Loading…

Incidence and outcome of transplantation of fungal-culture-positive donor corneoscleral tissue in optical keratoplasty

Purpose This study aims to determine the incidence of fungal-culture-positive corneoscleral donor rim in patients undergoing keratoplasty and evaluate clinical outcomes of eyes that received these contaminated donor tissues. Methods Patients who had optical keratoplasty between 2006 and 2016 and wer...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:International ophthalmology 2021-03, Vol.41 (3), p.867-873
Main Authors: Alshabeeb, Rawan Saleh, Aldayel, Ahmed Abdullah, Martinez-Osorio, Hernan, Ahad, Muhammad Ali
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-690f254774dd36984d580af51b159719bae5f48297a9ca95e58acbbf6d35919b3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-690f254774dd36984d580af51b159719bae5f48297a9ca95e58acbbf6d35919b3
container_end_page 873
container_issue 3
container_start_page 867
container_title International ophthalmology
container_volume 41
creator Alshabeeb, Rawan Saleh
Aldayel, Ahmed Abdullah
Martinez-Osorio, Hernan
Ahad, Muhammad Ali
description Purpose This study aims to determine the incidence of fungal-culture-positive corneoscleral donor rim in patients undergoing keratoplasty and evaluate clinical outcomes of eyes that received these contaminated donor tissues. Methods Patients who had optical keratoplasty between 2006 and 2016 and were found to have fungal-culture-positive donor rim were included. Microbiological and eye bank records were reviewed to determine the incidence of positive fungal rim cultures. Data were collected on visual and clinical outcomes. The main outcome measures were fungal-culture-positive donor rim and development of fungal keratitis or endophthalmitis post keratoplasty. Long-term clinical outcome and associated complications were the secondary outcome measures. Results Out of 9620 cases of corneal transplants, 145 (1.5%) had fungal-culture-positive donor rim. Candida was the most common organism, cultured in 127 (87.6%) cases. There were no cases of postoperative fungal keratitis or endophthalmitis. Median follow-up was 4.8 years (interquartile range 3.8–7.2 years). Only eight cases (5.5%) received prophylactic antifungal treatment. There were 34 (23.4%) cases of rejection, 13 (8.9%) developed glaucoma, and 7 (4.8%) developed late bacterial keratitis. At last follow-up, best corrected visual acuity was 20/60 or better in 88 cases (60.7%) and 115 eyes (79.3%) had a clear graft. Conclusion The incidence of fungal-culture-positive donor rim is extremely low. The risk of developing fungal keratitis or endophthalmitis in patients who received contaminated donor tissue was almost negligible. Further studies are warranted to prove whether prophylaxis or adding amphotericin B in Optisol-GS confers any added benefit.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s10792-020-01641-9
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2461863131</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2499225167</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-690f254774dd36984d580af51b159719bae5f48297a9ca95e58acbbf6d35919b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kU1LHTEYhYNU6vXaP9BFGejGTdp8TJLJskirgtBNXYdM5h2JnZtM8yH4741eteBCsgic9znnTTgIfabkGyVEfc-UKM0wYQQTKnuK9QHaUKE4ZpKTD2jTVIGFIvQIHed8SwjRSsuP6IhzRgRXdIPuLoPzEwQHnQ1TF2txcQddnLuSbMjrYkOxxcfwKM013NgFu7qUmgCvMfvi76CbYoipczEFiNktkOzSFZ9zhc4341q8a8rfppfYEnO5P0GHs10yfHq-t-j6188_Zxf46vf55dmPK-y4EgVLTWYmeqX6aeJSD_0kBmJnQUcqtKJ6tCDmfmBaWe2sFiAG68ZxlhMXuo35Fp3uc9cU_1XIxex8drC0b0Gs2bBe0kFy2s4WfX2D3saaQntdo7RmTFCpGsX2lEsx5wSzWZPf2XRvKDGPrZh9K6a1Yp5aMbqZvjxH13EH06vlpYYG8D2Q2yjcQPq_-53YB4KhmZ0</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2499225167</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Incidence and outcome of transplantation of fungal-culture-positive donor corneoscleral tissue in optical keratoplasty</title><source>Springer Link</source><creator>Alshabeeb, Rawan Saleh ; Aldayel, Ahmed Abdullah ; Martinez-Osorio, Hernan ; Ahad, Muhammad Ali</creator><creatorcontrib>Alshabeeb, Rawan Saleh ; Aldayel, Ahmed Abdullah ; Martinez-Osorio, Hernan ; Ahad, Muhammad Ali</creatorcontrib><description>Purpose This study aims to determine the