Loading…
Seeking transformation: how students in nursing view their academic writing context – a qualitative systematic review
Writing practices in nursing education programs are situated in a tension-filled context resulting from competing medical-technical and relational nursing discourses. The goal of this qualitative meta-study is to understand, from the student perspective, how the context for writing in nursing is con...
Saved in:
Published in: | International journal of nursing education scholarship 2020-01, Vol.17 (1) |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c353t-96c78863f5cccab9ed5b140a2d04ea1e20a187f1dc60244c95e90f324f17bd653 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c353t-96c78863f5cccab9ed5b140a2d04ea1e20a187f1dc60244c95e90f324f17bd653 |
container_end_page | |
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | |
container_title | International journal of nursing education scholarship |
container_volume | 17 |
creator | Mitchell, Kim M. Blanchard, Laurie Roberts, Tara |
description | Writing practices in nursing education programs are situated in a tension-filled context resulting from competing medical-technical and relational nursing discourses. The goal of this qualitative meta-study is to understand, from the student perspective, how the context for writing in nursing is constructed and the benefits of writing to nursing knowledge development. A literature search using the CINHAL, Medline, ERIC, and Academic Search complete databases, using systematic methods identified 21 papers and dissertations which gathered qualitative interview or survey data from students in nursing at the pre-registration, continuing education, and graduate levels. The studies provided evidence that writing assignments promote professional identity development but overemphasis on writing mechanics when grading have a deleterious effect on learning and student engagement with writing. Relationship building with faculty should extend beyond what is needed to maximize grades. Suggestions for writing pedagogical reform are identified to facilitate a change in focus from mechanical-technical to transformative writing. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1515/ijnes-2020-0074 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2456409273</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2456409273</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c353t-96c78863f5cccab9ed5b140a2d04ea1e20a187f1dc60244c95e90f324f17bd653</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kctKxDAUhoMoOI6u3QbcuKkmadI0sxPxBoILFdyVTHqqGTvpmKRz2fkOvoDP4qP4JLaOIAiuciDf_3E4P0L7lBxRQcWxnTgICSOMJIRIvoEGVPA8USx92EQDRhVPhJRsG-2EMCGEyVyJAVreAjxb94ij1y5UjZ_qaBs3wk_NAofYluBiwNZh1_rQc3MLCxyfwHqsjS5hag1eeBv7P9O4CMv48f75-oY1fml1bWPnmwMOqxChdxvsoXfsoq1K1wH2ft4huj8_uzu9TK5vLq5OT64Tk4o0JiozMs-ztBLGGD1WUIox5USzknDQFBjRNJcVLU1GGOdGCVCkShmvqByXmUiH6HDtnfnmpYUQi6kNBupaO2jaUDAuMk4Uk2mHHvxBJ03rXbddT-XdxTKqOup4TRnfhOChKmbeTrVfFZQUfRPFdxNF30TRN9ElRuvEQtcRfAmPvl11w6_-nySVNP0CFySUyw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2458278619</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Seeking transformation: how students in nursing view their academic writing context – a qualitative systematic review</title><source>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>Sociology Collection</source><source>ProQuest Social Science Premium Collection</source><source>Education Collection</source><creator>Mitchell, Kim M. ; Blanchard, Laurie ; Roberts, Tara</creator><creatorcontrib>Mitchell, Kim M. ; Blanchard, Laurie ; Roberts, Tara</creatorcontrib><description>Writing practices in nursing education programs are situated in a tension-filled context resulting from competing medical-technical and relational nursing discourses. The goal of this qualitative meta-study is to understand, from the student perspective, how the context for writing in nursing is constructed and the benefits of writing to nursing knowledge development. A literature search using the CINHAL, Medline, ERIC, and Academic Search complete databases, using systematic methods identified 21 papers and dissertations which gathered qualitative interview or survey data from students in nursing at the pre-registration, continuing education, and graduate levels. The studies provided evidence that writing assignments promote professional identity development but overemphasis on writing mechanics when grading have a deleterious effect on learning and student engagement with writing. Relationship building with faculty should extend beyond what is needed to maximize grades. Suggestions for writing pedagogical reform are identified to facilitate a change in focus from mechanical-technical to transformative writing.