Loading…

An epitope-based approach of HLA-matched platelets for transfusion: a noninferiority crossover randomized trial

Platelet transfusion refractoriness results in adverse outcomes and increased health care costs. Managing refractoriness resulting from HLA alloimmunization necessitates the use of HLA antigen–matched platelets but requires a large platelet donor pool and does not guarantee full matching. We report...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Blood 2021-01, Vol.137 (3), p.310-322
Main Authors: Marsh, Judith C., Stanworth, Simon J., Pankhurst, Laura A., Kallon, Delordson, Gilbertson, Adeline Z., Pigden, Collette, Deary, Alison J., Mora, Ana S., Brown, Joanne, Laing, Emma S., Choo, Louise L., Hodge, Renate, Llewelyn, Charlotte A., Harding, Kay, Sage, Deborah, Mijovic, Aleksandar, Mufti, Ghulam J., Navarrete, Cristina V., Brown, Colin J.
Format: Article
Language:English
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Platelet transfusion refractoriness results in adverse outcomes and increased health care costs. Managing refractoriness resulting from HLA alloimmunization necessitates the use of HLA antigen–matched platelets but requires a large platelet donor pool and does not guarantee full matching. We report the first randomized, double-blind, noninferiority, crossover trial comparing HLA epitope–matched (HEM) platelets with HLA standard antigen–matched (HSM) platelet transfusions. Alloimmunized, platelet-refractory, thrombocytopenic patients with aplastic anemia, myelodysplastic syndrome, or acute myeloid leukemia were eligible. HEM platelets were selected using HLAMatchMaker epitope (specifically eplet) matching. Patients received up to 8 prophylactic HEM and HSM transfusions provided in random order. The primary outcome was 1-hour posttransfusion platelet count increment (PCI). Forty-nine patients were randomized at 14 UK hospitals. For intention to treat, numbers of evaluable transfusions were 107 and 112 for HEM and HSM methods, respectively. Unadjusted mean PCIs for HEM and HSM methods were 23.9 (standard deviation [SD], 15) and 23.5 (SD, 14.1), respectively (adjusted mean difference, −0.1; 95% confidence interval [CI], −2.9 to 2.8). Because the lower limit of the 95% CI was not greater than the predefined noninferiority limit, the HEM approach was declared noninferior to the HSM approach. There were no differences in secondary outcomes of platelet counts, transfusion requirements, and bleeding events. Adequate 1-hour PCI was more frequently observed, with a mean number of 3.2 epitope mismatches, compared with 5.5 epitope mismatches for inadequate 1-hour increments. For every additional epitope mismatch, the likelihood of an adequate PCI decreased by 15%. Epitope-matched platelets should be considered to support HLA alloimmunized patients. This trial was registered at www.isrctn.com as #ISRCTN23996532. •Management of platelet refractoriness resulting from HLA alloimmunization is a major and costly clinical problem.•A noninferiority, crossover, randomized trial supported a role for epitope matched platelets for HLA alloimmunized patients. [Display omitted]
ISSN:0006-4971
1528-0020
DOI:10.1182/blood.2020007199