incidence of fungal-culture-positive corneoscleral donor rim in patients undergoing keratoplasty and evaluate clinical outcomes of eyes that received these contaminated donor tissues. Methods Patients who had optical keratoplasty between 2006 and 2016 and were found to have fungal-culture-positive donor rim were included. Microbiological and eye bank records were reviewed to determine the incidence of positive fungal rim cultures. Data were collected on visual and clinical outcomes. The main outcome measures were fungal-culture-positive donor rim and development of fungal keratitis or endophthalmitis post keratoplasty. Long-term clinical outcome and associated complications were the secondary outcome measures. Results Out of 9620 cases of corneal transplants, 145 (1.5%) had fungal-culture-positive donor rim. Candida was the most common organism, cultured in 127 (87.6%) cases. There were no cases of postoperative fungal keratitis or endophthalmitis. Median follow-up was 4.8 years (interquartile range 3.8–7.2 years). Only eight cases (5.5%) received prophylactic antifungal treatment. There were 34 (23.4%) cases of rejection, 13 (8.9%) developed glaucoma, and 7 (4.8%) developed late bacterial keratitis. At last follow-up, best corrected visual acuity was 20/60 or better in 88 cases (60.7%) and 115 eyes (79.3%) had a clear graft. Conclusion The incidence of fungal-culture-positive donor rim is extremely low. The risk of developing fungal keratitis or endophthalmitis in patients who received contaminated donor tissue was almost negligible. Further studies are warranted to prove whether prophylaxis or adding amphotericin B in Optisol-GS confers any added benefit.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0165-5701</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-2630</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10792-020-01641-9</identifier><identifier>PMID: 33205371</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands</publisher><subject>Acuity ; Amphotericin B ; Clinical outcomes ; Complications ; Cornea ; Corneal transplantation ; Endophthalmitis ; Eye ; Eye (anatomy) ; Fungi ; Fungicides ; Glaucoma ; Graft rejection ; Keratitis ; Medicine ; Medicine &amp; Public Health ; Ophthalmology ; Original Paper ; Patients ; Prophylaxis ; Tissue culture ; Tissues ; Transplantation ; Transplants ; Transplants &amp; implants ; Visual acuity</subject><ispartof>International ophthalmology, 2021-03, Vol.41 (3), p.867-873</ispartof><rights>Springer Nature B.V. 2020</rights><rights>Springer Nature B.V. 2020.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-690f254774dd36984d580af51b159719bae5f48297a9ca95e58acbbf6d35919b3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-690f254774dd36984d580af51b159719bae5f48297a9ca95e58acbbf6d35919b3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-8050-2953</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33205371$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Alshabeeb, Rawan Saleh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Aldayel, Ahmed Abdullah</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Martinez-Osorio, Hernan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ahad, Muhammad Ali</creatorcontrib><title>Incidence and outcome of transplantation of fungal-culture-positive donor corneoscleral tissue in optical keratoplasty</title><title>International ophthalmology</title><addtitle>Int Ophthalmol</addtitle><addtitle>Int Ophthalmol</addtitle><description>Purpose This study aims to determine the incidence of fungal-culture-positive corneoscleral donor rim in patients undergoing keratoplasty and evaluate clinical outcomes of eyes that received these contaminated donor tissues. Methods Patients who had optical keratoplasty between 2006 and 2016 and were found to have fungal-culture-positive donor rim were included. Microbiological and eye bank records were reviewed to determine the incidence of positive fungal rim cultures. Data were collected on visual and clinical outcomes. The main outcome measures were fungal-culture-positive donor rim and development of fungal keratitis or endophthalmitis post keratoplasty. Long-term clinical outcome and associated complications were the secondary outcome measures. Results Out of 