Loading…
Reliability of the Edinburgh Claudication Questionnaire for Identifying Symptomatic PAD in General Practice
The Edinburgh Claudication Questionnaire (ECQ) was developed to help identify peripheral arterial disease (PAD) in the general population but has not been validated against diagnostic arterial imaging methods such as Duplex Vascular Ultrasound Scanning (DUS). In the present study, we assessed the ac...
Saved in:
Published in: | Angiology 2021-05, Vol.72 (5), p.474-479 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c379t-e958d68cfc1cc5c9afcddf5c19a74e3bd30e41afe683a5070390b5b9bef0925e3 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c379t-e958d68cfc1cc5c9afcddf5c19a74e3bd30e41afe683a5070390b5b9bef0925e3 |
container_end_page | 479 |
container_issue | 5 |
container_start_page | 474 |
container_title | Angiology |
container_volume | 72 |
creator | Boylan, Luke Nesbitt, Craig Wilson, Lesley Allen, John Sims, Andrew Guri, Ina Mawson, Philip Oates, Crispian Stansby, Gerard Investigators, On Behalf of the NOTEPAD |
description | The Edinburgh Claudication Questionnaire (ECQ) was developed to help identify peripheral arterial disease (PAD) in the general population but has not been validated against diagnostic arterial imaging methods such as Duplex Vascular Ultrasound Scanning (DUS). In the present study, we assessed the accuracy of the ECQ for diagnosis using DUS. As part of a National Institute of Health Research funded project looking at novel diagnostic methods, 250 patients were studied from 15 general practices across North East England from May 2015 and November 2016. Practices identified those with a PAD diagnosis from their registers as well as age- and sex-matched controls. All the ECQs were recorded by a vascular specialist nurse. Duplex vascular ultrasound scanning was used as a reference standard for the diagnosis of occlusive PAD. The ECQ had a sensitivity of 52.5% (95% CI: 42.3%-62.5%), specificity of 87.1% (95% CI: 80.6%-92.0%), positive likelihood ratio of 4.06 (95% CI: 2.57-6.42), and negative likelihood ratio of 0.55 (95% CI: 0.44-0.68) compared with reference standard DUS. The ECQ has relatively poor overall diagnostic test accuracy in isolation. It may be helpful in ruling out PAD or as a supplementary test to improve diagnosis of symptomatic disease in General Practice. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1177/0003319720984882 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2475532294</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_0003319720984882</sage_id><sourcerecordid>2475532294</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c379t-e958d68cfc1cc5c9afcddf5c19a74e3bd30e41afe683a5070390b5b9bef0925e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kD1PwzAQhi0EoqWwMyGPLAE7jut4rEoplSpRvubIcc6tS-IUOxn670nUwoDEdF_Pvbp7Ebqm5I5SIe4JIYxRKWIi0yRN4xM0pDIhEeUiOUXDfhz18wG6CGHblZyS8TkaMJYQKjkfos9XKK3KbWmbPa4NbjaAZ4V1eevXGzwtVVtYrRpbO_zSQugTp6wHbGqPFwW4xpq9dWv8tq92TV11qMaryQO2Ds_BgVclXnmluzZcojOjygBXxzhCH4-z9-lTtHyeL6aTZaSZkE0EkqfFONVGU625lsroojBcU6lEAiwvGIGEKgPjlClOBGGS5DyXORgiYw5shG4Pujtff_VHZ5UNGspSOajbkMWJ4JzFsUw6lBxQ7esQPJhs522l_D6jJOstzv5a3K3cHNXbvILid-HH0w6IDkBQa8i2detd9-3_gt_iT4UC</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2475532294</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Reliability of the Edinburgh Claudication Questionnaire for Identifying Symptomatic PAD in General Practice</title><source>SAGE</source><creator>Boylan, Luke ; Nesbitt, Craig ; Wilson, Lesley ; Allen, John ; Sims, Andrew ; Guri, Ina ; Mawson, Philip ; Oates, Crispian ; Stansby, Gerard ; Investigators, On Behalf of the NOTEPAD</creator><creatorcontrib>Boylan, Luke ; Nesbitt, Craig ; Wilson, Lesley ; Allen, John ; Sims, Andrew ; Guri, Ina ; Mawson, Philip ; Oates, Crispian ; Stansby, Gerard ; Investigators, On Behalf of the NOTEPAD</creatorcontrib><description>The Edinburgh Claudication Questionnaire (ECQ) was developed to help identify peripheral arterial disease (PAD) in the general population but has not been validated against diagnostic arterial imaging methods such as Duplex Vascular Ultrasound Scanning (DUS). In the present study, we assessed the accuracy of the ECQ for diagnosis using DUS. As part of a National Institute of Health Research funded project looking at novel diagnostic methods, 250 patients were studied from 15 general practices across North East England from May 2015 and November 2016. Practices identified those with a PAD diagnosis from their registers as well as age- and sex-matched controls. All the ECQs were recorded by a vascular specialist nurse. Duplex vascular ultrasound scanning was used as a reference standard for the diagnosis of occlusive PAD. The ECQ had a sensitivity of 52.5% (95% CI: 42.3%-62.5%), specificity of 87.1% (95% CI: 80.6%-92.0%), positive likelihood ratio of 4.06 (95% CI: 2.57-6.42), and negative likelihood ratio of 0.55 (95% CI: 0.44-0.68) compared with reference standard DUS. The ECQ has relatively poor overall diagnostic test accuracy in isolation. It may be helpful in ruling out PAD or as a supplementary test to improve diagnosis of symptomatic disease in General Practice.