Loading…

Trends in the use of administrative databases in urologic oncology: 2000–2019

•Utilization of administrative databases for research in urology has increased dramatically.•Prostate, kidney, and bladder are the most common malignancies studied using administrative databases.•Surveillance, epidemiology, and end results is the most frequently used database in urology. Administrat...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Urologic oncology 2021-08, Vol.39 (8), p.487-492
Main Authors: Leopold, Zev, Dave, Priya, Menon, Adarsh, Patel, Hiren V., Srivastava, Arnav, Kim, Isaac Y., Jang, Thomas L., Singer, Eric A.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c365t-ffd411f55ae9ac5de4635ca8146b371d2bc6ed86c61c1debec54e111358cddc33
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c365t-ffd411f55ae9ac5de4635ca8146b371d2bc6ed86c61c1debec54e111358cddc33
container_end_page 492
container_issue 8
container_start_page 487
container_title Urologic oncology
container_volume 39
creator Leopold, Zev
Dave, Priya
Menon, Adarsh
Patel, Hiren V.
Srivastava, Arnav
Kim, Isaac Y.
Jang, Thomas L.
Singer, Eric A.
description •Utilization of administrative databases for research in urology has increased dramatically.•Prostate, kidney, and bladder are the most common malignancies studied using administrative databases.•Surveillance, epidemiology, and end results is the most frequently used database in urology. Administrative databases (AD) provide investigators with nationally representative study populations to answer research questions using large sample sizes. We aimed to quantify the trends and incidence of AD use in published manuscripts in urologic oncology. We examined 6 commonly used databases: National Cancer Database, surveillance, epidemiology, and end results database (SEER), SEER-Medicare, Nationwide Inpatient Sample, National Surgical Quality Improvement Program, and Premier Healthcare Database. A literature review, powered by PubMed and DistillerSR, aggregated manuscripts that used the aforementioned databases to study a genitourinary malignancy between July 1, 2000 through June 30, 2019. Included publications were categorized by database used, corresponding author department affiliation, organ, journal, year, and contribution – defined as temporal treatment trends, outcomes and survival, comparative effectiveness research, or cost-effectiveness. There were 2,265 publications across 302 journals that met the inclusion criteria. Between 2000 and 2019 the compound annual growth rate of these publications was 18.7%. SEER use grew at a rate of 14.6% annually. National Cancer Database use grew 28.2% annually. Prostate cancer comprised the majority of publications (51.3%), followed by kidney (23.1%) and bladder (22.5%) cancer. Journals publishing these manuscripts had a median impact factor of 3.28 (IQR = 1.84–5.74) in 2019. Urologists published 52.5% of AD manuscripts over the study period. Our results show substantial growth in the use of ADs for the study of urologic oncology. Given the broad use of ADs, investigators and specialty societies should advocate for continued improvement in the data captured by them. [Display omitted]
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.urolonc.2021.01.014
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2487430149</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S1078143921000144</els_id><sourcerecordid>2487430149</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c365t-ffd411f55ae9ac5de4635ca8146b371d2bc6ed86c61c1debec54e111358cddc33</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkMtOwzAQRS0EoqXwCaAs2aR4YjsPNghVvKRK3ZS15dgTcJVHsZNK3fEP_CFfQtIWtkhXmrs4M1dzCbkEOgUK8c1q2rmmbGo9jWgEUzqIH5ExpAkLI57Fx72nSRoCZ9mInHm_oj2RApySEWNCQCTomCyWDmvjA1sH7TsGncegKQJlKltb3zrV2g0GRrUqVx532C72zeqgzx7c9jaIKKXfn18RheycnBSq9HhxmBPy-viwnD2H88XTy-x-HmoWizYsCsMBCiEUZkoLgzxmQqsUeJyzBEyU6xhNGusYNBjMUQuOAMBEqo3RjE3I9f7u2jUfHfpWVtZrLEtVY9N5GfE04ax_OOtRsUe1a7x3WMi1s5VyWwlUDl3KlTx0KYcuJR3E-72rQ0SXV2j-tn7L64G7PYD9oxuLTnptsdZorEPdStPYfyJ-AKNLiIk</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2487430149</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Trends in the use of administrative databases in urologic oncology: 2000–2019</title><source>ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Leopold, Zev ; Dave, Priya ; Menon, Adarsh ; Patel, Hiren V. ; Srivastava, Arnav ; Kim, Isaac Y. ; Jang, Thomas L. ; Singer, Eric A.</creator><creatorcontrib>Leopold, Zev ; Dave, Priya ; Menon, Adarsh ; Patel, Hiren V. ; Srivastava, Arnav ; Kim, Isaac Y. ; Jang, Thomas L. ; Singer, Eric A.</creatorcontrib><description>•Utilization of administrative databases for research in urology has increased dramatically.•Prostate, kidney, and bladder are the most common malignancies studied using administrative databases.•Surveillance, epidemiology, and end results is the most frequently used database in urology. Administrative databases (AD) provide investigators with nationally representative study populations to answer research questions using large sample sizes. We aimed to quantify the trends and incidence of AD use in published manuscripts in urologic oncology. We examined 6 commonly used databases: National Cancer Database, surveillance, epidemiology, and end results database (SEER), SEER-Medicare, Nationwide Inpatient Sample, National Surgical Quality Improvement Program, and Premier Healthcare Database. A literature review, powered by PubMed and DistillerSR, aggregated manuscripts that used the aforementioned databases to study a genitourinary malignancy between July 1, 2000 through June 30, 2019. Included publications were categorized by database used, corresponding author department affiliation, organ, journal, year, and contribution – defined as temporal treatment trends, outcomes and survival, comparative effectiveness research, or cost-effectiveness. There were 2,265 publications across 302 journals that met the inclusion criteria. Between 2000 and 2019 the compound annual growth rate of these publications was 18.7%. SEER use grew at a rate of 14.6% annually. National Cancer Database use grew 28.2% annually. Prostate cancer comprised the majority of publications (51.3%), followed by kidney (23.1%) and bladder (22.5%) cancer. Journals publishing these manuscripts had a median impact factor of 3.28 (IQR = 1.84–5.74) in 2019. Urologists published 52.5% of AD manuscripts over the study period. Our results show substantial growth in the use of ADs for the study of urologic oncology. Given the broad use of ADs, investigators and specialty societies should advocate for continued improvement in the data captured by them. [Display omitted]</description><identifier>ISSN: 1078-1439</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-2496</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2021.01.014</identifier><identifier>PMID: 33551250</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Administrative databases ; Databases, Factual - statistics &amp; numerical data ; Databases, Factual - trends ; Humans ; Periodicals as Topic - statistics &amp; numerical data ; Publications - trends ; Quality Improvement ; Research Design ; Trends ; Urologic Neoplasms - diagnosis ; Urologic Neoplasms - therapy ; Urologic oncology</subject><ispartof>Urologic oncology, 2021-08, Vol.39 (8), p.487-492</ispartof><rights>2021 Elsevier Inc.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c365t-ffd411f55ae9ac5de4635ca8146b371d2bc6ed86c61c1debec54e111358cddc33</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c365t-ffd411f55ae9ac5de4635ca8146b371d2bc6ed86c61c1debec54e111358cddc33</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,27905,27906</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33551250$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Leopold, Zev</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dave, Priya</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Menon, Adarsh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Patel, Hiren V.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Srivastava, Arnav</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Isaac Y.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jang, Thomas L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Singer, Eric A.</creatorcontrib><title>Trends in the use of administrative databases in urologic oncology: 2000–2019</title><title>Urologic oncology</title><addtitle>Urol Oncol</addtitle><description>•Utilization of administrative databases for research in urology has increased dramatically.•Prostate, kidney, and bladder are the most common malignancies studied using administrative databases.