Loading…
Evaluation of serum IgM and IgG antibodies in COVID‐19 patients by enzyme linked immunosorbent assay
Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS‐CoV‐2) is sweeping the world since the end of 2019. The titer change of antibodies against SARS‐CoV‐2 needs to be further clarified, the clinical and preventive value of antibodies still needs to be further investigated. An enzyme‐linked immunoso...
Saved in:
Published in: | Journal of Medical Virology 2021-05, Vol.93 (5), p.2857-2866 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Request full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4161-d62ac38946c9e6ace605d9397f983653bea49225d3afca242ef548cbf2fbd1ff3 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4161-d62ac38946c9e6ace605d9397f983653bea49225d3afca242ef548cbf2fbd1ff3 |
container_end_page | 2866 |
container_issue | 5 |
container_start_page | 2857 |
container_title | Journal of Medical Virology |
container_volume | 93 |
creator | Zhou, Chang Bu, Ge Sun, Yong Ren, Cuiping Qu, Mingsheng Gao, Yufeng Zhu, Yulin Wang, Linding Sun, Liang Liu, Yan |
description | Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS‐CoV‐2) is sweeping the world since the end of 2019. The titer change of antibodies against SARS‐CoV‐2 needs to be further clarified, the clinical and preventive value of antibodies still needs to be further investigated. An enzyme‐linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) was established by coating with SARS‐CoV‐2 recombinant spike protein and used to detect serum immunoglobulin M (IgM) and immunoglobulin G (IgG) antibodies against SARS‐CoV‐2 in coronavirus disease 2019 patients to evaluate the pattern of changes of antibodies. The specificity of the ELISA for detection SARS‐CoV‐2 IgM and IgG were 96% (144/150) and 100% (150/150), respectively. The sensitivity of ELISA was 100% (150/150) for IgM, and 99.3% (149/150) for IgG. SARS‐CoV‐2‐SP‐IgM and SP‐IgG antibodies could be detected on Day 1 of hospitalization in 12.5% patients, and SP‐IgM began to decrease after reaching its peak at around 22–28 days, and become negative at Month 3 in 30% patients and negative at Month 7 in 79% of these patients after onset; IgG reached its peak around Day 22–28 and kept at a high level within the longest observation period for 4 months, it dropped very sharply at 7 months. The positive rates of SP‐IgM and SP‐IgG were higher than those of reverse transcription‐polymerase chain reaction on Day 7 and 4. The established indirect ELISA has good specificity and sensitivity. IgM and IgG against SARS‐CoV‐2 appeared almost simultaneously in the early stage, and the level of IgG antibodies could not maintain a high plateau in the observation period of 7 months. Our data will help develop the diagnosis and vaccine of SARS‐CoV‐2. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1002/jmv.26741 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_COVID</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2470901264</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2509224657</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4161-d62ac38946c9e6ace605d9397f983653bea49225d3afca242ef548cbf2fbd1ff3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kcFO3DAURS3UipkOLPiBylI3dBHGdhwnXlYDpVOB2MBsLSd5Rp4m9jROQGHFJ_Qb-RLcBrqoVLy5C593nq2L0BElJ5QQtty2dydM5JzuoTklUiSS5PQdmhPKRSIEzWboQwhbQkghGdtHszQeKjI-R-bsTjeD7q132BscoBtavL69xNrVMc9j9rb0tYWArcOrq8369OnxF5V4F4fA9QGXIwb3MLaAG-t-QI1t2w7OB9-V8R7rEPR4gN4b3QQ4fMkFuvl6dr36llxcna9XXy6SilNBk1owXaWF5KKSIHQFgmS1TGVuZJGKLC1B8_iDrE61qTTjDEzGi6o0zJQ1NSZdoOPJu-v8zwFCr1obKmga7cAPQTGeE0koEzyin_5Bt37oXHydYhmJW7jI8jep6Co4oYJF6vNEVZ0PoQOjdp1tdTcqStTvilSsSP2pKLIfX4xD2UL9l3ztJALLCbi3DYz_N6nvl5tJ-QzZ3poc</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2470840162</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Evaluation of serum IgM and IgG antibodies in COVID‐19 patients by enzyme linked immunosorbent assay</title><source>Coronavirus Research Database</source><creator>Zhou, Chang ; Bu, Ge ; Sun, Yong ; Ren, Cuiping ; Qu, Mingsheng ; Gao, Yufeng ; Zhu, Yulin ; Wang, Linding ; Sun, Liang ; Liu, Yan</creator><creatorcontrib>Zhou, Chang ; Bu, Ge ; Sun, Yong ; Ren, Cuiping ; Qu, Mingsheng ; Gao, Yufeng ; Zhu, Yulin ; Wang, Linding ; Sun, Liang ; Liu, Yan</creatorcontrib><description>Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS‐CoV‐2) is