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0003-3197</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1940-1574</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/0003319720984882</identifier><identifier>PMID: 33401955</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Case-Control Studies ; England ; Female ; General Practice ; Humans ; Intermittent Claudication - diagnosis ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Peripheral Arterial Disease - diagnosis ; Predictive Value of Tests ; Primary Health Care ; Reproducibility of Results ; Surveys and Questionnaires ; Ultrasonography, Doppler, Duplex</subject><ispartof>Angiology, 2021-05, Vol.72 (5), p.474-479</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2021</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c379t-e958d68cfc1cc5c9afcddf5c19a74e3bd30e41afe683a5070390b5b9bef0925e3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c379t-e958d68cfc1cc5c9afcddf5c19a74e3bd30e41afe683a5070390b5b9bef0925e3</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-1577-8221 ; 0000-0002-9553-7278</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,79364</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33401955$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Boylan, Luke</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nesbitt, Craig</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wilson, Lesley</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Allen, John</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sims, Andrew</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Guri, Ina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mawson, Philip</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Oates, Crispian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stansby, Gerard</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Investigators, On Behalf of the NOTEPAD</creatorcontrib><title>Reliability of the Edinburgh Claudication Questionnaire for Identifying Symptomatic PAD in General Practice</title><title>Angiology</title><addtitle>Angiology</addtitle><description>The Edinburgh Claudication Questionnaire (ECQ) was developed to help identify peripheral arterial disease (PAD) in the general population but has not been validated against diagnostic arterial imaging methods such as Duplex Vascular Ultrasound Scanning (DUS). In the present study, we assessed the accuracy of the ECQ for diagnosis using DUS. As part of a National Institute of Health Research funded project looking at novel diagnostic methods, 250 patients were studied from 15 general practices across North East England from May 2015 and November 2016. Practices identified those with a PAD diagnosis from their registers as well as age- and sex-matched controls. All the ECQs were recorded by a vascular specialist nurse. Duplex vascular ultrasound scanning was used as a reference standard for the diagnosis of occlusive PAD. The ECQ had a sensitivity of 52.5% (95% CI: 42.3%-62.5%), specificity of 87.1% (95% CI: 80.6%-92.0%), positive likelihood ratio of 4.06 (95% CI: 2.57-6.42), and negative likelihood ratio of 0.55 (95% CI: 0.44-0.68) compared with reference standard DUS. The ECQ has relatively poor overall diagnostic test accuracy in isolation. It may be helpful in ruling out PAD or as a supplementary test to improve diagnosis of symptomatic disease in General Practice.</description><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Case-Control Studies</subject><subject>England</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>General Practice</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Intermittent Claudication - diagnosis</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Peripheral Arterial Disease - diagnosis</subject><subject>Predictive Value of Tests</subject><subject>Primary Health Care</subject><subject>Reproducibility of Results</subject><subject>Surveys and Questionnaires</subject><subject>Ultrasonography, Doppler, Duplex</subject><issn>0003-3197</issn><issn>1940-1574</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>AFRWT</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kD1PwzAQhi0EoqWwMyGPLAE7jut4rEoplSpRvubIcc6tS-IUOxn670nUwoDEdF_Pvbp7Ebqm5I5SIe4JIYxRKWIi0yRN4xM0pDIhEeUiOUXDfhz18wG6CGHblZyS8TkaMJYQKjkfos9XKK3KbWmbPa4NbjaAZ4V1eevXGzwtVVtYrRpbO_zSQugTp6wHbGqPFwW4xpq9dWv8tq92TV11qMaryQO2Ds_BgVclXnmluzZcojOjygBXxzhCH4-z9-lTtHyeL6aTZaSZkE0EkqfFONVGU625lsroojBcU6lEAiwvGIGEKgPjlClOBGGS5DyXORgiYw5shG4Pujtff_VHZ5UNGspSOajbkMWJ4JzFsUw6lBxQ7esQPJhs522l_D6jJOstzv5a3K3cHNXbvILid-HH0w6IDkBQa8i2detd9-3_gt_iT4UC</recordid><startdate>202105</startdate><enddate>202105</enddate><creator>Boylan, Luke</creator><creator>Nesbitt, Craig</creator><creator>Wilson, Lesley</creator><creator>Allen, John</creator><creator>Sims, Andrew</creator><creator>Guri, Ina</creator><creator>Mawson, Philip</creator><creator>Oates, Crispian</creator><creator>Stansby, Gerard</creator><creator>Investigators, On Behalf of the NOTEPAD</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><scope>AFRWT</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1577-8221</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9553-7278</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202105</creationdate><title>Reliability of the Edinburgh Claudication Questionnaire for Identifying Symptomatic PAD in General Practice</title><author>Boylan, Luke ; Nesbitt, Craig ; Wilson, Lesley ; Allen, John ; Sims, Andrew ; Guri, Ina ; Mawson, Philip ; Oates, Crispian ; Stansby, Gerard ; Investigators, On