Loading…

Estimating appendicular muscle mass in older adults with consideration on paralysis

Aim This study aimed to develop appendicular skeletal muscle mass (ASM) estimating formulas that also consider the presence of paralysis for older adults and people with disabilities. Methods This retrospective study analyzed 315 consecutive patients, post‐stroke, aged ≥65 years, in a rehabilitation...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Geriatrics & gerontology international 2020-12, Vol.20 (12), p.1145-1150
Main Authors: Ueshima, Junko, Maeda, Keisuke, Murotani, Kenta, Shimizu, Akio, Nagano, Ayano, Sato, Keisuke, Ishida, Yuria, Mori, Naoharu, Suenaga, Masaki
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Aim This study aimed to develop appendicular skeletal muscle mass (ASM) estimating formulas that also consider the presence of paralysis for older adults and people with disabilities. Methods This retrospective study analyzed 315 consecutive patients, post‐stroke, aged ≥65 years, in a rehabilitation hospital. Six different ASM estimating formulas were developed using a five‐fold cross‐validation method and compared with the measured ASM obtained from bioelectrical impedance analysis. These formulas included age, gender, height, weight, arm circumference, triceps skinfold, calf circumference and presence of paralysis. Using Pearson's correlation coefficients (r) and intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), we examined the correlation between the formulas and the measured ASM. The accuracy of the ASM estimating formula for detecting decreased muscle mass was evaluated using the F‐value and Matthew's correlation coefficient. Results Patients' mean ± SD age was 79.0 ± 8.1 years, and 51.4% of them were men. The mean ± SD bioelectrical impedance analysis‐measured ASM was 13.7 ± 4.3 kg. Furthermore, 241 (76.5%) patients had decreased measured ASM. The mean adjusted R2 of the developed six formulas was 0.861–0.871. In all formulas, the r and ICC of the estimated ASM for the measured ASM were strong (r = 0.936–0.930 and ICC = 0.928–0.934). These formulas revealed excellent sensitivity (86.0–88.2%), specificity (72.5–81.1%), accuracy (0.838–0.870), F‐value (0.899–0.918) and Matthew's correlation coefficient (0.509–0.612) for measured ASM depletion. Conclusions We successfully developed ASM estimating formulas using anthropometric measurements considering the presence of paralysis. Thus, these formulas are beneficial for diagnosing sarcopenia in older adults, without requiring any special equipment. Geriatr Gerontol Int 2020; 20: 1145–1150.
ISSN:1444-1586
1447-0594
DOI:10.1111/ggi.14056