Loading…

Evaluation of BioThrax® and AV7909 anthrax vaccines in adults 66 years of age or older

Multiple Anthrax vaccines are licensed or in development for post-exposure prophylaxis in individuals 18 to 65 years of age. No information exists on anthrax vaccines in populations over the age of 65. It is critical that we assess the capacity of anthrax vaccines to generate a protective immune res...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Vaccine 2020-11, Vol.38 (50), p.7970-7976
Main Authors: Wolfe, Daniel N., Espeland, Eric M., Gao, Yonghong, Lu, Di, Blatner, Gretta, Amass, Kathryn, Horwith, Gary, Tong, Xiaomi M., Hopkins, Robert, David, Gloria L., Jepson, Brett M., King, James C.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c440t-b46a201ea306de25a907c78b7c661828f7cb95c5b238e297fd79eb3306b0fd023
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c440t-b46a201ea306de25a907c78b7c661828f7cb95c5b238e297fd79eb3306b0fd023
container_end_page 7976
container_issue 50
container_start_page 7970
container_title Vaccine
container_volume 38
creator Wolfe, Daniel N.
Espeland, Eric M.
Gao, Yonghong
Lu, Di
Blatner, Gretta
Amass, Kathryn
Horwith, Gary
Tong, Xiaomi M.
Hopkins, Robert
David, Gloria L.
Jepson, Brett M.
King, James C.
description Multiple Anthrax vaccines are licensed or in development for post-exposure prophylaxis in individuals 18 to 65 years of age. No information exists on anthrax vaccines in populations over the age of 65. It is critical that we assess the capacity of anthrax vaccines to generate a protective immune response in older individuals. In this study, we compared BioThrax® to a formulation containing a CpG adjuvant (AV7909). We conducted a Phase 2 clinical study to evaluate safety and immunogenicity of three vaccination schedules of the AV7909 vaccine candidate and one vaccination schedule of BioThrax® vaccine in adults over 65 years of age. A total of 305 subjects were enrolled to assess safety and immunogenicity by seroprotection rates, toxin neutralizing antibody titers, and anti-Protective Antigen ELISA titers. Compared to BioThrax, AV7909 elicited a more robust immune response in older subjects, especially with three doses of AV7909 at Days 1, 15, and 29, or two doses at Days 1 and 29. These trends were true with both seroprotection rates as defined by the percentage of subjects with 50 percent neutralization factors greater than 0.56, and geometric mean antibody titers. The responses to both AV7909 and BioThax were lower in older subjects compared to those aged 18–50. The immunogenicity data suggest that the CpG adjuvant in the AV7909 vaccine helps to elicit a more robust immune response in subjects over the age of 65. Alternative dosing strategies may be considered in this population given the high seroprotection rates with Day 1 and 29, or Day 1, 15, and 29 regimens. Trial Registration: clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT03518125.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.vaccine.2020.10.053
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2456858841</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0264410X20313621</els_id><sourcerecordid>2460067756</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c440t-b46a201ea306de25a907c78b7c661828f7cb95c5b238e297fd79eb3306b0fd023</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkMuO1DAQRS0EYpqBTwBZYsMmTdmJXys0jIaHNBKb4bGzHLsCbqXjwU5azE_xEXwZjrphwYaVratzq0qHkKcMtgyYfLnbHpz3ccItB75mWxDtPbJhWrUNF0zfJxvgsms6Bl_OyKNSdgAVYeYhOWtbxo0EsyGfrw5uXNwc00TTQF_HdPMtux-_flI3BXrxSRkw9TuvIT1tLDRO1IVlnAuVkt6hy2Utu69IU6ZpDJgfkweDGws-Ob3n5OObq5vLd831h7fvLy-uG991MDd9Jx0Hhq4FGZALZ0B5pXvlpWSa60H53ggvet5q5EYNQRns20r3MATg7Tl5cZx7m9P3Bcts97F4HEc3YVqK5Z2QWmjdsYo-_wfdpSVP9bpKSQCplJCVEkfK51RKxsHe5rh3-c4ysKt5u7MnD3Y1v8ZVa-09O01f-j2Gv60_qivw6ghg1XGImG3xESePIWb0sw0p_mfFb3DQlO8</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2460067756</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Evaluation of BioThrax® and AV7909 anthrax vaccines in adults 66 years of age or older</title><source>ScienceDirect Freedom Collection</source><creator>Wolfe, Daniel N. ; Espeland, Eric M. ; Gao, Yonghong ; Lu, Di ; Blatner, Gretta ; Amass, Kathryn ; Horwith, Gary ; Tong, Xiaomi M. ; Hopkins, Robert ; David, Gloria L. ; Jepson, Brett M. ; King, James C.</creator><creatorcontrib>Wolfe, Daniel N. ; Espeland, Eric M. ; Gao, Yonghong ; Lu, Di ; Blatner, Gretta ; Amass, Kathryn ; Horwith, Gary ; Tong, Xiaomi M. ; Hopkins, Robert ; David, Gloria L. ; Jepson, Brett M. ; King, James C.