Behalf of the NOTEPAD</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c379t-e958d68cfc1cc5c9afcddf5c19a74e3bd30e41afe683a5070390b5b9bef0925e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Case-Control Studies</topic><topic>England</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>General Practice</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Intermittent Claudication - diagnosis</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Peripheral Arterial Disease - diagnosis</topic><topic>Predictive Value of Tests</topic><topic>Primary Health Care</topic><topic>Reproducibility of Results</topic><topic>Surveys and Questionnaires</topic><topic>Ultrasonography, Doppler, Duplex</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Boylan, Luke</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nesbitt, Craig</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wilson, Lesley</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Allen, John</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sims, Andrew</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Guri, Ina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mawson, Philip</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Oates, Crispian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stansby, Gerard</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Investigators, On Behalf of the NOTEPAD</creatorcontrib><collection>SAGE Open Access</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Angiology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Boylan, Luke</au><au>Nesbitt, Craig</au><au>Wilson, Lesley</au><au>Allen, John</au><au>Sims, Andrew</au><au>Guri, Ina</au><au>Mawson, Philip</au><au>Oates, Crispian</au><au>Stansby, Gerard</au><au>Investigators, On Behalf of the NOTEPAD</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Reliability of the Edinburgh Claudication Questionnaire for Identifying Symptomatic PAD in General Practice</atitle><jtitle>Angiology</jtitle><addtitle>Angiology</addtitle><date>2021-05</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>72</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>474</spage><epage>479</epage><pages>474-479</pages><issn>0003-3197</issn><eissn>1940-1574</eissn><abstract>The Edinburgh Claudication Questionnaire (ECQ) was developed to help identify peripheral arterial disease (PAD) in the general population but has not been validated against diagnostic arterial imaging methods such as Duplex Vascular Ultrasound Scanning (DUS). In the present study, we assessed the accuracy of the ECQ for diagnosis using DUS. As part of a National Institute of Health Research funded project looking at novel diagnostic methods, 250 patients were studied from 15 general practices across North East England from May 2015 and November 2016. Practices identified those with a PAD diagnosis from their registers as well as age- and sex-matched controls. All the ECQs were recorded by a vascular specialist nurse. Duplex vascular ultrasound scanning was used as a reference standard for the diagnosis of occlusive PAD. The ECQ had a sensitivity of 52.5% (95% CI: 42.3%-62.5%), specificity of 87.1% (95% CI: 80.6%-92.0%), positive likelihood ratio of 4.06 (95% CI: 2.57-6.42), and negative likelihood ratio of 0.55 (95% CI: 0.44-0.68) compared with reference standard DUS. The ECQ has relatively poor overall diagnostic test accuracy in isolation. It may be helpful in ruling out PAD or as a supplementary test to improve diagnosis of symptomatic disease in General Practice.</abstract><cop>Los Angeles, CA</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><pmid>33401955</pmid><doi>10.1177/0003319720984882</doi><tpages>6</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1577-8221</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9553-7278</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0003-3197 |
ispartof | Angiology, 2021-05, Vol.72 (5), p.474-479 |
issn | 0003-3197 1940-1574 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2475532294 |
source | SAGE |
subjects | Aged Aged, 80 and over Case-Control Studies England Female General Practice Humans Intermittent Claudication - diagnosis Male Middle Aged Peripheral Arterial Disease - diagnosis Predictive Value of Tests Primary Health Care Reproducibility of Results Surveys and Questionnaires Ultrasonography, Doppler, Duplex |
title | Reliability of the Edinburgh Claudication Questionnaire for Identifying Symptomatic PAD in General Practice |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-29T12%3A57%3A00IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Reliability%20of%20the%20Edinburgh%20Claudication%20Questionnaire%20for%20Identifying%20Symptomatic%20PAD%20in%20General%20Practice&rft.jtitle=Angiology&rft.au=Boylan,%20Luke&rft.date=2021-05&rft.volume=72&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=474&rft.epage=479&rft.pages=474-479&rft.issn=0003-3197&rft.eissn=1940-1574&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/0003319720984882&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2475532294%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c379t-e958d68cfc1cc5c9afcddf5c19a74e3bd30e41afe683a5070390b5b9bef0925e3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2475532294&rft_id=info:pmid/33401955&rft_sage_id=10.1177_0003319720984882&rfr_iscdi=true |