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2194-5772</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1548-923X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1515/ijnes-2020-0074</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Berlin: De Gruyter</publisher><subject>Academic Language ; academic writing ; Continuing education ; Discourses ; Doctoral Dissertations ; Educational Change ; Educational programs ; Identity formation ; Learner Engagement ; Medical education ; meta-study ; Nursing ; nursing discourse ; Nursing education ; Professional identity ; Professional training ; Qualitative research ; Self Actualization ; Student Attitudes ; Student Participation ; Student teacher relationship ; Systematic review ; Transformation ; University students ; Writing ; Writing Assignments ; Writing Instruction</subject><ispartof>International journal of nursing education scholarship, 2020-01, Vol.17 (1)</ispartof><rights>2020 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c353t-96c78863f5cccab9ed5b140a2d04ea1e20a187f1dc60244c95e90f324f17bd653</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c353t-96c78863f5cccab9ed5b140a2d04ea1e20a187f1dc60244c95e90f324f17bd653</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2458278619?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,12846,21378,21394,21395,27924,27925,30999,33611,33612,33877,33878,34530,34531,43733,43880,44115</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Mitchell, Kim M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Blanchard, Laurie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Roberts, Tara</creatorcontrib><title>Seeking transformation: how students in nursing view their academic writing context – a qualitative systematic review</title><title>International journal of nursing education scholarship</title><description>Writing practices in nursing education programs are situated in a tension-filled context resulting from competing medical-technical and relational nursing discourses. The goal of this qualitative meta-study is to understand, from the student perspective, how the context for writing in nursing is constructed and the benefits of writing to nursing knowledge development. A literature search using the CINHAL, Medline, ERIC, and Academic Search complete databases, using systematic methods identified 21 papers and dissertations which gathered qualitative interview or survey data from students in nursing at the pre-registration, continuing education, and graduate levels. The studies provided evidence that writing assignments promote professional identity development but overemphasis on writing mechanics when grading have a deleterious effect on learning and student engagement with writing. Relationship building with faculty should extend beyond what is needed to maximize grades. Suggestions for writing pedagogical reform are identified to facilitate a change in focus from mechanical-technical to transformative writing.</description><subject>Academic Language</subject><subject>academic writing</subject><subject>Continuing education</subject><subject>Discourses</subject><subject>Doctoral Dissertations</subject><subject>Educational Change</subject><subject>Educational programs</subject><subject>Identity formation</subject><subject>Learner Engagement</subject><subject>Medical education</subject><subject>meta-study</subject><subject>Nursing</subject><subject>nursing discourse</subject><subject>Nursing education</subject><subject>Professional identity</subject><subject>Professional training</subject><subject>Qualitative research</subject><subject>Self Actualization</subject><subject>Student Attitudes</subject><subject>Student Participation</subject><subject>Student teacher relationship</subject><subject>Systematic review</subject><subject>Transformation</subject><subject>University students</subject><subject>Writing</subject><subject>Writing Assignments</subject><subject>Writing Instruction</subject><issn>2194-5772</issn><issn>1548-923X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><sourceid>ALSLI</sourceid><sourceid>CJNVE</sourceid><sourceid>HEHIP</sourceid><sourceid>M0P</sourceid><sourceid>M2S</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kctKxDAUhoMoOI6u3QbcuKkmadI0sxPxBoILFdyVTHqqGTvpmKRz2fkOvoDP4qP4JLaOIAiuciDf_3E4P0L7lBxRQcWxnTgICSOMJIRIvoEGVPA8USx92EQDRhVPhJRsG-2EMCGEyVyJAVreAjxb94ij1y5UjZ_qaBs3wk_NAofYluBiwNZh1_rQc3MLCxyfwHqsjS5hag1eeBv7P9O4CMv48f75-oY1fml1bWPnmwMOqxChdxvsoXfsoq1K1wH2ft4huj8_uzu9TK5vLq5OT64Tk4o0JiozMs-ztBLGGD1WUIox5USzknDQFBjRNJcVLU1GGOdGCVCkShmvqByXmUiH6HDtnfnmpYUQi6kNBupaO2jaUDAuMk4Uk2mHHvxBJ03rXbddT-XdxTKqOup4TRnfhOChKmbeTrVfFZQUfRPFdxNF30TRN9ElRuvEQtcRfAmPvl11w6_-nySVNP0CFySUyw</recordid><startdate>20200101</startdate><enddate>20200101</enddate><creator>Mitchell, Kim M.</creator><creator>Blanchard, Laurie</creator><creator>Roberts, Tara</creator><general>De Gruyter</general><general>Walter de Gruyter GmbH</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88B</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AN0</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>CJNVE</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HEHIP</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0P</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2S</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEDU</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20200101</creationdate><title>Seeking transformation: how students in nursing view their academic writing context – a qualitative systematic review</title><author>Mitchell, Kim M. ; Blanchard, Laurie ; Roberts, Tara</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c353t-96c78863f5cccab9ed5b140a2d04ea1e20a187f1dc60244c95e90f324f17bd653</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Academic Language</topic><topic>academic writing</topic><topic>Continuing