Ocular motility and diplopia measurements following orbital floor fracture repair

• Published in: American journal of otolaryngology 2021-03, Vol.42 (2), p.102879-102879, Article 102879
• Main Authors: Campbell, Benjamin C., Shipchandler, Taha Z., Ting, Jonathan Y., Nesemeier, B. Ryan, Geng, June, Camp, David A., Lee, H.B. Harold
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Complications; Diplopia; Fractures; Measurement methods; Medical records; Motility; Ocular motility; Orbital floor fracture; Orbital trauma; Patients; Strabismus; Surgery; Transplants & implants; Trauma
• ISSN: 0196-0709; 1532-818X
• DOI: 10.1016/j.amjoto.2020.102879

Diplopia and ocular motility restriction following orbital fracture repair are common complications. The reported rates in the literature differ greatly, in part due to varying definitions of diplopia and methods of measurement. The purpose of this study is to describe a practical and efficient in-office method for examining ocular motility and diplopia in orbital trauma patients and to report the outcomes in a series of patients who underwent orbital floor fracture repair. A retrospective chart review from 2012 to 2019 was conducted in patients who underwent isolated orbital floor fracture repair within 3 weeks of trauma. All patients had examinations to assess extraocular motility and subjective diplopia using the described techniques. Ninety-three patients underwent orbital floor fracture repair and had adequate follow-up. Preoperatively, 71 (76%) patients had some restriction in motility and 59 (63%) patients complained of diplopia. Postoperatively, only 1 patient (1.09%) had clinically significant diplopia. Five (5.4%) additional patients demonstrated mild restriction in supraduction upon detailed ophthalmic examination that was not discovered upon subjective history. No patients had worsening of diplopia or motility after surgery. Diplopia and motility restriction following orbital fracture repair can be a persistent problem for some patients. It is important to perform a careful ophthalmic examination to detect motility deficits and diplopia that can be significant to the patient. The true rate of restriction and diplopia may be higher using detailed ophthalmic diagnostic techniques compared to subjective patient history.