Loading…
Genotypic diversity in multi-drug-resistant E. coli isolated from animal feces and Yamuna River water, India, using rep-PCR fingerprinting
Genotypic diversity among multi-drug-resistant (MDR) aquatic E. coli isolated from different sites of Yamuna River was analyzed using repetitive element PCR (rep-PCR) methods viz. ERIC-PCR and (GTG) 5 -PCR and compared with the MDR animal fecal isolates. The 97 E. coli isolates belonging to differen...
Saved in:
Published in: | Environmental monitoring and assessment 2020-11, Vol.192 (11), p.681-681, Article 681 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2671-36b5efc37e33294b9050cf2917b4bcf37fc8d975980f5afe9b85c3126190eb3e3 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2671-36b5efc37e33294b9050cf2917b4bcf37fc8d975980f5afe9b85c3126190eb3e3 |
container_end_page | 681 |
container_issue | 11 |
container_start_page | 681 |
container_title | Environmental monitoring and assessment |
container_volume | 192 |
creator | Khare, Neha Kaushik, Megha Martin, Juan Pedro Mohanty, Aparajita Gulati, Pooja |
description | Genotypic diversity among multi-drug-resistant (MDR) aquatic
E. coli
isolated from different sites of Yamuna River was analyzed using repetitive element PCR (rep-PCR) methods viz. ERIC-PCR and (GTG)
5
-PCR and compared with the MDR animal fecal isolates. The 97
E. coli
isolates belonging to different serotypes, phylogroups, and multi-drug resistance patterns were analyzed. High genetic diversity was observed by both the methods; however, (GTG)
5
typing showed higher discriminating potential. Combination of ERIC types (E1–E32) and (GTG)
5
types (G1–G46) generated 77 genotypes. The frequency of genotypes ranged from 0.013 to 0.065. The genotype composition of
E. coli
isolates was highly diverse at all the sampling sites across Yamuna River except at its entry site in Delhi. The sampling sites under the influence of high anthropogenic activities showed an increase in number of unique genotype isolates. These sites also exhibited high multiple antibiotic resistance (MAR) indexes (above 0.25) suggesting high risk of contamination. Principal coordinate analysis (PCoA) showed limited clustering of genotypes based on the sampling sites. The most frequent genotypes were grouped in the positive zone of both the principal coordinates (PC1 and PC2). The genotypes of most of the animal fecal isolates were unique and occupied a common space in the negative PC1 area forming a separate cluster. High genotypic diversity among the aquatic
E. coli
and the drain isolates, discharging the untreated municipal waste in the river, was observed, suggesting that the sewage effluents contribute substantially to contamination of this river system than animal feces. The presence of such a high diversity among the MDR
E. coli
isolates in the natural river systems is of great public health significance and highlights the need of an efficient surveillance system for better management of Indian natural water bodies. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s10661-020-08635-1 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2449180413</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2473353413</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2671-36b5efc37e33294b9050cf2917b4bcf37fc8d975980f5afe9b85c3126190eb3e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kUFrFTEQx4Mo-Kx-AU8BLx6aOtlsks1RHm0tFJSiB08hm52UlN3sM9m1vK_gpzbPFQoePM0M_P5_ZuZPyFsOFxxAfygclOIMGmDQKSEZf0Z2XGrBGiPNc7IDrjRTQpmX5FUpDwBgdGt25Nc1pnk5HqKnQ_yJucTlSGOi0zoukQ15vWcZSyyLSwu9vKB-HiONZR7dggMNeZ6oS3FyIw3osdRhoN_dtCZH705-9LGC-ZzepCG6c7qWmO5pxgP7sr-joQ6YDzmmpXavyYvgxoJv_tYz8u3q8uv-E7v9fH2z_3jLfKM0Z0L1EoMXGoVoTNsbkOBDY7ju294HoYPvBqOl6SBIF9D0nfSCN4obwF6gOCPvN99Dnn-sWBY7xeJxHF3CeS22aVvDO2i5qOi7f9CHec2pblcpLYQUG9VslM9zKRmDrSdNLh8tB3uKx27x2BqP_ROP5VUkNlE53V_f8GT9H9VvlDyTWw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2473353413</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Genotypic diversity in multi-drug-resistant E. coli isolated from animal feces and Yamuna River water, India, using rep-PCR fingerprinting</title><source>ABI/INFORM Global</source><source>Springer Nature:Jisc Collections:Springer Nature Read and Publish 2023-2025: Springer Reading List</source><creator>Khare, Neha ; Kaushik, Megha ; Martin, Juan Pedro ; Mohanty, Aparajita ; Gulati, Pooja</creator><creatorcontrib>Khare, Neha ; Kaushik, Megha ; Martin, Juan Pedro ; Mohanty, Aparajita ; Gulati, Pooja</creatorcontrib><description>Genotypic diversity among multi-drug-resistant (MDR) aquatic