</creatorcontrib><description>Multiple Anthrax vaccines are licensed or in development for post-exposure prophylaxis in individuals 18 to 65 years of age. No information exists on anthrax vaccines in populations over the age of 65. It is critical that we assess the capacity of anthrax vaccines to generate a protective immune response in older individuals. In this study, we compared BioThrax® to a formulation containing a CpG adjuvant (AV7909). We conducted a Phase 2 clinical study to evaluate safety and immunogenicity of three vaccination schedules of the AV7909 vaccine candidate and one vaccination schedule of BioThrax® vaccine in adults over 65 years of age. A total of 305 subjects were enrolled to assess safety and immunogenicity by seroprotection rates, toxin neutralizing antibody titers, and anti-Protective Antigen ELISA titers. Compared to BioThrax, AV7909 elicited a more robust immune response in older subjects, especially with three doses of AV7909 at Days 1, 15, and 29, or two doses at Days 1 and 29. These trends were true with both seroprotection rates as defined by the percentage of subjects with 50 percent neutralization factors greater than 0.56, and geometric mean antibody titers. The responses to both AV7909 and BioThax were lower in older subjects compared to those aged 18–50. The immunogenicity data suggest that the CpG adjuvant in the AV7909 vaccine helps to elicit a more robust immune response in subjects over the age of 65. Alternative dosing strategies may be considered in this population given the high seroprotection rates with Day 1 and 29, or Day 1, 15, and 29 regimens. Trial Registration: clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT03518125.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0264-410X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-2518</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2020.10.053</identifier><identifier>PMID: 33129609</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Netherlands: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Adolescent ; Adult ; Adults ; Age ; Aged ; Aluminum ; Anthrax ; Anthrax - prevention &amp; control ; Anthrax Vaccines ; Antibodies ; Antibodies, Neutralizing ; Antigens ; Clinical trial ; CpG islands ; Dosage ; Drug dosages ; Elderly ; Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay ; Evaluation ; Humans ; Immune response ; Immune system ; Immunization ; Immunization Schedule ; Immunogenicity ; Licenses ; Middle Aged ; Neutralization ; Older people ; Population ; Prophylaxis ; Protective antigen ; Robustness ; Safety ; Schedules ; Toxins ; Vaccine ; Vaccines ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>Vaccine, 2020-11, Vol.38 (50), p.7970-7976</ispartof><rights>2020</rights><rights>Published by Elsevier Ltd.</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier Limited Nov 25, 2020</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c440t-b46a201ea306de25a907c78b7c661828f7cb95c5b238e297fd79eb3306b0fd023</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c440t-b46a201ea306de25a907c78b7c661828f7cb95c5b238e297fd79eb3306b0fd023</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33129609$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Wolfe, Daniel N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Espeland, Eric M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gao, Yonghong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lu, Di</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Blatner, Gretta</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Amass, Kathryn</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Horwith, Gary</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tong, Xiaomi M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hopkins, Robert</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>David, Gloria L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jepson, Brett M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>King, James C.</creatorcontrib><title>Evaluation of BioThrax® and AV7909 anthrax vaccines in adults 66 years of age or older</title><title>Vaccine</title><addtitle>Vaccine</addtitle><description>Multiple Anthrax vaccines are licensed or in development for post-exposure prophylaxis in individuals 18 to 65 years of age. No information exists on anthrax vaccines in populations over the age of 65. It is critical that we assess the capacity of anthrax vaccines to generate a protective immune response in older individuals. In this study, we compared BioThrax® to a formulation containing a CpG adjuvant (AV7909). We conducted a Phase 2 clinical study to evaluate safety and immunogenicity of three vaccination schedules of the AV7909 vaccine candidate and one vaccination schedule of BioThrax® vaccine in adults over 65 years of age. A total of 305 subjects were enrolled to assess safety and immunogenicity by seroprotection rates, toxin neutralizing antibody titers, and anti-Protective Antigen ELISA titers. Compared to BioThrax, AV7909 elicited a more robust immune response in older subjects, especially with three doses of AV7909 at Days 1, 15, and 29, or two doses at Days 1 and 29. These trends were true with both seroprotection rates as defined by the percentage of subjects with 50 percent neutralization factors greater than 0.56, and geometric mean antibody titers. The responses to both AV7909 and BioThax were lower in older subjects compared to those aged 18–50. The immunogenicity data suggest that the CpG adjuvant in the AV7909 vaccine helps to elicit a more robust immune response in subjects over the age of 65. Alternative dosing strategies may be considered in this population given the high seroprotection rates with Day 1 and 29, or Day 1, 15, and 29 regimens. Trial Registration: clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT03518125.