•Surveillance, epidemiology, and end results is the most frequently used database in urology. Administrative databases (AD) provide investigators with nationally representative study populations to answer research questions using large sample sizes. We aimed to quantify the trends and incidence of AD use in published manuscripts in urologic oncology. We examined 6 commonly used databases: National Cancer Database, surveillance, epidemiology, and end results database (SEER), SEER-Medicare, Nationwide Inpatient Sample, National Surgical Quality Improvement Program, and Premier Healthcare Database. A literature review, powered by PubMed and DistillerSR, aggregated manuscripts that used the aforementioned databases to study a genitourinary malignancy between July 1, 2000 through June 30, 2019. Included publications were categorized by database used, corresponding author department affiliation, organ, journal, year, and contribution – defined as temporal treatment trends, outcomes and survival, comparative effectiveness research, or cost-effectiveness. There were 2,265 publications across 302 journals that met the inclusion criteria. Between 2000 and 2019 the compound annual growth rate of these publications was 18.7%. SEER use grew at a rate of 14.6% annually. National Cancer Database use grew 28.2% annually. Prostate cancer comprised the majority of publications (51.3%), followed by kidney (23.1%) and bladder (22.5%) cancer. Journals publishing these manuscripts had a median impact factor of 3.28 (IQR = 1.84–5.74) in 2019. Urologists published 52.5% of AD manuscripts over the study period. Our results show substantial growth in the use of ADs for the study of urologic oncology. Given the broad use of ADs, investigators and specialty societies should advocate for continued improvement in the data captured by them. [Display omitted]</description><subject>Administrative databases</subject><subject>Databases, Factual - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Databases, Factual - trends</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Periodicals as Topic - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Publications - trends</subject><subject>Quality Improvement</subject><subject>Research Design</subject><subject>Trends</subject><subject>Urologic Neoplasms - diagnosis</subject><subject>Urologic Neoplasms - therapy</subject><subject>Urologic oncology</subject><issn>1078-1439</issn><issn>1873-2496</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkMtOwzAQRS0EoqXwCaAs2aR4YjsPNghVvKRK3ZS15dgTcJVHsZNK3fEP_CFfQtIWtkhXmrs4M1dzCbkEOgUK8c1q2rmmbGo9jWgEUzqIH5ExpAkLI57Fx72nSRoCZ9mInHm_oj2RApySEWNCQCTomCyWDmvjA1sH7TsGncegKQJlKltb3zrV2g0GRrUqVx532C72zeqgzx7c9jaIKKXfn18RheycnBSq9HhxmBPy-viwnD2H88XTy-x-HmoWizYsCsMBCiEUZkoLgzxmQqsUeJyzBEyU6xhNGusYNBjMUQuOAMBEqo3RjE3I9f7u2jUfHfpWVtZrLEtVY9N5GfE04ax_OOtRsUe1a7x3WMi1s5VyWwlUDl3KlTx0KYcuJR3E-72rQ0SXV2j-tn7L64G7PYD9oxuLTnptsdZorEPdStPYfyJ-AKNLiIk</recordid><startdate>202108</startdate><enddate>202108</enddate><creator>Leopold, Zev</creator><creator>Dave, Priya</creator><creator>Menon, Adarsh</creator><creator>Patel, Hiren V.</creator><creator>Srivastava, Arnav</creator><creator>Kim, Isaac Y.</creator><creator>Jang, Thomas L.</creator><creator>Singer, Eric A.</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>202108</creationdate><title>Trends in the use of administrative databases in urologic oncology: 2000–2019</title><author>Leopold, Zev ; Dave, Priya ; Menon, Adarsh ; Patel, Hiren V. ; Srivastava, Arnav ; Kim, Isaac Y. ; Jang, Thomas L. ; Singer, Eric A.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c365t-ffd411f55ae9ac5de4635ca8146b371d2bc6ed86c61c1debec54e111358cddc33</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Administrative databases</topic><topic>Databases, Factual - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Databases, Factual - trends</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Periodicals as Topic - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Publications - trends</topic><topic>Quality Improvement</topic><topic>Research Design</topic><topic>Trends</topic><topic>Urologic Neoplasms - diagnosis</topic><topic>Urologic Neoplasms - therapy</topic><topic>Urologic oncology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Leopold, Zev</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dave, Priya</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Menon, Adarsh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Patel, Hiren V.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Srivastava, Arnav</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Isaac Y.