sweeping the world since the end of 2019. The titer change of antibodies against SARS‐CoV‐2 needs to be further clarified, the clinical and preventive value of antibodies still needs to be further investigated. An enzyme‐linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) was established by coating with SARS‐CoV‐2 recombinant spike protein and used to detect serum immunoglobulin M (IgM) and immunoglobulin G (IgG) antibodies against SARS‐CoV‐2 in coronavirus disease 2019 patients to evaluate the pattern of changes of antibodies. The specificity of the ELISA for detection SARS‐CoV‐2 IgM and IgG were 96% (144/150) and 100% (150/150), respectively. The sensitivity of ELISA was 100% (150/150) for IgM, and 99.3% (149/150) for IgG. SARS‐CoV‐2‐SP‐IgM and SP‐IgG antibodies could be detected on Day 1 of hospitalization in 12.5% patients, and SP‐IgM began to decrease after reaching its peak at around 22–28 days, and become negative at Month 3 in 30% patients and negative at Month 7 in 79% of these patients after onset; IgG reached its peak around Day 22–28 and kept at a high level within the longest observation period for 4 months, it dropped very sharply at 7 months. The positive rates of SP‐IgM and SP‐IgG were higher than those of reverse transcription‐polymerase chain reaction on Day 7 and 4. The established indirect ELISA has good specificity and sensitivity. IgM and IgG against SARS‐CoV‐2 appeared almost simultaneously in the early stage, and the level of IgG antibodies could not maintain a high plateau in the observation period of 7 months. Our data will help develop the diagnosis and vaccine of SARS‐CoV‐2.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0146-6615</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1096-9071</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/jmv.26741</identifier><identifier>PMID: 33331654</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: John Wiley & Sons, Inc</publisher><subject>Adolescent ; Adult ; Aged ; Antibodies ; Antibodies, Viral - blood ; Coronaviridae ; Coronaviruses ; COVID-19 ; COVID-19 - diagnosis ; COVID-19 - immunology ; COVID-19 Nucleic Acid Testing - methods ; COVID-19 Serological Testing - methods ; ELISA ; Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay ; Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay - methods ; Enzymes ; Humans ; IgG ; IgG antibody ; IgM ; Immunoglobulin G ; Immunoglobulin G - blood ; Immunoglobulin M ; Immunoglobulin M - blood ; Immunoglobulins ; Middle Aged ; pike protein ; Polymerase chain reaction ; Recombinant Proteins - immunology ; Reverse transcription ; SARS-CoV-2 - genetics ; SARS-CoV-2 - isolation & purification ; SARS‐CoV‐2 ; Sensitivity ; Sensitivity and Specificity ; Severe acute respiratory syndrome ; Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 ; Spike Glycoprotein, Coronavirus - genetics ; Spike Glycoprotein, Coronavirus - immunology ; Spike protein ; Time Factors ; Vaccines ; Viral diseases ; Virology ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>Journal of Medical Virology, 2021-05, Vol.93 (5), p.2857-2866</ispartof><rights>2020 Wiley Periodicals LLC</rights><rights>2020 Wiley Periodicals LLC.</rights><rights>2020. Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the associated terms available at https://novel-coronavirus.onlinelibrary.wiley.com</rights><rights>2021 Wiley Periodicals LLC</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4161-d62ac38946c9e6ace605d9397f983653bea49225d3afca242ef548cbf2fbd1ff3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4161-d62ac38946c9e6ace605d9397f983653bea49225d3afca242ef548cbf2fbd1ff3</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-6877-5791</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2470840162?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,38516,43895</link.rule.ids><linktorsrc>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2470840162?pq-origsite=primo$$EView_record_in_ProQuest$$FView_record_in_$$GProQuest</linktorsrc><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33331654$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Zhou, Chang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bu, Ge</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sun, Yong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ren, Cuiping</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Qu, Mingsheng</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gao, Yufeng</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhu, Yulin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Linding</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sun, Liang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liu, Yan</creatorcontrib><title>Evaluation of serum IgM and IgG antibodies in COVID‐19 patients by enzyme linked immunosorbent assay</title><title>Journal of Medical Virology</title><addtitle>J Med Virol</addtitle><description>Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS‐CoV‐2) is sweeping the world since the end of 2019. The titer change of antibodies against SARS‐CoV‐2 needs to be further clarified, the clinical and preventive value of antibodies still needs to be further investigated. An enzyme‐linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) was established by coating with SARS‐CoV‐2 recombinant spike protein and used to detect serum immunoglobulin M (IgM) and immunoglobulin G (IgG) antibodies against SARS‐CoV‐2 in coronavirus disease 2019 patients to evaluate the pattern of changes of antibodies. The specificity of the ELISA for detection SARS‐CoV‐2 IgM and IgG were 96% (144/150) and 100% (150/150), respectively. The sensitivity of ELISA was 100% (150/150) for IgM, and 99.3% (149/150) for IgG. SARS‐CoV‐2‐SP‐IgM and SP‐IgG antibodies could be detected on Day 1 of hospitalization in 12.5% patients, and SP‐IgM began to decrease after reaching its peak at around 22–28 days, and become negative at Month 3 in 30% patients and negative at Month 7 in 79% of these patients after onset; IgG reached its peak around Day 22–28 and kept at a high level within the longest observation period for 4 months, it dropped very sharply at 7 months. The positive rates of SP‐IgM and SP‐IgG were higher than those of reverse transcription‐polymerase chain reaction on Day 7 and 4. The established indirect ELISA has good specificity and sensitivity. IgM and IgG against SARS‐CoV‐2 appeared almost simultaneously in the early stage, and the level of IgG antibodies could not maintain a high plateau in the observation period of 7 months. Our data will help develop the diagnosis and vaccine of SARS‐CoV‐2.</description><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Antibodies</subject><subject>Antibodies, Viral - blood</subject><subject>Coronaviridae</subject><subject>Coronaviruses</subject><subject>COVID-19</subject><subject>COVID-19 - diagnosis</subject><subject>COVID-19 - immunology</subject><subject>COVID-19 Nucleic Acid Testing - methods</subject><subject>COVID-19 Serological Testing - methods</subject><subject>ELISA</subject><subject>Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay</subject><subject>Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay - methods</subject><subject>Enzymes</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>IgG</subject><subject>IgG antibody</subject><subject>IgM</subject><subject>Immunoglobulin G</subject><subject>Immunoglobulin G - blood</subject><subject>Immunoglobulin M</subject><subject>Immunoglobulin M - blood</subject><subject>Immunoglobulins</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>pike protein</subject><subject>Polymerase chain reaction</subject><subject>Recombinant Proteins - immunology</subject><subject>Reverse transcription</subject><subject>SARS-CoV-2 - genetics</subject><subject>SARS-CoV-2 - isolation & purification</subject><subject>SARS‐CoV‐2</subject><subject>Sensitivity</subject><subject>Sensitivity and Specificity</subject><subject>Severe acute respiratory syndrome</subject><subject>Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2</subject><subject>Spike Glycoprotein, Coronavirus - genetics</subject><subject>Spike Glycoprotein, Coronavirus - immunology</subject><subject>Spike protein</subject><subject>Time Factors</subject><subject>Vaccines</subject><subject>Viral