Loading…

Wildfire severity influences offspring sex ratio in a native solitary bee

Although ecological disturbances can have a strong influence on pollinators through changes in habitat, virtually no studies have quantified how characteristics of wildfire influence the demography of essential pollinators. Nevertheless, evaluating this topic is critical for understanding how wildfi...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Oecologia 2021-01, Vol.195 (1), p.65-75
Main Authors: Galbraith, Sara M., Cane, James H., Rivers, James W.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c498t-8d41ea61c27ae71848a06202685989aa3b0a7c4846af12ee1ad7fe7ceade30b23
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c498t-8d41ea61c27ae71848a06202685989aa3b0a7c4846af12ee1ad7fe7ceade30b23
container_end_page 75
container_issue 1
container_start_page 65
container_title Oecologia
container_volume 195
creator Galbraith, Sara M.
Cane, James H.
Rivers, James W.
description Although ecological disturbances can have a strong influence on pollinators through changes in habitat, virtually no studies have quantified how characteristics of wildfire influence the demography of essential pollinators. Nevertheless, evaluating this topic is critical for understanding how wildfire is linked to pollinator population dynamics, particularly given recent changes in wildfire frequency and severity in many regions of the world. In this study, we measured the demographic response of the blue orchard bee (Osmia lignaria) across a natural gradient of wildfire severity to assess how variation in wildfire characteristics influenced reproductive output, offspring sex ratio, and offspring mass. We placed nest blocks with a standardized number and sex ratio of pre-emergent adult bees across the wildfire gradient, finding some evidence for a positive but highly variable relationship between reproductive output and fire severity surrounding the nest site at both local (100 m) and landscape (750 m) scales. In addition, the production of female offspring was > 10% greater at nest sites experiencing the greatest landscape-scale fire severity relative to the lowest-severity areas. The finding that blue orchard bees biased offspring production towards the more expensive offspring sex with increasing fire severity shows a functional response to changes in habitat quality through increased density of flowering plants. Our findings indicate that burned mixed-conifer forest provides forage for the blue orchard bee across a severity gradient, and that the increase in floral resources that follows high-severity fire leads females to shift resource allocation to the more costly sex when nesting.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s00442-020-04809-3
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2475090437</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A651870258</galeid><jstor_id>48696904</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>A651870258</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c498t-8d41ea61c27ae71848a06202685989aa3b0a7c4846af12ee1ad7fe7ceade30b23</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kV9rFDEUxYModlv9AoIy0Bf7MPXmz0ySx1K0XSgIreJjyGZuliyzk5rMlPbbm3Vqy4pIHhJyf-dw7z2EvKNwSgHkpwwgBKuBQQ1Cga75C7KggrOaaq5fkgUA07VqhD4ghzlvAKigTfOaHHDONZMaFmT5I_SdDwmrjHeYwvhQhcH3Ew4OcxW9z7cpDOtSva-SHUMs5cpWQ3neFU3sw2jTQ7VCfENeedtnfPt4H5HvXz5_O7-sr75eLM_PrmontBpr1QmKtqWOSYuSKqEstAxYqxqttLV8BVY6oURrPWWI1HbSo3RoO-SwYvyIfJx9b1P8OWEezTZkh31vB4xTNkzIBjQILgt6_Be6iVMaSneFUprSVrD2mVrbHk2ZPo7Jup2pOWsbqiSwRhXq9B9UOR1ug4sD-lD-9wQne4LCjHg_ru2Us1neXO-zbGZdijkn9KZsfVsWayiYXdZmztqUrM3vrA0vog-P002rLXZPkj_hFoDPwJwhpufx_2v7flZt8hjTk6tQrW53a_0FoXK6vA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2489116426</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Wildfire severity influences offspring sex ratio in a native solitary bee</title><source>JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection</source><source>Springer Nature</source><creator>Galbraith, Sara M. ; Cane, James H. ; Rivers, James W.</creator><creatorcontrib>Galbraith, Sara M. ; Cane, James H. ; Rivers, James W.