Loading…

Effectiveness of anesthetic solutions for pain control in lower third molar extraction surgeries: a systematic review of randomized clinical trials with network meta-analysis

Objective To assess the effectiveness of different anesthetic solutions for pain control immediately after the extraction of lower third molars. Methods Nine databases were used to identify randomized clinical trials, without restriction of language or year of publication. The “JBI Critical Appraisa...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Clinical oral investigations 2021-01, Vol.25 (1), p.1-22
Main Authors: Rossi, Marco Tulio, de Oliveira, Murilo Navarro, Vidigal, Maria Tereza Campos, de Andrade Vieira, Walbert, Figueiredo, Cristiano Elias, Blumenberg, Cauane, de Almeida, Vinicius Lima, Paranhos, Luiz Renato, Oliveira, Luciana Butini, Siqueira, Walter Luiz, de Brito Júnior, Rui Barbosa
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-dcfabdc6c1fedc37cd05eafaa7be44595011357a262f968d509c1e2618b4d5023
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-dcfabdc6c1fedc37cd05eafaa7be44595011357a262f968d509c1e2618b4d5023
container_end_page 22
container_issue 1
container_start_page 1
container_title Clinical oral investigations
container_volume 25
creator Rossi, Marco Tulio
de Oliveira, Murilo Navarro
Vidigal, Maria Tereza Campos
de Andrade Vieira, Walbert
Figueiredo, Cristiano Elias
Blumenberg, Cauane
de Almeida, Vinicius Lima
Paranhos, Luiz Renato
Oliveira, Luciana Butini
Siqueira, Walter Luiz
de Brito Júnior, Rui Barbosa
description Objective To assess the effectiveness of different anesthetic solutions for pain control immediately after the extraction of lower third molars. Methods Nine databases were used to identify randomized clinical trials, without restriction of language or year of publication. The “JBI Critical Appraisal Tools for Systematic Reviews” was used to assess the risk of bias in the studies. The network meta-analysis was performed to compare the effectiveness of different anesthetics to control the pain immediately after the surgery of lower third molars, using the standardized mean difference (SMD) as the effect estimate. The GRADE approach was used to assess the certainty of evidence. Results The search presented 13,739 initial results, from which 45 met the eligibility criteria and presented low to moderate risk of bias. Thirteen studies were included in the meta-analysis. The 2% lidocaine + clonidine presented the lowest pain scores (SMD = − 1.44; − 2.72 to − 0.16) compared to 4% articaine + adrenaline, followed by 0.5% bupivacaine + adrenaline (SMD = − 1.36; − 2.13 to − 0.59). The certainty of evidence varied between very low to moderate. Conclusion 2% lidocaine + clonidine and 0.5% bupivacaine + adrenaline were the anesthetics with the highest probability for pain control immediately after the surgical procedure of removing impacted lower third molars. Clinical significance The use of an adequate anesthetic with effective pain control can contribute to a more comfortable postoperative period.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s00784-020-03675-w
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2458955251</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2458955251</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-dcfabdc6c1fedc37cd05eafaa7be44595011357a262f968d509c1e2618b4d5023</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kcFuFSEUhidGY2v1BVwYEjduRmEYhsGdaVo1adJNuyZc5uClMsOVw3S8PpTPWKa3atKFGzjA9_-HnL-qXjP6nlEqP2BZ-ramDa0p76SolyfVMWt5V3Mp2dP7uqk71bOj6gXiDaWs7SR_Xh1xzjrWKnVc_T5zDmz2tzABIomOmFLkLWRvCcYwZx8nJC4msjN-IjZOOcVAShniAonkrU8DGWMwicDPnIxdFQTn9A2SB_xIDME9ZhjNapng1sOy9klmGuLof8FAbPCTtyaQnLwJSBaft2SCvMT0nYyQTW0mE_bo8WX1zBUCXj3sJ9X1-dnV6Zf64vLz19NPF7XlUuR6sM5sBttZ5mAoV3agAowzRm6gbYUSlDEupGm6xqmuHwRVlkHTsX7TlkPDT6p3B99dij_mMhA9erQQQplOnFE3reiVEI1gBX37CL2Jcyr_XSkpmFK95IVqDpRNETGB07vkR5P2mlG9pqkPaeqSpr5PUy9F9ObBet6MMPyV_ImvAPwAYHmaysD_9f6P7R3GcLCf</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2475199873</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Effectiveness of anesthetic solutions for pain control in lower third molar extraction surgeries: a systematic review of randomized clinical trials with network meta-analysis</title><source>Springer Link</source><creator>Rossi, Marco Tulio ; de Oliveira, Murilo Navarro ; Vidigal, Maria Tereza Campos ; de Andrade Vieira, Walbert ; Figueiredo, Cristiano Elias ; Blumenberg, Cauane ; de Almeida, Vinicius Lima ; Paranhos, Luiz Renato ; Oliveira, Luciana Butini ; Siqueira, Walter Luiz ; de Brito Júnior, Rui Barbosa</creator><creatorcontrib>Rossi, Marco Tulio ; de Oliveira, Murilo Navarro ; Vidigal, Maria Tereza Campos ; de Andrade Vieira, Walbert ; Figueiredo, Cristiano Elias ; Blumenberg, Cauane ; de Almeida, Vinicius Lima ; Paranhos, Luiz Renato ; Oliveira, Luciana Butini ; Siqueira, Walter Luiz ; de Brito Júnior, Rui Barbosa</creatorcontrib><description>Objective To assess the effectiveness of different anesthetic solutions for pain control immediately after the extraction of lower third molars. Methods Nine databases were used to identify randomized clinical trials, without restriction of language or year of publication. The “JBI Critical Appraisal Tools for Systematic Reviews” was used to assess the risk of bias in the studies. The network meta-analysis was performed to compare the effectiveness of different anesthetics to control the pain immediately after the surgery of lower third molars, using the standardized mean difference (SMD) as the effect estimate. The GRADE approach was used to assess the certainty of evidence. Results The search presented 13,739 initial results, from which 45 met the eligibility criteria and presented low to moderate risk of bias. Thirteen studies were included in the meta-analysis. The 2% lidocaine + clonidine presented the lowest pain scores (SMD = − 1.44; − 2.72 to − 0.16) compared to 4% articaine + adrenaline, followed by 0.5% bupivacaine + adrenaline (SMD = − 1.36; − 2.13 to − 0.59). The certainty of evidence varied between very low to moderate. Conclusion 2% lidocaine + clonidine and 0.5% bupivacaine + adrenaline were the anesthetics with the highest probability for pain control immediately after the surgical procedure of removing impacted lower third molars. Clinical significance The use of an adequate anesthetic with effective pain control can contribute to a more comfortable postoperative period.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1432-6981</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1436-3771</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s00784-020-03675-w</identifier><identifier>PMID: 33161499</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg</publisher><subject>Anesthetics ; Anesthetics, Local ; Bupivacaine ; Clinical trials ; Clonidine ; Dentistry ; Epinephrine ; Humans ; Lidocaine ; Medicine ; Meta-analysis ; Molar, Third - surgery ; Network Meta-Analysis ; Pain ; Pain, Postoperative - prevention &amp; control ; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic ; Review ; Reviews ; Surgery ; Teeth</subject><ispartof>Clinical oral investigations, 2021-01, Vol.25 (1), p.1-22</ispartof><rights>Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2020</rights><rights>Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2020.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-dcfabdc6c1fedc37cd05eafaa7be44595011357a262f968d509c1e2618b4d5023</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-dcfabdc6c1fedc37cd05eafaa7be44595011357a262f968d509c1e2618b4d5023</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-7599-0120</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33161499$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Rossi, Marco Tulio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Oliveira, Murilo Navarro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vidigal, Maria Tereza Campos</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Andrade Vieira, Walbert</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Figueiredo, Cristiano Elias</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Blumenberg, Cauane</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Almeida, Vinicius Lima</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Paranhos, Luiz Renato</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Oliveira, Luciana Butini</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Siqueira, Walter Luiz</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Brito Júnior, Rui Barbosa</creatorcontrib><title>Effectiveness of anesthetic solutions for pain control in lower third molar extraction surgeries: a systematic review of randomized clinical trials with network meta-analysis</title><title>Clinical oral investigations</title><addtitle>Clin Oral Invest</addtitle><addtitle>Clin Oral Investig</addtitle><description>Objective To assess the effectiveness of different anesthetic solutions for pain control immediately after the extraction of lower third molars. Methods Nine databases were used to identify randomized clinical trials, without restriction of language or year of publication. The “JBI Critical Appraisal Tools for Systematic Reviews” was used to assess the risk of bias in the studies. The network meta-analysis was performed to compare the effectiveness of different anesthetics to control the pain immediately after the surgery of lower third molars, using the standardized mean difference (SMD) as the effect estimate. The