Loading…
Modeling UV response of rear-surface sensitized charge-coupled devices
Rear-surface illuminated charge-coupled devices (CCD’s) are typically insensitive to radiation whose depth of penetration is less than 1000 Å. This is due to the presence of immobile charges either in the rear-surface native oxide or at the native oxide/semiconductor interface. These fixed charges c...
Saved in:
Published in: | Applied physics letters 1987-05, Vol.50 (18), p.1275-1277 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c316t-99de688f3ca226bc17b6b8326b99d4ef16dc7980097a21da5755e601aac513b13 |
---|---|
cites | |
container_end_page | 1277 |
container_issue | 18 |
container_start_page | 1275 |
container_title | Applied physics letters |
container_volume | 50 |
creator | PECKERAR, M. C BOSIERS, J. T MCCARTHY, D SAKS, N. S MICHELS, D. J |
description | Rear-surface illuminated charge-coupled devices (CCD’s) are typically insensitive to radiation whose depth of penetration is less than 1000 Å. This is due to the presence of immobile charges either in the rear-surface native oxide or at the native oxide/semiconductor interface. These fixed charges channel signal charge away from the front-surface confinement minima. The result is a loss of detective quantum efficiency (DQE), which is defined as the number of signal charges actually collected divided by the number produced. The CCD can be sensitized to shallow-penetrating radiation through the use of ion implantation techniques. To model the sensitization process, four factors must be accounted for. They are: the extent of the rear-surface depletion created by the fixed charge, Debye length spreading of the mobile charge background in the semiconductor, the position of the implant maximum, and the gradient of the active implant charge before the implant maximum is reached. By judicious manipulation of these factors DQE’s as high as 20% (uncorrected for UV reflection loss) have been obtained at 1216 Å. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1063/1.97882 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_24524724</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>24517322</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c316t-99de688f3ca226bc17b6b8326b99d4ef16dc7980097a21da5755e601aac513b13</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkDFPwzAUhC0EEqUg_kIGBJOLnx3byYgqCkhFLJTVcpyXEpQmwa9Bgl9PoBUz093pPt1wjJ2DmIEw6hpmuc0yecAmIKzlCiA7ZBMhhOIm13DMTojexqilUhO2eOxKbOp2naxekojUdy1h0lWj95HTECsfMCFsqd7WX1gm4dXHNfLQDX0zxhI_6oB0yo4q3xCe7XXKVovb5_k9Xz7dPcxvljwoMFue5yWaLKtU8FKaIoAtTJGp0Y5NihWYMtg8EyK3XkLptdUajQDvgwZVgJqyy91uH7v3AWnrNjUFbBrfYjeQk6mWqZXpf0CwSsoRvNqBIXZEESvXx3rj46cD4X4OdeB-Dx3Ji_2kp-CbKvo21PSHWy3SXEj1DdcPc28</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>24517322</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Modeling UV response of rear-surface sensitized charge-coupled devices</title><source>AIP Digital Archive</source><creator>PECKERAR, M. C ; BOSIERS, J. T ; MCCARTHY, D ; SAKS, N. S ; MICHELS, D. J</creator><creatorcontrib>PECKERAR, M. C ; BOSIERS, J. T ; MCCARTHY, D ; SAKS, N. S ; MICHELS, D. J</creatorcontrib><description>Rear-surface illuminated charge-coupled devices (CCD’s) are typically insensitive to radiation whose depth of penetration is less than 1000 Å. This is due to the presence of immobile charges either in the rear-surface native oxide or at the native oxide/semiconductor interface. These fixed charges channel signal charge away from the front-surface confinement minima. The result is a loss of detective quantum efficiency (DQE), which is defined as the number of signal charges actually collected divided by the number produced. The CCD can be sensitized to shallow-penetrating radiation through the use of ion implantation techniques. To model the sensitization process, four factors must be accounted for. They are: the extent of the rear-surface depletion created by the fixed charge, Debye length spreading of the mobile charge background in the semiconductor, the position of the implant maximum, and the gradient of the active implant charge before the implant maximum is reached. By judicious manipulation of these factors DQE’s as high as 20% (uncorrected for UV reflection loss) have been obtained at 1216 Å.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0003-6951</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1077-3118</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1063/1.97882</identifier><identifier>CODEN: APPLAB</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Melville, NY: American Institute of Physics</publisher><subject>Applied sciences ; Charge transfer devices ; Electronics ; Exact sciences and technology ; Semiconductor electronics. Microelectronics. Optoelectronics. Solid state devices</subject><ispartof>Applied physics letters, 1987-05, Vol.50 (18), p.1275-1277</ispartof><rights>1988 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c316t-99de688f3ca226bc17b6b8326b99d4ef16dc7980097a21da5755e601aac513b13</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=7504902$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>PECKERAR, M. C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>BOSIERS, J. T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MCCARTHY, D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>SAKS, N. S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MICHELS, D. J</creatorcontrib><title>Modeling UV response of rear-surface sensitized charge-coupled devices</title><title>Applied physics letters</title><description>Rear-surface illuminated charge-coupled devices (CCD’s) are typically insensitive to radiation whose depth of penetration is less than 1000 Å. This is due to the presence of immobile charges either in the rear-surface native oxide or at the native oxide/semiconductor interface. These fixed charges channel signal charge away from the front-surface confinement minima. The result is a loss of detective quantum efficiency (DQE), which is defined as the number of signal charges actually collected divided by the number produced. The CCD can be sensitized to shallow-penetrating radiation through the use of ion implantation techniques. To model the sensitization process, four factors must be accounted for. They are: the extent of the rear-surface depletion created by the fixed charge, Debye length spreading of the mobile charge background in the semiconductor, the position of the implant maximum, and the gradient of the active implant charge before the implant maximum is reached. By judicious manipulation of these factors DQE’s as high as 20% (uncorrected for UV reflection loss) have been obtained at 1216 Å.