E. coli
isolated from different sites of Yamuna River was analyzed using repetitive element PCR (rep-PCR) methods viz. ERIC-PCR and (GTG)
5
-PCR and compared with the MDR animal fecal isolates. The 97
E. coli
isolates belonging to different serotypes, phylogroups, and multi-drug resistance patterns were analyzed. High genetic diversity was observed by both the methods; however, (GTG)
5
typing showed higher discriminating potential. Combination of ERIC types (E1–E32) and (GTG)
5
types (G1–G46) generated 77 genotypes. The frequency of genotypes ranged from 0.013 to 0.065. The genotype composition of
E. coli
isolates was highly diverse at all the sampling sites across Yamuna River except at its entry site in Delhi. The sampling sites under the influence of high anthropogenic activities showed an increase in number of unique genotype isolates. These sites also exhibited high multiple antibiotic resistance (MAR) indexes (above 0.25) suggesting high risk of contamination. Principal coordinate analysis (PCoA) showed limited clustering of genotypes based on the sampling sites. The most frequent genotypes were grouped in the positive zone of both the principal coordinates (PC1 and PC2). The genotypes of most of the animal fecal isolates were unique and occupied a common space in the negative PC1 area forming a separate cluster. High genotypic diversity among the aquatic
E. coli
and the drain isolates, discharging the untreated municipal waste in the river, was observed, suggesting that the sewage effluents contribute substantially to contamination of this river system than animal feces. The presence of such a high diversity among the MDR
E. coli
isolates in the natural river systems is of great public health significance and highlights the need of an efficient surveillance system for better management of Indian natural water bodies.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0167-6369</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-2959</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10661-020-08635-1</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cham: Springer International Publishing</publisher><subject>Anthropogenic factors ; Antibiotic resistance ; Antibiotics ; Atmospheric Protection/Air Quality Control/Air Pollution ; Clustering ; Contamination ; Disease resistance ; DNA ; Drug resistance ; Drugs ; E coli ; Earth and Environmental Science ; Ecology ; Ecotoxicology ; Effluents ; Environment ; Environmental Management ; Environmental monitoring ; Environmental science ; Faeces ; Feces ; Fingerprinting ; Genetic diversity ; Genetic variation ; Genotypes ; Human influences ; Methods ; Monitoring/Environmental Analysis ; Multidrug resistance ; Municipal wastes ; Nucleotide sequence ; PCR ; Public health ; River systems ; River water ; Rivers ; Sampling ; Serotypes ; Sewage ; Sewage effluents ; Sewerage</subject><ispartof>Environmental monitoring and assessment, 2020-11, Vol.192 (11), p.681-681, Article 681</ispartof><rights>Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020</rights><rights>Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2671-36b5efc37e33294b9050cf2917b4bcf37fc8d975980f5afe9b85c3126190eb3e3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2671-36b5efc37e33294b9050cf2917b4bcf37fc8d975980f5afe9b85c3126190eb3e3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-3442-5125</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2473353413/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2473353413?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,11688,27924,27925,36060,36061,44363,74895</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Khare, Neha</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kaushik, Megha</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Martin, Juan Pedro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mohanty, Aparajita</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gulati, Pooja</creatorcontrib><title>Genotypic diversity in multi-drug-resistant E. coli isolated from animal feces and Yamuna River water, India, using rep-PCR fingerprinting</title><title>Environmental monitoring and assessment</title><addtitle>Environ Monit Assess</addtitle><description>Genotypic diversity among multi-drug-resistant (MDR) aquatic
