Loading…

Complications in pulmonary vein isolation in the Netherlands Heart Registration differ with sex and ablation technique

Abstract Aims  Pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) has become a cornerstone of the invasive treatment of atrial fibrillation. Severe complications are reported in 1–3% of patients. This study aims to compare complications and follow-up outcome of PVI in patients with atrial fibrillation. Methods and resu...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Europace (London, England) England), 2021-02, Vol.23 (2), p.216-225
Main Authors: Mol, Daniel, Houterman, Saskia, Balt, Jippe C, Bhagwandien, Rohit E, Blaauw, Yuri, Delnoy, Peter-Paul H, van Driel, Vincent J, Driessen, Antoine H, Folkeringa, Richard J, Hassink, Rutger J, van Huysduynen, Bart Hooft, Luermans, Justin G, Ouss, Alexandre J, Stevenhagen, Yorick J, van Veghel, Dennis, Westra, Sjoerd W, de Jong, Jonas S, de Groot, Joris R
Format: Article
Language:English
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Request full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c377t-505fa311c405b3e0e78d06f3b1471957fb24f753b298e3353e2d133aef6bfcab3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c377t-505fa311c405b3e0e78d06f3b1471957fb24f753b298e3353e2d133aef6bfcab3
container_end_page 225
container_issue 2
container_start_page 216
container_title Europace (London, England)
container_volume 23
creator Mol, Daniel
Houterman, Saskia
Balt, Jippe C
Bhagwandien, Rohit E
Blaauw, Yuri
Delnoy, Peter-Paul H
van Driel, Vincent J
Driessen, Antoine H
Folkeringa, Richard J
Hassink, Rutger J
van Huysduynen, Bart Hooft
Luermans, Justin G
Ouss, Alexandre J
Stevenhagen, Yorick J
van Veghel, Dennis
Westra, Sjoerd W
de Jong, Jonas S
de Groot, Joris R
description Abstract Aims  Pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) has become a cornerstone of the invasive treatment of atrial fibrillation. Severe complications are reported in 1–3% of patients. This study aims to compare complications and follow-up outcome of PVI in patients with atrial fibrillation. Methods and results  The data were extracted from the Netherlands Heart Registration. Procedural and follow-up outcomes in patients treated with conventional radiofrequency (C-RF), multielectrode phased RF (Ph-RF), or cryoballoon (CB) ablation from 2012 to 2017 were compared. Subgroup analysis was performed to identify variables associated with complications and repeat ablations. In total, 13 823 patients (69% male) were included. The reported complication incidence was 3.6%. Patients treated with C-RF developed more cardiac tamponades (C-RF 0.8% vs. Ph-RF 0.3% vs. CB 0.3%, P ≤ 0.001) and vascular complications (C-RF 1.7% vs. Ph-RF 1.2% vs. CB 1.3%, P ≤ 0.001). Ph-RF was associated with fewer bleeding complications (C-RF: 1.0% vs. Ph-RF: 0.4% vs. CB: 0.7%, P = 0.020). Phrenic nerve palsy mainly occurred in patients treated with CB (C-RF: 0.1% vs. Ph-RF: 0.2% vs. CB: 1.5%, P ≤ 0.001). In total, 18.4% of patients were referred for repeat ablation within 1 year. Female sex, age, and CHA2DS2-VASc were independent risk factors for cardiac tamponade and bleeding complications, with an adjusted OR for female patients of 2.97 (95% CI 1.98–4.45) and 2.02 (95% CI 1.03–4.00) respectively. Conclusion  The reported complication rate during PVI was low. Patients treated with C-RF ablation were more likely to develop cardiac tamponades and vascular complications. Female sex was associated with more cardiac tamponade and bleeding complications. Graphical Abstract
doi_str_mv 10.1093/europace/euaa255
