Loading…

Meta-analysis Comparing Outcomes of Percutaneous Coronary Intervention of Native Artery Versus Bypass Graft in Patients With Prior Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting

Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is common in patients with prior coronary artery bypass graft surgery (CABG), however the data on the association between the PCI target-vessel and clinical outcomes are not clear. We aimed to investigate long-term clinical outcomes of patients with prior CAB...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:The American journal of cardiology 2021-02, Vol.140, p.47-54
Main Authors: Farag, Mohamed, Gue, Ying X., Brilakis, Emmanouil S., Egred, Mohaned
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c393t-5e1390bda8bbc756ea9396b76258deb5af88ce992fe4c58d758648e87166c2323
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c393t-5e1390bda8bbc756ea9396b76258deb5af88ce992fe4c58d758648e87166c2323
container_end_page 54
container_issue
container_start_page 47
container_title The American journal of cardiology
container_volume 140
creator Farag, Mohamed
Gue, Ying X.
Brilakis, Emmanouil S.
Egred, Mohaned
description Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is common in patients with prior coronary artery bypass graft surgery (CABG), however the data on the association between the PCI target-vessel and clinical outcomes are not clear. We aimed to investigate long-term clinical outcomes of patients with prior CABG who underwent PCI of either bypass graft or native artery. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies comparing PCI of either bypass graft or native artery in patients with prior CABG. Twenty-two studies comprising 40,984 patients were included. The median follow-up duration was 2 (1 to 3) years. Compared with bypass graft PCI, native artery PCI was frequent (61% vs 39%) and was associated with lower major adverse cardiac events (MACE) (odds ratio [OR] 0.51, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.45 to 0.57, p
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.amjcard.2020.10.062
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2457691336</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0002914920311954</els_id><sourcerecordid>2475350542</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c393t-5e1390bda8bbc756ea9396b76258deb5af88ce992fe4c58d758648e87166c2323</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkc2O0zAUhS0EYsrAI4AssWGTYsexE6_QUMEw0sB0wc_ScpwbcNTE5dqp1NfhSXHU8iM2rCxffefY9xxCnnK25oyrl8PajoOz2K1LVi6zNVPlPbLiTa0Lrrm4T1aMsbLQvNIX5FGMQ75yLtVDciEEryqu9Ir8eA_JFnayu2P0kW7CuLfop6_0bk4ujBBp6OkW0M3JThDmBcEwWTzSmykBHmBKPkwL9cEmfwB6hXl8pJ8BY6ZfH_c2RnqNtk_UT3SboSyJ9ItP3-gWfcA_jmfp35r8lcfkQW93EZ6cz0vy6e2bj5t3xe3d9c3m6rZwQotUSOBCs7azTdu6WiqwWmjV1qqUTQettH3TONC67KFyeVTLRlUNNDVXypWiFJfkxcl3j-H7DDGZ0UcHu91pcVNWslY5WKEy-vwfdAgz5hAXqpZCMlkthvJEOQwxIvRmj37MixrOzFKiGcy5RLOUuIxziVn37Ow-tyN0v1W_WsvAqxMAOY6DBzTR5VQddB7BJdMF_58nfgKd5rKX</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2475350542</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Meta-analysis Comparing Outcomes of Percutaneous Coronary Intervention of Native Artery Versus Bypass Graft in Patients With Prior Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting</title><source>ScienceDirect Freedom Collection 2022-2024</source><creator>Farag, Mohamed ; Gue, Ying X. ; Brilakis, Emmanouil S. ; Egred, Mohaned</creator><creatorcontrib>Farag, Mohamed ; Gue, Ying X. ; Brilakis, Emmanouil S. ; Egred, Mohaned</creatorcontrib><description>Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is common in patients with prior coronary artery bypass graft surgery (CABG), however the data on the association between the PCI target-vessel and clinical outcomes are not clear. We aimed to investigate long-term clinical outcomes of patients with prior CABG who underwent PCI of either bypass graft or native artery. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies comparing PCI of either bypass graft or native artery in patients with prior CABG. Twenty-two studies comprising 40,984 patients were included. The median follow-up duration was 2 (1 to 3) years. Compared with bypass graft PCI, native artery PCI was frequent (61% vs 39%) and was associated with lower major adverse cardiac events (MACE) (odds ratio [OR] 0.51, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.45 to 0.57, p &lt;0.001), lower all-cause death (OR 0.65, 95% CI 0.49 to 0.87, p = 0.004), lower myocardial infarction (OR 0.56, 95% CI 0.45 to 0.69, p &lt;0.001), and lower target vessel revascularization (TVR) (OR 0.62, 95% CI 0.51to 0.76, p &lt;0.001). There was no significant difference in the early incidence of major bleeding or stroke between the 2 cohorts. In 6 studies involving 2,919 patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction, there was no significant differences between the 2 cohorts. The increase in TVR risk with bypass graft PCI was associated with MACE. In conclusion, in observational studies involving patients with prior CABG, native artery PCI was associated with lower MACE, all-cause death, myocardial infarction, and TVR compared with bypass graft PCI at a median follow-up of 2 years. Native artery PCI might be considered the preferred treatment for bypass graft failure.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0002-9149</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-1913</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2020.10.062</identifier><identifier>PMID: 33144169</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Acute coronary syndromes ; Angioplasty ; Bias ; Bleeding ; Blood vessels ; Cerebral infarction ; Clinical outcomes ; Confidence intervals ; Coronary artery ; Coronary Artery Bypass - methods ; Coronary Artery Disease - surgery ; Coronary vessels ; Diabetes ; Global Health ; Graft Occlusion, Vascular - epidemiology ; Graft Occlusion, Vascular - prevention &amp; control ; Graft rejection ; Grafting ; Grafts ; Heart attacks ; Heart surgery ; Humans ; Incidence ; Intervention ; Meta-analysis ; Mortality ; Myocardial infarction ; Observational Studies as Topic ; Patients ; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention - methods ; Reoperation ; Stents ; Stroke ; Veins &amp; arteries</subject><ispartof>The American journal of cardiology, 2021-02, Vol.140, p.47-54</ispartof><rights>2020 Elsevier Inc.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><rights>2020. Elsevier Inc.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c393t-5e1390bda8bbc756ea9396b76258deb5af88ce992fe4c58d758648e87166c2323</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c393t-5e1390bda8bbc756ea9396b76258deb5af88ce992fe4c58d758648e87166c2323</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-0811-7679 ; 0000-0003-3642-318X ; 0000-0001-9416-9701 ; 0000-0001-9994-8915</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33144169$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Farag, Mohamed</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gue, Ying X.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brilakis, Emmanouil S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Egred, Mohaned</creatorcontrib><title>Meta-analysis Comparing Outcomes of Percutaneous Coronary Intervention of Native Artery Versus Bypass Graft in Patients With Prior Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting</title><title>The American journal of cardiology</title><addtitle>Am J Cardiol</addtitle><description>Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is common in patients with prior coronary artery bypass graft surgery (CABG), however the data on the association between the PCI target-vessel and clinical outcomes are not clear. We aimed to investigate long-term clinical outcomes of patients with prior CABG who underwent PCI of either bypass graft or native artery. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies comparing PCI of either bypass graft or native artery in patients with prior CABG. Twenty-two studies comprising 40,984 patients were included. The median follow-up duration was 2 (1 to 3) years. Compared with bypass graft PCI, native artery PCI was frequent (61% vs 39%) and was associated with lower major adverse cardiac events (MACE) (odds ratio [OR] 0.51, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.45 to 0.57, p &lt;0.001), lower all-cause death (OR 0.65, 95% CI 0.49 to 0.87, p = 0.004), lower myocardial infarction (OR 0.56, 95% CI 0.45 to 0.69, p &lt;0.001), and lower target vessel revascularization (TVR) (OR 0.62, 95% CI 0.51to 0.76, p &lt;0.001). There was no significant difference in the early incidence of major bleeding or stroke between the 2 cohorts. In 6 studies involving 2,919 patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction, there was no significant differences between the 2 cohorts. The increase in TVR risk with bypass graft PCI was associated with MACE. In conclusion, in observational studies involving patients with prior CABG, native artery PCI was associated with lower MACE, all-cause death, myocardial infarction, and TVR compared with bypass graft PCI at a median follow-up of 2 years. Native artery PCI might be considered the preferred treatment for bypass graft failure.