E. coli
isolated from different sites of Yamuna River was analyzed using repetitive element PCR (rep-PCR) methods viz. ERIC-PCR and (GTG)
5
-PCR and compared with the MDR animal fecal isolates. The 97
E. coli
isolates belonging to different serotypes, phylogroups, and multi-drug resistance patterns were analyzed. High genetic diversity was observed by both the methods; however, (GTG)
5
typing showed higher discriminating potential. Combination of ERIC types (E1–E32) and (GTG)
5
types (G1–G46) generated 77 genotypes. The frequency of genotypes ranged from 0.013 to 0.065. The genotype composition of
E. coli
isolates was highly diverse at all the sampling sites across Yamuna River except at its entry site in Delhi. The sampling sites under the influence of high anthropogenic activities showed an increase in number of unique genotype isolates. These sites also exhibited high multiple antibiotic resistance (MAR) indexes (above 0.25) suggesting high risk of contamination. Principal coordinate analysis (PCoA) showed limited clustering of genotypes based on the sampling sites. The most frequent genotypes were grouped in the positive zone of both the principal coordinates (PC1 and PC2). The genotypes of most of the animal fecal isolates were unique and occupied a common space in the negative PC1 area forming a separate cluster. High genotypic diversity among the aquatic
E. coli
and the drain isolates, discharging the untreated municipal waste in the river, was observed, suggesting that the sewage effluents contribute substantially to contamination of this river system than animal feces. The presence of such a high diversity among the MDR
E. coli
isolates in the natural river systems is of great public health significance and highlights the need of an efficient surveillance system for better management of Indian natural water bodies.</description><subject>Anthropogenic factors</subject><subject>Antibiotic resistance</subject><subject>Antibiotics</subject><subject>Atmospheric Protection/Air Quality Control/Air Pollution</subject><subject>Clustering</subject><subject>Contamination</subject><subject>Disease resistance</subject><subject>DNA</subject><subject>Drug resistance</subject><subject>Drugs</subject><subject>E coli</subject><subject>Earth and Environmental Science</subject><subject>Ecology</subject><subject>Ecotoxicology</subject><subject>Effluents</subject><subject>Environment</subject><subject>Environmental Management</subject><subject>Environmental monitoring</subject><subject>Environmental science</subject><subject>Faeces</subject><subject>Feces</subject><subject>Fingerprinting</subject><subject>Genetic diversity</subject><subject>Genetic variation</subject><subject>Genotypes</subject><subject>Human influences</subject><subject>Methods</subject><subject>Monitoring/Environmental Analysis</subject><subject>Multidrug resistance</subject><subject>Municipal wastes</subject><subject>Nucleotide sequence</subject><subject>PCR</subject><subject>Public health</subject><subject>River systems</subject><subject>River water</subject><subject>Rivers</subject><subject>Sampling</subject><subject>Serotypes</subject><subject>Sewage</subject><subject>Sewage