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_TOX</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2457277324</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><oup_id>10.1093/europace/euaa255</oup_id><sourcerecordid>2457277324</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c377t-505fa311c405b3e0e78d06f3b1471957fb24f753b298e3353e2d133aef6bfcab3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkM9LwzAUx4Mobk7vniRHQar50SzrUYY6QRREzyVtX1ykbWqSTv3vzWzn1Uvywvu87wsfhE4puaQk41fQO9upEmKhFBNiD02p4CxhJGP7sSZZlgjKsgk68v6dECJZJg7RhHOaUirYFG2WtulqU6pgbOuxaXHX141tlfvGG4hP423929z2whrwI8TT1aqtPF6BcgE_w5vxwQ1UZbQGhz9NWGMPXzhyWBVjRIBy3ZqPHo7RgVa1h5PxnqHX25uX5Sp5eLq7X14_JCWXMiSCCK04pWVKRMGBgFxUZK55QVNJMyF1wVItBS9YtgDOBQdWUc4V6HmhS1XwGTofcjtn41of8sb4Eur4fbC9z1kqJJOSszSiZEBLZ713oPPOmSZ6yCnJt7bzne18tB1Hzsb0vmig-hvY6Y3AxQDYvvs_7gcR7o_G</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2457277324</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Complications in pulmonary vein isolation in the Netherlands Heart Registration differ with sex and ablation technique</title><source>OUP_牛津大学出版社OA刊</source><creator>Mol, Daniel ; Houterman, Saskia ; Balt, Jippe C ; Bhagwandien, Rohit E ; Blaauw, Yuri ; Delnoy, Peter-Paul H ; van Driel, Vincent J ; Driessen, Antoine H ; Folkeringa, Richard J ; Hassink, Rutger J ; van Huysduynen, Bart Hooft ; Luermans, Justin G ; Ouss, Alexandre J ; Stevenhagen, Yorick J ; van Veghel, Dennis ; Westra, Sjoerd W ; de Jong, Jonas S ; de Groot, Joris R</creator><creatorcontrib>Mol, Daniel ; Houterman, Saskia ; Balt, Jippe C ; Bhagwandien, Rohit E ; Blaauw, Yuri ; Delnoy, Peter-Paul H ; van Driel, Vincent J ; Driessen, Antoine H ; Folkeringa, Richard J ; Hassink, Rutger J ; van Huysduynen, Bart Hooft ; Luermans, Justin G ; Ouss, Alexandre J ; Stevenhagen, Yorick J ; van Veghel, Dennis ; Westra, Sjoerd W ; de Jong, Jonas S ; de Groot, Joris R ; Netherlands Heart Registration Ablation Registration Committee ; the Netherlands Heart Registration Ablation Registration Committee</creatorcontrib><description>Abstract Aims  Pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) has become a cornerstone of the invasive treatment of atrial fibrillation. Severe complications are reported in 1–3% of patients. This study aims to compare complications and follow-up outcome of PVI in patients with atrial fibrillation. Methods and results  The data were extracted from the Netherlands Heart Registration. Procedural and follow-up outcomes in patients treated with conventional radiofrequency (C-RF), multielectrode phased RF (Ph-RF), or cryoballoon (CB) ablation from 2012 to 2017 were compared. Subgroup analysis was performed to identify variables associated with complications and repeat ablations. In total, 13 823 patients (69% male) were included. The reported complication incidence was 3.6%. Patients treated with C-RF developed more cardiac tamponades (C-RF 0.8% vs. Ph-RF 0.3% vs. CB 0.3%, P ≤ 0.001) and vascular complications (C-RF 1.7% vs. Ph-RF 1.2% vs. CB 1.3%, P ≤ 0.001). Ph-RF was associated with fewer bleeding complications (C-RF: 1.0% vs. Ph-RF: 0.4% vs. CB: 0.7%, P = 0.020). Phrenic nerve palsy mainly occurred in patients treated with CB (C-RF: 0.1% vs. Ph-RF: 0.2% vs. CB: 1.5%, P ≤ 0.001). In total, 18.4% of patients were referred for repeat ablation within 1 year. Female sex, age, and CHA2DS2-VASc were independent risk factors for cardiac tamponade and bleeding complications, with an adjusted OR for female patients of 2.97 (95% CI 1.98–4.45) and 2.02 (95% CI 1.03–4.00) respectively. Conclusion  The reported complication rate during PVI was low. Patients treated with C-RF ablation were more likely to develop cardiac tamponades and vascular complications. Female sex was associated with more cardiac tamponade and bleeding complications. Graphical Abstract</description><identifier>ISSN: 1099-5129</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1532-2092</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1093/europace/euaa255</identifier><identifier>PMID: 33141152</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Oxford University Press</publisher><ispartof>Europace (London, England), 2021-02, Vol.23 (2), p.216-225</ispartof><rights>Published on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology. All rights reserved. © The Author(s) 2020. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com. 2020</rights><rights>Published on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology. All rights reserved. © The Author(s) 2020. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c377t-505fa311c405b3e0e78d06f3b1471957fb24f753b298e3353e2d133aef6bfcab3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c377t-505fa311c405b3e0e78d06f3b1471957fb24f753b298e3353e2d133aef6bfcab3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-0746-4903</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1604,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><linktorsrc>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1093/europace/euaa255$$EView_record_in_Oxford_University_Press$$FView_record_in_$$GOxford_University_Press</linktorsrc><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33141152$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Mol, Daniel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Houterman, Saskia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Balt, Jippe C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bhagwandien, Rohit E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Blaauw, Yuri</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Delnoy, Peter-Paul H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van Driel, Vincent J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Driessen, Antoine H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Folkeringa, Richard J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hassink, Rutger J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van Huysduynen, Bart Hooft</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Luermans, Justin G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ouss, Alexandre J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stevenhagen, Yorick J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van Veghel, Dennis</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Westra, Sjoerd W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Jong, Jonas S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Groot, Joris R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Netherlands Heart Registration Ablation Registration Committee</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>the Netherlands Heart Registration Ablation Registration Committee</creatorcontrib><title>Complications in pulmonary vein isolation in the Netherlands Heart Registration differ with sex and ablation technique</title><title>Europace (London, England)</title><addtitle>Europace</addtitle><description>Abstract Aims  Pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) has become a cornerstone of the invasive treatment of atrial fibrillation. Severe complications are reported in 1–3% of patients. This study aims to compare complications and follow-up outcome of PVI in patients with atrial fibrillation. Methods and results  The data were extracted from the Netherlands Heart Registration. Procedural and follow-up outcomes in patients treated with conventional radiofrequency (C-RF), multielectrode phased RF (Ph-RF), or cryoballoon (CB) ablation from 2012 to 2017 were compared. Subgroup analysis was performed to identify variables associated with complications and repeat ablations. In total, 13 823 patients (69% male) were included. The reported complication incidence was 3.6%. Patients treated with C-RF developed more cardiac tamponades (C-RF 0.8% vs. Ph-RF 0.3% vs. CB 0.3%, P ≤ 0.001) and vascular complications (C-RF 1.7% vs. Ph-RF 1.2% vs. CB 1.3%, P ≤ 0.001). Ph-RF was associated with fewer bleeding complications (C-RF: 1.0% vs. Ph-RF: 0.4% vs. CB: 0.7%, P = 0.020). Phrenic nerve palsy mainly occurred in patients treated with CB (C-RF: 0.1% vs. Ph-RF: 0.2% vs. CB: 1.5%, P ≤ 0.001). In total, 18.4% of patients were referred for repeat ablation within 1 year. Female sex, age, and CHA2DS2-VASc were independent risk factors for cardiac tamponade and bleeding complications, with an adjusted OR for female patients of 2.97 (95% CI 1.98–4.45) and 2.02 (95% CI 1.03–4.00) respectively. Conclusion  The reported complication rate during PVI was low. Patients treated with C-RF ablation were more likely to develop cardiac tamponades and vascular complications. Female sex was associated with more cardiac tamponade and bleeding complications. Graphical