Pet Medications: A Tail of Caution

• Published in: Journal of pharmacy practice 2022-04, Vol.35 (2), p.317-321
• Main Authors: Nguyen, Tammy T., Kirkwood, Craig F., Reilly, Denise, Lee, Danyae, Coggin, Christy
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Aged; Electronic Health Records; Emergency Service, Hospital; Female; Humans; Medication Errors; Medication Reconciliation; Pharmaceutical Services; Pharmacists
• ISSN: 0897-1900; 1531-1937
• DOI: 10.1177/0897190020966149

Purpose: A case report of pet medications appearing along with the patient’s medications (pet owner) in the external medication history list of the electronic medical record (EMR). Case Presentation: A 67-year-old female presented to the emergency department for altered mental status. A medication history was performed by the pharmacist in an attempt to identify possible etiologies of the patient’s clinical status. An external prescription refill report from the EMR included 2 medications that could not be confirmed by the family as the patient’s: phenobarbital 50 mg twice daily and zonisamide 200 mg every 12 hours. The patient’s pharmacy identified that the prescriptions were pet medications registered under the patient’s name and date of birth for the state’s prescription monitoring program. Conclusion: A lack of standardization between pet identifiers in community pharmacy databases and state Board of Pharmacy regulations for prescription monitoring programs, has led to the association of pet medications with their human owners in the EMR. Patient medication histories should always be verified and validated utilizing patient/patient family interviews and prescription refill histories. Utilization of pharmacists to identify and scrutinize inconsistencies can reduce medication errors that could occur during medication history or reconciliation.