diseases</subject><subject>Virology</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>0146-6615</issn><issn>1096-9071</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>COVID</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kcFO3DAURS3UipkOLPiBylI3dBHGdhwnXlYDpVOB2MBsLSd5Rp4m9jROQGHFJ_Qb-RLcBrqoVLy5C593nq2L0BElJ5QQtty2dydM5JzuoTklUiSS5PQdmhPKRSIEzWboQwhbQkghGdtHszQeKjI-R-bsTjeD7q132BscoBtavL69xNrVMc9j9rb0tYWArcOrq8369OnxF5V4F4fA9QGXIwb3MLaAG-t-QI1t2w7OB9-V8R7rEPR4gN4b3QQ4fMkFuvl6dr36llxcna9XXy6SilNBk1owXaWF5KKSIHQFgmS1TGVuZJGKLC1B8_iDrE61qTTjDEzGi6o0zJQ1NSZdoOPJu-v8zwFCr1obKmga7cAPQTGeE0koEzyin_5Bt37oXHydYhmJW7jI8jep6Co4oYJF6vNEVZ0PoQOjdp1tdTcqStTvilSsSP2pKLIfX4xD2UL9l3ztJALLCbi3DYz_N6nvl5tJ-QzZ3poc</recordid><startdate>202105</startdate><enddate>202105</enddate><creator>Zhou, Chang</creator><creator>Bu, Ge</creator><creator>Sun, Yong</creator><creator>Ren, Cuiping</creator><creator>Qu, Mingsheng</creator><creator>Gao, Yufeng</creator><creator>Zhu, Yulin</creator><creator>Wang, Linding</creator><creator>Sun, Liang</creator><creator>Liu, Yan</creator><general>John Wiley & Sons, Inc</general><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>COVID</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6877-5791</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202105</creationdate><title>Evaluation of serum IgM and IgG antibodies in COVID‐19 patients by enzyme linked immunosorbent assay</title><author>Zhou, Chang ; Bu, Ge ; Sun, Yong ; Ren, Cuiping ; Qu, Mingsheng ; Gao, Yufeng ; Zhu, Yulin ; Wang, Linding ; Sun, Liang ; Liu, Yan</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4161-d62ac38946c9e6ace605d9397f983653bea49225d3afca242ef548cbf2fbd1ff3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Antibodies</topic><topic>Antibodies, Viral - blood</topic><topic>Coronaviridae</topic><topic>Coronaviruses</topic><topic>COVID-19</topic><topic>COVID-19 - diagnosis</topic><topic>COVID-19 - immunology</topic><topic>COVID-19 Nucleic Acid Testing - methods</topic><topic>COVID-19 Serological Testing - methods</topic><topic>ELISA</topic><topic>Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay</topic><topic>Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay - methods</topic><topic>Enzymes</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>IgG</topic><topic>IgG antibody</topic><topic>IgM</topic><topic>Immunoglobulin G</topic><topic>Immunoglobulin G - blood</topic><topic>Immunoglobulin M</topic><topic>Immunoglobulin M - blood</topic><topic>Immunoglobulins</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>pike protein</topic><topic>Polymerase chain reaction</topic><topic>Recombinant Proteins - immunology</topic><topic>Reverse transcription</topic><topic>SARS-CoV-2 - genetics</topic><topic>SARS-CoV-2 - isolation & purification</topic><topic>SARS‐CoV‐2</topic><topic>Sensitivity</topic><topic>Sensitivity and Specificity</topic><topic>Severe acute respiratory syndrome</topic><topic>Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2</topic><topic>Spike Glycoprotein, Coronavirus - genetics</topic><topic>Spike Glycoprotein, Coronavirus - immunology</topic><topic>Spike protein</topic><topic>Time Factors</topic><topic>Vaccines</topic><topic>Viral diseases</topic><topic>Virology</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Zhou, Chang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bu, Ge</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sun, Yong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ren, Cuiping</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Qu, Mingsheng</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gao, Yufeng</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhu, Yulin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Linding</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sun, Liang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liu, Yan</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Coronavirus Research Database</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of Medical Virology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext_linktorsrc</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Zhou, Chang</au><au>Bu, Ge</au><au>Sun, Yong</au><au>Ren, Cuiping</au><au>Qu, Mingsheng</au><au>Gao, Yufeng</au><au>Zhu, Yulin</au><au>Wang, Linding</au><au>Sun, Liang</au><au>Liu, Yan</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Evaluation of serum IgM and IgG antibodies in COVID‐19 patients by enzyme linked immunosorbent assay</atitle><jtitle>Journal of Medical Virology</jtitle><addtitle>J Med