9620 cases of corneal transplants, 145 (1.5%) had fungal-culture-positive donor rim. Candida was the most common organism, cultured in 127 (87.6%) cases. There were no cases of postoperative fungal keratitis or endophthalmitis. Median follow-up was 4.8 years (interquartile range 3.8–7.2 years). Only eight cases (5.5%) received prophylactic antifungal treatment. There were 34 (23.4%) cases of rejection, 13 (8.9%) developed glaucoma, and 7 (4.8%) developed late bacterial keratitis. At last follow-up, best corrected visual acuity was 20/60 or better in 88 cases (60.7%) and 115 eyes (79.3%) had a clear graft. Conclusion The incidence of fungal-culture-positive donor rim is extremely low. The risk of developing fungal keratitis or endophthalmitis in patients who received contaminated donor tissue was almost negligible. Further studies are warranted to prove whether prophylaxis or adding amphotericin B in Optisol-GS confers any added benefit.</description><subject>Acuity</subject><subject>Amphotericin B</subject><subject>Clinical outcomes</subject><subject>Complications</subject><subject>Cornea</subject><subject>Corneal transplantation</subject><subject>Endophthalmitis</subject><subject>Eye</subject><subject>Eye (anatomy)</subject><subject>Fungi</subject><subject>Fungicides</subject><subject>Glaucoma</subject><subject>Graft rejection</subject><subject>Keratitis</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine &amp; Public Health</subject><subject>Ophthalmology</subject><subject>Original Paper</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Prophylaxis</subject><subject>Tissue culture</subject><subject>Tissues</subject><subject>Transplantation</subject><subject>Transplants</subject><subject>Transplants &amp; implants</subject><subject>Visual acuity</subject><issn>0165-5701</issn><issn>1573-2630</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kU1LHTEYhYNU6vXaP9BFGejGTdp8TJLJskirgtBNXYdM5h2JnZtM8yH4741eteBCsgic9znnTTgIfabkGyVEfc-UKM0wYQQTKnuK9QHaUKE4ZpKTD2jTVIGFIvQIHed8SwjRSsuP6IhzRgRXdIPuLoPzEwQHnQ1TF2txcQddnLuSbMjrYkOxxcfwKM013NgFu7qUmgCvMfvi76CbYoipczEFiNktkOzSFZ9zhc4341q8a8rfppfYEnO5P0GHs10yfHq-t-j6188_Zxf46vf55dmPK-y4EgVLTWYmeqX6aeJSD_0kBmJnQUcqtKJ6tCDmfmBaWe2sFiAG68ZxlhMXuo35Fp3uc9cU_1XIxex8drC0b0Gs2bBe0kFy2s4WfX2D3saaQntdo7RmTFCpGsX2lEsx5wSzWZPf2XRvKDGPrZh9K6a1Yp5aMbqZvjxH13EH06vlpYYG8D2Q2yjcQPq_-53YB4KhmZ0</recordid><startdate>20210301</startdate><enddate>20210301</enddate><creator>Alshabeeb, Rawan Saleh</creator><creator>Aldayel, Ahmed Abdullah</creator><creator>Martinez-Osorio, Hernan</creator><creator>Ahad, Muhammad Ali</creator><general>Springer Netherlands</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8050-2953</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20210301</creationdate><title>Incidence and outcome of transplantation of fungal-culture-positive donor corneoscleral tissue in optical keratoplasty</title><author>Alshabeeb, Rawan Saleh ; Aldayel, Ahmed Abdullah ; Martinez-Osorio, Hernan ; Ahad, Muhammad Ali</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-690f254774dd36984d580af51b159719bae5f48297a9ca95e58acbbf6d35919b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Acuity</topic><topic>Amphotericin B</topic><topic>Clinical outcomes</topic><topic>Complications</topic><topic>Cornea</topic><topic>Corneal transplantation</topic><topic>Endophthalmitis</topic><topic>Eye</topic><topic>Eye (anatomy)</topic><topic>Fungi</topic><topic>Fungicides</topic><topic>Glaucoma</topic><topic>Graft rejection</topic><topic>Keratitis</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine &amp; Public Health</topic><topic>Ophthalmology</topic><topic>Original Paper</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Prophylaxis</topic><topic>Tissue culture</topic><topic>Tissues</topic><topic>Transplantation</topic><topic>Transplants</topic><topic>Transplants &amp; implants</topic><topic>Visual acuity</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Alshabeeb, Rawan Saleh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Aldayel, Ahmed Abdullah</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Martinez-Osorio, Hernan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ahad, Muhammad Ali</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health and