Loading…
Meta-analysis Comparing Outcomes of Percutaneous Coronary Intervention of Native Artery Versus Bypass Graft in Patients With Prior Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting
Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is common in patients with prior coronary artery bypass graft surgery (CABG), however the data on the association between the PCI target-vessel and clinical outcomes are not clear. We aimed to investigate long-term clinical outcomes of patients with prior CAB...
Saved in:
Published in: | The American journal of cardiology 2021-02, Vol.140, p.47-54 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c393t-5e1390bda8bbc756ea9396b76258deb5af88ce992fe4c58d758648e87166c2323 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c393t-5e1390bda8bbc756ea9396b76258deb5af88ce992fe4c58d758648e87166c2323 |
container_end_page | 54 |
container_issue | |
container_start_page | 47 |
container_title | The American journal of cardiology |
container_volume | 140 |
creator | Farag, Mohamed Gue, Ying X. Brilakis, Emmanouil S. Egred, Mohaned |
description | Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is common in patients with prior coronary artery bypass graft surgery (CABG), however the data on the association between the PCI target-vessel and clinical outcomes are not clear. We aimed to investigate long-term clinical outcomes of patients with prior CABG who underwent PCI of either bypass graft or native artery. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies comparing PCI of either bypass graft or native artery in patients with prior CABG. Twenty-two studies comprising 40,984 patients were included. The median follow-up duration was 2 (1 to 3) years. Compared with bypass graft PCI, native artery PCI was frequent (61% vs 39%) and was associated with lower major adverse cardiac events (MACE) (odds ratio [OR] 0.51, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.45 to 0.57, p |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.amjcard.2020.10.062 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2457691336</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0002914920311954</els_id><sourcerecordid>2475350542</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c393t-5e1390bda8bbc756ea9396b76258deb5af88ce992fe4c58d758648e87166c2323</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkc2O0zAUhS0EYsrAI4AssWGTYsexE6_QUMEw0sB0wc_ScpwbcNTE5dqp1NfhSXHU8iM2rCxffefY9xxCnnK25oyrl8PajoOz2K1LVi6zNVPlPbLiTa0Lrrm4T1aMsbLQvNIX5FGMQ75yLtVDciEEryqu9Ir8eA_JFnayu2P0kW7CuLfop6_0bk4ujBBp6OkW0M3JThDmBcEwWTzSmykBHmBKPkwL9cEmfwB6hXl8pJ8BY6ZfH_c2RnqNtk_UT3SboSyJ9ItP3-gWfcA_jmfp35r8lcfkQW93EZ6cz0vy6e2bj5t3xe3d9c3m6rZwQotUSOBCs7azTdu6WiqwWmjV1qqUTQettH3TONC67KFyeVTLRlUNNDVXypWiFJfkxcl3j-H7DDGZ0UcHu91pcVNWslY5WKEy-vwfdAgz5hAXqpZCMlkthvJEOQwxIvRmj37MixrOzFKiGcy5RLOUuIxziVn37Ow-tyN0v1W_WsvAqxMAOY6DBzTR5VQddB7BJdMF_58nfgKd5rKX</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2475350542</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Meta-analysis Comparing Outcomes of Percutaneous Coronary Intervention of Native Artery Versus Bypass Graft in Patients With Prior Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting</title><source>ScienceDirect Freedom Collection 2022-2024</source><creator>Farag, Mohamed ; Gue, Ying X. ; Brilakis, Emmanouil S. ; Egred, Mohaned</creator><creatorcontrib>Farag, Mohamed ; Gue, Ying X. ; Brilakis, Emmanouil S. ; Egred, Mohaned</creatorcontrib><description>Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is common in patients with prior coronary artery bypass graft surgery (CABG), however the data on the association between the PCI target-vessel and clinical outcomes are not clear. We aimed to investigate long-term clinical outcomes of patients with prior CABG who underwent PCI of either bypass graft or native artery. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies comparing PCI of either bypass graft or native artery in patients with prior CABG. Twenty-two studies comprising 40,984 patients were included. The median follow-up duration was 2 (1 to 3) years. Compared with bypass graft PCI, native artery PCI was frequent (61% vs 39%) and was associated with lower major adverse cardiac events (MACE) (odds ratio [OR] 0.51, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.45 to 0.57, p <0.001), lower all-cause death (OR 0.65, 95% CI 0.49 to 0.87, p = 0.004), lower myocardial infarction (OR 0.56, 95% CI 0.45 to 0.69, p <0.001), and lower target vessel revascularization (TVR) (OR 0.62, 95% CI 0.51to 0.76, p <0.001). There was no significant difference in the early incidence of major bleeding or stroke between the 2 cohorts. In 6 studies involving 2,919 patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction, there was no significant differences between the 2 cohorts. The increase in TVR risk with bypass graft PCI was associated with MACE. In conclusion, in observational studies involving patients with prior CABG, native artery PCI was associated with lower MACE, all-cause death, myocardial infarction, and TVR compared with bypass graft PCI at a median follow-up of 2 years. Native artery PCI might be considered the preferred treatment for bypass graft failure.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0002-9149</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-1913</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2020.10.062</identifier><identifier>PMID: 33144169</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Acute coronary syndromes ; Angioplasty ; Bias ; Bleeding ; Blood vessels ; Cerebral infarction ; Clinical outcomes ; Confidence intervals ; Coronary artery ; Coronary Artery Bypass - methods ; Coronary Artery Disease - surgery ; Coronary vessels ; Diabetes ; Global Health ; Graft Occlusion, Vascular - epidemiology ; Graft Occlusion, Vascular - prevention & control ; Graft rejection ; Grafting ; Grafts ; Heart attacks ; Heart surgery ; Humans ; Incidence ; Intervention ; Meta-analysis ; Mortality ; Myocardial infarction ; Observational Studies as Topic ; Patients ; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention - methods ; Reoperation ; Stents ; Stroke ; Veins & arteries</subject><ispartof>The American journal of cardiology, 2021-02, Vol.140, p.47-54</ispartof><rights>2020 Elsevier Inc.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><rights>2020. Elsevier Inc.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c393t-5e1390bda8bbc756ea9396b76258deb5af88ce992fe4c58d758648e87166c2323</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c393t-5e1390bda8bbc756ea9396b76258deb5af88ce992fe4c58d758648e87166c2323</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-0811-7679 ; 0000-0003-3642-318X ; 0000-0001-9416-9701 ; 0000-0001-9994-8915</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33144169$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Farag, Mohamed</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gue, Ying X.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brilakis, Emmanouil S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Egred, Mohaned</creatorcontrib><title>Meta-analysis Comparing Outcomes of Percutaneous Coronary Intervention of Native Artery Versus Bypass Graft in Patients With Prior Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting</title><title>The American journal of cardiology</title><addtitle>Am J Cardiol</addtitle><description>Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is common in patients with prior coronary artery bypass graft surgery (CABG), however the data on the association between the PCI target-vessel and clinical outcomes are not clear. We aimed to investigate long-term clinical outcomes of patients with prior CABG who underwent PCI of either bypass graft or native artery. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies comparing PCI of either bypass graft or native artery in patients with prior CABG. Twenty-two studies comprising 40,984 patients were included. The median follow-up duration was 2 (1 to 3) years. Compared with bypass graft PCI, native artery PCI was frequent (61% vs 39%) and was associated with lower major adverse cardiac events (MACE) (odds ratio [OR] 0.51, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.45 to 0.57, p <0.001), lower all-cause death (OR 0.65, 95% CI 0.49 to 0.87, p = 0.004), lower myocardial infarction (OR 0.56, 95% CI 0.45 to 0.69, p <0.001), and lower target vessel revascularization (TVR) (OR 0.62, 95% CI 0.51to 0.76, p <0.001). There was no significant difference in the early incidence of major bleeding or stroke between the 2 cohorts. In 6 studies involving 2,919 patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction, there was no significant differences between the 2 cohorts. The increase in TVR risk with bypass graft PCI was associated with MACE. In conclusion, in observational studies involving patients with prior CABG, native artery PCI was associated with lower MACE, all-cause death, myocardial infarction, and TVR compared with bypass graft PCI at a median follow-up of 2 years. Native artery PCI might be considered the preferred treatment for bypass graft failure.</description><subject>Acute coronary syndromes</subject><subject>Angioplasty</subject><subject>Bias</subject><subject>Bleeding</subject><subject>Blood vessels</subject><subject>Cerebral infarction</subject><subject>Clinical outcomes</subject><subject>Confidence intervals</subject><subject>Coronary artery</subject><subject>Coronary Artery Bypass - methods</subject><subject>Coronary Artery Disease - surgery</subject><subject>Coronary vessels</subject><subject>Diabetes</subject><subject>Global Health</subject><subject>Graft Occlusion, Vascular - epidemiology</subject><subject>Graft Occlusion, Vascular - prevention & control</subject><subject>Graft rejection</subject><subject>Grafting</subject><subject>Grafts</subject><subject>Heart attacks</subject><subject>Heart surgery</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Incidence</subject><subject>Intervention</subject><subject>Meta-analysis</subject><subject>Mortality</subject><subject>Myocardial infarction</subject><subject>Observational Studies as Topic</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Percutaneous Coronary Intervention - methods</subject><subject>Reoperation</subject><subject>Stents</subject><subject>Stroke</subject><subject>Veins & arteries</subject><issn>0002-9149</issn><issn>1879-1913</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkc2O0zAUhS0EYsrAI4AssWGTYsexE6_QUMEw0sB0wc_ScpwbcNTE5dqp1NfhSXHU8iM2rCxffefY9xxCnnK25oyrl8PajoOz2K1LVi6zNVPlPbLiTa0Lrrm4T1aMsbLQvNIX5FGMQ75yLtVDciEEryqu9Ir8eA_JFnayu2P0kW7CuLfop6_0bk4ujBBp6OkW0M3JThDmBcEwWTzSmykBHmBKPkwL9cEmfwB6hXl8pJ8BY6ZfH_c2RnqNtk_UT3SboSyJ9ItP3-gWfcA_jmfp35r8lcfkQW93EZ6cz0vy6e2bj5t3xe3d9c3m6rZwQotUSOBCs7azTdu6WiqwWmjV1qqUTQettH3TONC67KFyeVTLRlUNNDVXypWiFJfkxcl3j-H7DDGZ0UcHu91pcVNWslY5WKEy-vwfdAgz5hAXqpZCMlkthvJEOQwxIvRmj37MixrOzFKiGcy5RLOUuIxziVn37Ow-tyN0v1W_WsvAqxMAOY6DBzTR5VQddB7BJdMF_58nfgKd5rKX</recordid><startdate>20210201</startdate><enddate>20210201</enddate><creator>Farag, Mohamed</creator><creator>Gue, Ying X.</creator><creator>Brilakis, Emmanouil S.</creator><creator>Egred, Mohaned</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>Elsevier Limited</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7TS</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M7Z</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0811-7679</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3642-318X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9416-9701</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9994-8915</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20210201</creationdate><title>Meta-analysis Comparing Outcomes of Percutaneous Coronary Intervention of Native Artery Versus Bypass Graft in Patients With Prior Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting</title><author>Farag, Mohamed ; Gue, Ying X. ; Brilakis, Emmanouil S. ; Egred, Mohaned</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c393t-5e1390bda8bbc756ea9396b76258deb5af88ce992fe4c58d758648e87166c2323</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Acute coronary syndromes</topic><topic>Angioplasty</topic><topic>Bias</topic><topic>Bleeding</topic><topic>Blood vessels</topic><topic>Cerebral infarction</topic><topic>Clinical outcomes</topic><topic>Confidence intervals</topic><topic>Coronary artery</topic><topic>Coronary Artery Bypass - methods</topic><topic>Coronary Artery Disease - surgery</topic><topic>Coronary vessels</topic><topic>Diabetes</topic><topic>Global Health</topic><topic>Graft Occlusion, Vascular - epidemiology</topic><topic>Graft Occlusion, Vascular - prevention & control</topic><topic>Graft rejection</topic><topic>Grafting</topic><topic>Grafts</topic><topic>Heart attacks</topic><topic>Heart surgery</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Incidence</topic><topic>Intervention</topic><topic>Meta-analysis</topic><topic>Mortality</topic><topic>Myocardial infarction</topic><topic>Observational Studies as Topic</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Percutaneous Coronary Intervention - methods</topic><topic>Reoperation</topic><topic>Stents</topic><topic>Stroke</topic><topic>Veins & arteries</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Farag, Mohamed</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gue, Ying X.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brilakis, Emmanouil S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Egred, Mohaned</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Nursing and Allied Health Journals</collection><collection>Physical Education Index</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>PML(ProQuest Medical Library)</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Biochemistry Abstracts 1</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>The American journal of cardiology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Farag, Mohamed</au><au>Gue, Ying X.