Diurnal Variability of the Planetary Albedo: An Appraisal with Satellite Measurements and General Circulation Models

This study addresses two aspects of the planetary albedo's diurnal cycle, the first of which refers to directional models of the planetary albedo. It is found that even for clear regions there appear to be deficiencies in our knowledge of how to model this quantity. Over land surfaces, for exam...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of climate 1988-03, Vol.1 (3), p.233-239
Main Authors: Potter, G. L., Cess, R. D., Minnis, P., Harrison, E. F., Ramanathan, V.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Aerosols
Albedo
Atmospheric circulation
Climate models
Cloud cover
Clouds
Earth, ocean, space
Exact sciences and technology
External geophysics
Geophysics
Meteorology
Ocean surface
Oceans
Planetary atmospheres
Radiative transfer. Solar radiation
Zenith
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:This study addresses two aspects of the planetary albedo's diurnal cycle, the first of which refers to directional models of the planetary albedo. It is found that even for clear regions there appear to be deficiencies in our knowledge of how to model this quantity. Over land surfaces, for example, Nimbus-7 data for the directional planetary albedo compare best with model calculations for which a Lambertian surface is assumed, despite ample evidence that the albedo of land surfaces is dependent upon solar zenith angle. Similarly, over ocean surfaces both GOES and Nimbus-7 data produce a weaker dependence of the planetary albedo upon solar zenith angle than would be suggested by model calculations. The second aspect of the study concerns a comparison of the diurnal amplitude factor, defined as the ratio of the diurnally averaged planetary albedo to that at noon, between two general circulation models (GCMs) and measurements made from a geostationary satellite (GOES). While these comparisons indicate reasonable consistency between the GCMs and the satellite measurements, this is due in part to compensating differences, such as an underestimate in cloud amount by a GCM being compensated for by a corresponding underestimate of the diurnal amplitude factor for overcast regions. The comparisons further underscore difficulties associated with converting local-time albedo measurements, as made from sun-synchronous satellites, to diurnally averaged albedos.
ISSN:0894-8755
1520-0442
DOI:10.1175/1520-0442(1988)001<0233:DVOTPA>2.0.CO;2