Medical</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>International ophthalmology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Alshabeeb, Rawan Saleh</au><au>Aldayel, Ahmed Abdullah</au><au>Martinez-Osorio, Hernan</au><au>Ahad, Muhammad Ali</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Incidence and outcome of transplantation of fungal-culture-positive donor corneoscleral tissue in optical keratoplasty</atitle><jtitle>International ophthalmology</jtitle><stitle>Int Ophthalmol</stitle><addtitle>Int Ophthalmol</addtitle><date>2021-03-01</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>41</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>867</spage><epage>873</epage><pages>867-873</pages><issn>0165-5701</issn><eissn>1573-2630</eissn><abstract>Purpose This study aims to determine the incidence of fungal-culture-positive corneoscleral donor rim in patients undergoing keratoplasty and evaluate clinical outcomes of eyes that received these contaminated donor tissues. Methods Patients who had optical keratoplasty between 2006 and 2016 and were found to have fungal-culture-positive donor rim were included. Microbiological and eye bank records were reviewed to determine the incidence of positive fungal rim cultures. Data were collected on visual and clinical outcomes. The main outcome measures were fungal-culture-positive donor rim and development of fungal keratitis or endophthalmitis post keratoplasty. Long-term clinical outcome and associated complications were the secondary outcome measures. Results Out of 9620 cases of corneal transplants, 145 (1.5%) had fungal-culture-positive donor rim. Candida was the most common organism, cultured in 127 (87.6%) cases. There were no cases of postoperative fungal keratitis or endophthalmitis. Median follow-up was 4.8 years (interquartile range 3.8–7.2 years). Only eight cases (5.5%) received prophylactic antifungal treatment. There were 34 (23.4%) cases of rejection, 13 (8.9%) developed glaucoma, and 7 (4.8%) developed late bacterial keratitis. At last follow-up, best corrected visual acuity was 20/60 or better in 88 cases (60.7%) and 115 eyes (79.3%) had a clear graft. Conclusion The incidence of fungal-culture-positive donor rim is extremely low. The risk of developing fungal keratitis or endophthalmitis in patients who received contaminated donor tissue was almost negligible. Further studies are warranted to prove whether prophylaxis or adding amphotericin B in Optisol-GS confers any added benefit.</abstract><cop>Dordrecht</cop><pub>Springer Netherlands</pub><pmid>33205371</pmid><doi>10.1007/s10792-020-01641-9</doi><tpages>7</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8050-2953</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0165-5701
ispartof International ophthalmology, 2021-03, Vol.41 (3), p.867-873
issn 0165-5701
1573-2630
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2461863131
source Springer Link
subjects Acuity
Amphotericin B
Clinical outcomes
Complications
Cornea
Corneal transplantation
Endophthalmitis
Eye
Eye (anatomy)
Fungi
Fungicides
Glaucoma
Graft rejection
Keratitis
Medicine
Medicine & Public Health
Ophthalmology
Original Paper
Patients
Prophylaxis
Tissue culture
Tissues
Transplantation
Transplants
Transplants & implants
Visual acuity
title Incidence and outcome of transplantation of fungal-culture-positive donor corneoscleral tissue in optical keratoplasty
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-27T05%3A32%3A23IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Incidence%20and%20outcome%20of%20transplantation%20of%20fungal-culture-positive%20donor%20corneoscleral%20tissue%20in%20optical%20keratoplasty&rft.jtitle=International%20ophthalmology&rft.au=Alshabeeb,%20Rawan%20Saleh&rft.date=2021-03-01&rft.volume=41&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=867&rft.epage=873&rft.pages=867-873&rft.issn=0165-5701&rft.eissn=1573-2630&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10792-020-01641-9&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2499225167%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-690f254774dd36984d580af51b159719bae5f48297a9ca95e58acbbf6d35919b3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2499225167&rft_id=info:pmid/33205371&rfr_iscdi=true