</description><subject>Applied sciences</subject><subject>Charge transfer devices</subject><subject>Electronics</subject><subject>Exact sciences and technology</subject><subject>Semiconductor electronics. Microelectronics. Optoelectronics. Solid state devices</subject><issn>0003-6951</issn><issn>1077-3118</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1987</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNkDFPwzAUhC0EEqUg_kIGBJOLnx3byYgqCkhFLJTVcpyXEpQmwa9Bgl9PoBUz093pPt1wjJ2DmIEw6hpmuc0yecAmIKzlCiA7ZBMhhOIm13DMTojexqilUhO2eOxKbOp2naxekojUdy1h0lWj95HTECsfMCFsqd7WX1gm4dXHNfLQDX0zxhI_6oB0yo4q3xCe7XXKVovb5_k9Xz7dPcxvljwoMFue5yWaLKtU8FKaIoAtTJGp0Y5NihWYMtg8EyK3XkLptdUajQDvgwZVgJqyy91uH7v3AWnrNjUFbBrfYjeQk6mWqZXpf0CwSsoRvNqBIXZEESvXx3rj46cD4X4OdeB-Dx3Ji_2kp-CbKvo21PSHWy3SXEj1DdcPc28</recordid><startdate>19870504</startdate><enddate>19870504</enddate><creator>PECKERAR, M. C</creator><creator>BOSIERS, J. T</creator><creator>MCCARTHY, D</creator><creator>SAKS, N. S</creator><creator>MICHELS, D. J</creator><general>American Institute of Physics</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>7SP</scope><scope>7U5</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19870504</creationdate><title>Modeling UV response of rear-surface sensitized charge-coupled devices</title><author>PECKERAR, M. C ; BOSIERS, J. T ; MCCARTHY, D ; SAKS, N. S ; MICHELS, D. J</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c316t-99de688f3ca226bc17b6b8326b99d4ef16dc7980097a21da5755e601aac513b13</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1987</creationdate><topic>Applied sciences</topic><topic>Charge transfer devices</topic><topic>Electronics</topic><topic>Exact sciences and technology</topic><topic>Semiconductor electronics. Microelectronics. Optoelectronics. Solid state devices</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>PECKERAR, M. C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>BOSIERS, J. T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MCCARTHY, D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>SAKS, N. S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MICHELS, D. J</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Electronics & Communications Abstracts</collection><collection>Solid State and Superconductivity Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Applied physics letters</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>PECKERAR, M. C</au><au>BOSIERS, J. T</au><au>MCCARTHY, D</au><au>SAKS, N. S</au><au>MICHELS, D. J</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Modeling UV response of rear-surface sensitized charge-coupled devices</atitle><jtitle>Applied physics letters</jtitle><date>1987-05-04</date><risdate>1987</risdate><volume>50</volume><issue>18</issue><spage>1275</spage><epage>1277</epage><pages>1275-1277</pages><issn>0003-6951</issn><eissn>1077-3118</eissn><coden>APPLAB</coden><abstract>Rear-surface illuminated charge-coupled devices (CCD’s) are typically insensitive to radiation whose depth of penetration is less than 1000 Å. This is due to the presence of immobile charges either in the rear-surface native oxide or at the native oxide/semiconductor interface. These fixed charges channel signal charge away from the front-surface confinement minima. The result is a loss of detective quantum efficiency (DQE), which is defined as the number of signal charges actually collected divided by the number produced. The CCD can be sensitized to shallow-penetrating radiation through the use of ion implantation techniques. To model the sensitization process, four factors must be accounted for. They are: the extent of the rear-surface depletion created by the fixed charge, Debye length spreading of the mobile charge background in the semiconductor, the position of the implant maximum, and the gradient of the active implant charge before the implant maximum is reached. By judicious manipulation of these factors DQE’s as high as 20% (uncorrected for UV reflection loss) have been obtained at 1216 Å.</abstract><cop>Melville, NY</cop><pub>American Institute of Physics</pub><doi>10.1063/1.97882</doi><tpages>3</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0003-6951 |
ispartof | Applied physics letters, 1987-05, Vol.50 (18), p.1275-1277 |
issn | 0003-6951 1077-3118 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_24524724 |
source | AIP Digital Archive |
subjects | Applied sciences Charge transfer devices Electronics Exact sciences and technology Semiconductor electronics. Microelectronics. Optoelectronics. Solid state devices |
title | Modeling UV response of rear-surface sensitized charge-coupled devices |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-27T02%3A52%3A57IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Modeling%20UV%20response%20of%20rear-surface%20sensitized%20charge-coupled%20devices&rft.jtitle=Applied%20physics%20letters&rft.au=PECKERAR,%20M.%20C&rft.date=1987-05-04&rft.volume=50&rft.issue=18&rft.spage=1275&rft.epage=1277&rft.pages=1275-1277&rft.issn=0003-6951&rft.eissn=1077-3118&rft.coden=APPLAB&rft_id=info:doi/10.1063/1.97882&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E24517322%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c316t-99de688f3ca226bc17b6b8326b99d4ef16dc7980097a21da5755e601aac513b13%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=24517322&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |