Loading…
Wildfire severity influences offspring sex ratio in a native solitary bee
Although ecological disturbances can have a strong influence on pollinators through changes in habitat, virtually no studies have quantified how characteristics of wildfire influence the demography of essential pollinators. Nevertheless, evaluating this topic is critical for understanding how wildfi...
Saved in:
Published in: | Oecologia 2021-01, Vol.195 (1), p.65-75 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c498t-8d41ea61c27ae71848a06202685989aa3b0a7c4846af12ee1ad7fe7ceade30b23 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c498t-8d41ea61c27ae71848a06202685989aa3b0a7c4846af12ee1ad7fe7ceade30b23 |
container_end_page | 75 |
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 65 |
container_title | Oecologia |
container_volume | 195 |
creator | Galbraith, Sara M. Cane, James H. Rivers, James W. |
description | Although ecological disturbances can have a strong influence on pollinators through changes in habitat, virtually no studies have quantified how characteristics of wildfire influence the demography of essential pollinators. Nevertheless, evaluating this topic is critical for understanding how wildfire is linked to pollinator population dynamics, particularly given recent changes in wildfire frequency and severity in many regions of the world. In this study, we measured the demographic response of the blue orchard bee (Osmia lignaria) across a natural gradient of wildfire severity to assess how variation in wildfire characteristics influenced reproductive output, offspring sex ratio, and offspring mass. We placed nest blocks with a standardized number and sex ratio of pre-emergent adult bees across the wildfire gradient, finding some evidence for a positive but highly variable relationship between reproductive output and fire severity surrounding the nest site at both local (100 m) and landscape (750 m) scales. In addition, the production of female offspring was > 10% greater at nest sites experiencing the greatest landscape-scale fire severity relative to the lowest-severity areas. The finding that blue orchard bees biased offspring production towards the more expensive offspring sex with increasing fire severity shows a functional response to changes in habitat quality through increased density of flowering plants. Our findings indicate that burned mixed-conifer forest provides forage for the blue orchard bee across a severity gradient, and that the increase in floral resources that follows high-severity fire leads females to shift resource allocation to the more costly sex when nesting. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s00442-020-04809-3 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2475090437</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A651870258</galeid><jstor_id>48696904</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>A651870258</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c498t-8d41ea61c27ae71848a06202685989aa3b0a7c4846af12ee1ad7fe7ceade30b23</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kV9rFDEUxYModlv9AoIy0Bf7MPXmz0ySx1K0XSgIreJjyGZuliyzk5rMlPbbm3Vqy4pIHhJyf-dw7z2EvKNwSgHkpwwgBKuBQQ1Cga75C7KggrOaaq5fkgUA07VqhD4ghzlvAKigTfOaHHDONZMaFmT5I_SdDwmrjHeYwvhQhcH3Ew4OcxW9z7cpDOtSva-SHUMs5cpWQ3neFU3sw2jTQ7VCfENeedtnfPt4H5HvXz5_O7-sr75eLM_PrmontBpr1QmKtqWOSYuSKqEstAxYqxqttLV8BVY6oURrPWWI1HbSo3RoO-SwYvyIfJx9b1P8OWEezTZkh31vB4xTNkzIBjQILgt6_Be6iVMaSneFUprSVrD2mVrbHk2ZPo7Jup2pOWsbqiSwRhXq9B9UOR1ug4sD-lD-9wQne4LCjHg_ru2Us1neXO-zbGZdijkn9KZsfVsWayiYXdZmztqUrM3vrA0vog-P002rLXZPkj_hFoDPwJwhpufx_2v7flZt8hjTk6tQrW53a_0FoXK6vA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2489116426</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Wildfire severity influences offspring sex ratio in a native solitary bee</title><source>JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection</source><source>Springer Nature</source><creator>Galbraith, Sara M. ; Cane, James H. ; Rivers, James W.</creator><creatorcontrib>Galbraith, Sara M. ; Cane, James H. ; Rivers, James W.</creatorcontrib><description>Although ecological disturbances can have a strong influence on pollinators through changes in habitat, virtually no studies have quantified how characteristics of wildfire influence the demography of essential pollinators. Nevertheless, evaluating this topic is critical for understanding how wildfire is linked to pollinator population dynamics, particularly given recent changes in wildfire frequency and severity in many regions of the world. In this study, we measured the demographic response of the blue orchard bee (Osmia lignaria) across a natural gradient of wildfire severity to assess how variation in wildfire characteristics influenced reproductive output, offspring sex ratio, and offspring mass. We placed nest blocks with a standardized number and sex ratio of pre-emergent adult bees across the wildfire gradient, finding some evidence for a positive but highly variable relationship between reproductive output and fire severity surrounding the nest site at both local (100 m) and landscape (750 m) scales. In addition, the production of female offspring was > 10% greater at nest sites experiencing the greatest landscape-scale fire severity relative to the lowest-severity areas. The finding that blue orchard bees biased offspring production towards the more expensive offspring sex with increasing fire severity shows a functional response to changes in habitat quality through increased density of flowering plants. Our findings indicate that burned mixed-conifer forest provides forage for the blue orchard bee across a severity gradient, and that the increase in floral resources that follows high-severity fire leads females to shift resource allocation to the more costly sex when nesting.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0029-8549</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1432-1939</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s00442-020-04809-3</identifier><identifier>PMID: 33392790</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer Science + Business Media</publisher><subject>Animals ; Bees ; BEHAVIORAL ECOLOGY - ORIGINAL RESEARCH ; Biomedical and Life Sciences ; Coniferous forests ; Demography ; Ecological effects ; Ecology ; Ecosystem ; Ecosystem disturbance ; Ecosystems ; Environmental quality ; Female ; Females ; Fires ; Flowering ; Flowering plants ; Foraging habitats ; Habitat changes ; Habitats ; Hydrology/Water Resources ; Hypotheses ; Influence ; Landscape ; Life Sciences ; Mixed forests ; Nesting ; Offspring ; Plant Sciences ; Planting density ; Plants (botany) ; Pollinators ; Population biology ; Population dynamics ; Reproduction ; Resource allocation ; Sex ; Sex Ratio ; Wildfires</subject><ispartof>Oecologia, 2021-01, Vol.195 (1), p.65-75</ispartof><rights>Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2021</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2021 Springer</rights><rights>Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2021.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c498t-8d41ea61c27ae71848a06202685989aa3b0a7c4846af12ee1ad7fe7ceade30b23</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c498t-8d41ea61c27ae71848a06202685989aa3b0a7c4846af12ee1ad7fe7ceade30b23</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-5138-3297</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/48696904$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/48696904$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27915,27916,58229,58462</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33392790$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Galbraith, Sara M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cane, James H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rivers, James W.</creatorcontrib><title>Wildfire severity influences offspring sex ratio in a native solitary bee</title><title>Oecologia</title><addtitle>Oecologia</addtitle><addtitle>Oecologia</addtitle><description>Although ecological disturbances can have a strong influence on pollinators through changes in habitat, virtually no studies have quantified how characteristics of wildfire influence the demography of essential pollinators. Nevertheless, evaluating this topic is critical for understanding how wildfire is linked to pollinator population dynamics, particularly given recent changes in wildfire frequency and severity in many regions of the world. In this study, we measured the demographic response of the blue orchard bee (Osmia lignaria) across a natural gradient of wildfire severity to assess how variation in wildfire characteristics influenced reproductive output, offspring sex ratio, and offspring mass. We placed nest blocks with a standardized number and sex ratio of pre-emergent adult bees across the wildfire gradient, finding some evidence for a positive but highly variable relationship between reproductive output and fire severity surrounding the nest site at both local (100 m) and landscape (750 m) scales. In addition, the production of female offspring was > 10% greater at nest sites experiencing the greatest landscape-scale fire severity relative to the lowest-severity areas. The finding that blue orchard bees biased offspring production towards the more expensive offspring sex with increasing fire severity shows a functional response to changes in habitat quality through increased density of flowering plants. Our findings indicate that burned mixed-conifer forest provides forage for the blue orchard bee across a severity gradient, and that the increase in floral resources that follows high-severity fire leads females to shift resource allocation to the more costly sex when nesting.</description><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Bees</subject><subject>BEHAVIORAL ECOLOGY - ORIGINAL RESEARCH</subject><subject>Biomedical and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Coniferous forests</subject><subject>Demography</subject><subject>Ecological effects</subject><subject>Ecology</subject><subject>Ecosystem</subject><subject>Ecosystem disturbance</subject><subject>Ecosystems</subject><subject>Environmental quality</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Females</subject><subject>Fires</subject><subject>Flowering</subject><subject>Flowering plants</subject><subject>Foraging habitats</subject><subject>Habitat changes</subject><subject>Habitats</subject><subject>Hydrology/Water Resources</subject><subject>Hypotheses</subject><subject>Influence</subject><subject>Landscape</subject><subject>Life Sciences</subject><subject>Mixed forests</subject><subject>Nesting</subject><subject>Offspring</subject><subject>Plant Sciences</subject><subject>Planting density</subject><subject>Plants (botany)</subject><subject>Pollinators</subject><subject>Population biology</subject><subject>Population dynamics</subject><subject>Reproduction</subject><subject>Resource allocation</subject><subject>Sex</subject><subject>Sex Ratio</subject><subject>Wildfires</subject><issn>0029-8549</issn><issn>1432-1939</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kV9rFDEUxYModlv9AoIy0Bf7MPXmz0ySx1K0XSgIreJjyGZuliyzk5rMlPbbm3Vqy4pIHhJyf-dw7z2EvKNwSgHkpwwgBKuBQQ1Cga75C7KggrOaaq5fkgUA07VqhD4ghzlvAKigTfOaHHDONZMaFmT5I_SdDwmrjHeYwvhQhcH3Ew4OcxW9z7cpDOtSva-SHUMs5cpWQ3neFU3sw2jTQ7VCfENeedtnfPt4H5HvXz5_O7-sr75eLM_PrmontBpr1QmKtqWOSYuSKqEstAxYqxqttLV8BVY6oURrPWWI1HbSo3RoO-SwYvyIfJx9b1P8OWEezTZkh31vB4xTNkzIBjQILgt6_Be6iVMaSneFUprSVrD2mVrbHk2ZPo7Jup2pOWsbqiSwRhXq9B9UOR1ug4sD-lD-9wQne4LCjHg_ru2Us1neXO-zbGZdijkn9KZsfVsWayiYXdZmztqUrM3vrA0vog-P002rLXZPkj_hFoDPwJwhpufx_2v7flZt8hjTk6tQrW53a_0FoXK6vA</recordid><startdate>20210101</startdate><enddate>20210101</enddate><creator>Galbraith, Sara M.</creator><creator>Cane, James H.</creator><creator>Rivers, James W.</creator><general>Springer Science + Business Media</general><general>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</general><general>Springer</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>ISR</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7TN</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88A</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BKSAR</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>H95</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PCBAR</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5138-3297</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20210101</creationdate><title>Wildfire severity influences offspring sex ratio in a native solitary bee</title><author>Galbraith, Sara M. ; Cane, James H. ; Rivers, James W.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c498t-8d41ea61c27ae71848a06202685989aa3b0a7c4846af12ee1ad7fe7ceade30b23</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Bees</topic><topic>BEHAVIORAL ECOLOGY - ORIGINAL RESEARCH</topic><topic>Biomedical and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Coniferous forests</topic><topic>Demography</topic><topic>Ecological effects</topic><topic>Ecology</topic><topic>Ecosystem</topic><topic>Ecosystem disturbance</topic><topic>Ecosystems</topic><topic>Environmental quality</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Females</topic><topic>Fires</topic><topic>Flowering</topic><topic>Flowering plants</topic><topic>Foraging habitats</topic><topic>Habitat changes</topic><topic>Habitats</topic><topic>Hydrology/Water Resources</topic><topic>Hypotheses</topic><topic>Influence</topic><topic>Landscape</topic><topic>Life Sciences</topic><topic>Mixed forests</topic><topic>Nesting</topic><topic>Offspring</topic><topic>Plant Sciences</topic><topic>Planting density</topic><topic>Plants (botany)</topic><topic>Pollinators</topic><topic>Population biology</topic><topic>Population dynamics</topic><topic>Reproduction</topic><topic>Resource allocation</topic><topic>Sex</topic><topic>Sex Ratio</topic><topic>Wildfires</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Galbraith, Sara M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cane, James H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rivers, James W.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Science</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Oceanic Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Biology Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 1: Biological Sciences & Living Resources</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>PML(ProQuest Medical Library)</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Oecologia</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Galbraith, Sara M.</au><au>Cane, James H.</au><au>Rivers, James W.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Wildfire severity influences offspring sex ratio in a native solitary bee</atitle><jtitle>Oecologia</jtitle><stitle>Oecologia</stitle><addtitle>Oecologia</addtitle><date>2021-01-01</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>195</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>65</spage><epage>75</epage><pages>65-75</pages><issn>0029-8549</issn><eissn>1432-1939</eissn><abstract>Although ecological disturbances can have a strong influence on pollinators through changes in habitat, virtually no studies have quantified how characteristics of wildfire influence the demography of essential pollinators. Nevertheless, evaluating this topic is critical for understanding how wildfire is linked to pollinator population dynamics, particularly given recent changes in wildfire frequency and severity in many regions of the world. In this study, we measured the demographic response of the blue orchard bee (Osmia lignaria) across a natural gradient of wildfire severity to assess how variation in wildfire characteristics influenced reproductive output, offspring sex ratio, and offspring mass. We placed nest blocks with a standardized number and sex ratio of pre-emergent adult bees across the wildfire gradient, finding some evidence for a positive but highly variable relationship between reproductive output and fire severity surrounding the nest site at both local (100 m) and landscape (750 m) scales. In addition, the production of female offspring was > 10% greater at nest sites experiencing the greatest landscape-scale fire severity relative to the lowest-severity areas. The finding that blue orchard bees biased offspring production towards the more expensive offspring sex with increasing fire severity shows a functional response to changes in habitat quality through increased density of flowering plants. Our findings indicate that burned mixed-conifer forest provides forage for the blue orchard bee across a severity gradient, and that the increase in floral resources that follows high-severity fire leads females to shift resource allocation to the more costly sex when nesting.</abstract><cop>Berlin/Heidelberg</cop><pub>Springer Science + Business Media</pub><pmid>33392790</pmid><doi>10.1007/s00442-020-04809-3</doi><tpages>11</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5138-3297</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0029-8549 |
ispartof | Oecologia, 2021-01, Vol.195 (1), p.65-75 |
issn | 0029-8549 1432-1939 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2475090437 |
source | JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection; Springer Nature |
subjects | Animals Bees BEHAVIORAL ECOLOGY - ORIGINAL RESEARCH Biomedical and Life Sciences Coniferous forests Demography Ecological effects Ecology Ecosystem Ecosystem disturbance Ecosystems Environmental quality Female Females Fires Flowering Flowering plants Foraging habitats Habitat changes Habitats Hydrology/Water Resources Hypotheses Influence Landscape Life Sciences Mixed forests Nesting Offspring Plant Sciences Planting density Plants (botany) Pollinators Population biology Population dynamics Reproduction Resource allocation Sex Sex Ratio Wildfires |
title | Wildfire severity influences offspring sex ratio in a native solitary bee |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-15T06%3A44%3A59IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Wildfire%20severity%20influences%20offspring%20sex%20ratio%20in%20a%20native%20solitary%20bee&rft.jtitle=Oecologia&rft.au=Galbraith,%20Sara%20M.&rft.date=2021-01-01&rft.volume=195&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=65&rft.epage=75&rft.pages=65-75&rft.issn=0029-8549&rft.eissn=1432-1939&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s00442-020-04809-3&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA651870258%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c498t-8d41ea61c27ae71848a06202685989aa3b0a7c4846af12ee1ad7fe7ceade30b23%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2489116426&rft_id=info:pmid/33392790&rft_galeid=A651870258&rft_jstor_id=48696904&rfr_iscdi=true |