Loading…

Modeling UV response of rear-surface sensitized charge-coupled devices

Rear-surface illuminated charge-coupled devices (CCD’s) are typically insensitive to radiation whose depth of penetration is less than 1000 Å. This is due to the presence of immobile charges either in the rear-surface native oxide or at the native oxide/semiconductor interface. These fixed charges c...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Applied physics letters 1987-05, Vol.50 (18), p.1275-1277
Main Authors: PECKERAR, M. C, BOSIERS, J. T, MCCARTHY, D, SAKS, N. S, MICHELS, D. J
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c316t-99de688f3ca226bc17b6b8326b99d4ef16dc7980097a21da5755e601aac513b13
cites
container_end_page 1277
container_issue 18
container_start_page 1275
container_title Applied physics letters
container_volume 50
creator PECKERAR, M. C
BOSIERS, J. T
MCCARTHY, D
SAKS, N. S
MICHELS, D. J
description Rear-surface illuminated charge-coupled devices (CCD’s) are typically insensitive to radiation whose depth of penetration is less than 1000 Å. This is due to the presence of immobile charges either in the rear-surface native oxide or at the native oxide/semiconductor interface. These fixed charges channel signal charge away from the front-surface confinement minima. The result is a loss of detective quantum efficiency (DQE), which is defined as the number of signal charges actually collected divided by the number produced. The CCD can be sensitized to shallow-penetrating radiation through the use of ion implantation techniques. To model the sensitization process, four factors must be accounted for. They are: the extent of the rear-surface depletion created by the fixed charge, Debye length spreading of the mobile charge background in the semiconductor, the position of the implant maximum, and the gradient of the active implant charge before the implant maximum is reached. By judicious manipulation of these factors DQE’s as high as 20% (uncorrected for UV reflection loss) have been obtained at 1216 Å.
doi_str_mv 10.1063/1.97882
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_24524724</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>24517322</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c316t-99de688f3ca226bc17b6b8326b99d4ef16dc7980097a21da5755e601aac513b13</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkDFPwzAUhC0EEqUg_kIGBJOLnx3byYgqCkhFLJTVcpyXEpQmwa9Bgl9PoBUz093pPt1wjJ2DmIEw6hpmuc0yecAmIKzlCiA7ZBMhhOIm13DMTojexqilUhO2eOxKbOp2naxekojUdy1h0lWj95HTECsfMCFsqd7WX1gm4dXHNfLQDX0zxhI_6oB0yo4q3xCe7XXKVovb5_k9Xz7dPcxvljwoMFue5yWaLKtU8FKaIoAtTJGp0Y5NihWYMtg8EyK3XkLptdUajQDvgwZVgJqyy91uH7v3AWnrNjUFbBrfYjeQk6mWqZXpf0CwSsoRvNqBIXZEESvXx3rj46cD4X4OdeB-Dx3Ji_2kp-CbKvo21PSHWy3SXEj1DdcPc28</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>24517322</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Modeling UV response of rear-surface sensitized charge-coupled devices</title><source>AIP Digital Archive</source><creator>PECKERAR, M. C ; BOSIERS, J. T ; MCCARTHY, D ; SAKS, N. S ; MICHELS, D. J</creator><creatorcontrib>PECKERAR, M. C ; BOSIERS, J. T ; MCCARTHY, D ; SAKS, N. S ; MICHELS, D. J</creatorcontrib><description>Rear-surface illuminated charge-coupled devices (CCD’s) are typically insensitive to radiation whose depth of penetration is less than 1000 Å. This is due to the presence of immobile charges either in the rear-surface native oxide or at the native oxide/semiconductor interface. These fixed charges channel signal charge away from the front-surface confinement minima. The result is a loss of detective quantum efficiency (DQE), which is defined as the number of signal charges actually collected divided by the number produced. The CCD can be sensitized to shallow-penetrating radiation through the use of ion implantation techniques. To model the sensitization process, four factors must be accounted for. They are: the extent of the rear-surface depletion created by the fixed charge, Debye length spreading of the mobile charge background in the semiconductor, the position of the implant maximum, and the gradient of the active implant charge before the implant maximum is reached. By judicious manipulation of these factors DQE’s as high as 20% (uncorrected for UV reflection loss) have been obtained at 1216 Å.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0003-6951</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1077-3118</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1063/1.97882</identifier><identifier>CODEN: APPLAB</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Melville, NY: American Institute of Physics</publisher><subject>Applied sciences ; Charge transfer devices ; Electronics ; Exact sciences and technology ; Semiconductor electronics. Microelectronics. Optoelectronics. Solid state devices</subject><ispartof>Applied physics letters, 1987-05, Vol.50 (18), p.1275-1277</ispartof><rights>1988 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c316t-99de688f3ca226bc17b6b8326b99d4ef16dc7980097a21da5755e601aac513b13</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=7504902$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>PECKERAR, M. C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>BOSIERS, J. T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MCCARTHY, D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>SAKS, N. S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MICHELS, D. J</creatorcontrib><title>Modeling UV response of rear-surface sensitized charge-coupled devices</title><title>Applied physics letters</title><description>Rear-surface illuminated charge-coupled devices (CCD’s) are typically insensitive to radiation whose depth of penetration is less than 1000 Å. This is due to the presence of immobile charges either in the rear-surface native oxide or at the native oxide/semiconductor interface. These fixed charges channel signal charge away from the front-surface confinement minima. The result is a loss of detective quantum efficiency (DQE), which is defined as the number of signal charges actually collected divided by the number produced. The CCD can be sensitized to shallow-penetrating radiation through the use of ion implantation techniques. To model the sensitization process, four factors must be accounted for. They are: the extent of the rear-surface depletion created by the fixed charge, Debye length spreading of the mobile charge background in the semiconductor, the position of the implant maximum, and the gradient of the active implant charge before the implant maximum is reached. By judicious manipulation of these factors DQE’s as high as 20% (uncorrected for UV reflection loss) have been obtained at 1216 Å.</description><subject>Applied sciences</subject><subject>Charge transfer devices</subject><subject>Electronics</subject><subject>Exact sciences and technology</subject><subject>Semiconductor electronics. Microelectronics. Optoelectronics. Solid state devices</subject><issn>0003-6951</issn><issn>1077-3118</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1987</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNkDFPwzAUhC0EEqUg_kIGBJOLnx3byYgqCkhFLJTVcpyXEpQmwa9Bgl9PoBUz093pPt1wjJ2DmIEw6hpmuc0yecAmIKzlCiA7ZBMhhOIm13DMTojexqilUhO2eOxKbOp2naxekojUdy1h0lWj95HTECsfMCFsqd7WX1gm4dXHNfLQDX0zxhI_6oB0yo4q3xCe7XXKVovb5_k9Xz7dPcxvljwoMFue5yWaLKtU8FKaIoAtTJGp0Y5NihWYMtg8EyK3XkLptdUajQDvgwZVgJqyy91uH7v3AWnrNjUFbBrfYjeQk6mWqZXpf0CwSsoRvNqBIXZEESvXx3rj46cD4X4OdeB-Dx3Ji_2kp-CbKvo21PSHWy3SXEj1DdcPc28</recordid><startdate>19870504</startdate><enddate>19870504</enddate><creator>PECKERAR, M. C</creator><creator>BOSIERS, J. T</creator><creator>MCCARTHY, D</creator><creator>SAKS, N. S</creator><creator>MICHELS, D. J</creator><general>American Institute of Physics</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>7SP</scope><scope>7U5</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19870504</creationdate><title>Modeling UV response of rear-surface sensitized charge-coupled devices</title><author>PECKERAR, M. C ; BOSIERS, J. T ; MCCARTHY, D ; SAKS, N. S ; MICHELS, D. J</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c316t-99de688f3ca226bc17b6b8326b99d4ef16dc7980097a21da5755e601aac513b13</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1987</creationdate><topic>Applied sciences</topic><topic>Charge transfer devices</topic><topic>Electronics</topic><topic>Exact sciences and technology</topic><topic>Semiconductor electronics. Microelectronics. Optoelectronics. Solid state devices</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>PECKERAR, M. C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>BOSIERS, J. T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MCCARTHY, D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>SAKS, N. S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MICHELS, D. J</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Electronics &amp; Communications Abstracts</collection><collection>Solid State and Superconductivity Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Applied physics letters</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>PECKERAR, M. C</au><au>BOSIERS, J. T</au><au>MCCARTHY, D</au><au>SAKS, N. S</au><au>MICHELS, D. J</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Modeling UV response of rear-surface sensitized charge-coupled devices</atitle><jtitle>Applied physics letters</jtitle><date>1987-05-04</date><risdate>1987</risdate><volume>50</volume><issue>18</issue><spage>1275</spage><epage>1277</epage><pages>1275-1277</pages><issn>0003-6951</issn><eissn>1077-3118</eissn><coden>APPLAB</coden><abstract>Rear-surface illuminated charge-coupled devices (CCD’s) are typically insensitive to radiation whose depth of penetration is less than 1000 Å. This is due to the presence of immobile charges either in the rear-surface native oxide or at the native oxide/semiconductor interface. These fixed charges channel signal charge away from the front-surface confinement minima. The result is a loss of detective quantum efficiency (DQE), which is defined as the number of signal charges actually collected divided by the number produced. The CCD can be sensitized to shallow-penetrating radiation through the use of ion implantation techniques. To model the sensitization process, four factors must be accounted for. They are: the extent of the rear-surface depletion created by the fixed charge, Debye length spreading of the mobile charge background in the semiconductor, the position of the implant maximum, and the gradient of the active implant charge before the implant maximum is reached. By judicious manipulation of these factors DQE’s as high as 20% (uncorrected for UV reflection loss) have been obtained at 1216 Å.</abstract><cop>Melville, NY</cop><pub>American Institute of Physics</pub><doi>10.1063/1.97882</doi><tpages>3</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0003-6951
ispartof Applied physics letters, 1987-05, Vol.50 (18), p.1275-1277
issn 0003-6951
1077-3118
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_24524724
source AIP Digital Archive
subjects Applied sciences
Charge transfer devices
Electronics
Exact sciences and technology
Semiconductor electronics. Microelectronics. Optoelectronics. Solid state devices
title Modeling UV response of rear-surface sensitized charge-coupled devices
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-27T02%3A52%3A57IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Modeling%20UV%20response%20of%20rear-surface%20sensitized%20charge-coupled%20devices&rft.jtitle=Applied%20physics%20letters&rft.au=PECKERAR,%20M.%20C&rft.date=1987-05-04&rft.volume=50&rft.issue=18&rft.spage=1275&rft.epage=1277&rft.pages=1275-1277&rft.issn=0003-6951&rft.eissn=1077-3118&rft.coden=APPLAB&rft_id=info:doi/10.1063/1.97882&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E24517322%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c316t-99de688f3ca226bc17b6b8326b99d4ef16dc7980097a21da5755e601aac513b13%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=24517322&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true