Loading…
Decreased coevolutionary potential and increased symbiont fecundity during the biological invasion of a legume-rhizobium mutualism
Although most invasive species engage in mutualism, we know little about how mutualism evolves as partners colonize novel environments. Selection on cooperation and standing genetic variation for mutualism traits may differ between a mutualism’s invaded and native ranges, which could alter cooperati...
Saved in:
Published in: | Evolution 2021-03, Vol.75 (3), p.731-747 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4104-d3d9f64d8ab4565a481d6a4a53080d6d8f93a7ccfa2fa0ae6d8199fea479d7e23 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4104-d3d9f64d8ab4565a481d6a4a53080d6d8f93a7ccfa2fa0ae6d8199fea479d7e23 |
container_end_page | 747 |
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 731 |
container_title | Evolution |
container_volume | 75 |
creator | Wendlandt, Camille E. Helliwell, Emily Roberts, Miles Nguyen, Kyle T. Friesen, Maren L. von Wettberg, Eric Price, Paul Griffitts, Joel S. Porter, Stephanie S. |
description | Although most invasive species engage in mutualism, we know little about how mutualism evolves as partners colonize novel environments. Selection on cooperation and standing genetic variation for mutualism traits may differ between a mutualism’s invaded and native ranges, which could alter cooperation and coevolutionary dynamics. To test for such differences, we compare mutualism traits between invaded-and native-range host-symbiont genotype combinations of the weedy legume, Medicago polymorpha, and its nitrogen-fixing rhizobium symbiont, Ensifer medicae, which have coinvaded North America. We find that mutualism benefits for plants are indistinguishable between invaded-and native-range symbioses. However, rhizobia gain greater fitness from invaded-range mutualisms than from native-range mutualisms, and this enhancement of symbiont fecundity could increase the mutualism’s spread by increasing symbiont availability during plant colonization. Furthermore, mutualism traits in invaded-range symbioses show lower genetic variance and a simpler partitioning of genetic variance between host and symbiont sources, compared to native-range symbioses. This suggests that biological invasion has reduced mutualists’ potential to respond to coevolutionary selection. Additionally, rhizobia bearing a locus (hrrP) that can enhance symbiotic fitness have more exploitative phenotypes in invaded-range than in native-range symbioses. These findings highlight the impacts of biological invasion on the evolution of mutualistic interactions. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/evo.14164 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2477263484</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>48622531</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>48622531</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4104-d3d9f64d8ab4565a481d6a4a53080d6d8f93a7ccfa2fa0ae6d8199fea479d7e23</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kU1vVCEUhonR2LG68AdoSNzo4rZ83o9lU-tH0qQbdUsYOEyZcGGES8249JeLTqcLE9mQwPM-OTkvQi8pOaPtnMNdOqOC9uIRWlEpx072on-MVoRQ0fGRkRP0rJQtIWSSdHqKTjgXnE9MrtCv92Ay6AIWm9Q8oS4-RZ33eJcWiIvXAetosY9HrOzndUMW7MDUaP2yx7ZmHzd4uQXcvkLaeNNiPt7p0kicHNY4wKbO0OVb_zOtfZ3xXJeqgy_zc_TE6VDgxf19ir5-uPpy-am7vvn4-fLiujOCEtFZbifXCzvqtZC91GKkttdCS05GYns7uonrwRinmdNEQ3uh0-RAi2GyAzB-it4evLucvlcoi5p9MRCCjpBqUUwMA-u5GEVD3_yDblPNsU2nmCQTE4yPpFHvDpTJqZQMTu2yn9vuFCXqTzGqLVT9Laaxr--NdT2DfSCPTTTg_AD88AH2_zepq283R-WrQ2JblpQfEmLsWfNR_hudA6RI</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2509242380</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Decreased coevolutionary potential and increased symbiont fecundity during the biological invasion of a legume-rhizobium mutualism</title><source>JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection</source><creator>Wendlandt, Camille E. ; Helliwell, Emily ; Roberts, Miles ; Nguyen, Kyle T. ; Friesen, Maren L. ; von Wettberg, Eric ; Price, Paul ; Griffitts, Joel S. ; Porter, Stephanie S.</creator><creatorcontrib>Wendlandt, Camille E. ; Helliwell, Emily ; Roberts, Miles ; Nguyen, Kyle T. ; Friesen, Maren L. ; von Wettberg, Eric ; Price, Paul ; Griffitts, Joel S. ; Porter, Stephanie S.