Virol</addtitle><date>2021-05</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>93</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>2857</spage><epage>2866</epage><pages>2857-2866</pages><issn>0146-6615</issn><eissn>1096-9071</eissn><abstract>Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS‐CoV‐2) is sweeping the world since the end of 2019. The titer change of antibodies against SARS‐CoV‐2 needs to be further clarified, the clinical and preventive value of antibodies still needs to be further investigated. An enzyme‐linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) was established by coating with SARS‐CoV‐2 recombinant spike protein and used to detect serum immunoglobulin M (IgM) and immunoglobulin G (IgG) antibodies against SARS‐CoV‐2 in coronavirus disease 2019 patients to evaluate the pattern of changes of antibodies. The specificity of the ELISA for detection SARS‐CoV‐2 IgM and IgG were 96% (144/150) and 100% (150/150), respectively. The sensitivity of ELISA was 100% (150/150) for IgM, and 99.3% (149/150) for IgG. SARS‐CoV‐2‐SP‐IgM and SP‐IgG antibodies could be detected on Day 1 of hospitalization in 12.5% patients, and SP‐IgM began to decrease after reaching its peak at around 22–28 days, and become negative at Month 3 in 30% patients and negative at Month 7 in 79% of these patients after onset; IgG reached its peak around Day 22–28 and kept at a high level within the longest observation period for 4 months, it dropped very sharply at 7 months. The positive rates of SP‐IgM and SP‐IgG were higher than those of reverse transcription‐polymerase chain reaction on Day 7 and 4. The established indirect ELISA has good specificity and sensitivity. IgM and IgG against SARS‐CoV‐2 appeared almost simultaneously in the early stage, and the level of IgG antibodies could not maintain a high plateau in the observation period of 7 months. Our data will help develop the diagnosis and vaccine of SARS‐CoV‐2.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>John Wiley & Sons, Inc</pub><pmid>33331654</pmid><doi>10.1002/jmv.26741</doi><tpages>10</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6877-5791</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext_linktorsrc |
identifier | ISSN: 0146-6615 |
ispartof | Journal of Medical Virology, 2021-05, Vol.93 (5), p.2857-2866 |
issn | 0146-6615 1096-9071 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2470901264 |
source | Coronavirus Research Database |
subjects | Adolescent Adult Aged Antibodies Antibodies, Viral - blood Coronaviridae Coronaviruses COVID-19 COVID-19 - diagnosis COVID-19 - immunology COVID-19 Nucleic Acid Testing - methods COVID-19 Serological Testing - methods ELISA Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay - methods Enzymes Humans IgG IgG antibody IgM Immunoglobulin G Immunoglobulin G - blood Immunoglobulin M Immunoglobulin M - blood Immunoglobulins Middle Aged pike protein Polymerase chain reaction Recombinant Proteins - immunology Reverse transcription SARS-CoV-2 - genetics SARS-CoV-2 - isolation & purification SARS‐CoV‐2 Sensitivity Sensitivity and Specificity Severe acute respiratory syndrome Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 Spike Glycoprotein, Coronavirus - genetics Spike Glycoprotein, Coronavirus - immunology Spike protein Time Factors Vaccines Viral diseases Virology Young Adult |
title | Evaluation of serum IgM and IgG antibodies in COVID‐19 patients by enzyme linked immunosorbent assay |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-20T17%3A33%3A25IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_COVID&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Evaluation%20of%20serum%20IgM%20and%20IgG%20antibodies%20in%20COVID%E2%80%9019%20patients%20by%20enzyme%20linked%20immunosorbent%20assay&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20Medical%20Virology&rft.au=Zhou,%20Chang&rft.date=2021-05&rft.volume=93&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=2857&rft.epage=2866&rft.pages=2857-2866&rft.issn=0146-6615&rft.eissn=1096-9071&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/jmv.26741&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_COVID%3E2509224657%3C/proquest_COVID%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4161-d62ac38946c9e6ace605d9397f983653bea49225d3afca242ef548cbf2fbd1ff3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2470840162&rft_id=info:pmid/33331654&rfr_iscdi=true |