education</topic><topic>Discourses</topic><topic>Doctoral Dissertations</topic><topic>Educational Change</topic><topic>Educational programs</topic><topic>Identity formation</topic><topic>Learner Engagement</topic><topic>Medical education</topic><topic>meta-study</topic><topic>Nursing</topic><topic>nursing discourse</topic><topic>Nursing education</topic><topic>Professional identity</topic><topic>Professional training</topic><topic>Qualitative research</topic><topic>Self Actualization</topic><topic>Student Attitudes</topic><topic>Student Participation</topic><topic>Student teacher relationship</topic><topic>Systematic review</topic><topic>Transformation</topic><topic>University students</topic><topic>Writing</topic><topic>Writing Assignments</topic><topic>Writing Instruction</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Mitchell, Kim M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Blanchard, Laurie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Roberts, Tara</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection【Remote access available】</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>PHMC-Proquest健康医学期刊库</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Education Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>British Nursing Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Education Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Sociology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Education Database (ProQuest)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Sociology Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Education</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>International journal of nursing education scholarship</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Mitchell, Kim M.</au><au>Blanchard, Laurie</au><au>Roberts, Tara</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Seeking transformation: how students in nursing view their academic writing context – a qualitative systematic review</atitle><jtitle>International journal of nursing education scholarship</jtitle><date>2020-01-01</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>17</volume><issue>1</issue><issn>2194-5772</issn><eissn>1548-923X</eissn><abstract>Writing practices in nursing education programs are situated in a tension-filled context resulting from competing medical-technical and relational nursing discourses. The goal of this qualitative meta-study is to understand, from the student perspective, how the context for writing in nursing is constructed and the benefits of writing to nursing knowledge development. A literature search using the CINHAL, Medline, ERIC, and Academic Search complete databases, using systematic methods identified 21 papers and dissertations which gathered qualitative interview or survey data from students in nursing at the pre-registration, continuing education, and graduate levels. The studies provided evidence that writing assignments promote professional identity development but overemphasis on writing mechanics when grading have a deleterious effect on learning and student engagement with writing. Relationship building with faculty should extend beyond what is needed to maximize grades. Suggestions for writing pedagogical reform are identified to facilitate a change in focus from mechanical-technical to transformative writing.</abstract><cop>Berlin</cop><pub>De Gruyter</pub><doi>10.1515/ijnes-2020-0074</doi><tpages>14</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2194-5772 |
ispartof | International journal of nursing education scholarship, 2020-01, Vol.17 (1) |
issn | 2194-5772 1548-923X |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2456409273 |
source | Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); Sociology Collection; ProQuest Social Science Premium Collection; Education Collection |
subjects | Academic Language academic writing Continuing education Discourses Doctoral Dissertations Educational Change Educational programs Identity formation Learner Engagement Medical education meta-study Nursing nursing discourse Nursing education Professional identity Professional training Qualitative research Self Actualization Student Attitudes Student Participation Student teacher relationship Systematic review Transformation University students Writing Writing Assignments Writing Instruction |
title | Seeking transformation: how students in nursing view their academic writing context – a qualitative systematic review |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-27T07%3A00%3A21IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Seeking%20transformation:%20how%20students%20in%20nursing%20view%20their%20academic%20writing%20context%C2%A0%E2%80%93%20a%20qualitative%20systematic%20review&rft.jtitle=International%20journal%20of%20nursing%20education%20scholarship&rft.au=Mitchell,%20Kim%20M.&rft.date=2020-01-01&rft.volume=17&rft.issue=1&rft.issn=2194-5772&rft.eissn=1548-923X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1515/ijnes-2020-0074&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2456409273%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c353t-96c78863f5cccab9ed5b140a2d04ea1e20a187f1dc60244c95e90f324f17bd653%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2458278619&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |