Investigating the effects of myofascial induction therapy techniques on pain, function and quality of life in patients with chronic low back pain

Low back pain (LBP) is well documented as a common health problem; it is the leading cause of activity limitation and work absence throughout much of the world, and it causes an enormous economic burden on individuals, families, communities, industry, and governments. The aim of this study was to co...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of bodywork and movement therapies 2020-10, Vol.24 (4), p.188-195
Main Authors: Ünal, Mehmet, Evci̇k, Ender, Kocatürk, Muammer, Algun, Z. Candan
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Chronic low back pain
Chronic Pain - therapy
Disability Evaluation
Humans
Induction Chemotherapy
Low Back Pain - therapy
Manual therapy
Myofascial induction therapy
Pain Measurement
Pain neuroscience education
Quality of Life
Surveys and Questionnaires
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c356t-a12344a911dd83d78897b99597716ac91ba15cbcb886aa939fa96b511b60a0303
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c356t-a12344a911dd83d78897b99597716ac91ba15cbcb886aa939fa96b511b60a0303
container_end_page 195
container_issue 4
container_start_page 188
container_title Journal of bodywork and movement therapies
container_volume 24
creator Ünal, Mehmet
Evci̇k, Ender
Kocatürk, Muammer
Algun, Z. Candan
description Low back pain (LBP) is well documented as a common health problem; it is the leading cause of activity limitation and work absence throughout much of the world, and it causes an enormous economic burden on individuals, families, communities, industry, and governments. The aim of this study was to comparatively investigate the effects of myofascial induction therapy (MIT) against pain neuroscience education (PNE) on pain and function in patients with chronic low back pain (CLBP). Forty patients with CLBP were included and randomly divided into two groups according to the treatment program (40 min/session, 2 sessions/week during 8-week), as follows: the MIT and the PNE groups. The outcome measures were the fear-avoidance beliefs questionnaire (FABQ), Roland Morris disability questionnaire, McGill pain questionnaire, finger floor test, SF-36 quality-of-life questionnaire, and thoracolumbar fascia ultrasound imaging results. Patients were evaluated before and after treatment. Within both groups, all outcome scores showed a significant improvement (p 
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.jbmt.2020.07.014
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2463106833</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S136085922030142X</els_id><sourcerecordid>2463106833</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c356t-a12344a911dd83d78897b99597716ac91ba15cbcb886aa939fa96b511b60a0303</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kctu1DAUQC0Eog_4ARbISxYk-JE4tsQGVVAqVWIDa-vasTseEnsaO63mM_hjHKawZGUvzj3SvQehN5S0lFDxYd_uzVxaRhhpydAS2j1D57TnrFFM8uf1zwVpZK_YGbrIeU8IUR1TL9EZ54zKnpJz9OsmPrhcwh2UEO9w2TnsvHe2ZJw8no_JQ7YBJhziuNoSUtyYBQ5HXJzdxXC_uopGfIAQ32O_xhMEccT3K0yhHDfRFLyrikqV4GKVP4ayw3a3pBgsntIjNmB__pG8Qi88TNm9fnov0Y8vn79ffW1uv13fXH26bSzvRWmAMt51oCgdR8nHQUo1GKV6NQxUgFXUAO2tsUZKAaC48qCE6Sk1ggDhhF-idyfvYUnbEkXPIVs3TRBdWrNmneCUCMl5RdkJtUvKeXFeH5Yww3LUlOgthd7rLYXeUmgy6JqiDr198q9mduO_kb-3r8DHE-Dqlg_BLbpe2kXrxrDUAHpM4X_-3zt9nKc</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2463106833</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Investigating the effects of myofascial induction therapy techniques on pain, function and quality of life in patients with chronic low back pain</title><source>ScienceDirect Freedom Collection 2022-2024</source><creator>Ünal, Mehmet ; Evci̇k, Ender ; Kocatürk, Muammer ; Algun, Z. Candan</creator><creatorcontrib>Ünal, Mehmet ; Evci̇k, Ender ; Kocatürk, Muammer ; Algun, Z. Candan</creatorcontrib><description>Low back pain (LBP) is well documented as a common health problem; it is the leading cause of activity limitation and work absence throughout much of the world, and it causes an enormous economic burden on individuals, families, communities, industry, and governments. The aim of this study was to comparatively investigate the effects of myofascial induction therapy (MIT) against pain neuroscience education (PNE) on pain and function in patients with chronic low back pain (CLBP). Forty patients with CLBP were included and randomly divided into two groups according to the treatment program (40 min/session, 2 sessions/week during 8-week), as follows: the MIT and the PNE groups. The outcome measures were the fear-avoidance beliefs questionnaire (FABQ), Roland Morris disability questionnaire, McGill pain questionnaire, finger floor test, SF-36 quality-of-life questionnaire, and thoracolumbar fascia ultrasound imaging results. Patients were evaluated before and after treatment. Within both groups, all outcome scores showed a significant improvement (p &lt; 0.05). After 8-week, SF-36 physical function, physical role and mental health scores significantly improved in MIT group compared with PNE group, finger floor test score significantly decreased in MIT group compared with PNE group, and FABQ score significantly decreased in PNE group compared with MIT group (p &lt; 0.05). Although both MIT and PNE were found to be effective on pain and function in patients with CLBP, MIT techniques were substantially better in improving the mobility of trunk flexion and quality of life in these patients.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1360-8592</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1532-9283</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.jbmt.2020.07.014</identifier><identifier>PMID: 33218510</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Chronic low back pain ; Chronic Pain - therapy ; Disability Evaluation ; Humans ; Induction Chemotherapy ; Low Back Pain - therapy ; Manual therapy ; Myofascial induction therapy ; Pain Measurement ; Pain neuroscience education ; Quality of Life ; Surveys and Questionnaires</subject><ispartof>Journal of bodywork and movement therapies, 2020-10, Vol.24 (4), p.188-195</ispartof><rights>2020 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c356t-a12344a911dd83d78897b99597716ac91ba15cbcb886aa939fa96b511b60a0303</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c356t-a12344a911dd83d78897b99597716ac91ba15cbcb886aa939fa96b511b60a0303</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-4927-649X</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33218510$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ünal, Mehmet</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Evci̇k, Ender</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kocatürk, Muammer</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Algun, Z. Candan</creatorcontrib><title>Investigating the effects of myofascial induction therapy techniques on pain, function and quality of life in patients with chronic low back pain</title><title>Journal of bodywork and movement therapies</title><addtitle>J Bodyw Mov Ther</addtitle><description>Low back pain (LBP) is well documented as a common health problem; it is the leading cause of activity limitation and work absence throughout much of the world, and it causes an enormous economic burden on individuals, families, communities, industry, and governments. The aim of this study was to comparatively investigate the effects of myofascial induction therapy (MIT) against pain neuroscience education (PNE) on pain and function in patients with chronic low back pain (CLBP). Forty patients with CLBP were included and randomly divided into two groups according to the treatment program (40 min/session, 2 sessions/week during 8-week), as follows: the MIT and the PNE groups. The outcome measures were the fear-avoidance beliefs questionnaire (FABQ), Roland Morris disability questionnaire, McGill pain questionnaire, finger floor test, SF-36 quality-of-life questionnaire, and thoracolumbar fascia ultrasound imaging results. Patients were evaluated before and after treatment. Within both groups, all outcome scores showed a significant improvement (p &lt; 0.05). After 8-week, SF-36 physical function, physical role and mental health scores significantly improved in MIT group compared with PNE group, finger floor test score significantly decreased in MIT group compared with PNE group, and FABQ score significantly decreased in PNE group compared with MIT group (p &lt; 0.05). Although both MIT and PNE were found to be effective on pain and function in patients with CLBP, MIT techniques were substantially better in improving the mobility of trunk flexion and quality of life in these patients.</description><subject>Chronic low back pain</subject><subject>Chronic Pain - therapy</subject><subject>Disability Evaluation</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Induction Chemotherapy</subject><subject>Low Back Pain - therapy</subject><subject>Manual therapy</subject><subject>Myofascial induction therapy</subject><subject>Pain Measurement</subject><subject>Pain neuroscience education</subject><subject>Quality of Life</subject><subject>Surveys and Questionnaires</subject><issn>1360-8592</issn><issn>1532-9283</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kctu1DAUQC0Eog_4ARbISxYk-JE4tsQGVVAqVWIDa-vasTseEnsaO63mM_hjHKawZGUvzj3SvQehN5S0lFDxYd_uzVxaRhhpydAS2j1D57TnrFFM8uf1zwVpZK_YGbrIeU8IUR1TL9EZ54zKnpJz9OsmPrhcwh2UEO9w2TnsvHe2ZJw8no_JQ7YBJhziuNoSUtyYBQ5HXJzdxXC_uopGfIAQ32O_xhMEccT3K0yhHDfRFLyrikqV4GKVP4ayw3a3pBgsntIjNmB__pG8Qi88TNm9fnov0Y8vn79ffW1uv13fXH26bSzvRWmAMt51oCgdR8nHQUo1GKV6NQxUgFXUAO2tsUZKAaC48qCE6Sk1ggDhhF-idyfvYUnbEkXPIVs3TRBdWrNmneCUCMl5RdkJtUvKeXFeH5Yww3LUlOgthd7rLYXeUmgy6JqiDr198q9mduO_kb-3r8DHE-Dqlg_BLbpe2kXrxrDUAHpM4X_-3zt9nKc</recordid><startdate>202010</startdate><enddate>202010</enddate><creator>Ünal, Mehmet</creator><creator>Evci̇k, Ender</creator><creator>Kocatürk, Muammer</creator><creator>Algun, Z. Candan</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4927-649X</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202010</creationdate><title>Investigating the effects of myofascial induction therapy techniques on pain, function and quality of life in patients with chronic low back pain</title><author>Ünal, Mehmet ; Evci̇k, Ender ; Kocatürk, Muammer ; Algun, Z. Candan</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c356t-a12344a911dd83d78897b99597716ac91ba15cbcb886aa939fa96b511b60a0303</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Chronic low back pain</topic><topic>Chronic Pain - therapy</topic><topic>Disability Evaluation</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Induction Chemotherapy</topic><topic>Low Back Pain - therapy</topic><topic>Manual therapy</topic><topic>Myofascial induction therapy</topic><topic>Pain Measurement</topic><topic>Pain neuroscience education</topic><topic>Quality of Life</topic><topic>Surveys and Questionnaires</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ünal, Mehmet</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Evci̇k, Ender</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kocatürk, Muammer</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Algun, Z. Candan</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of bodywork and movement therapies</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ünal, Mehmet</au><au>Evci̇k, Ender</au><au>Kocatürk, Muammer</au><au>Algun, Z. Candan</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Investigating the effects of myofascial induction therapy techniques on pain, function and quality of life in patients with chronic low back pain</atitle><jtitle>Journal of bodywork and movement therapies</jtitle><addtitle>J Bodyw Mov Ther</addtitle><date>2020-10</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>24</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>188</spage><epage>195</epage><pages>188-195</pages><issn>1360-8592</issn><eissn>1532-9283</eissn><abstract>Low back pain (LBP) is well documented as a common health problem; it is the leading cause of activity limitation and work absence throughout much of the world, and it causes an enormous economic burden on individuals, families, communities, industry, and governments. The aim of this study was to comparatively investigate the effects of myofascial induction therapy (MIT) against pain neuroscience education (PNE) on pain and function in patients with chronic low back pain (CLBP). Forty patients with CLBP were included and randomly divided into two groups according to the treatment program (40 min/session, 2 sessions/week during 8-week), as follows: the MIT and the PNE groups. The outcome measures were the fear-avoidance beliefs questionnaire (FABQ), Roland Morris disability questionnaire, McGill pain questionnaire, finger floor test, SF-36 quality-of-life questionnaire, and thoracolumbar fascia ultrasound imaging results. Patients were evaluated before and after treatment. Within both groups, all outcome scores showed a significant improvement (p &lt; 0.05). After 8-week, SF-36 physical function, physical role and mental health scores significantly improved in MIT group compared with PNE group, finger floor test score significantly decreased in MIT group compared with PNE group, and FABQ score significantly decreased in PNE group compared with MIT group (p &lt; 0.05). Although both MIT and PNE were found to be effective on pain and function in patients with CLBP, MIT techniques were substantially better in improving the mobility of trunk flexion and quality of life in these patients.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>33218510</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.jbmt.2020.07.014</doi><tpages>8</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4927-649X</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1360-8592
ispartof Journal of bodywork and movement therapies, 2020-10, Vol.24 (4), p.188-195
issn 1360-8592
1532-9283
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2463106833
source ScienceDirect Freedom Collection 2022-2024
subjects Chronic low back pain
Chronic Pain - therapy
Disability Evaluation
Humans
Induction Chemotherapy
Low Back Pain - therapy
Manual therapy
Myofascial induction therapy
Pain Measurement
Pain neuroscience education
Quality of Life
Surveys and Questionnaires
title Investigating the effects of myofascial induction therapy techniques on pain, function and quality of life in patients with chronic low back pain
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-06T16%3A24%3A13IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Investigating%20the%20effects%20of%20myofascial%20induction%20therapy%20techniques%20on%20pain,%20function%20and%20quality%20of%20life%20in%20patients%20with%20chronic%20low%20back%20pain&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20bodywork%20and%20movement%20therapies&rft.au=%C3%9Cnal,%20Mehmet&rft.date=2020-10&rft.volume=24&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=188&rft.epage=195&rft.pages=188-195&rft.issn=1360-8592&rft.eissn=1532-9283&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.jbmt.2020.07.014&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2463106833%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c356t-a12344a911dd83d78897b99597716ac91ba15cbcb886aa939fa96b511b60a0303%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2463106833&rft_id=info:pmid/33218510&rfr_iscdi=true