Intrasession repeatability of corneal, limbal and scleral measurements obtained with a fourier transform profilometer

• Published in: Contact lens & anterior eye 2021-10, Vol.44 (5), p.101382-101382, Article 101382
• Main Authors: Bataille, Laurent, Molina-Martin, Ainhoa, Piñero, David P
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Conjunctiva; Corneo-scleral topography; Eye surface profiler; Ocular sagittal height; Profilometry; Repeatability
• ISSN: 1367-0484; 1476-5411
• DOI: 10.1016/j.clae.2020.11.002

To evaluate the intrasession repeatability of corneal, limbal and scleral measurements obtained by an experienced operator with a Fourier transform profilometer in healthy eyes. Prospective, single-center study including 35 eyes of 35 participants with ages ranging from 13 to 52 years. All patients underwent three consecutive corneoscleral topographic evaluations with the Eye Surface Profiler (ESP) system (Eaglet Eye b.v.). Intrasession repeatability was analyzed for different geometric and sagittal height variables using the following parameters: the within-subject standard deviation (Sw) of the three consecutive measurements, intrasubject precision (1.96 × Sw), coefficient of variation (CV) and the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). Inner best fit sphere (BFS) showed good repeatability, with ICC of 0.844. Higher variability was observed for the repeated measurements of limbus and outer BFS, with ICCs of 0.636 and 0.739, respectively. For mean corneal and scleral radius, ICCs were 0.933 and 0.888, respectively. The repeatability of all sagittal height data was good for all chords evaluated (11–15 mm), with Sw values from 0.02 to 0.11 mm, and ICCs from 0.568 to 0.909. A significant positive correlation was found between the magnitude of temporal-nasal sagittal height difference for all measured chords and its Sw associated. The ESP system can provide consistent measurements of sagittal height data for different chord diameters as well as for mean corneal and scleral radius in healthy eyes. Best fit approaches for limbal and scleral areas were less repeatable, although within a clinically acceptable range.