Loading…

Decreased coevolutionary potential and increased symbiont fecundity during the biological invasion of a legume-rhizobium mutualism

Although most invasive species engage in mutualism, we know little about how mutualism evolves as partners colonize novel environments. Selection on cooperation and standing genetic variation for mutualism traits may differ between a mutualism’s invaded and native ranges, which could alter cooperati...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Evolution 2021-03, Vol.75 (3), p.731-747
Main Authors: Wendlandt, Camille E., Helliwell, Emily, Roberts, Miles, Nguyen, Kyle T., Friesen, Maren L., von Wettberg, Eric, Price, Paul, Griffitts, Joel S., Porter, Stephanie S.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4104-d3d9f64d8ab4565a481d6a4a53080d6d8f93a7ccfa2fa0ae6d8199fea479d7e23
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4104-d3d9f64d8ab4565a481d6a4a53080d6d8f93a7ccfa2fa0ae6d8199fea479d7e23
container_end_page 747
container_issue 3
container_start_page 731
container_title Evolution
container_volume 75
creator Wendlandt, Camille E.
Helliwell, Emily
Roberts, Miles
Nguyen, Kyle T.
Friesen, Maren L.
von Wettberg, Eric
Price, Paul
Griffitts, Joel S.
Porter, Stephanie S.
description Although most invasive species engage in mutualism, we know little about how mutualism evolves as partners colonize novel environments. Selection on cooperation and standing genetic variation for mutualism traits may differ between a mutualism’s invaded and native ranges, which could alter cooperation and coevolutionary dynamics. To test for such differences, we compare mutualism traits between invaded-and native-range host-symbiont genotype combinations of the weedy legume, Medicago polymorpha, and its nitrogen-fixing rhizobium symbiont, Ensifer medicae, which have coinvaded North America. We find that mutualism benefits for plants are indistinguishable between invaded-and native-range symbioses. However, rhizobia gain greater fitness from invaded-range mutualisms than from native-range mutualisms, and this enhancement of symbiont fecundity could increase the mutualism’s spread by increasing symbiont availability during plant colonization. Furthermore, mutualism traits in invaded-range symbioses show lower genetic variance and a simpler partitioning of genetic variance between host and symbiont sources, compared to native-range symbioses. This suggests that biological invasion has reduced mutualists’ potential to respond to coevolutionary selection. Additionally, rhizobia bearing a locus (hrrP) that can enhance symbiotic fitness have more exploitative phenotypes in invaded-range than in native-range symbioses. These findings highlight the impacts of biological invasion on the evolution of mutualistic interactions.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/evo.14164
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2477263484</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>48622531</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>48622531</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4104-d3d9f64d8ab4565a481d6a4a53080d6d8f93a7ccfa2fa0ae6d8199fea479d7e23</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kU1vVCEUhonR2LG68AdoSNzo4rZ83o9lU-tH0qQbdUsYOEyZcGGES8249JeLTqcLE9mQwPM-OTkvQi8pOaPtnMNdOqOC9uIRWlEpx072on-MVoRQ0fGRkRP0rJQtIWSSdHqKTjgXnE9MrtCv92Ay6AIWm9Q8oS4-RZ33eJcWiIvXAetosY9HrOzndUMW7MDUaP2yx7ZmHzd4uQXcvkLaeNNiPt7p0kicHNY4wKbO0OVb_zOtfZ3xXJeqgy_zc_TE6VDgxf19ir5-uPpy-am7vvn4-fLiujOCEtFZbifXCzvqtZC91GKkttdCS05GYns7uonrwRinmdNEQ3uh0-RAi2GyAzB-it4evLucvlcoi5p9MRCCjpBqUUwMA-u5GEVD3_yDblPNsU2nmCQTE4yPpFHvDpTJqZQMTu2yn9vuFCXqTzGqLVT9Laaxr--NdT2DfSCPTTTg_AD88AH2_zepq283R-WrQ2JblpQfEmLsWfNR_hudA6RI</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2509242380</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Decreased coevolutionary potential and increased symbiont fecundity during the biological invasion of a legume-rhizobium mutualism</title><source>JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection</source><creator>Wendlandt, Camille E. ; Helliwell, Emily ; Roberts, Miles ; Nguyen, Kyle T. ; Friesen, Maren L. ; von Wettberg, Eric ; Price, Paul ; Griffitts, Joel S. ; Porter, Stephanie S.</creator><creatorcontrib>Wendlandt, Camille E. ; Helliwell, Emily ; Roberts, Miles ; Nguyen, Kyle T. ; Friesen, Maren L. ; von Wettberg, Eric ; Price, Paul ; Griffitts, Joel S. ; Porter, Stephanie S.