St Georg Sled medial unicompartmental arthroplasty: survivorship analysis and function at 20 years follow up

• Published in: Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA, 2022-03, Vol.30 (3), p.800-808
• Main Authors: Porteous, Andrew J., Smith, James R. A., Bray, Rachel, Robinson, James R., White, Paul, Murray, James R. D.
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Aged; Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee - methods; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; Kaplan-Meier Estimate; Knee; Knee Prosthesis; Medicine; Medicine & Public Health; Orthopedics; Osteoarthritis, Knee - surgery; Prospective Studies; Reoperation; Retrospective Studies; Sports Medicine; Survivorship; Treatment Outcome
• ISSN: 0942-2056; 1433-7347
• DOI: 10.1007/s00167-021-06454-6

Purpose The peri-operative and short-term benefits of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) are well supported in the literature. However, there remains concern regarding the higher revision rate when compared with total knee replacement. This manuscript reports the functional outcome and survivorship of a large series of fixed bearing, medial unicompartmental replacements (St Georg Sled), with a minimum of 20 years follow-up. Methods Between 1974 and 1994, 399 patients (496 knees) underwent a medial fixed-bearing UKA. Prospective data were collected pre-operatively and at regular intervals post-operatively using the Bristol Knee Score (BKS), Oxford Knee (OKS) and Western Ontario MacMaster (WOMAC) scores. Kaplan–Meier survival analysis was used to determine survivorship, with revision or need for revision as end point, and differences assessed using Mantel–Cox log rank test. Results Functional knee scores improved post-operatively, but demonstrated a slight decline from 10 years of follow-up onwards. Survivorship is estimated as 86% at 10 years, 80% at 15 years, and 78% at 20 years. Sixty knees were revised, with progression of disease in another compartment the commonest reason. Eighty eight percent were revised using a primary prosthesis. For patients over the age of 65 years at the time of index procedure, 93% died with a functioning prosthesis in situ. Conclusion Medial UKA demonstrates good long-term function and survivorship, and represents an excellent surgical option for patients aged over 65 years of age, where few patients will require a revision procedure. Level of evidence IV.