effluents</subject><subject>Sewerage</subject><issn>0167-6369</issn><issn>1573-2959</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>M0C</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kUFrFTEQx4Mo-Kx-AU8BLx6aOtlsks1RHm0tFJSiB08hm52UlN3sM9m1vK_gpzbPFQoePM0M_P5_ZuZPyFsOFxxAfygclOIMGmDQKSEZf0Z2XGrBGiPNc7IDrjRTQpmX5FUpDwBgdGt25Nc1pnk5HqKnQ_yJucTlSGOi0zoukQ15vWcZSyyLSwu9vKB-HiONZR7dggMNeZ6oS3FyIw3osdRhoN_dtCZH705-9LGC-ZzepCG6c7qWmO5pxgP7sr-joQ6YDzmmpXavyYvgxoJv_tYz8u3q8uv-E7v9fH2z_3jLfKM0Z0L1EoMXGoVoTNsbkOBDY7ju294HoYPvBqOl6SBIF9D0nfSCN4obwF6gOCPvN99Dnn-sWBY7xeJxHF3CeS22aVvDO2i5qOi7f9CHec2pblcpLYQUG9VslM9zKRmDrSdNLh8tB3uKx27x2BqP_ROP5VUkNlE53V_f8GT9H9VvlDyTWw</recordid><startdate>20201101</startdate><enddate>20201101</enddate><creator>Khare, Neha</creator><creator>Kaushik, Megha</creator><creator>Martin, Juan Pedro</creator><creator>Mohanty, Aparajita</creator><creator>Gulati, Pooja</creator><general>Springer International Publishing</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QH</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7TN</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H97</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3442-5125</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20201101</creationdate><title>Genotypic diversity in multi-drug-resistant E. coli isolated from animal feces and Yamuna River water, India, using rep-PCR fingerprinting</title><author>Khare, Neha ; Kaushik, Megha ; Martin, Juan Pedro ; Mohanty, Aparajita ; Gulati, Pooja</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2671-36b5efc37e33294b9050cf2917b4bcf37fc8d975980f5afe9b85c3126190eb3e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Anthropogenic factors</topic><topic>Antibiotic resistance</topic><topic>Antibiotics</topic><topic>Atmospheric Protection/Air Quality Control/Air Pollution</topic><topic>Clustering</topic><topic>Contamination</topic><topic>Disease resistance</topic><topic>DNA</topic><topic>Drug resistance</topic><topic>Drugs</topic><topic>E coli</topic><topic>Earth and Environmental Science</topic><topic>Ecology</topic><topic>Ecotoxicology</topic><topic>Effluents</topic><topic>Environment</topic><topic>Environmental Management</topic><topic>Environmental monitoring</topic><topic>Environmental science</topic><topic>Faeces</topic><topic>Feces</topic><topic>Fingerprinting</topic><topic>Genetic diversity</topic><topic>Genetic variation</topic><topic>Genotypes</topic><topic>Human influences</topic><topic>Methods</topic><topic>Monitoring/Environmental Analysis</topic><topic>Multidrug resistance</topic><topic>Municipal wastes</topic><topic>Nucleotide sequence</topic><topic>PCR</topic><topic>Public health</topic><topic>River systems</topic><topic>River water</topic><topic>Rivers</topic><topic>Sampling</topic><topic>Serotypes</topic><topic>Sewage</topic><topic>Sewage effluents</topic><topic>Sewerage</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Khare, Neha</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kaushik, Megha</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Martin, Juan Pedro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mohanty, Aparajita</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gulati, Pooja</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Aqualine</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Oceanic Abstracts</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>Access via ABI/INFORM (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 3: Aquatic Pollution & Environmental Quality</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>One Business (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Environmental monitoring and assessment</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Khare, Neha</au><au>Kaushik, Megha</au><au>Martin, Juan Pedro</au><au>Mohanty, Aparajita</au><au>Gulati, Pooja</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Genotypic diversity in multi-drug-resistant E. coli isolated from animal feces and Yamuna River water, India, using rep-PCR fingerprinting</atitle><jtitle>Environmental monitoring and assessment</jtitle><stitle>Environ Monit Assess</stitle><date>2020-11-01</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>192</volume><issue>11</issue><spage>681</spage><epage>681</epage><pages>681-681</pages><artnum>681</artnum><issn>0167-6369</issn><eissn>1573-2959</eissn><abstract>Genotypic diversity among multi-drug-resistant (MDR) aquatic
