Loading…
Nighttime Calls, Pages, and Interruptions to the On-Call Surgery Resident
Background Communication is a keystone to good medical practice. At night, as physician numbers decrease, frequent, nonurgent interruptions have shown to disrupt patient care and impact resident/physician wellness. Potentially, interruptions can lead to an increase in medical errors. The frequency a...
Saved in:
Published in: | The American surgeon 2022-06, Vol.88 (6), p.1181-1186 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c473t-5ff9b088719ad13add67ffa8fcc466a6d1e0eea9d29bb13c1cee677502eed49b3 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c473t-5ff9b088719ad13add67ffa8fcc466a6d1e0eea9d29bb13c1cee677502eed49b3 |
container_end_page | 1186 |
container_issue | 6 |
container_start_page | 1181 |
container_title | The American surgeon |
container_volume | 88 |
creator | Parrado, Raphael H. Notrica, David M Molitor, Mark S. |
description | Background
Communication is a keystone to good medical practice. At night, as physician numbers decrease, frequent, nonurgent interruptions have shown to disrupt patient care and impact resident/physician wellness. Potentially, interruptions can lead to an increase in medical errors. The frequency and activities interrupted during night calls have not been fully described.
Methods
For a period of 44 days (August through September), all calls and pages received during the 12-hour night call session were documented. Calls were analyzed by caller, urgency, need for intervention, and resident interrupted by the communication.
Results
A total of 494 communications were identified with a mean of 10 calls per shift (IQR 7-14). Communications lasted a mean of 2.7 +/− 2.9 minutes. Direct calls occurred in 78% and pages in 22% of the cases. From the non-ED calls (n = 335), most of them came from nursing staff (85%), followed by other specialties (12%). Five percent of the calls were directed to the wrong service. Communications occurred during charting (41%), patient assessment (33%), interrupted resident’s sleep (12%), or during a surgical procedure (6%). Communication required no action in 47% of the cases. A physician order was needed in 41%, while bedside clinical assessment was required in 12% of the calls.
Conclusions
Communications are common at night, but most did not require clinical assessment. A large portion of communications interrupted direct patient care. An opportunity exists to eliminate nonproductive communications and improve the quality of medical education. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1177/0003134821991987 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2484155681</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_0003134821991987</sage_id><sourcerecordid>2669994848</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c473t-5ff9b088719ad13add67ffa8fcc466a6d1e0eea9d29bb13c1cee677502eed49b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kMtLw0AQhxdRbK3ePUnAiwej-0j2cZTioyBWfJzDJjtpU_Kou5tD_3s3tCoUPA3DfPOb4UPonOAbQoS4xRgzwhJJiVJESXGAxiRN01hJyg7ReBjHw3yETpxbhTbhKTlGI8ZSSimnYzR7qRZL76sGoqmua3cdveoFhKJbE81aD9b2a191rYt8F_klRPM2HsjovbcLsJvoDVxloPWn6KjUtYOzXZ2gz4f7j-lT_Dx_nE3vnuMiEczHaVmqHEspiNKGMG0MF2WpZVkUCeeaGwIYQCtDVZ4TVpACgAuRYgpgEpWzCbra5q5t99WD81lTuQLqWrfQ9S6jiUyCBC5JQC_30FXX2zZ8l1HOlVIBlYHCW6qwnXMWymxtq0bbTUZwNmjO9jWHlYtdcJ83YH4XfrwGIN4CLtj8u_pv4Df_jIN9</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2669994848</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Nighttime Calls, Pages, and Interruptions to the On-Call Surgery Resident</title><source>SAGE</source><creator>Parrado, Raphael H. ; Notrica, David M ; Molitor, Mark S.</creator><creatorcontrib>Parrado, Raphael H. ; Notrica, David M ; Molitor, Mark S.</creatorcontrib><description>Background
Communication is a keystone to good medical practice. At night, as physician numbers decrease, frequent, nonurgent interruptions have shown to disrupt patient care and impact resident/physician wellness. Potentially, interruptions can lead to an increase in medical errors. The frequency and activities interrupted during night calls have not been fully described.
Methods
For a period of 44 days (August through September), all calls and pages received during the 12-hour night call session were documented. Calls were analyzed by caller, urgency, need for intervention, and resident interrupted by the communication.