</creatorcontrib><description>Although most invasive species engage in mutualism, we know little about how mutualism evolves as partners colonize novel environments. Selection on cooperation and standing genetic variation for mutualism traits may differ between a mutualism’s invaded and native ranges, which could alter cooperation and coevolutionary dynamics. To test for such differences, we compare mutualism traits between invaded-and native-range host-symbiont genotype combinations of the weedy legume, Medicago polymorpha, and its nitrogen-fixing rhizobium symbiont, Ensifer medicae, which have coinvaded North America. We find that mutualism benefits for plants are indistinguishable between invaded-and native-range symbioses. However, rhizobia gain greater fitness from invaded-range mutualisms than from native-range mutualisms, and this enhancement of symbiont fecundity could increase the mutualism’s spread by increasing symbiont availability during plant colonization. Furthermore, mutualism traits in invaded-range symbioses show lower genetic variance and a simpler partitioning of genetic variance between host and symbiont sources, compared to native-range symbioses. This suggests that biological invasion has reduced mutualists’ potential to respond to coevolutionary selection. Additionally, rhizobia bearing a locus (hrrP) that can enhance symbiotic fitness have more exploitative phenotypes in invaded-range than in native-range symbioses. These findings highlight the impacts of biological invasion on the evolution of mutualistic interactions.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0014-3820</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1558-5646</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/evo.14164</identifier><identifier>PMID: 33433925</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Wiley</publisher><subject>Alfalfa ; Biological invasion ; coevolution ; Colonization ; Cooperation ; Fecundity ; Fitness ; Genetic diversity ; Genetic variance ; Genotypes ; hrrP ; Introduced species ; Invasive species ; legume ; Legumes ; Mutualism ; ORIGINAL ARTICLE ; Phenotypes ; Reproductive fitness ; rhizobium ; Symbiosis</subject><ispartof>Evolution, 2021-03, Vol.75 (3), p.731-747</ispartof><rights>2021 The Authors. Evolution © 2021 The Society for the Study of Evolution</rights><rights>2021 The Authors. © 2021 The Society for the Study of Evolution.</rights><rights>2021 The Authors. Evolution © 2021 The Society for the Study of Evolution.</rights><rights>2021, Society for the Study of Evolution</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4104-d3d9f64d8ab4565a481d6a4a53080d6d8f93a7ccfa2fa0ae6d8199fea479d7e23</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4104-d3d9f64d8ab4565a481d6a4a53080d6d8f93a7ccfa2fa0ae6d8199fea479d7e23</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-9854-701X ; 0000-0001-8688-8175 ; 0000-0003-1177-272X ; 0000-0002-1193-9705 ; 0000-0002-2724-0317 ; 0000-0001-6340-7260 ; 0000-0002-4274-8928 ; 0000-0001-7901-3442</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/48622531$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/48622531$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,58238,58471</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33433925$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Wendlandt, Camille E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Helliwell, Emily</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Roberts, Miles</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nguyen, Kyle T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Friesen, Maren L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>von Wettberg, Eric</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Price, Paul</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Griffitts, Joel S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Porter, Stephanie S.</creatorcontrib><title>Decreased coevolutionary potential and increased symbiont fecundity during the biological invasion of a legume-rhizobium mutualism</title><title>Evolution</title><addtitle>Evolution</addtitle><description>Although most invasive species engage in mutualism, we know little about how mutualism evolves as partners colonize novel environments. Selection on cooperation and standing genetic variation for mutualism traits may differ between a mutualism’s invaded and native ranges, which could alter cooperation and coevolutionary dynamics. To test for such differences, we compare mutualism traits between invaded-and native-range host-symbiont genotype combinations of the weedy legume, Medicago polymorpha, and its nitrogen-fixing rhizobium symbiont, Ensifer medicae, which have coinvaded North America. We find that mutualism benefits for plants are indistinguishable between invaded-and native-range symbioses. However, rhizobia gain greater fitness from invaded-range mutualisms than from native-range mutualisms, and this enhancement of symbiont fecundity could increase the mutualism’s spread by increasing symbiont availability during plant colonization. Furthermore, mutualism traits in invaded-range symbioses show lower genetic variance and a simpler partitioning of genetic variance between host and symbiont sources, compared to native-range symbioses. This suggests that biological invasion has reduced mutualists’ potential to respond to coevolutionary selection. Additionally, rhizobia bearing a locus (hrrP) that can enhance symbiotic fitness have more exploitative phenotypes in invaded-range than in native-range symbioses. These findings highlight the impacts of biological invasion on the evolution of mutualistic interactions.