The relation between two barriers to self‐compassion and clinical characteristics in individuals with eating disorders

There is growing support for the role of self‐compassion in recovery from an eating disorder (ED) and two types of barriers have been identified in this population: (a) fears that self‐compassion will result in a failure to meet personal and interpersonal standards (meeting standards); and (b) fears...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:European eating disorders review 2020-11, Vol.28 (6), p.766-772
Main Authors: Geller, Josie, Kelly, Allison C., Samson, Lindsay, Iyar, Megumi M., Srikameswaran, Suja
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Adolescent
Adult
Aged
barriers
Eating disorders
Feeding and Eating Disorders - psychology
Female
Humans
Male
Middle Aged
Quality of life
Quality of Life - psychology
Self compassion
Self Concept
Young Adult
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:There is growing support for the role of self‐compassion in recovery from an eating disorder (ED) and two types of barriers have been identified in this population: (a) fears that self‐compassion will result in a failure to meet personal and interpersonal standards (meeting standards); and (b) fears that self‐compassion gives rise to difficult emotions such as grief and unworthiness (emotional vulnerability). Objective This research examined the relative contribution of meeting standards and emotional vulnerability barriers to the clinical characteristics of individuals with EDs. Method Participants (N = 349) completed the fears of compassion for self‐scale, and measures of self‐compassion, ED and psychiatric symptom severity, interpersonal and affective functioning, quality of life and readiness for ED change. Results Together, the two barrier types accounted for significant variance in all study variables. Meeting standards was associated with lower readiness to change and greater over‐control. In contrast, emotional vulnerability was associated with lower self‐compassion, readiness, and quality of life, poorer interpersonal and affective functioning, and greater ED and psychiatric severity. Conclusion While both barriers to self‐compassion were related to functioning in individuals with EDs, the emotional vulnerability barrier accounted for more variance in pathology and may be most beneficial to target in treatment.
ISSN:1072-4133
1099-0968
DOI:10.1002/erv.2764