Results
A total of 494 communications were identified with a mean of 10 calls per shift (IQR 7-14). Communications lasted a mean of 2.7 +/− 2.9 minutes. Direct calls occurred in 78% and pages in 22% of the cases. From the non-ED calls (n = 335), most of them came from nursing staff (85%), followed by other specialties (12%). Five percent of the calls were directed to the wrong service. Communications occurred during charting (41%), patient assessment (33%), interrupted resident’s sleep (12%), or during a surgical procedure (6%). Communication required no action in 47% of the cases. A physician order was needed in 41%, while bedside clinical assessment was required in 12% of the calls.
Conclusions
Communications are common at night, but most did not require clinical assessment. A large portion of communications interrupted direct patient care. An opportunity exists to eliminate nonproductive communications and improve the quality of medical education.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0003-1348</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1555-9823</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/0003134821991987</identifier><identifier>PMID: 33522262</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Communication ; Communications ; Data collection ; Hospitals ; Humans ; Internship and Residency ; Night ; Nursing ; Nursing Staff ; Patients ; Pediatrics ; Physicians ; Surgery ; Text messaging</subject><ispartof>The American surgeon, 2022-06, Vol.88 (6), p.1181-1186</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2021</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c473t-5ff9b088719ad13add67ffa8fcc466a6d1e0eea9d29bb13c1cee677502eed49b3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c473t-5ff9b088719ad13add67ffa8fcc466a6d1e0eea9d29bb13c1cee677502eed49b3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,79364</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33522262$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Parrado, Raphael H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Notrica, David M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Molitor, Mark S.</creatorcontrib><title>Nighttime Calls, Pages, and Interruptions to the On-Call Surgery Resident</title><title>The American surgeon</title><addtitle>Am Surg</addtitle><description>Background
Communication is a keystone to good medical practice. At night, as physician numbers decrease, frequent, nonurgent interruptions have shown to disrupt patient care and impact resident/physician wellness. Potentially, interruptions can lead to an increase in medical errors. The frequency and activities interrupted during night calls have not been fully described.
Methods
For a period of 44 days (August through September), all calls and pages received during the 12-hour night call session were documented. Calls were analyzed by caller, urgency, need for intervention, and resident interrupted by the communication.
Results
A total of 494 communications were identified with a mean of 10 calls per shift (IQR 7-14). Communications lasted a mean of 2.7 +/− 2.9 minutes. Direct calls occurred in 78% and pages in 22% of the cases. From the non-ED calls (n = 335), most of them came from nursing staff (85%), followed by other specialties (12%). Five percent of the calls were directed to the wrong service. Communications occurred during charting (41%), patient assessment (33%), interrupted resident’s sleep (12%), or during a surgical procedure (6%). Communication required no action in 47% of the cases. A physician order was needed in 41%, while bedside clinical assessment was required in 12% of the calls.
Conclusions
Communications are common at night, but most did not require clinical assessment. A large portion of communications interrupted direct patient care. An opportunity exists to eliminate nonproductive communications and improve the quality of medical education.</description><subject>Communication</subject><subject>Communications</subject><subject>Data collection</subject><subject>Hospitals</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Internship and Residency</subject><subject>Night</subject><subject>Nursing</subject><subject>Nursing Staff</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Pediatrics</subject><subject>Physicians</subject><subject>Surgery</subject><subject>Text messaging</subject><issn>0003-1348</issn><issn>1555-9823</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kMtLw0AQhxdRbK3ePUnAiwej-0j2cZTioyBWfJzDJjtpU_Kou5tD_3s3tCoUPA3DfPOb4UPonOAbQoS4xRgzwhJJiVJESXGAxiRN01hJyg7ReBjHw3yETpxbhTbhKTlGI8ZSSimnYzR7qRZL76sGoqmua3cdveoFhKJbE81aD9b2a191rYt8F_klRPM2HsjovbcLsJvoDVxloPWn6KjUtYOzXZ2gz4f7j-lT_Dx_nE3vnuMiEczHaVmqHEspiNKGMG0MF2WpZVkUCeeaGwIYQCtDVZ4TVpACgAuRYgpgEpWzCbra5q5t99WD81lTuQLqWrfQ9S6jiUyCBC5JQC_30FXX2zZ8l1HOlVIBlYHCW6qwnXMWymxtq0bbTUZwNmjO9jWHlYtdcJ83YH4XfrwGIN4CLtj8u_pv4Df_jIN9</recordid><startdate>20220601</startdate><enddate>20220601</enddate><creator>Parrado, Raphael H.</creator><creator>Notrica, David M</creator><creator>Molitor, Mark S.