</description><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Adults</subject><subject>Age</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aluminum</subject><subject>Anthrax</subject><subject>Anthrax - prevention &amp; control</subject><subject>Anthrax Vaccines</subject><subject>Antibodies</subject><subject>Antibodies, Neutralizing</subject><subject>Antigens</subject><subject>Clinical trial</subject><subject>CpG islands</subject><subject>Dosage</subject><subject>Drug dosages</subject><subject>Elderly</subject><subject>Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay</subject><subject>Evaluation</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Immune response</subject><subject>Immune system</subject><subject>Immunization</subject><subject>Immunization Schedule</subject><subject>Immunogenicity</subject><subject>Licenses</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Neutralization</subject><subject>Older people</subject><subject>Population</subject><subject>Prophylaxis</subject><subject>Protective antigen</subject><subject>Robustness</subject><subject>Safety</subject><subject>Schedules</subject><subject>Toxins</subject><subject>Vaccine</subject><subject>Vaccines</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>0264-410X</issn><issn>1873-2518</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkMuO1DAQRS0EYpqBTwBZYsMmTdmJXys0jIaHNBKb4bGzHLsCbqXjwU5azE_xEXwZjrphwYaVratzq0qHkKcMtgyYfLnbHpz3ccItB75mWxDtPbJhWrUNF0zfJxvgsms6Bl_OyKNSdgAVYeYhOWtbxo0EsyGfrw5uXNwc00TTQF_HdPMtux-_flI3BXrxSRkw9TuvIT1tLDRO1IVlnAuVkt6hy2Utu69IU6ZpDJgfkweDGws-Ob3n5OObq5vLd831h7fvLy-uG991MDd9Jx0Hhq4FGZALZ0B5pXvlpWSa60H53ggvet5q5EYNQRns20r3MATg7Tl5cZx7m9P3Bcts97F4HEc3YVqK5Z2QWmjdsYo-_wfdpSVP9bpKSQCplJCVEkfK51RKxsHe5rh3-c4ysKt5u7MnD3Y1v8ZVa-09O01f-j2Gv60_qivw6ghg1XGImG3xESePIWb0sw0p_mfFb3DQlO8</recordid><startdate>20201125</startdate><enddate>20201125</enddate><creator>Wolfe, Daniel N.</creator><creator>Espeland, Eric M.</creator><creator>Gao, Yonghong</creator><creator>Lu, Di</creator><creator>Blatner, Gretta</creator><creator>Amass, Kathryn</creator><creator>Horwith, Gary</creator><creator>Tong, Xiaomi M.</creator><creator>Hopkins, Robert</creator><creator>David, Gloria L.</creator><creator>Jepson, Brett M.</creator><creator>King, James C.</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier Limited</general><scope>6I.</scope><scope>AAFTH</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7T2</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88C</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9-</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0R</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M0T</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20201125</creationdate><title>Evaluation of BioThrax® and AV7909 anthrax vaccines in adults 66 years of age or older</title><author>Wolfe, Daniel N. ; Espeland, Eric M. ; Gao, Yonghong ; Lu, Di ; Blatner, Gretta ; Amass, Kathryn ; Horwith, Gary ; Tong, Xiaomi M. ; Hopkins, Robert ; David, Gloria L. ; Jepson, Brett M. ; King, James C.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c440t-b46a201ea306de25a907c78b7c661828f7cb95c5b238e297fd79eb3306b0fd023</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Adults</topic><topic>Age</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aluminum</topic><topic>Anthrax</topic><topic>Anthrax - prevention &amp; control</topic><topic>Anthrax Vaccines</topic><topic>Antibodies</topic><topic>Antibodies, Neutralizing</topic><topic>Antigens</topic><topic>Clinical trial</topic><topic>CpG islands</topic><topic>Dosage</topic><topic>Drug dosages</topic><topic>Elderly</topic><topic>Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay</topic><topic>Evaluation</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Immune response</topic><topic>Immune system</topic><topic>Immunization</topic><topic>Immunization Schedule</topic><topic>Immunogenicity</topic><topic>Licenses</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Neutralization</topic><topic>Older people</topic><topic>Population</topic><topic>Prophylaxis</topic><topic>Protective antigen</topic><topic>Robustness</topic><topic>Safety</topic><topic>Schedules</topic><topic>Toxins</topic><topic>Vaccine</topic><topic>Vaccines</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Wolfe, Daniel N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Espeland, Eric M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gao, Yonghong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lu, Di</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Blatner, Gretta</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Amass, Kathryn</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Horwith, Gary</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tong, Xiaomi M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hopkins, Robert</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>David, Gloria L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jepson, Brett M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>King, James C.