Therapists’ perceptions of barriers and facilitators to uptake and engagement with therapy in long‐term conditions

• Published in: British journal of health psychology 2021-05, Vol.26 (2), p.307-324
• Main Authors: Carroll, Susan, Moss‐Morris, Rona, Hulme, Katrin, Hudson, Joanna
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Barriers; Chronic illnesses; cognitive behavioural therapy; Coherence; Collective action; Flexibility; Health services; Health status; Improving Access to Psychological Therapies; Interviews; long‐term conditions; online therapy; Perceptions; Professional attitudes; psychological therapy; qualitative; Therapist patient relationships; Therapists; Therapy; Uptake
• ISSN: 1359-107X; 2044-8287
• DOI: 10.1111/bjhp.12475

Objective Improving Access to Psychological Therapies (IAPT) services in England have established a long‐term condition (LTC) pathway in recent years, meaning that LTC therapies are now delivered via varied modes and by professionals with varied experiences. To gain insight into how this new pathway is functioning in practice, this study aimed to explore therapists’ perceptions of barriers and facilitators to uptake and engagement with therapy in LTCs. Design A qualitative design was employed using semi‐structured interviews. Methods Fifteen therapists were recruited from IAPT and physical health care settings. Interviews were first analysed using inductive thematic analysis. A deductive approach was then taken to map themes onto Normalisation Process Theory constructs (coherence, cognitive participation, collective action, reflective monitoring) to guide steps towards improving implementation. Results Four key themes highlighted patient, therapist, and service‐level factors related to uptake and engagement: Working flexibly with barriers within the National Health Service context; Acceptability of ‘embedded’ versus ‘separate’ psychological care; Confidence in working with people with LTCs; and Navigating implementation of online therapies. Therapists recognized the need for tailored LTC therapies, though opinions about online therapies varied. Therapists expressed commitment to flexibly adapting their practice to suit patient needs, but felt their flexibility was limited by system and service constraints. Conclusion Barriers to uptake and engagement need to be addressed to optimize LTC pathways. Findings demonstrated the importance of offering flexible, tailored therapy to people with LTCs, and equipping staff and services with adequate training and resources to improve functioning of LTC pathways in practice.