</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><general>SAGE PUBLICATIONS, INC</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>4T-</scope><scope>4U-</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20220601</creationdate><title>Nighttime Calls, Pages, and Interruptions to the On-Call Surgery Resident</title><author>Parrado, Raphael H. ; Notrica, David M ; Molitor, Mark S.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c473t-5ff9b088719ad13add67ffa8fcc466a6d1e0eea9d29bb13c1cee677502eed49b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Communication</topic><topic>Communications</topic><topic>Data collection</topic><topic>Hospitals</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Internship and Residency</topic><topic>Night</topic><topic>Nursing</topic><topic>Nursing Staff</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Pediatrics</topic><topic>Physicians</topic><topic>Surgery</topic><topic>Text messaging</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Parrado, Raphael H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Notrica, David M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Molitor, Mark S.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Docstoc</collection><collection>University Readers</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>The American surgeon</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Parrado, Raphael H.</au><au>Notrica, David M</au><au>Molitor, Mark S.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Nighttime Calls, Pages, and Interruptions to the On-Call Surgery Resident</atitle><jtitle>The American surgeon</jtitle><addtitle>Am Surg</addtitle><date>2022-06-01</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>88</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>1181</spage><epage>1186</epage><pages>1181-1186</pages><issn>0003-1348</issn><eissn>1555-9823</eissn><abstract>Background
Communication is a keystone to good medical practice. At night, as physician numbers decrease, frequent, nonurgent interruptions have shown to disrupt patient care and impact resident/physician wellness. Potentially, interruptions can lead to an increase in medical errors. The frequency and activities interrupted during night calls have not been fully described.
Methods
For a period of 44 days (August through September), all calls and pages received during the 12-hour night call session were documented. Calls were analyzed by caller, urgency, need for intervention, and resident interrupted by the communication.
Results
A total of 494 communications were identified with a mean of 10 calls per shift (IQR 7-14). Communications lasted a mean of 2.7 +/− 2.9 minutes. Direct calls occurred in 78% and pages in 22% of the cases. From the non-ED calls (n = 335), most of them came from nursing staff (85%), followed by other specialties (12%). Five percent of the calls were directed to the wrong service. Communications occurred during charting (41%), patient assessment (33%), interrupted resident’s sleep (12%), or during a surgical procedure (6%). Communication required no action in 47% of the cases. A physician order was needed in 41%, while bedside clinical assessment was required in 12% of the calls.
Conclusions
Communications are common at night, but most did not require clinical assessment. A large portion of communications interrupted direct patient care. An opportunity exists to eliminate nonproductive communications and improve the quality of medical education.</abstract><cop>Los Angeles, CA</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><pmid>33522262</pmid><doi>10.1177/0003134821991987</doi><tpages>6</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0003-1348 |
ispartof | The American surgeon, 2022-06, Vol.88 (6), p.1181-1186 |
issn | 0003-1348 1555-9823 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2484155681 |
source | SAGE |
subjects | Communication Communications Data collection Hospitals Humans Internship and Residency Night Nursing Nursing Staff Patients Pediatrics Physicians Surgery Text messaging |
title | Nighttime Calls, Pages, and Interruptions to the On-Call Surgery Resident |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-21T18%3A23%3A12IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Nighttime%20Calls,%20Pages,%20and%20Interruptions%20to%20the%20On-Call%20Surgery%20Resident&rft.jtitle=The%20American%20surgeon&rft.au=Parrado,%20Raphael%20H.&rft.date=2022-06-01&rft.volume=88&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=1181&rft.epage=1186&rft.pages=1181-1186&rft.issn=0003-1348&rft.eissn=1555-9823&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/0003134821991987&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2669994848%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c473t-5ff9b088719ad13add67ffa8fcc466a6d1e0eea9d29bb13c1cee677502eed49b3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2669994848&rft_id=info:pmid/33522262&rft_sage_id=10.1177_0003134821991987&rfr_iscdi=true |