Test-Retest Reliability and Known-Groups Validity of Trunk Muscle Tests in People With Multiple Sclerosis: A Cross-Sectional, Case-Control Study

• Published in: Physical therapy 2021-05, Vol.101 (5)
• Main Authors: Moreno-Navarro, Pedro, Manca, Andrea, Martinez, Gianluca, Ventura, Lucia, Barbado, David, Vera-García, Francisco J, Deriu, Franca
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Endurance; Multiple sclerosis; Validity
• ISSN: 0031-9023; 1538-6724
• DOI: 10.1093/ptj/pzab049

Abstract Objective Research on muscle performance testing reliability in people with multiple sclerosis (MS) has focused on limb performance while less is known about trunk strength and endurance. This work aims to 1) establish test–retest reliability of trunk flexion, lateral flexion, and extension strength tests, and plank, side bridge, and Biering-Sørensen endurance tests in people with MS and matched healthy controls (HCs); 2) analyze known-groups validity of these tests in people with MS and HCs; 3) to compare groups for side-to-side differences; and 4) to describe the relationships between trunk performance and functional mobility tests. Methods Fifteen people with MS (median Expanded Disability Status Scale = 3) and 15 HCs underwent 2 trunk isometric strength and endurance testing sessions. Mobility was evaluated by Timed Up-and-Go test. Intraclass correlation coefficient, SEM, and minimal detectable change (MDC) were calculated. Between-group differences in trunk performance were tested using the t test for independent measures. Between-group differences in an asymmetry index were analyzed by independent t test. Bivariate correlations between trunk tests and mobility were also examined. Results All trunk tests showed good-to-excellent relative reliability in both groups (intraclass correlation coefficient > 0.71). Regarding absolute reliability, strength tests were associated with low intersession variability in both groups (MDC: MS, 11.23%–36.45%; HCs, 26.60%–31.98%). Conversely, endurance tests showed higher variability scores in people with MS (MDC: MS, 69.55%–116.50%; HCs, 29.57%–54.40%). People with MS displayed significantly lower trunk performance. Likewise, the asymmetry index showed significantly higher scores in people with MS for endurance assessment but not in strength tests. Significant correlations were detected in people with MS between Timed Up-and-Go and several trunk tests (r = 0.63–0.70). Conclusions SEM and MDC scores revealed similar consistency and variability between groups for strength tests, whereas higher variability was observed for endurance tests in people with MS. Trunk strength tests are reliable and present discriminant validity to distinguish mildly disabled people with MS from HCs. Conversely, the high measurement error and variability of the endurance tests may hinder their application in intervention programs. Impact Determining the reliability and validity of the tests currently used to assess trunk function is