Abstract</description><issn>1099-5129</issn><issn>1532-2092</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkM9LwzAUx4Mobk7vniRHQar50SzrUYY6QRREzyVtX1ykbWqSTv3vzWzn1Uvywvu87wsfhE4puaQk41fQO9upEmKhFBNiD02p4CxhJGP7sSZZlgjKsgk68v6dECJZJg7RhHOaUirYFG2WtulqU6pgbOuxaXHX141tlfvGG4hP423929z2whrwI8TT1aqtPF6BcgE_w5vxwQ1UZbQGhz9NWGMPXzhyWBVjRIBy3ZqPHo7RgVa1h5PxnqHX25uX5Sp5eLq7X14_JCWXMiSCCK04pWVKRMGBgFxUZK55QVNJMyF1wVItBS9YtgDOBQdWUc4V6HmhS1XwGTofcjtn41of8sb4Eur4fbC9z1kqJJOSszSiZEBLZ713oPPOmSZ6yCnJt7bzne18tB1Hzsb0vmig-hvY6Y3AxQDYvvs_7gcR7o_G</recordid><startdate>20210205</startdate><enddate>20210205</enddate><creator>Mol, Daniel</creator><creator>Houterman, Saskia</creator><creator>Balt, Jippe C</creator><creator>Bhagwandien, Rohit E</creator><creator>Blaauw, Yuri</creator><creator>Delnoy, Peter-Paul H</creator><creator>van Driel, Vincent J</creator><creator>Driessen, Antoine H</creator><creator>Folkeringa, Richard J</creator><creator>Hassink, Rutger J</creator><creator>van Huysduynen, Bart Hooft</creator><creator>Luermans, Justin G</creator><creator>Ouss, Alexandre J</creator><creator>Stevenhagen, Yorick J</creator><creator>van Veghel, Dennis</creator><creator>Westra, Sjoerd W</creator><creator>de Jong, Jonas S</creator><creator>de Groot, Joris R</creator><general>Oxford University Press</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0746-4903</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20210205</creationdate><title>Complications in pulmonary vein isolation in the Netherlands Heart Registration differ with sex and ablation technique</title><author>Mol, Daniel ; Houterman, Saskia ; Balt, Jippe C ; Bhagwandien, Rohit E ; Blaauw, Yuri ; Delnoy, Peter-Paul H ; van Driel, Vincent J ; Driessen, Antoine H ; Folkeringa, Richard J ; Hassink, Rutger J ; van Huysduynen, Bart Hooft ; Luermans, Justin G ; Ouss, Alexandre J ; Stevenhagen, Yorick J ; van Veghel, Dennis ; Westra, Sjoerd W ; de Jong, Jonas S ; de Groot, Joris R</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c377t-505fa311c405b3e0e78d06f3b1471957fb24f753b298e3353e2d133aef6bfcab3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Mol, Daniel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Houterman, Saskia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Balt, Jippe C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bhagwandien, Rohit E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Blaauw, Yuri</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Delnoy, Peter-Paul H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van Driel, Vincent J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Driessen, Antoine H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Folkeringa, Richard J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hassink, Rutger J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van Huysduynen, Bart Hooft</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Luermans, Justin G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ouss, Alexandre J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stevenhagen, Yorick J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van Veghel, Dennis</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Westra, Sjoerd W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Jong, Jonas S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Groot, Joris R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Netherlands Heart Registration Ablation Registration Committee</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>the Netherlands Heart Registration Ablation Registration Committee</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Europace (London, England)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext_linktorsrc</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Mol, Daniel</au><au>Houterman, Saskia</au><au>Balt, Jippe C</au><au>Bhagwandien, Rohit E</au><au>Blaauw, Yuri</au><au>Delnoy, Peter-Paul H</au><au>van Driel, Vincent J</au><au>Driessen, Antoine H</au><au>Folkeringa, Richard J</au><au>Hassink, Rutger J</au><au>van Huysduynen, Bart Hooft</au><au>Luermans, Justin G</au><au>Ouss, Alexandre J</au><au>Stevenhagen, Yorick J</au><au>van Veghel, Dennis</au><au>Westra, Sjoerd W</au><au>de Jong, Jonas