Loading…
Imaging fibroblast activation protein in liver cancer: a single-center post hoc retrospective analysis to compare [68Ga]Ga-FAPI-04 PET/CT versus MRI and [18F]-FDG PET/CT
Purpose This study aimed to evaluate the potential utility of [ 68 Ga]Ga-FAPI-04 PET/CT for diagnosing primary and metastatic lesions in patients with liver cancer, as well as to compare it with contrast-enhanced CT (CE-CT), liver MRI, and [ 18 F]-FDG PET/CT. Methods We performed a single-center pos...
Saved in:
Published in: | European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging 2021-05, Vol.48 (5), p.1604-1617 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | Purpose
This study aimed to evaluate the potential utility of [
68
Ga]Ga-FAPI-04 PET/CT for diagnosing primary and metastatic lesions in patients with liver cancer, as well as to compare it with contrast-enhanced CT (CE-CT), liver MRI, and [
18
F]-FDG PET/CT.
Methods
We performed a single-center post hoc retrospective analysis of data obtained from a prospective parent study (NCT04416165). This study included 34 patients diagnosed with or suspected hepatic lesions who underwent concomitant [
68
Ga]Ga-FAPI-04 and [
18
F]-FDG/CT scans. Moreover, these patients underwent liver MRI (
n
= 34) and CE-CT (
n
= 25). Histopathologic (
n
= 62) or radiographic follow-up (
n
= 128) served as the reference standard for the final diagnosis.
Results
Among the 34 patients, 20, 12, and 2 patients presented with hepatocellular carcinomas, intrahepatic cholangiocarcinomas, and benign hepatic nodules, respectively. The sensitivities of CE-CT, MRI, [
68
Ga]Ga-FAPI-04, and [
18
F]-FDG/CT for detecting primary liver tumors were 96%, 100%, 96%, and 65%, respectively. Regarding the diagnosis of all intrahepatic lesions, the per-lesion detection rate of [
68
Ga]Ga-FAPI-04 PET/CT was slightly lower than that of MRI (85% vs. 100%,
P
= 0.34) and significantly higher than that of [
18
F]-FDG PET/CT (85% vs. 52%,
P
|
---|---|
ISSN: | 1619-7070 1619-7089 |
DOI: | 10.1007/s00259-020-05095-0 |