</description><subject>Alfalfa</subject><subject>Biological invasion</subject><subject>coevolution</subject><subject>Colonization</subject><subject>Cooperation</subject><subject>Fecundity</subject><subject>Fitness</subject><subject>Genetic diversity</subject><subject>Genetic variance</subject><subject>Genotypes</subject><subject>hrrP</subject><subject>Introduced species</subject><subject>Invasive species</subject><subject>legume</subject><subject>Legumes</subject><subject>Mutualism</subject><subject>ORIGINAL ARTICLE</subject><subject>Phenotypes</subject><subject>Reproductive fitness</subject><subject>rhizobium</subject><subject>Symbiosis</subject><issn>0014-3820</issn><issn>1558-5646</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kU1vVCEUhonR2LG68AdoSNzo4rZ83o9lU-tH0qQbdUsYOEyZcGGES8249JeLTqcLE9mQwPM-OTkvQi8pOaPtnMNdOqOC9uIRWlEpx072on-MVoRQ0fGRkRP0rJQtIWSSdHqKTjgXnE9MrtCv92Ay6AIWm9Q8oS4-RZ33eJcWiIvXAetosY9HrOzndUMW7MDUaP2yx7ZmHzd4uQXcvkLaeNNiPt7p0kicHNY4wKbO0OVb_zOtfZ3xXJeqgy_zc_TE6VDgxf19ir5-uPpy-am7vvn4-fLiujOCEtFZbifXCzvqtZC91GKkttdCS05GYns7uonrwRinmdNEQ3uh0-RAi2GyAzB-it4evLucvlcoi5p9MRCCjpBqUUwMA-u5GEVD3_yDblPNsU2nmCQTE4yPpFHvDpTJqZQMTu2yn9vuFCXqTzGqLVT9Laaxr--NdT2DfSCPTTTg_AD88AH2_zepq283R-WrQ2JblpQfEmLsWfNR_hudA6RI</recordid><startdate>20210301</startdate><enddate>20210301</enddate><creator>Wendlandt, Camille E.</creator><creator>Helliwell, Emily</creator><creator>Roberts, Miles</creator><creator>Nguyen, Kyle T.</creator><creator>Friesen, Maren L.</creator><creator>von Wettberg, Eric</creator><creator>Price, Paul</creator><creator>Griffitts, Joel S.</creator><creator>Porter, Stephanie S.</creator><general>Wiley</general><general>Oxford University Press</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>7QR</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9854-701X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8688-8175</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1177-272X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1193-9705</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2724-0317</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6340-7260</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4274-8928</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7901-3442</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20210301</creationdate><title>Decreased coevolutionary potential and increased symbiont fecundity during the biological invasion of a legume-rhizobium mutualism</title><author>Wendlandt, Camille E. ; Helliwell, Emily ; Roberts, Miles ; Nguyen, Kyle T. ; Friesen, Maren L. ; von Wettberg, Eric ; Price, Paul ; Griffitts, Joel S. ; Porter, Stephanie S.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4104-d3d9f64d8ab4565a481d6a4a53080d6d8f93a7ccfa2fa0ae6d8199fea479d7e23</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Alfalfa</topic><topic>Biological invasion</topic><topic>coevolution</topic><topic>Colonization</topic><topic>Cooperation</topic><topic>Fecundity</topic><topic>Fitness</topic><topic>Genetic diversity</topic><topic>Genetic variance</topic><topic>Genotypes</topic><topic>hrrP</topic><topic>Introduced species</topic><topic>Invasive species</topic><topic>legume</topic><topic>Legumes</topic><topic>Mutualism</topic><topic>ORIGINAL ARTICLE</topic><topic>Phenotypes</topic><topic>Reproductive fitness</topic><topic>rhizobium</topic><topic>Symbiosis</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Wendlandt, Camille E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Helliwell, Emily</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Roberts, Miles</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nguyen, Kyle T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Friesen, Maren L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>von Wettberg, Eric</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Price, Paul</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Griffitts, Joel S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Porter, Stephanie S.</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Calcium & Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>Chemoreception Abstracts</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Evolution</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Wendlandt, Camille E.</au><au>Helliwell, Emily</au><au>Roberts, Miles</au><au>Nguyen, Kyle T.</au><au>Friesen, Maren L.</au><au>von Wettberg, Eric</au><au>Price, Paul</au><au>Griffitts, Joel S.</au><au>Porter, Stephanie S.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Decreased coevolutionary potential and increased symbiont fecundity during the biological invasion of a legume-rhizobium mutualism</atitle><jtitle>Evolution</jtitle><addtitle>Evolution</addtitle><date>2021-03-01</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>75</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>731</spage><epage>747</epage><pages>731-747</pages><issn>0014-3820</issn><eissn>1558-5646</eissn><abstract>Although most invasive species engage in mutualism, we know little about how mutualism evolves as partners colonize novel environments. Selection on cooperation and standing genetic variation for mutualism traits may differ between a mutualism’s invaded and native ranges, which could alter cooperation and coevolutionary dynamics. To test for such differences, we compare mutualism traits between invaded-and native-range host-symbiont genotype combinations of the weedy legume, Medicago polymorpha, and its nitrogen-fixing rhizobium symbiont, Ensifer medicae, which have coinvaded North America. We find that mutualism benefits for plants are indistinguishable between invaded-and native-range symbioses. However, rhizobia gain greater fitness from invaded-range mutualisms than from native-range mutualisms, and this enhancement of symbiont fecundity could increase the mutualism’s spread by increasing symbiont availability during plant colonization. Furthermore, mutualism traits in invaded-range symbioses show lower genetic variance and a simpler partitioning of genetic variance between host and symbiont sources, compared to native-range symbioses. This suggests that biological invasion has reduced mutualists’ potential to respond to coevolutionary selection. Additionally, rhizobia bearing a locus (hrrP) that can enhance symbiotic fitness have more exploitative phenotypes in invaded-range than in native-range symbioses. These findings highlight the impacts of biological invasion on the evolution of mutualistic interactions.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Wiley</pub><pmid>33433925</pmid><doi>10.1111/evo.14164</doi><tpages>17</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9854-701X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8688-8175</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1177-272X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1193-9705</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2724-0317</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6340-7260</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4274-8928</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7901-3442</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0014-3820 |
ispartof | Evolution, 2021-03, Vol.75 (3), p.731-747 |
issn | 0014-3820 1558-5646 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2477263484 |
source | JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection |
subjects | Alfalfa Biological invasion coevolution Colonization Cooperation Fecundity Fitness Genetic diversity Genetic variance Genotypes hrrP Introduced species Invasive species legume Legumes Mutualism ORIGINAL ARTICLE Phenotypes Reproductive fitness rhizobium Symbiosis |
title | Decreased coevolutionary potential and increased symbiont fecundity during the biological invasion of a legume-rhizobium mutualism |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-06T23%3A04%3A33IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Decreased%20coevolutionary%20potential%20and%20increased%20symbiont%20fecundity%20during%20the%20biological%20invasion%20of%20a%20legume-rhizobium%20mutualism&rft.jtitle=Evolution&rft.au=Wendlandt,%20Camille%20E.&rft.date=2021-03-01&rft.volume=75&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=731&rft.epage=747&rft.pages=731-747&rft.issn=0014-3820&rft.eissn=1558-5646&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/evo.14164&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E48622531%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4104-d3d9f64d8ab4565a481d6a4a53080d6d8f93a7ccfa2fa0ae6d8199fea479d7e23%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2509242380&rft_id=info:pmid/33433925&rft_jstor_id=48622531&rfr_iscdi=true |