</creatorcontrib><description>Although ecological disturbances can have a strong influence on pollinators through changes in habitat, virtually no studies have quantified how characteristics of wildfire influence the demography of essential pollinators. Nevertheless, evaluating this topic is critical for understanding how wildfire is linked to pollinator population dynamics, particularly given recent changes in wildfire frequency and severity in many regions of the world. In this study, we measured the demographic response of the blue orchard bee (Osmia lignaria) across a natural gradient of wildfire severity to assess how variation in wildfire characteristics influenced reproductive output, offspring sex ratio, and offspring mass. We placed nest blocks with a standardized number and sex ratio of pre-emergent adult bees across the wildfire gradient, finding some evidence for a positive but highly variable relationship between reproductive output and fire severity surrounding the nest site at both local (100 m) and landscape (750 m) scales. In addition, the production of female offspring was &gt; 10% greater at nest sites experiencing the greatest landscape-scale fire severity relative to the lowest-severity areas. The finding that blue orchard bees biased offspring production towards the more expensive offspring sex with increasing fire severity shows a functional response to changes in habitat quality through increased density of flowering plants. Our findings indicate that burned mixed-conifer forest provides forage for the blue orchard bee across a severity gradient, and that the increase in floral resources that follows high-severity fire leads females to shift resource allocation to the more costly sex when nesting.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0029-8549</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1432-1939</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s00442-020-04809-3</identifier><identifier>PMID: 33392790</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer Science + Business Media</publisher><subject>Animals ; Bees ; BEHAVIORAL ECOLOGY - ORIGINAL RESEARCH ; Biomedical and Life Sciences ; Coniferous forests ; Demography ; Ecological effects ; Ecology ; Ecosystem ; Ecosystem disturbance ; Ecosystems ; Environmental quality ; Female ; Females ; Fires ; Flowering ; Flowering plants ; Foraging habitats ; Habitat changes ; Habitats ; Hydrology/Water Resources ; Hypotheses ; Influence ; Landscape ; Life Sciences ; Mixed forests ; Nesting ; Offspring ; Plant Sciences ; Planting density ; Plants (botany) ; Pollinators ; Population biology ; Population dynamics ; Reproduction ; Resource allocation ; Sex ; Sex Ratio ; Wildfires</subject><ispartof>Oecologia, 2021-01, Vol.195 (1), p.65-75</ispartof><rights>Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2021</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2021 Springer</rights><rights>Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2021.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c498t-8d41ea61c27ae71848a06202685989aa3b0a7c4846af12ee1ad7fe7ceade30b23</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c498t-8d41ea61c27ae71848a06202685989aa3b0a7c4846af12ee1ad7fe7ceade30b23</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-5138-3297</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/48696904$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/48696904$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27915,27916,58229,58462</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33392790$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Galbraith, Sara M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cane, James H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rivers, James W.</creatorcontrib><title>Wildfire severity influences offspring sex ratio in a native solitary bee</title><title>Oecologia</title><addtitle>Oecologia</addtitle><addtitle>Oecologia</addtitle><description>Although ecological disturbances can have a strong influence on pollinators through changes in habitat, virtually no studies have quantified how characteristics of wildfire influence the demography of essential pollinators. Nevertheless, evaluating this topic is critical for understanding how wildfire is linked to pollinator population dynamics, particularly given recent changes in wildfire frequency and severity in many regions of the world. In this study, we measured the demographic response of the blue orchard bee (Osmia lignaria) across a natural gradient of wildfire severity to assess how variation in wildfire characteristics influenced reproductive output, offspring sex ratio, and offspring mass. We placed nest blocks with a standardized number and sex ratio of pre-emergent adult bees across the wildfire gradient, finding some evidence for a positive but highly variable relationship between reproductive output and fire severity surrounding the nest site at both local (100 m) and landscape (750 m) scales. In addition, the production of female offspring was &gt; 10% greater at nest sites experiencing the greatest landscape-scale fire severity relative to the lowest-severity areas. The finding that blue orchard bees biased offspring production towards the more expensive offspring sex with increasing fire severity shows a functional response to changes in habitat quality through increased density of flowering plants. Our findings indicate that burned mixed-conifer forest provides forage for the blue orchard bee across a severity gradient, and that the increase in floral resources that follows high-severity fire leads females to shift resource allocation to the more costly sex when nesting.