</creatorcontrib><collection>ScienceDirect Open Access Titles</collection><collection>Elsevier:ScienceDirect:Open Access</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Health and Safety Science Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Consumer Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Consumer Health Database</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Vaccine</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Wolfe, Daniel N.</au><au>Espeland, Eric M.</au><au>Gao, Yonghong</au><au>Lu, Di</au><au>Blatner, Gretta</au><au>Amass, Kathryn</au><au>Horwith, Gary</au><au>Tong, Xiaomi M.</au><au>Hopkins, Robert</au><au>David, Gloria L.</au><au>Jepson, Brett M.</au><au>King, James C.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Evaluation of BioThrax® and AV7909 anthrax vaccines in adults 66 years of age or older</atitle><jtitle>Vaccine</jtitle><addtitle>Vaccine</addtitle><date>2020-11-25</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>38</volume><issue>50</issue><spage>7970</spage><epage>7976</epage><pages>7970-7976</pages><issn>0264-410X</issn><eissn>1873-2518</eissn><abstract>Multiple Anthrax vaccines are licensed or in development for post-exposure prophylaxis in individuals 18 to 65 years of age. No information exists on anthrax vaccines in populations over the age of 65. It is critical that we assess the capacity of anthrax vaccines to generate a protective immune response in older individuals. In this study, we compared BioThrax® to a formulation containing a CpG adjuvant (AV7909). We conducted a Phase 2 clinical study to evaluate safety and immunogenicity of three vaccination schedules of the AV7909 vaccine candidate and one vaccination schedule of BioThrax® vaccine in adults over 65 years of age. A total of 305 subjects were enrolled to assess safety and immunogenicity by seroprotection rates, toxin neutralizing antibody titers, and anti-Protective Antigen ELISA titers. Compared to BioThrax, AV7909 elicited a more robust immune response in older subjects, especially with three doses of AV7909 at Days 1, 15, and 29, or two doses at Days 1 and 29. These trends were true with both seroprotection rates as defined by the percentage of subjects with 50 percent neutralization factors greater than 0.56, and geometric mean antibody titers. The responses to both AV7909 and BioThax were lower in older subjects compared to those aged 18–50. The immunogenicity data suggest that the CpG adjuvant in the AV7909 vaccine helps to elicit a more robust immune response in subjects over the age of 65. Alternative dosing strategies may be considered in this population given the high seroprotection rates with Day 1 and 29, or Day 1, 15, and 29 regimens. Trial Registration: clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT03518125.</abstract><cop>Netherlands</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>33129609</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.vaccine.2020.10.053</doi><tpages>7</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0264-410X
ispartof Vaccine, 2020-11, Vol.38 (50), p.7970-7976
issn 0264-410X
1873-2518
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2456858841
source ScienceDirect Freedom Collection
subjects Adolescent
Adult
Adults
Age
Aged
Aluminum
Anthrax
Anthrax - prevention & control
Anthrax Vaccines
Antibodies
Antibodies, Neutralizing
Antigens
Clinical trial
CpG islands
Dosage
Drug dosages
Elderly
Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay
Evaluation
Humans
Immune response
Immune system
Immunization
Immunization Schedule
Immunogenicity
Licenses
Middle Aged
Neutralization
Older people
Population
Prophylaxis
Protective antigen
Robustness
Safety
Schedules
Toxins
Vaccine
Vaccines
Young Adult
title Evaluation of BioThrax® and AV7909 anthrax vaccines in adults 66 years of age or older
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-10T16%3A05%3A05IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Evaluation%20of%20BioThrax%C2%AE%20and%20AV7909%20anthrax%20vaccines%20in%20adults%2066%20years%20of%20age%20or%20older&rft.jtitle=Vaccine&rft.au=Wolfe,%20Daniel%20N.&rft.date=2020-11-25&rft.volume=38&rft.issue=50&rft.spage=7970&rft.epage=7976&rft.pages=7970-7976&rft.issn=0264-410X&rft.eissn=1873-2518&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.vaccine.2020.10.053&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2460067756%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c440t-b46a201ea306de25a907c78b7c661828f7cb95c5b238e297fd79eb3306b0fd023%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2460067756&rft_id=info:pmid/33129609&rfr_iscdi=true