</description><subject>Acute coronary syndromes</subject><subject>Angioplasty</subject><subject>Bias</subject><subject>Bleeding</subject><subject>Blood vessels</subject><subject>Cerebral infarction</subject><subject>Clinical outcomes</subject><subject>Confidence intervals</subject><subject>Coronary artery</subject><subject>Coronary Artery Bypass - methods</subject><subject>Coronary Artery Disease - surgery</subject><subject>Coronary vessels</subject><subject>Diabetes</subject><subject>Global Health</subject><subject>Graft Occlusion, Vascular - epidemiology</subject><subject>Graft Occlusion, Vascular - prevention &amp; control</subject><subject>Graft rejection</subject><subject>Grafting</subject><subject>Grafts</subject><subject>Heart attacks</subject><subject>Heart surgery</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Incidence</subject><subject>Intervention</subject><subject>Meta-analysis</subject><subject>Mortality</subject><subject>Myocardial infarction</subject><subject>Observational Studies as Topic</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Percutaneous Coronary Intervention - methods</subject><subject>Reoperation</subject><subject>Stents</subject><subject>Stroke</subject><subject>Veins &amp; arteries</subject><issn>0002-9149</issn><issn>1879-1913</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkc2O0zAUhS0EYsrAI4AssWGTYsexE6_QUMEw0sB0wc_ScpwbcNTE5dqp1NfhSXHU8iM2rCxffefY9xxCnnK25oyrl8PajoOz2K1LVi6zNVPlPbLiTa0Lrrm4T1aMsbLQvNIX5FGMQ75yLtVDciEEryqu9Ir8eA_JFnayu2P0kW7CuLfop6_0bk4ujBBp6OkW0M3JThDmBcEwWTzSmykBHmBKPkwL9cEmfwB6hXl8pJ8BY6ZfH_c2RnqNtk_UT3SboSyJ9ItP3-gWfcA_jmfp35r8lcfkQW93EZ6cz0vy6e2bj5t3xe3d9c3m6rZwQotUSOBCs7azTdu6WiqwWmjV1qqUTQettH3TONC67KFyeVTLRlUNNDVXypWiFJfkxcl3j-H7DDGZ0UcHu91pcVNWslY5WKEy-vwfdAgz5hAXqpZCMlkthvJEOQwxIvRmj37MixrOzFKiGcy5RLOUuIxziVn37Ow-tyN0v1W_WsvAqxMAOY6DBzTR5VQddB7BJdMF_58nfgKd5rKX</recordid><startdate>20210201</startdate><enddate>20210201</enddate><creator>Farag, Mohamed</creator><creator>Gue, Ying X.</creator><creator>Brilakis, Emmanouil S.</creator><creator>Egred, Mohaned</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>Elsevier Limited</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7TS</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M7Z</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0811-7679</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3642-318X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9416-9701</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9994-8915</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20210201</creationdate><title>Meta-analysis Comparing Outcomes of Percutaneous Coronary Intervention of Native Artery Versus Bypass Graft in Patients With Prior Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting</title><author>Farag, Mohamed ; Gue, Ying X. ; Brilakis, Emmanouil S. ; Egred, Mohaned</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c393t-5e1390bda8bbc756ea9396b76258deb5af88ce992fe4c58d758648e87166c2323</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Acute coronary syndromes</topic><topic>Angioplasty</topic><topic>Bias</topic><topic>Bleeding</topic><topic>Blood vessels</topic><topic>Cerebral infarction</topic><topic>Clinical outcomes</topic><topic>Confidence intervals</topic><topic>Coronary artery</topic><topic>Coronary Artery Bypass - methods</topic><topic>Coronary Artery Disease - surgery</topic><topic>Coronary vessels</topic><topic>Diabetes</topic><topic>Global Health</topic><topic>Graft Occlusion, Vascular - epidemiology</topic><topic>Graft Occlusion, Vascular - prevention &amp; control</topic><topic>Graft rejection</topic><topic>Grafting</topic><topic>Grafts</topic><topic>Heart attacks</topic><topic>Heart surgery</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Incidence</topic><topic>Intervention</topic><topic>Meta-analysis</topic><topic>Mortality</topic><topic>Myocardial infarction</topic><topic>Observational Studies as Topic</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Percutaneous Coronary Intervention - methods</topic><topic>Reoperation</topic><topic>Stents</topic><topic>Stroke</topic><topic>Veins &amp; arteries</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Farag, Mohamed</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gue, Ying X.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brilakis, Emmanouil S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Egred, Mohaned</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Nursing and Allied Health Journals</collection><collection>Physical Education Index</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>PML(ProQuest Medical Library)</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Biochemistry Abstracts 1</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>The American journal of cardiology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Farag, Mohamed</au><au>Gue, Ying X.