Hormonal contraceptive prescriptions in the UK Armed Forces

IntroductionThirty four per cent of women use hormonal contraceptives in the UK and the contraceptive pill is the most common method. There are no comparable data in the UK Armed Forces, but servicewomen are often required to complete physically arduous job roles in combat zones and may be more like...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:BMJ military health 2023-02, Vol.169 (1), p.23-26
Main Authors: Double, Rebecca L, Wardle, S L, O'Leary, T J, Weaden, N, Bailey, G, Greeves, J P
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Age
Armed forces
audit
Birth control
Contraception - methods
Contraceptive Agents
Female
Fractures
Humans
Iron
Menstruation
Methods
Military Personnel
Military training
Original research
physiology
Prescriptions
reproductive medicine
United Kingdom
Womens health
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:IntroductionThirty four per cent of women use hormonal contraceptives in the UK and the contraceptive pill is the most common method. There are no comparable data in the UK Armed Forces, but servicewomen are often required to complete physically arduous job roles in combat zones and may be more likely to take contraceptives to control or stop menstrual bleeding than the general population. We explored the prevalence of hormonal contraceptive prescriptions in the UK Armed Forces.MethodsThe study used defence medical records (Defence Medical Information Capability Programme) to identify hormonal contraceptive prescriptions for all serving regular UK servicewomen (n=15 738) as of 1 September 2017.ResultsThirty one per cent of servicewomen (Royal Navy, 28%; British Army, 30%; Royal Air Force, 34%) had a current prescription for a hormonal contraceptive. Non-officer ranks were more likely to have a prescription for a hormonal contraceptive (32%) than officers (27%) (p
ISSN:2633-3767
2633-3775
DOI:10.1136/bmjmilitary-2020-001594