Loading…

Effects of maternal mental health on fetal visual preference for face-like compared to non-face like light stimulation

The question of whether humans react differentially to face-like versus non face-like light stimulation in the prenatal period has been much discussed, but to date has remained unresolved. In this feasibility study we have come closer to understanding fetal vision. In contrast to other studies exami...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Early human development 2020-12, Vol.151, p.105227-105227, Article 105227
Main Authors: Reissland, N., Wood, R., Einbeck, J., Lane, A.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:The question of whether humans react differentially to face-like versus non face-like light stimulation in the prenatal period has been much discussed, but to date has remained unresolved. In this feasibility study we have come closer to understanding fetal vision. In contrast to other studies examining fetal reactions to prenatal light stimulation, we controlled maternal factors known to affect fetal neurodevelopment; including maternal mental health and attachment. We found that, for fetuses at 33 weeks gestation, maternal mental health (anxiety and depression), and fetal growth factors (femur length) all had a significant effect on fetal reactivity to face-like compared to a non-face-like control light stimulus. This calls into question some previously published results. We discuss implications of these findings in terms of the development of fetal visual perception. •Maternal depression and anxiety affect fetal reactions to light stimulation.•Fetuses react differently to light projected in a striped configuration compared with face-like configurations.•Fetal growth factors affect fetal reactivity to face-like compared to non-face-like control light stimuli.
ISSN:0378-3782
1872-6232
DOI:10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105227