</creatorcontrib><description>Although most invasive species engage in mutualism, we know little about how mutualism evolves as partners colonize novel environments. Selection on cooperation and standing genetic variation for mutualism traits may differ between a mutualism’s invaded and native ranges, which could alter cooperation and coevolutionary dynamics. To test for such differences, we compare mutualism traits between invaded-and native-range host-symbiont genotype combinations of the weedy legume, Medicago polymorpha, and its nitrogen-fixing rhizobium symbiont, Ensifer medicae, which have coinvaded North America. We find that mutualism benefits for plants are indistinguishable between invaded-and native-range symbioses. However, rhizobia gain greater fitness from invaded-range mutualisms than from native-range mutualisms, and this enhancement of symbiont fecundity could increase the mutualism’s spread by increasing symbiont availability during plant colonization. Furthermore, mutualism traits in invaded-range symbioses show lower genetic variance and a simpler partitioning of genetic variance between host and symbiont sources, compared to native-range symbioses. This suggests that biological invasion has reduced mutualists’ potential to respond to coevolutionary selection. Additionally, rhizobia bearing a locus (hrrP) that can enhance symbiotic fitness have more exploitative phenotypes in invaded-range than in native-range symbioses. These findings highlight the impacts of biological invasion on the evolution of mutualistic interactions.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0014-3820</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1558-5646</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/evo.14164</identifier><identifier>PMID: 33433925</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Wiley</publisher><subject>Alfalfa ; Biological invasion ; coevolution ; Colonization ; Cooperation ; Fecundity ; Fitness ; Genetic diversity ; Genetic variance ; Genotypes ; hrrP ; Introduced species ; Invasive species ; legume ; Legumes ; Mutualism ; ORIGINAL ARTICLE ; Phenotypes ; Reproductive fitness ; rhizobium ; Symbiosis</subject><ispartof>Evolution, 2021-03, Vol.75 (3), p.731-747</ispartof><rights>2021 The Authors. Evolution © 2021 The Society for the Study of Evolution</rights><rights>2021 The Authors. © 2021 The Society for the Study of Evolution.</rights><rights>2021 The Authors. Evolution © 2021 The Society for the Study of Evolution.</rights><rights>2021, Society for the Study of Evolution</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4104-d3d9f64d8ab4565a481d6a4a53080d6d8f93a7ccfa2fa0ae6d8199fea479d7e23</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4104-d3d9f64d8ab4565a481d6a4a53080d6d8f93a7ccfa2fa0ae6d8199fea479d7e23</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-9854-701X ; 0000-0001-8688-8175 ; 0000-0003-1177-272X ; 0000-0002-1193-9705 ; 0000-0002-2724-0317 ; 0000-0001-6340-7260 ; 0000-0002-4274-8928 ; 0000-0001-7901-3442</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/48622531$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/48622531$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,58238,58471</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33433925$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Wendlandt, Camille E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Helliwell, Emily</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Roberts, Miles</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nguyen, Kyle T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Friesen, Maren L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>von Wettberg, Eric</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Price, Paul</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Griffitts, Joel S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Porter, Stephanie S.</creatorcontrib><title>Decreased coevolutionary potential and increased symbiont fecundity during the biological invasion of a legume-rhizobium mutualism</title><title>Evolution</title><addtitle>Evolution</addtitle><description>Although most invasive species engage in mutualism, we know little about how mutualism evolves as partners colonize novel environments. Selection on cooperation and standing genetic variation for mutualism traits may differ between a mutualism’s invaded and native ranges, which could alter cooperation and coevolutionary dynamics. To test for such differences, we compare mutualism traits between invaded-and native-range host-symbiont genotype combinations of the weedy legume, Medicago polymorpha, and its nitrogen-fixing rhizobium symbiont, Ensifer medicae, which have coinvaded North America. We find that mutualism benefits for plants are indistinguishable between invaded-and native-range symbioses. However, rhizobia gain greater fitness from invaded-range mutualisms than from native-range mutualisms, and this enhancement of symbiont fecundity could increase the mutualism’s spread by increasing symbiont availability during plant colonization. Furthermore, mutualism traits in invaded-range symbioses show lower genetic variance and a simpler partitioning of genetic variance between host and symbiont sources, compared to native-range symbioses. This suggests that biological invasion has reduced mutualists’ potential to respond to coevolutionary selection. Additionally, rhizobia bearing a locus (hrrP) that can enhance symbiotic fitness have more exploitative phenotypes in invaded-range than in native-range symbioses. These findings highlight the impacts of biological invasion on the evolution of mutualistic interactions.