E. coli
isolated from different sites of Yamuna River was analyzed using repetitive element PCR (rep-PCR) methods viz. ERIC-PCR and (GTG)
5
-PCR and compared with the MDR animal fecal isolates. The 97
E. coli
isolates belonging to different serotypes, phylogroups, and multi-drug resistance patterns were analyzed. High genetic diversity was observed by both the methods; however, (GTG)
5
typing showed higher discriminating potential. Combination of ERIC types (E1–E32) and (GTG)
5
types (G1–G46) generated 77 genotypes. The frequency of genotypes ranged from 0.013 to 0.065. The genotype composition of
E. coli
isolates was highly diverse at all the sampling sites across Yamuna River except at its entry site in Delhi. The sampling sites under the influence of high anthropogenic activities showed an increase in number of unique genotype isolates. These sites also exhibited high multiple antibiotic resistance (MAR) indexes (above 0.25) suggesting high risk of contamination. Principal coordinate analysis (PCoA) showed limited clustering of genotypes based on the sampling sites. The most frequent genotypes were grouped in the positive zone of both the principal coordinates (PC1 and PC2). The genotypes of most of the animal fecal isolates were unique and occupied a common space in the negative PC1 area forming a separate cluster. High genotypic diversity among the aquatic
E. coli
and the drain isolates, discharging the untreated municipal waste in the river, was observed, suggesting that the sewage effluents contribute substantially to contamination of this river system than animal feces. The presence of such a high diversity among the MDR
E. coli
isolates in the natural river systems is of great public health significance and highlights the need of an efficient surveillance system for better management of Indian natural water bodies.</abstract><cop>Cham</cop><pub>Springer International Publishing</pub><doi>10.1007/s10661-020-08635-1</doi><tpages>1</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3442-5125</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0167-6369 |
ispartof | Environmental monitoring and assessment, 2020-11, Vol.192 (11), p.681-681, Article 681 |
issn | 0167-6369 1573-2959 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2449180413 |
source | ABI/INFORM Global; Springer Nature:Jisc Collections:Springer Nature Read and Publish 2023-2025: Springer Reading List |
subjects | Anthropogenic factors Antibiotic resistance Antibiotics Atmospheric Protection/Air Quality Control/Air Pollution Clustering Contamination Disease resistance DNA Drug resistance Drugs E coli Earth and Environmental Science Ecology Ecotoxicology Effluents Environment Environmental Management Environmental monitoring Environmental science Faeces Feces Fingerprinting Genetic diversity Genetic variation Genotypes Human influences Methods Monitoring/Environmental Analysis Multidrug resistance Municipal wastes Nucleotide sequence PCR Public health River systems River water Rivers Sampling Serotypes Sewage Sewage effluents Sewerage |
title | Genotypic diversity in multi-drug-resistant E. coli isolated from animal feces and Yamuna River water, India, using rep-PCR fingerprinting |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-24T23%3A29%3A52IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Genotypic%20diversity%20in%20multi-drug-resistant%20E.%20coli%20isolated%20from%20animal%20feces%20and%20Yamuna%20River%20water,%20India,%20using%20rep-PCR%20fingerprinting&rft.jtitle=Environmental%20monitoring%20and%20assessment&rft.au=Khare,%20Neha&rft.date=2020-11-01&rft.volume=192&rft.issue=11&rft.spage=681&rft.epage=681&rft.pages=681-681&rft.artnum=681&rft.issn=0167-6369&rft.eissn=1573-2959&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10661-020-08635-1&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2473353413%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2671-36b5efc37e33294b9050cf2917b4bcf37fc8d975980f5afe9b85c3126190eb3e3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2473353413&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |