Loading…
The information provided by the absence of cues: insights from Bayesian models of within and transgenerational plasticity
Empirical studies of phenotypic plasticity often use an experimental design in which the subjects in experimental treatments are exposed to cues, while the subjects in control treatments are maintained in the absence of those cues. However, researchers have virtually ignored the question of what, if...
Saved in:
Published in: | Oecologia 2020-12, Vol.194 (4), p.585-596 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c498t-651aff67f01f7d28cf82e1564e0f0079fc7ae1bfb27128fda7f28053b23c764e3 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c498t-651aff67f01f7d28cf82e1564e0f0079fc7ae1bfb27128fda7f28053b23c764e3 |
container_end_page | 596 |
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 585 |
container_title | Oecologia |
container_volume | 194 |
creator | Stamps, Judy A. Bell, Alison M. |
description | Empirical studies of phenotypic plasticity often use an experimental design in which the subjects in experimental treatments are exposed to cues, while the subjects in control treatments are maintained in the absence of those cues. However, researchers have virtually ignored the question of what, if any, information might be provided to subjects by the absence of the cues in control treatments. We apply basic principles of information-updating to several experimental protocols used to study phenotypic plasticity in response to cues from predators to show why the reliability of the information provided by the absence of those cues in a control treatment might vary as a function of the subjects’ experiences in the experimental treatment. We then analyze Bayesian models designed to mimic fully factorial experimental studies of trans and within-generational plasticity, in which parents, offspring, both or neither are exposed to cues from predators, and the information-states of the offspring in the different groups are compared at the end of the experiment. The models predict that the pattern of differences in offspring information-state across the four treatment groups will vary among experiments, depending on the reliability of the information provided by the control treatment, and the parent’s initial estimate of the value of the state (the parental Prior). We suggest that variation among experiments in the reliability of the information provided by the absence of particular cues in the control treatment may be a general phenomenon, and that Bayesian approaches can be useful in interpreting the results of such experiments. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s00442-020-04792-9 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2456431244</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A651084778</galeid><jstor_id>48696307</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>A651084778</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c498t-651aff67f01f7d28cf82e1564e0f0079fc7ae1bfb27128fda7f28053b23c764e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kVtr3DAQhUVpabZp_0ChxdCX5sHJ6GJLegyhl0CgkKTPQpZHWy9rO5Xs0Pz7ztZpwoZS9CDQfOfoDIextxyOOYA-yQBKiRIElKC0FaV9xlZcSVFyK-1ztgIQtjSVsgfsVc4bAK54Vb1kB1JyYcDYFTu5_oFFN8Qx9X7qxqG4SeNt12JbNHfFRDPfZBwCFmMswoz5NXsR_Tbjm_v7kH3__On67Gt58e3L-dnpRRmUNVNZV9zHWOsIPOpWmBCNQF7VCiFSdBuD9sib2AhNSWLrdaRAlWyEDJooecg-Lr6U5yf9O7m-ywG3Wz_gOGcnFJnRFkoR-uEJuhnnNFA6orSUWmvOH6m136LbbTwlH3am7pTSglFaG6KO_0HRabHvwjhg7Oh9T3C0JyBmwl_T2s85u_Ory31WLGxIY84Jo7tJXe_TnePgdo26pVFHjbo_jTpLovf3281Nj-2D5G-FBMgFyDQa1pge1_-v7btFtcnTmB5claltLUHL3_-nsFE</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2473377711</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The information provided by the absence of cues: insights from Bayesian models of within and transgenerational plasticity</title><source>Springer Nature</source><source>JSTOR</source><creator>Stamps, Judy A. ; Bell, Alison M.</creator><creatorcontrib>Stamps, Judy A. ; Bell, Alison M.</creatorcontrib><description>Empirical studies of phenotypic plasticity often use an experimental design in which the subjects in experimental treatments are exposed to cues, while the subjects in control treatments are maintained in the absence of those cues. However, researchers have virtually ignored the question of what, if any, information might be provided to subjects by the absence of the cues in control treatments. We apply basic principles of information-updating to several experimental protocols used to study phenotypic plasticity in response to cues from predators to show why the reliability of the information provided by the absence of those cues in a control treatment might vary as a function of the subjects’ experiences in the experimental treatment. We then analyze Bayesian models designed to mimic fully factorial experimental studies of trans and within-generational plasticity, in which parents, offspring, both or neither are exposed to cues from predators, and the information-states of the offspring in the different groups are compared at the end of the experiment. The models predict that the pattern of differences in offspring information-state across the four treatment groups will vary among experiments, depending on the reliability of the information provided by the control treatment, and the parent’s initial estimate of the value of the state (the parental Prior). We suggest that variation among experiments in the reliability of the information provided by the absence of particular cues in the control treatment may be a general phenomenon, and that Bayesian approaches can be useful in interpreting the results of such experiments.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0029-8549</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1432-1939</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s00442-020-04792-9</identifier><identifier>PMID: 33128089</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer Science + Business Media</publisher><subject>Adaptation, Physiological ; Bayes Theorem ; Bayesian analysis ; Biomedical and Life Sciences ; Concepts ; CONCEPTS, REVIEWS AND SYNTHESES ; Control ; Cues ; Design of experiments ; Ecology ; Empirical analysis ; Experimental design ; Experiments ; Humans ; Hydrology/Water Resources ; Life Sciences ; Mathematical models ; Offspring ; Phenotypic plasticity ; Plant Sciences ; Plastic properties ; Plasticity ; Predators ; Probability theory ; Reliability ; Reproducibility of Results ; Reviews and Syntheses</subject><ispartof>Oecologia, 2020-12, Vol.194 (4), p.585-596</ispartof><rights>Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2020</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2020 Springer</rights><rights>Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2020.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c498t-651aff67f01f7d28cf82e1564e0f0079fc7ae1bfb27128fda7f28053b23c764e3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c498t-651aff67f01f7d28cf82e1564e0f0079fc7ae1bfb27128fda7f28053b23c764e3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-5776-4269</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/48696307$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/48696307$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27922,27923,58236,58469</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33128089$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Stamps, Judy A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bell, Alison M.</creatorcontrib><title>The information provided by the absence of cues: insights from Bayesian models of within and transgenerational plasticity</title><title>Oecologia</title><addtitle>Oecologia</addtitle><addtitle>Oecologia</addtitle><description>Empirical studies of phenotypic plasticity often use an experimental design in which the subjects in experimental treatments are exposed to cues, while the subjects in control treatments are maintained in the absence of those cues. However, researchers have virtually ignored the question of what, if any, information might be provided to subjects by the absence of the cues in control treatments. We apply basic principles of information-updating to several experimental protocols used to study phenotypic plasticity in response to cues from predators to show why the reliability of the information provided by the absence of those cues in a control treatment might vary as a function of the subjects’ experiences in the experimental treatment. We then analyze Bayesian models designed to mimic fully factorial experimental studies of trans and within-generational plasticity, in which parents, offspring, both or neither are exposed to cues from predators, and the information-states of the offspring in the different groups are compared at the end of the experiment. The models predict that the pattern of differences in offspring information-state across the four treatment groups will vary among experiments, depending on the reliability of the information provided by the control treatment, and the parent’s initial estimate of the value of the state (the parental Prior). We suggest that variation among experiments in the reliability of the information provided by the absence of particular cues in the control treatment may be a general phenomenon, and that Bayesian approaches can be useful in interpreting the results of such experiments.</description><subject>Adaptation, Physiological</subject><subject>Bayes Theorem</subject><subject>Bayesian analysis</subject><subject>Biomedical and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Concepts</subject><subject>CONCEPTS, REVIEWS AND SYNTHESES</subject><subject>Control</subject><subject>Cues</subject><subject>Design of experiments</subject><subject>Ecology</subject><subject>Empirical analysis</subject><subject>Experimental design</subject><subject>Experiments</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Hydrology/Water Resources</subject><subject>Life Sciences</subject><subject>Mathematical models</subject><subject>Offspring</subject><subject>Phenotypic plasticity</subject><subject>Plant Sciences</subject><subject>Plastic properties</subject><subject>Plasticity</subject><subject>Predators</subject><subject>Probability theory</subject><subject>Reliability</subject><subject>Reproducibility of Results</subject><subject>Reviews and Syntheses</subject><issn>0029-8549</issn><issn>1432-1939</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kVtr3DAQhUVpabZp_0ChxdCX5sHJ6GJLegyhl0CgkKTPQpZHWy9rO5Xs0Pz7ztZpwoZS9CDQfOfoDIextxyOOYA-yQBKiRIElKC0FaV9xlZcSVFyK-1ztgIQtjSVsgfsVc4bAK54Vb1kB1JyYcDYFTu5_oFFN8Qx9X7qxqG4SeNt12JbNHfFRDPfZBwCFmMswoz5NXsR_Tbjm_v7kH3__On67Gt58e3L-dnpRRmUNVNZV9zHWOsIPOpWmBCNQF7VCiFSdBuD9sib2AhNSWLrdaRAlWyEDJooecg-Lr6U5yf9O7m-ywG3Wz_gOGcnFJnRFkoR-uEJuhnnNFA6orSUWmvOH6m136LbbTwlH3am7pTSglFaG6KO_0HRabHvwjhg7Oh9T3C0JyBmwl_T2s85u_Ory31WLGxIY84Jo7tJXe_TnePgdo26pVFHjbo_jTpLovf3281Nj-2D5G-FBMgFyDQa1pge1_-v7btFtcnTmB5claltLUHL3_-nsFE</recordid><startdate>20201201</startdate><enddate>20201201</enddate><creator>Stamps, Judy A.</creator><creator>Bell, Alison M.</creator><general>Springer Science + Business Media</general><general>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</general><general>Springer</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>ISR</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7TN</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88A</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BKSAR</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>H95</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PCBAR</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5776-4269</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20201201</creationdate><title>The information provided by the absence of cues</title><author>Stamps, Judy A. ; Bell, Alison M.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c498t-651aff67f01f7d28cf82e1564e0f0079fc7ae1bfb27128fda7f28053b23c764e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Adaptation, Physiological</topic><topic>Bayes Theorem</topic><topic>Bayesian analysis</topic><topic>Biomedical and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Concepts</topic><topic>CONCEPTS, REVIEWS AND SYNTHESES</topic><topic>Control</topic><topic>Cues</topic><topic>Design of experiments</topic><topic>Ecology</topic><topic>Empirical analysis</topic><topic>Experimental design</topic><topic>Experiments</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Hydrology/Water Resources</topic><topic>Life Sciences</topic><topic>Mathematical models</topic><topic>Offspring</topic><topic>Phenotypic plasticity</topic><topic>Plant Sciences</topic><topic>Plastic properties</topic><topic>Plasticity</topic><topic>Predators</topic><topic>Probability theory</topic><topic>Reliability</topic><topic>Reproducibility of Results</topic><topic>Reviews and Syntheses</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Stamps, Judy A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bell, Alison M.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Science In Context</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Oceanic Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Biology Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 1: Biological Sciences & Living Resources</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Biological Sciences</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Oecologia</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Stamps, Judy A.</au><au>Bell, Alison M.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The information provided by the absence of cues: insights from Bayesian models of within and transgenerational plasticity</atitle><jtitle>Oecologia</jtitle><stitle>Oecologia</stitle><addtitle>Oecologia</addtitle><date>2020-12-01</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>194</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>585</spage><epage>596</epage><pages>585-596</pages><issn>0029-8549</issn><eissn>1432-1939</eissn><abstract>Empirical studies of phenotypic plasticity often use an experimental design in which the subjects in experimental treatments are exposed to cues, while the subjects in control treatments are maintained in the absence of those cues. However, researchers have virtually ignored the question of what, if any, information might be provided to subjects by the absence of the cues in control treatments. We apply basic principles of information-updating to several experimental protocols used to study phenotypic plasticity in response to cues from predators to show why the reliability of the information provided by the absence of those cues in a control treatment might vary as a function of the subjects’ experiences in the experimental treatment. We then analyze Bayesian models designed to mimic fully factorial experimental studies of trans and within-generational plasticity, in which parents, offspring, both or neither are exposed to cues from predators, and the information-states of the offspring in the different groups are compared at the end of the experiment. The models predict that the pattern of differences in offspring information-state across the four treatment groups will vary among experiments, depending on the reliability of the information provided by the control treatment, and the parent’s initial estimate of the value of the state (the parental Prior). We suggest that variation among experiments in the reliability of the information provided by the absence of particular cues in the control treatment may be a general phenomenon, and that Bayesian approaches can be useful in interpreting the results of such experiments.</abstract><cop>Berlin/Heidelberg</cop><pub>Springer Science + Business Media</pub><pmid>33128089</pmid><doi>10.1007/s00442-020-04792-9</doi><tpages>12</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5776-4269</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0029-8549 |
ispartof | Oecologia, 2020-12, Vol.194 (4), p.585-596 |
issn | 0029-8549 1432-1939 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2456431244 |
source | Springer Nature; JSTOR |
subjects | Adaptation, Physiological Bayes Theorem Bayesian analysis Biomedical and Life Sciences Concepts CONCEPTS, REVIEWS AND SYNTHESES Control Cues Design of experiments Ecology Empirical analysis Experimental design Experiments Humans Hydrology/Water Resources Life Sciences Mathematical models Offspring Phenotypic plasticity Plant Sciences Plastic properties Plasticity Predators Probability theory Reliability Reproducibility of Results Reviews and Syntheses |
title | The information provided by the absence of cues: insights from Bayesian models of within and transgenerational plasticity |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-09T20%3A51%3A40IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20information%20provided%20by%20the%20absence%20of%20cues:%20insights%20from%20Bayesian%20models%20of%20within%20and%20transgenerational%20plasticity&rft.jtitle=Oecologia&rft.au=Stamps,%20Judy%20A.&rft.date=2020-12-01&rft.volume=194&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=585&rft.epage=596&rft.pages=585-596&rft.issn=0029-8549&rft.eissn=1432-1939&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s00442-020-04792-9&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA651084778%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c498t-651aff67f01f7d28cf82e1564e0f0079fc7ae1bfb27128fda7f28053b23c764e3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2473377711&rft_id=info:pmid/33128089&rft_galeid=A651084778&rft_jstor_id=48696307&rfr_iscdi=true |