S</au><au>de Groot, Joris R</au><aucorp>Netherlands Heart Registration Ablation Registration Committee</aucorp><aucorp>the Netherlands Heart Registration Ablation Registration Committee</aucorp><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Complications in pulmonary vein isolation in the Netherlands Heart Registration differ with sex and ablation technique</atitle><jtitle>Europace (London, England)</jtitle><addtitle>Europace</addtitle><date>2021-02-05</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>23</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>216</spage><epage>225</epage><pages>216-225</pages><issn>1099-5129</issn><eissn>1532-2092</eissn><abstract>Abstract Aims  Pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) has become a cornerstone of the invasive treatment of atrial fibrillation. Severe complications are reported in 1–3% of patients. This study aims to compare complications and follow-up outcome of PVI in patients with atrial fibrillation. Methods and results  The data were extracted from the Netherlands Heart Registration. Procedural and follow-up outcomes in patients treated with conventional radiofrequency (C-RF), multielectrode phased RF (Ph-RF), or cryoballoon (CB) ablation from 2012 to 2017 were compared. Subgroup analysis was performed to identify variables associated with complications and repeat ablations. In total, 13 823 patients (69% male) were included. The reported complication incidence was 3.6%. Patients treated with C-RF developed more cardiac tamponades (C-RF 0.8% vs. Ph-RF 0.3% vs. CB 0.3%, P ≤ 0.001) and vascular complications (C-RF 1.7% vs. Ph-RF 1.2% vs. CB 1.3%, P ≤ 0.001). Ph-RF was associated with fewer bleeding complications (C-RF: 1.0% vs. Ph-RF: 0.4% vs. CB: 0.7%, P = 0.020). Phrenic nerve palsy mainly occurred in patients treated with CB (C-RF: 0.1% vs. Ph-RF: 0.2% vs. CB: 1.5%, P ≤ 0.001). In total, 18.4% of patients were referred for repeat ablation within 1 year. Female sex, age, and CHA2DS2-VASc were independent risk factors for cardiac tamponade and bleeding complications, with an adjusted OR for female patients of 2.97 (95% CI 1.98–4.45) and 2.02 (95% CI 1.03–4.00) respectively. Conclusion  The reported complication rate during PVI was low. Patients treated with C-RF ablation were more likely to develop cardiac tamponades and vascular complications. Female sex was associated with more cardiac tamponade and bleeding complications. Graphical Abstract</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Oxford University Press</pub><pmid>33141152</pmid><doi>10.1093/europace/euaa255</doi><tpages>10</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0746-4903</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext_linktorsrc
identifier ISSN: 1099-5129
ispartof Europace (London, England), 2021-02, Vol.23 (2), p.216-225
issn 1099-5129
1532-2092
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2457277324
source OUP_牛津大学出版社OA刊
title Complications in pulmonary vein isolation in the Netherlands Heart Registration differ with sex and ablation technique
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-01T05%3A19%3A36IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_TOX&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Complications%20in%20pulmonary%20vein%20isolation%20in%20the%20Netherlands%20Heart%20Registration%20differ%20with%20sex%20and%20ablation%20technique&rft.jtitle=Europace%20(London,%20England)&rft.au=Mol,%20Daniel&rft.aucorp=Netherlands%20Heart%20Registration%20Ablation%20Registration%20Committee&rft.date=2021-02-05&rft.volume=23&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=216&rft.epage=225&rft.pages=216-225&rft.issn=1099-5129&rft.eissn=1532-2092&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093/europace/euaa255&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_TOX%3E2457277324%3C/proquest_TOX%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c377t-505fa311c405b3e0e78d06f3b1471957fb24f753b298e3353e2d133aef6bfcab3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2457277324&rft_id=info:pmid/33141152&rft_oup_id=10.1093/europace/euaa255&rfr_iscdi=true