</au><au>Brilakis, Emmanouil S.</au><au>Egred, Mohaned</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Meta-analysis Comparing Outcomes of Percutaneous Coronary Intervention of Native Artery Versus Bypass Graft in Patients With Prior Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting</atitle><jtitle>The American journal of cardiology</jtitle><addtitle>Am J Cardiol</addtitle><date>2021-02-01</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>140</volume><spage>47</spage><epage>54</epage><pages>47-54</pages><issn>0002-9149</issn><eissn>1879-1913</eissn><abstract>Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is common in patients with prior coronary artery bypass graft surgery (CABG), however the data on the association between the PCI target-vessel and clinical outcomes are not clear. We aimed to investigate long-term clinical outcomes of patients with prior CABG who underwent PCI of either bypass graft or native artery. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies comparing PCI of either bypass graft or native artery in patients with prior CABG. Twenty-two studies comprising 40,984 patients were included. The median follow-up duration was 2 (1 to 3) years. Compared with bypass graft PCI, native artery PCI was frequent (61% vs 39%) and was associated with lower major adverse cardiac events (MACE) (odds ratio [OR] 0.51, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.45 to 0.57, p &lt;0.001), lower all-cause death (OR 0.65, 95% CI 0.49 to 0.87, p = 0.004), lower myocardial infarction (OR 0.56, 95% CI 0.45 to 0.69, p &lt;0.001), and lower target vessel revascularization (TVR) (OR 0.62, 95% CI 0.51to 0.76, p &lt;0.001). There was no significant difference in the early incidence of major bleeding or stroke between the 2 cohorts. In 6 studies involving 2,919 patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction, there was no significant differences between the 2 cohorts. The increase in TVR risk with bypass graft PCI was associated with MACE. In conclusion, in observational studies involving patients with prior CABG, native artery PCI was associated with lower MACE, all-cause death, myocardial infarction, and TVR compared with bypass graft PCI at a median follow-up of 2 years. Native artery PCI might be considered the preferred treatment for bypass graft failure.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>33144169</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.amjcard.2020.10.062</doi><tpages>8</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0811-7679</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3642-318X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9416-9701</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9994-8915</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0002-9149
ispartof The American journal of cardiology, 2021-02, Vol.140, p.47-54
issn 0002-9149
1879-1913
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2457691336
source ScienceDirect Freedom Collection 2022-2024
subjects Acute coronary syndromes
Angioplasty
Bias
Bleeding
Blood vessels
Cerebral infarction
Clinical outcomes
Confidence intervals
Coronary artery
Coronary Artery Bypass - methods
Coronary Artery Disease - surgery
Coronary vessels
Diabetes
Global Health
Graft Occlusion, Vascular - epidemiology
Graft Occlusion, Vascular - prevention & control
Graft rejection
Grafting
Grafts
Heart attacks
Heart surgery
Humans
Incidence
Intervention
Meta-analysis
Mortality
Myocardial infarction
Observational Studies as Topic
Patients
Percutaneous Coronary Intervention - methods
Reoperation
Stents
Stroke
Veins & arteries
title Meta-analysis Comparing Outcomes of Percutaneous Coronary Intervention of Native Artery Versus Bypass Graft in Patients With Prior Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-04T20%3A41%3A19IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Meta-analysis%20Comparing%20Outcomes%20of%20Percutaneous%20Coronary%20Intervention%20of%20Native%20Artery%20Versus%20Bypass%20Graft%20in%20Patients%20With%20Prior%20Coronary%20Artery%20Bypass%20Grafting&rft.jtitle=The%20American%20journal%20of%20cardiology&rft.au=Farag,%20Mohamed&rft.date=2021-02-01&rft.volume=140&rft.spage=47&rft.epage=54&rft.pages=47-54&rft.issn=0002-9149&rft.eissn=1879-1913&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.amjcard.2020.10.062&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2475350542%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c393t-5e1390bda8bbc756ea9396b76258deb5af88ce992fe4c58d758648e87166c2323%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2475350542&rft_id=info:pmid/33144169&rfr_iscdi=true