Biomechanical planning for minimally invasive indirect restorations

This paper explores the planning and execution of indirect partial-coverage restorations and will outline practical recommendations for maximising the outcomes for minimally invasive (MI) approaches to indirect restorations, with a special focus on vital teeth, endodontically-treated teeth and worn...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:British dental journal 2020-10, Vol.229 (7), p.425-429
Main Authors: Bomfim, Deborah I., Rahim, Noushad M., Austin, Rupert S.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Adhesives
Algorithms
Biomechanics
Clinical
Composite materials
Decision making
Dental implants
Dental prosthetics
Dental Restoration, Permanent
Dentistry
Dentists
Design
Humans
Patients
Planning
Prosthodontics
Teeth
Tooth, Nonvital
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:This paper explores the planning and execution of indirect partial-coverage restorations and will outline practical recommendations for maximising the outcomes for minimally invasive (MI) approaches to indirect restorations, with a special focus on vital teeth, endodontically-treated teeth and worn dentitions. Throughout the paper, the supporting evidence for each rationale for partial-coverage restorations will be considered, as well as the risks and benefits of adopting an MI approach to indirect restorations. Key points Partial coverage indirect restorations are less commonly prescribed by dental practitioners compared to full-coverage crowns. Improvements in material science and digital technologies are opening increased possibilities for aesthetic adhesive partial-coverage indirect restorations. This article highlights recent developments in the evidence base for these restorations as well as an algorithm supporting decision-making in fixed prosthodontics.
ISSN:0007-0610
1476-5373
DOI:10.1038/s41415-020-2170-x