</au><au>Brilakis, Emmanouil S.</au><au>Egred, Mohaned</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Meta-analysis Comparing Outcomes of Percutaneous Coronary Intervention of Native Artery Versus Bypass Graft in Patients With Prior Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting</atitle><jtitle>The American journal of cardiology</jtitle><addtitle>Am J Cardiol</addtitle><date>2021-02-01</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>140</volume><spage>47</spage><epage>54</epage><pages>47-54</pages><issn>0002-9149</issn><eissn>1879-1913</eissn><abstract>Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is common in patients with prior coronary artery bypass graft surgery (CABG), however the data on the association between the PCI target-vessel and clinical outcomes are not clear. We aimed to investigate long-term clinical outcomes of patients with prior CABG who underwent PCI of either bypass graft or native artery. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies comparing PCI of either bypass graft or native artery in patients with prior CABG. Twenty-two studies comprising 40,984 patients were included. The median follow-up duration was 2 (1 to 3) years. Compared with bypass graft PCI, native artery PCI was frequent (61% vs 39%) and was associated with lower major adverse cardiac events (MACE) (odds ratio [OR] 0.51, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.45 to 0.57, p <0.001), lower all-cause death (OR 0.65, 95% CI 0.49 to 0.87, p = 0.004), lower myocardial infarction (OR 0.56, 95% CI 0.45 to 0.69, p <0.001), and lower target vessel revascularization (TVR) (OR 0.62, 95% CI 0.51to 0.76, p <0.001). There was no significant difference in the early incidence of major bleeding or stroke between the 2 cohorts. In 6 studies involving 2,919 patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction, there was no significant differences between the 2 cohorts. The increase in TVR risk with bypass graft PCI was associated with MACE. In conclusion, in observational studies involving patients with prior CABG, native artery PCI was associated with lower MACE, all-cause death, myocardial infarction, and TVR compared with bypass graft PCI at a median follow-up of 2 years. Native artery PCI might be considered the preferred treatment for bypass graft failure.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>33144169</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.amjcard.2020.10.062</doi><tpages>8</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0811-7679</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3642-318X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9416-9701</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9994-8915</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0002-9149 |
ispartof | The American journal of cardiology, 2021-02, Vol.140, p.47-54 |
issn | 0002-9149 1879-1913 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2457691336 |
source | ScienceDirect Freedom Collection 2022-2024 |
subjects | Acute coronary syndromes Angioplasty Bias Bleeding Blood vessels Cerebral infarction Clinical outcomes Confidence intervals Coronary artery Coronary Artery Bypass - methods Coronary Artery Disease - surgery Coronary vessels Diabetes Global Health Graft Occlusion, Vascular - epidemiology Graft Occlusion, Vascular - prevention & control Graft rejection Grafting Grafts Heart attacks Heart surgery Humans Incidence Intervention Meta-analysis Mortality Myocardial infarction Observational Studies as Topic Patients Percutaneous Coronary Intervention - methods Reoperation Stents Stroke Veins & arteries |
title | Meta-analysis Comparing Outcomes of Percutaneous Coronary Intervention of Native Artery Versus Bypass Graft in Patients With Prior Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-04T20%3A41%3A19IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Meta-analysis%20Comparing%20Outcomes%20of%20Percutaneous%20Coronary%20Intervention%20of%20Native%20Artery%20Versus%20Bypass%20Graft%20in%20Patients%20With%20Prior%20Coronary%20Artery%20Bypass%20Grafting&rft.jtitle=The%20American%20journal%20of%20cardiology&rft.au=Farag,%20Mohamed&rft.date=2021-02-01&rft.volume=140&rft.spage=47&rft.epage=54&rft.pages=47-54&rft.issn=0002-9149&rft.eissn=1879-1913&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.amjcard.2020.10.062&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2475350542%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c393t-5e1390bda8bbc756ea9396b76258deb5af88ce992fe4c58d758648e87166c2323%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2475350542&rft_id=info:pmid/33144169&rfr_iscdi=true |