</description><subject>Alfalfa</subject><subject>Biological invasion</subject><subject>coevolution</subject><subject>Colonization</subject><subject>Cooperation</subject><subject>Fecundity</subject><subject>Fitness</subject><subject>Genetic diversity</subject><subject>Genetic variance</subject><subject>Genotypes</subject><subject>hrrP</subject><subject>Introduced species</subject><subject>Invasive species</subject><subject>legume</subject><subject>Legumes</subject><subject>Mutualism</subject><subject>ORIGINAL ARTICLE</subject><subject>Phenotypes</subject><subject>Reproductive fitness</subject><subject>rhizobium</subject><subject>Symbiosis</subject><issn>0014-3820</issn><issn>1558-5646</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kU1vVCEUhonR2LG68AdoSNzo4rZ83o9lU-tH0qQbdUsYOEyZcGGES8249JeLTqcLE9mQwPM-OTkvQi8pOaPtnMNdOqOC9uIRWlEpx072on-MVoRQ0fGRkRP0rJQtIWSSdHqKTjgXnE9MrtCv92Ay6AIWm9Q8oS4-RZ33eJcWiIvXAetosY9HrOzndUMW7MDUaP2yx7ZmHzd4uQXcvkLaeNNiPt7p0kicHNY4wKbO0OVb_zOtfZ3xXJeqgy_zc_TE6VDgxf19ir5-uPpy-am7vvn4-fLiujOCEtFZbifXCzvqtZC91GKkttdCS05GYns7uonrwRinmdNEQ3uh0-RAi2GyAzB-it4evLucvlcoi5p9MRCCjpBqUUwMA-u5GEVD3_yDblPNsU2nmCQTE4yPpFHvDpTJqZQMTu2yn9vuFCXqTzGqLVT9Laaxr--NdT2DfSCPTTTg_AD88AH2_zepq283R-WrQ2JblpQfEmLsWfNR_hudA6RI</recordid><startdate>20210301</startdate><enddate>20210301</enddate><creator>Wendlandt, Camille E.</creator><creator>Helliwell, Emily</creator><creator>Roberts, Miles</creator><creator>Nguyen, Kyle T.</creator><creator>Friesen, Maren L.</creator><creator>von Wettberg, Eric</creator><creator>Price, Paul</creator><creator>Griffitts, Joel S.</creator><creator>Porter, Stephanie S.</creator><general>Wiley</general><general>Oxford University Press</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>7QR</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9854-701X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8688-8175</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1177-272X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1193-9705</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2724-0317</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6340-7260</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4274-8928</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7901-3442</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20210301</creationdate><title>Decreased coevolutionary potential and increased symbiont fecundity during the biological invasion of a legume-rhizobium mutualism</title><author>Wendlandt, Camille E. ; Helliwell, Emily ; Roberts, Miles ; Nguyen, Kyle T. ; Friesen, Maren L. ; von Wettberg, Eric ; Price, Paul ; Griffitts, Joel S. ; Porter, Stephanie S.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4104-d3d9f64d8ab4565a481d6a4a53080d6d8f93a7ccfa2fa0ae6d8199fea479d7e23</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Alfalfa</topic><topic>Biological invasion</topic><topic>coevolution</topic><topic>Colonization</topic><topic>Cooperation</topic><topic>Fecundity</topic><topic>Fitness</topic><topic>Genetic diversity</topic><topic>Genetic variance</topic><topic>Genotypes</topic><topic>hrrP</topic><topic>Introduced species</topic><topic>Invasive species</topic><topic>legume</topic><topic>Legumes</topic><topic>Mutualism</topic><topic>ORIGINAL ARTICLE</topic><topic>Phenotypes</topic><topic>Reproductive fitness</topic><topic>rhizobium</topic><topic>Symbiosis</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Wendlandt, Camille E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Helliwell, Emily</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Roberts, Miles</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nguyen, Kyle T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Friesen, Maren L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>von Wettberg, Eric</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Price, Paul</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Griffitts, Joel S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Porter, Stephanie S.</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Calcium &amp; Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>Chemoreception Abstracts</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Evolution</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Wendlandt, Camille E.</au><au>Helliwell, Emily</au><au>Roberts, Miles</au><au>Nguyen, Kyle T.</au><au>Friesen, Maren L.</au><au>von Wettberg, Eric</au><au>Price, Paul</au><au>Griffitts, Joel S.</au><au>Porter, Stephanie S.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Decreased coevolutionary potential and increased symbiont fecundity during the biological invasion of a legume-rhizobium mutualism</atitle><jtitle>Evolution</jtitle><addtitle>Evolution</addtitle><date>2021-03-01</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>75</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>731</spage><epage>747</epage><pages>731-747</pages><issn>0014-3820</issn><eissn>1558-5646</eissn><abstract>Although most invasive species engage in mutualism, we know little about how mutualism evolves as partners colonize novel environments. Selection on cooperation and standing genetic variation for mutualism traits may differ between a mutualism’s invaded and native ranges, which could alter cooperation and coevolutionary dynamics. To test for such differences, we compare mutualism traits between invaded-and native-range host-symbiont genotype combinations of the weedy legume, Medicago polymorpha, and its nitrogen-fixing rhizobium symbiont, Ensifer medicae, which have coinvaded North America. We find that mutualism benefits for plants are indistinguishable between invaded-and native-range symbioses. However, rhizobia gain greater fitness from invaded-range mutualisms than from native-range mutualisms, and this enhancement of symbiont fecundity could increase the mutualism’s spread by increasing symbiont availability during plant colonization. Furthermore, mutualism traits in invaded-range symbioses show lower genetic variance and a simpler partitioning of genetic variance between host and symbiont sources, compared to native-range symbioses. This suggests that biological invasion has reduced mutualists’ potential to respond to coevolutionary selection. Additionally, rhizobia bearing a locus (hrrP) that can enhance symbiotic fitness have more exploitative phenotypes in invaded-range than in native-range symbioses. These findings highlight the impacts of biological invasion on the evolution of mutualistic interactions.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Wiley</pub><pmid>33433925</pmid><doi>10.1111/evo.14164</doi><tpages>17</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9854-701X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8688-8175</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1177-272X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1193-9705</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2724-0317</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6340-7260</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4274-8928</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7901-3442</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0014-3820
ispartof Evolution, 2021-03, Vol.75 (3), p.731-747
issn 0014-3820
1558-5646
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2477263484
source JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection
subjects Alfalfa
Biological invasion
coevolution
Colonization
Cooperation
Fecundity
Fitness
Genetic diversity
Genetic variance
Genotypes
hrrP
Introduced species
Invasive species
legume
Legumes
Mutualism
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Phenotypes
Reproductive fitness
rhizobium
Symbiosis
title Decreased coevolutionary potential and increased symbiont fecundity during the biological invasion of a legume-rhizobium mutualism
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-06T23%3A04%3A33IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Decreased%20coevolutionary%20potential%20and%20increased%20symbiont%20fecundity%20during%20the%20biological%20invasion%20of%20a%20legume-rhizobium%20mutualism&rft.jtitle=Evolution&rft.au=Wendlandt,%20Camille%20E.&rft.date=2021-03-01&rft.volume=75&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=731&rft.epage=747&rft.pages=731-747&rft.issn=0014-3820&rft.eissn=1558-5646&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/evo.14164&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E48622531%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4104-d3d9f64d8ab4565a481d6a4a53080d6d8f93a7ccfa2fa0ae6d8199fea479d7e23%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2509242380&rft_id=info:pmid/33433925&rft_jstor_id=48622531&rfr_iscdi=true