</description><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Bees</subject><subject>BEHAVIORAL ECOLOGY - ORIGINAL RESEARCH</subject><subject>Biomedical and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Coniferous forests</subject><subject>Demography</subject><subject>Ecological effects</subject><subject>Ecology</subject><subject>Ecosystem</subject><subject>Ecosystem disturbance</subject><subject>Ecosystems</subject><subject>Environmental quality</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Females</subject><subject>Fires</subject><subject>Flowering</subject><subject>Flowering plants</subject><subject>Foraging habitats</subject><subject>Habitat changes</subject><subject>Habitats</subject><subject>Hydrology/Water Resources</subject><subject>Hypotheses</subject><subject>Influence</subject><subject>Landscape</subject><subject>Life Sciences</subject><subject>Mixed forests</subject><subject>Nesting</subject><subject>Offspring</subject><subject>Plant Sciences</subject><subject>Planting density</subject><subject>Plants (botany)</subject><subject>Pollinators</subject><subject>Population biology</subject><subject>Population dynamics</subject><subject>Reproduction</subject><subject>Resource allocation</subject><subject>Sex</subject><subject>Sex Ratio</subject><subject>Wildfires</subject><issn>0029-8549</issn><issn>1432-1939</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kV9rFDEUxYModlv9AoIy0Bf7MPXmz0ySx1K0XSgIreJjyGZuliyzk5rMlPbbm3Vqy4pIHhJyf-dw7z2EvKNwSgHkpwwgBKuBQQ1Cga75C7KggrOaaq5fkgUA07VqhD4ghzlvAKigTfOaHHDONZMaFmT5I_SdDwmrjHeYwvhQhcH3Ew4OcxW9z7cpDOtSva-SHUMs5cpWQ3neFU3sw2jTQ7VCfENeedtnfPt4H5HvXz5_O7-sr75eLM_PrmontBpr1QmKtqWOSYuSKqEstAxYqxqttLV8BVY6oURrPWWI1HbSo3RoO-SwYvyIfJx9b1P8OWEezTZkh31vB4xTNkzIBjQILgt6_Be6iVMaSneFUprSVrD2mVrbHk2ZPo7Jup2pOWsbqiSwRhXq9B9UOR1ug4sD-lD-9wQne4LCjHg_ru2Us1neXO-zbGZdijkn9KZsfVsWayiYXdZmztqUrM3vrA0vog-P002rLXZPkj_hFoDPwJwhpufx_2v7flZt8hjTk6tQrW53a_0FoXK6vA</recordid><startdate>20210101</startdate><enddate>20210101</enddate><creator>Galbraith, Sara M.</creator><creator>Cane, James H.</creator><creator>Rivers, James W.</creator><general>Springer Science + Business Media</general><general>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</general><general>Springer</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>ISR</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7TN</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88A</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BKSAR</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>H95</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PCBAR</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5138-3297</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20210101</creationdate><title>Wildfire severity influences offspring sex ratio in a native solitary bee</title><author>Galbraith, Sara M. ; Cane, James H. ; Rivers, James W.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c498t-8d41ea61c27ae71848a06202685989aa3b0a7c4846af12ee1ad7fe7ceade30b23</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Bees</topic><topic>BEHAVIORAL ECOLOGY - ORIGINAL RESEARCH</topic><topic>Biomedical and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Coniferous forests</topic><topic>Demography</topic><topic>Ecological effects</topic><topic>Ecology</topic><topic>Ecosystem</topic><topic>Ecosystem disturbance</topic><topic>Ecosystems</topic><topic>Environmental quality</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Females</topic><topic>Fires</topic><topic>Flowering</topic><topic>Flowering plants</topic><topic>Foraging habitats</topic><topic>Habitat changes</topic><topic>Habitats</topic><topic>Hydrology/Water Resources</topic><topic>Hypotheses</topic><topic>Influence</topic><topic>Landscape</topic><topic>Life Sciences</topic><topic>Mixed forests</topic><topic>Nesting</topic><topic>Offspring</topic><topic>Plant Sciences</topic><topic>Planting density</topic><topic>Plants (botany)</topic><topic>Pollinators</topic><topic>Population biology</topic><topic>Population dynamics</topic><topic>Reproduction</topic><topic>Resource allocation</topic><topic>Sex</topic><topic>Sex Ratio</topic><topic>Wildfires</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Galbraith, Sara M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cane, James H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rivers, James W.