GRADE approach was used to assess the certainty of evidence. Results The search presented 13,739 initial results, from which 45 met the eligibility criteria and presented low to moderate risk of bias. Thirteen studies were included in the meta-analysis. The 2% lidocaine + clonidine presented the lowest pain scores (SMD = − 1.44; − 2.72 to − 0.16) compared to 4% articaine + adrenaline, followed by 0.5% bupivacaine + adrenaline (SMD = − 1.36; − 2.13 to − 0.59). The certainty of evidence varied between very low to moderate. Conclusion 2% lidocaine + clonidine and 0.5% bupivacaine + adrenaline were the anesthetics with the highest probability for pain control immediately after the surgical procedure of removing impacted lower third molars. Clinical significance The use of an adequate anesthetic with effective pain control can contribute to a more comfortable postoperative period.</description><subject>Anesthetics</subject><subject>Anesthetics, Local</subject><subject>Bupivacaine</subject><subject>Clinical trials</subject><subject>Clonidine</subject><subject>Dentistry</subject><subject>Epinephrine</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Lidocaine</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Meta-analysis</subject><subject>Molar, Third - surgery</subject><subject>Network Meta-Analysis</subject><subject>Pain</subject><subject>Pain, Postoperative - prevention &amp; control</subject><subject>Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic</subject><subject>Review</subject><subject>Reviews</subject><subject>Surgery</subject><subject>Teeth</subject><issn>1432-6981</issn><issn>1436-3771</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kcFuFSEUhidGY2v1BVwYEjduRmEYhsGdaVo1adJNuyZc5uClMsOVw3S8PpTPWKa3atKFGzjA9_-HnL-qXjP6nlEqP2BZ-ramDa0p76SolyfVMWt5V3Mp2dP7uqk71bOj6gXiDaWs7SR_Xh1xzjrWKnVc_T5zDmz2tzABIomOmFLkLWRvCcYwZx8nJC4msjN-IjZOOcVAShniAonkrU8DGWMwicDPnIxdFQTn9A2SB_xIDME9ZhjNapng1sOy9klmGuLof8FAbPCTtyaQnLwJSBaft2SCvMT0nYyQTW0mE_bo8WX1zBUCXj3sJ9X1-dnV6Zf64vLz19NPF7XlUuR6sM5sBttZ5mAoV3agAowzRm6gbYUSlDEupGm6xqmuHwRVlkHTsX7TlkPDT6p3B99dij_mMhA9erQQQplOnFE3reiVEI1gBX37CL2Jcyr_XSkpmFK95IVqDpRNETGB07vkR5P2mlG9pqkPaeqSpr5PUy9F9ObBet6MMPyV_ImvAPwAYHmaysD_9f6P7R3GcLCf</recordid><startdate>20210101</startdate><enddate>20210101</enddate><creator>Rossi, Marco Tulio</creator><creator>de Oliveira, Murilo Navarro</creator><creator>Vidigal, Maria Tereza Campos</creator><creator>de Andrade Vieira, Walbert</creator><creator>Figueiredo, Cristiano Elias</creator><creator>Blumenberg, Cauane</creator><creator>de Almeida, Vinicius Lima</creator><creator>Paranhos, Luiz Renato</creator><creator>Oliveira, Luciana Butini</creator><creator>Siqueira, Walter Luiz</creator><creator>de Brito Júnior, Rui Barbosa</creator><general>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7599-0120</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20210101</creationdate><title>Effectiveness of anesthetic solutions for pain control in lower third molar extraction surgeries: a systematic review of randomized clinical trials with network meta-analysis</title><author>Rossi, Marco Tulio ; de Oliveira, Murilo Navarro ; Vidigal, Maria Tereza Campos ; de Andrade Vieira, Walbert ; Figueiredo, Cristiano Elias ; Blumenberg, Cauane ; de Almeida, Vinicius Lima ; Paranhos, Luiz Renato ; Oliveira, Luciana Butini ; Siqueira, Walter Luiz ; de Brito Júnior, Rui Barbosa</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-dcfabdc6c1fedc37cd05eafaa7be44595011357a262f968d509c1e2618b4d5023</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Anesthetics</topic><topic>Anesthetics, Local</topic><topic>Bupivacaine</topic><topic>Clinical trials</topic><topic>Clonidine</topic><topic>Dentistry</topic><topic>Epinephrine</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Lidocaine</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Meta-analysis</topic><topic>Molar, Third - surgery</topic><topic>Network Meta-Analysis</topic><topic>Pain</topic><topic>Pain, Postoperative - prevention &amp; control</topic><topic>Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic</topic><topic>Review</topic><topic>Reviews</topic><topic>Surgery</topic><topic>Teeth</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Rossi, Marco Tulio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Oliveira, Murilo Navarro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vidigal, Maria Tereza Campos</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Andrade Vieira, Walbert</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Figueiredo, Cristiano Elias</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Blumenberg, Cauane</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Almeida, Vinicius Lima</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Paranhos, Luiz Renato</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Oliveira, Luciana Butini</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Siqueira, Walter Luiz</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Brito Júnior, Rui Barbosa</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Clinical oral investigations</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Rossi, Marco Tulio</au><au>de Oliveira, Murilo Navarro</au><au>Vidigal, Maria Tereza Campos</au><au>de Andrade Vieira, Walbert</au><au>Figueiredo, Cristiano Elias</au><au>Blumenberg, Cauane</au><au>de Almeida, Vinicius Lima</au><au>Paranhos, Luiz Renato</au><au>Oliveira, Luciana Butini</au><au>Siqueira, Walter Luiz</au><au>de Brito Júnior, Rui Barbosa</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Effectiveness of anesthetic solutions for pain control in lower third molar extraction surgeries: a systematic review of randomized clinical trials with network meta-analysis</atitle><jtitle>Clinical oral investigations</jtitle><stitle>Clin Oral Invest</stitle><addtitle>Clin Oral Investig</addtitle><date>2021-01-01</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>25</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>1</spage><epage>22</epage><pages>1-22</pages><issn>1432-6981</issn><eissn>1436-3771</eissn><abstract>Objective To assess the effectiveness of different anesthetic solutions for pain control immediately after the extraction of lower third molars. Methods Nine databases were used to identify randomized clinical trials, without restriction of language or year of publication. The “JBI Critical Appraisal Tools for Systematic Reviews” was used to assess the risk of bias in the studies. The network meta-analysis was performed to compare the effectiveness of different anesthetics to control the pain immediately after the surgery of lower third molars, using the standardized mean difference (SMD) as the effect estimate. The GRADE approach was used to assess the certainty of evidence. Results The search presented 13,739 initial results, from which 45 met the eligibility criteria and presented low to moderate risk of bias. Thirteen studies were included in the meta-analysis. The 2% lidocaine + clonidine presented the lowest pain scores (SMD = − 1.44; − 2.72 to − 0.16) compared to 4% articaine + adrenaline, followed by 0.5% bupivacaine + adrenaline (SMD = − 1.36; − 2.13 to − 0.59). The certainty of evidence varied between very low to moderate. Conclusion 2% lidocaine + clonidine and 0.5% bupivacaine + adrenaline were the anesthetics with the highest probability for pain control immediately after the surgical procedure of removing impacted lower third molars. Clinical significance The use of an adequate anesthetic with effective pain control can contribute to a more comfortable postoperative period.</abstract><cop>Berlin/Heidelberg</cop><pub>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</pub><pmid>33161499</pmid><doi>10.1007/s00784-020-03675-w</doi><tpages>22</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7599-0120</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1432-6981
ispartof Clinical oral investigations, 2021-01, Vol.25 (1), p.1-22
issn 1432-6981
1436-3771
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2458955251
source Springer Link
subjects Anesthetics
Anesthetics, Local
Bupivacaine
Clinical trials
Clonidine
Dentistry
Epinephrine
Humans
Lidocaine
Medicine
Meta-analysis
Molar, Third - surgery
Network Meta-Analysis
Pain
Pain, Postoperative - prevention & control
Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
Review
Reviews
Surgery
Teeth
title Effectiveness of anesthetic solutions for pain control in lower third molar extraction surgeries: a systematic review of randomized clinical trials with network meta-analysis
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-05T00%3A32%3A19IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Effectiveness%20of%20anesthetic%20solutions%20for%20pain%20control%20in%20lower%20third%20molar%20extraction%20surgeries:%20a%20systematic%20review%20of%20randomized%20clinical%20trials%20with%20network%20meta-analysis&rft.jtitle=Clinical%20oral%20investigations&rft.au=Rossi,%20Marco%20Tulio&rft.date=2021-01-01&rft.volume=25&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=1&rft.epage=22&rft.pages=1-22&rft.issn=1432-6981&rft.eissn=1436-3771&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s00784-020-03675-w&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2458955251%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-dcfabdc6c1fedc37cd05eafaa7be44595011357a262f968d509c1e2618b4d5023%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2475199873&rft_id=info:pmid/33161499&rfr_iscdi=true