Clinician-rated quality of video otoscopy recordings and still images for the asynchronous assessment of middle-ear disease

• Published in: Journal of telemedicine and telecare 2023-07, Vol.29 (6), p.435-443
• Main Authors: Alenezi, Eman MA, Jajko, Kathryn, Reid, Allison, Locatelli-Smith, Alessandra, McMahen, Courtney SE, Tao, Karina FM, Marsh, Julie, Bright, Tess, Richmond, Peter C, Eikelboom, Robert H, Brennan-Jones, Christopher G
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Ear diseases; Telemedicine
• ISSN: 1357-633X; 1758-1109
• DOI: 10.1177/1357633X20987783

Introduction Video otoscopy plays an important role in improving access to ear health services. This study investigated the clinician-rated quality of video otoscopy recordings and still images, and compared their suitability for asynchronous diagnosis of middle-ear disease. Methods Two hundred and eighty video otoscopy image–recording pairs were collected from 150 children (aged six months to 15 years) by an ear, nose, and throat (ENT) specialist, audiologists, and trained research assistants, and independently rated by an audiologist and ENT surgeon. On a five-point scale, clinicians rated the cerumen amount, field of view, quality, focus, light, and gave an overall rating, and asked whether they could make an accurate diagnosis for both still images and recordings. Results More video otoscopy recordings were rated as ‘good’ or ‘excellent’ compared to still images across all domains. The mean difference between the two otoscopic procedures ratings was significant across almost all domains (p