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jang, Thomas L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Singer, Eric A.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Urologic oncology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Leopold, Zev</au><au>Dave, Priya</au><au>Menon, Adarsh</au><au>Patel, Hiren V.</au><au>Srivastava, Arnav</au><au>Kim, Isaac Y.</au><au>Jang, Thomas L.</au><au>Singer, Eric A.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Trends in the use of administrative databases in urologic oncology: 2000–2019</atitle><jtitle>Urologic oncology</jtitle><addtitle>Urol Oncol</addtitle><date>2021-08</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>39</volume><issue>8</issue><spage>487</spage><epage>492</epage><pages>487-492</pages><issn>1078-1439</issn><eissn>1873-2496</eissn><abstract>•Utilization of administrative databases for research in urology has increased dramatically.•Prostate, kidney, and bladder are the most common malignancies studied using administrative databases.•Surveillance, epidemiology, and end results is the most frequently used database in urology. Administrative databases (AD) provide investigators with nationally representative study populations to answer research questions using large sample sizes. We aimed to quantify the trends and incidence of AD use in published manuscripts in urologic oncology. We examined 6 commonly used databases: National Cancer Database, surveillance, epidemiology, and end results database (SEER), SEER-Medicare, Nationwide Inpatient Sample, National Surgical Quality Improvement Program, and Premier Healthcare Database. A literature review, powered by PubMed and DistillerSR, aggregated manuscripts that used the aforementioned databases to study a genitourinary malignancy between July 1, 2000 through June 30, 2019. Included publications were categorized by database used, corresponding author department affiliation, organ, journal, year, and contribution – defined as temporal treatment trends, outcomes and survival, comparative effectiveness research, or cost-effectiveness. There were 2,265 publications across 302 journals that met the inclusion criteria. Between 2000 and 2019 the compound annual growth rate of these publications was 18.7%. SEER use grew at a rate of 14.6% annually. National Cancer Database use grew 28.2% annually. Prostate cancer comprised the majority of publications (51.3%), followed by kidney (23.1%) and bladder (22.5%) cancer. Journals publishing these manuscripts had a median impact factor of 3.28 (IQR = 1.84–5.74) in 2019. Urologists published 52.5% of AD manuscripts over the study period. Our results show substantial growth in the use of ADs for the study of urologic oncology. Given the broad use of ADs, investigators and specialty societies should advocate for continued improvement in the data captured by them. [Display omitted]</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>33551250</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.urolonc.2021.01.014</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1078-1439
ispartof Urologic oncology, 2021-08, Vol.39 (8), p.487-492
issn 1078-1439
1873-2496
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2487430149
source ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Administrative databases
Databases, Factual - statistics & numerical data
Databases, Factual - trends
Humans
Periodicals as Topic - statistics & numerical data
Publications - trends
Quality Improvement
Research Design
Trends
Urologic Neoplasms - diagnosis
Urologic Neoplasms - therapy
Urologic oncology
title Trends in the use of administrative databases in urologic oncology: 2000–2019
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-20T05%3A22%3A02IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Trends%20in%20the%20use%20of%20administrative%20databases%20in%20urologic%20oncology:%202000%E2%80%932019&rft.jtitle=Urologic%20oncology&rft.au=Leopold,%20Zev&rft.date=2021-08&rft.volume=39&rft.issue=8&rft.spage=487&rft.epage=492&rft.pages=487-492&rft.issn=1078-1439&rft.eissn=1873-2496&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.urolonc.2021.01.014&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2487430149%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c365t-ffd411f55ae9ac5de4635ca8146b371d2bc6ed86c61c1debec54e111358cddc33%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2487430149&rft_id=info:pmid/33551250&rfr_iscdi=true