator><creator>Hollen, Valerie Tantiana</creator><creator>Ang, Elaine</creator><creator>Lee, Yee Mei</creator><creator>Devi, M. Kamala</creator><general>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</general><general>Springer</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88J</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HEHIP</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2R</scope><scope>M2S</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0225-6494</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20210501</creationdate><title>Nurses’ communication difficulties when providing end-of-life care in the oncology setting: a cross-sectional study</title><author>Toh, Shao Wei ; Hollen, Valerie Tantiana ; Ang, Elaine ; Lee, Yee Mei ; Devi, M. Kamala</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c442t-d5ecce34b555c5ace2180765fcf7ad19771702e08f3f09327a6256a57100bc5e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Age</topic><topic>Analysis</topic><topic>Cancer</topic><topic>Communication</topic><topic>Cross-Sectional Studies</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine & Public Health</topic><topic>Neoplasms - therapy</topic><topic>Nurse patient relationships</topic><topic>Nurses</topic><topic>Nursing</topic><topic>Nursing care</topic><topic>Nursing Research</topic><topic>Oncology</topic><topic>Original Article</topic><topic>Pain Medicine</topic><topic>Palliative care</topic><topic>Palliative treatment</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Questionnaires</topic><topic>Recruiting</topic><topic>Rehabilitation Medicine</topic><topic>Religion</topic><topic>Sociodemographics</topic><topic>Terminal Care - methods</topic><topic>Verbal communication</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Toh, Shao Wei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hollen, Valerie Tantiana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ang, Elaine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, Yee Mei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Devi, M. Kamala</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Social Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Sociology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>PML(ProQuest Medical Library)</collection><collection>Social Science Database</collection><collection>Sociology Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Supportive care in cancer</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Toh, Shao Wei</au><au>Hollen, Valerie Tantiana</au><au>Ang, Elaine</au><au>Lee, Yee Mei</au><au>Devi, M. Kamala</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Nurses’ communication difficulties when providing end-of-life care in the oncology setting: a cross-sectional study</atitle><jtitle>Supportive care in cancer</jtitle><stitle>Support Care Cancer</stitle><addtitle>Support Care Cancer</addtitle><date>2021-05-01</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>29</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>2787</spage><epage>2794</epage><pages>2787-2794</pages><issn>0941-4355</issn><eissn>1433-7339</eissn><abstract>Purpose
To (1) examine the communication difficulties nurses experience when providing end-of-life (EOL) care, (2) establish the correlation between communication difficulties across various stakeholders and (3) determine the impact sociodemographic factors has on the communication difficulties experienced.
Methods
124/178 (69.7%) nurses from oncology wards of a tertiary hospital were recruited. Sociodemographic survey and three validated subscales: Communication with Patient and Family (CPF), Explanation to Family (EF) and Reassessment of Current Treatment and Nursing Care (RCTNC) were used to collect the data. Data were analysed with Independent Samples
T
test, One-Way Analysis of Variance and Pearson’s correlation coefficient.
Results
Mean score was highest for CPF (8.75 ± 2.24) and lowest for RCTNC (6.32 ± 2.26). Positive correlations were found between CPF with EF (
r
= 0.613,
p
< 0.001), CPF with RCTNC (
r
= 0.243,
p
= 0.007) and EF with RCTNC (
r
= 0.370,
p
< 0.001). Age (
p
= 0.048), years of experience (
p
= 0.001), religion (
p
= 0.034) and EOL care training received (
p
= 0.040) were significant factors for CPF subscale while age (
p
= 0.011), years of experience (
p
= 0.001), educational qualification (
p
= 0.003) and EOL care training received (
p
= 0.026) were the significant factors for EF subscale.
Conclusion
Nurses experienced more communication difficulties with patients and families than with the healthcare team. When nurses experience communication difficulties with the healthcare team, they also tend to experience communication difficulties with patients and families and when providing explanations to families. Nurses experienced greater communication difficulties when they are younger, are non-graduates, have less years of experience, adopted a religion or did not receive training in EOL care.
Trial registration
Clinical
Trials.gov
Identifier: 2019/00680 (Domain Specific Review Board)</abstract><cop>Berlin/Heidelberg</cop><pub>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</pub><pmid>32997186</pmid><doi>10.1007/s00520-020-05787-1</doi><tpages>8</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0225-6494</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0941-4355 |
ispartof | Supportive care in cancer, 2021-05, Vol.29 (5), p.2787-2794 |
issn | 0941-4355 1433-7339 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2447542762 |
source | Social Science Premium Collection; Sociology Collection; Springer Link |
subjects | Adult Age Analysis Cancer Communication Cross-Sectional Studies Female Humans Male Medicine Medicine & Public Health Neoplasms - therapy Nurse patient relationships Nurses Nursing Nursing care Nursing Research Oncology Original Article Pain Medicine Palliative care Palliative treatment Patients Questionnaires Recruiting Rehabilitation Medicine Religion Sociodemographics Terminal Care - methods Verbal communication Young Adult |
title | Nurses’ communication difficulties when providing end-of-life care in the oncology setting: a cross-sectional study |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-04T17%3A31%3A41IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Nurses%E2%80%99%20communication%20difficulties%20when%20providing%20end-of-life%20care%20in%20the%20oncology%20setting:%20a%20cross-sectional%20study&rft.jtitle=Supportive%20care%20in%20cancer&rft.au=Toh,%20Shao%20Wei&rft.date=2021-05-01&rft.volume=29&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=2787&rft.epage=2794&rft.pages=2787-2794&rft.issn=0941-4355&rft.eissn=1433-7339&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s00520-020-05787-1&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA656117113%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c442t-d5ecce34b555c5ace2180765fcf7ad19771702e08f3f09327a6256a57100bc5e3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2503197167&rft_id=info:pmid/32997186&rft_galeid=A656117113&rfr_iscdi=true |