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Science</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Oceanic Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Biology Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric &amp; Aquatic Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 1: Biological Sciences &amp; Living Resources</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>PML(ProQuest Medical Library)</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric &amp; Aquatic Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Oecologia</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Galbraith, Sara M.</au><au>Cane, James H.</au><au>Rivers, James W.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Wildfire severity influences offspring sex ratio in a native solitary bee</atitle><jtitle>Oecologia</jtitle><stitle>Oecologia</stitle><addtitle>Oecologia</addtitle><date>2021-01-01</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>195</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>65</spage><epage>75</epage><pages>65-75</pages><issn>0029-8549</issn><eissn>1432-1939</eissn><abstract>Although ecological disturbances can have a strong influence on pollinators through changes in habitat, virtually no studies have quantified how characteristics of wildfire influence the demography of essential pollinators. Nevertheless, evaluating this topic is critical for understanding how wildfire is linked to pollinator population dynamics, particularly given recent changes in wildfire frequency and severity in many regions of the world. In this study, we measured the demographic response of the blue orchard bee (Osmia lignaria) across a natural gradient of wildfire severity to assess how variation in wildfire characteristics influenced reproductive output, offspring sex ratio, and offspring mass. We placed nest blocks with a standardized number and sex ratio of pre-emergent adult bees across the wildfire gradient, finding some evidence for a positive but highly variable relationship between reproductive output and fire severity surrounding the nest site at both local (100 m) and landscape (750 m) scales. In addition, the production of female offspring was &gt; 10% greater at nest sites experiencing the greatest landscape-scale fire severity relative to the lowest-severity areas. The finding that blue orchard bees biased offspring production towards the more expensive offspring sex with increasing fire severity shows a functional response to changes in habitat quality through increased density of flowering plants. Our findings indicate that burned mixed-conifer forest provides forage for the blue orchard bee across a severity gradient, and that the increase in floral resources that follows high-severity fire leads females to shift resource allocation to the more costly sex when nesting.</abstract><cop>Berlin/Heidelberg</cop><pub>Springer Science + Business Media</pub><pmid>33392790</pmid><doi>10.1007/s00442-020-04809-3</doi><tpages>11</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5138-3297</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0029-8549
ispartof Oecologia, 2021-01, Vol.195 (1), p.65-75
issn 0029-8549
1432-1939
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2475090437
source JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection; Springer Nature
subjects Animals
Bees
BEHAVIORAL ECOLOGY - ORIGINAL RESEARCH
Biomedical and Life Sciences
Coniferous forests
Demography
Ecological effects
Ecology
Ecosystem
Ecosystem disturbance
Ecosystems
Environmental quality
Female
Females
Fires
Flowering
Flowering plants
Foraging habitats
Habitat changes
Habitats
Hydrology/Water Resources
Hypotheses
Influence
Landscape
Life Sciences
Mixed forests
Nesting
Offspring
Plant Sciences
Planting density
Plants (botany)
Pollinators
Population biology
Population dynamics
Reproduction
Resource allocation
Sex
Sex Ratio
Wildfires
title Wildfire severity influences offspring sex ratio in a native solitary bee
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-15T06%3A44%3A59IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Wildfire%20severity%20influences%20offspring%20sex%20ratio%20in%20a%20native%20solitary%20bee&rft.jtitle=Oecologia&rft.au=Galbraith,%20Sara%20M.&rft.date=2021-01-01&rft.volume=195&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=65&rft.epage=75&rft.pages=65-75&rft.issn=0029-8549&rft.eissn=1432-1939&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s00442-020-04809-3&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA651870258%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c498t-8d41ea61c27ae71848a06202685989aa3b0a7c4846af12ee1ad7fe7ceade30b23%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2489116426&rft_id=info:pmid/33392790&rft_galeid=A651870258&rft_jstor_id=48696904&rfr_iscdi=true