Loading…

Diagnostic utility of fine needle aspiration cytology and core biopsy histopathology with or without immunohistochemical staining in the subtyping of the non‐small cell lung carcinomas: Experience from an academic centre in Turkey

Introduction This retrospective morphological study compared the results of fine needle aspiration (FNA) cytology, haematoxylin‐eosin (HE)‐stained samples and immunohistochemical (IHC)‐stained core needle biopsy (CNB) histology samples for primary non‐small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) subtyping. We ass...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Cytopathology (Oxford) 2021-05, Vol.32 (3), p.331-337
Main Authors: Bayrak, Büşra Yaprak, Paksoy, Nadir, Vural, Çiğdem
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Introduction This retrospective morphological study compared the results of fine needle aspiration (FNA) cytology, haematoxylin‐eosin (HE)‐stained samples and immunohistochemical (IHC)‐stained core needle biopsy (CNB) histology samples for primary non‐small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) subtyping. We assessed the diagnostic utility of these methods to investigate the contribution of each method to NSCLC subtyping. We also identified the point at which NSCLC subtyping could be performed using histomorphology alone without IHC. Methodology Concurrent FNA and CNB specimens obtained via a single computed tomography‐guided procedure and diagnosed as NSCLC in the Pathology Department of our university within 3 years were reviewed. The results of FNA samples, HE‐stained biopsies and IHC‐stained biopsies were compared according to subtype. Results A total of 141 subjects were enrolled in the study. For subtyping, FNA provided an accurate diagnosis in 70 (55.1%) of 127 eligible subjects after the exclusion of 14 cases determined as not otherwise specified. CNB histology without IHC achieved a diagnosis in 53 (41.7%) of 127 subjects, which was a significant difference (P 
ISSN:0956-5507
1365-2303
DOI:10.1111/cyt.12937