Loading…

Classification and prognostic factors of residual symptoms after minimally invasive lumbar decompression surgery using a cluster analysis: a 5-year follow-up cohort study

Purpose Residual symptoms indicating incomplete remission of lower leg numbness or low back pain may occur after spine surgery. The purpose was to elucidate the pattern of residual symptoms 5 years after minimally invasive lumbar decompression surgery using a cluster analysis. Methods The study comp...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:European spine journal 2021-04, Vol.30 (4), p.918-927
Main Authors: Toyoda, Hiromitsu, Yamada, Kentaro, Terai, Hidetomi, Hoshino, Masatoshi, Suzuki, Akinobu, Takahashi, Shinji, Tamai, Koji, Ohyama, Shoichiro, Hori, Yusuke, Yabu, Akito, Salimi, Hamidullah, Nakamura, Hiroaki
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c463t-360515136a5db8009c7397820622cc15c1f5c71b4e717b32c09ffb5f1b50e8a13
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c463t-360515136a5db8009c7397820622cc15c1f5c71b4e717b32c09ffb5f1b50e8a13
container_end_page 927
container_issue 4
container_start_page 918
container_title European spine journal
container_volume 30
creator Toyoda, Hiromitsu
Yamada, Kentaro
Terai, Hidetomi
Hoshino, Masatoshi
Suzuki, Akinobu
Takahashi, Shinji
Tamai, Koji
Ohyama, Shoichiro
Hori, Yusuke
Yabu, Akito
Salimi, Hamidullah
Nakamura, Hiroaki
description Purpose Residual symptoms indicating incomplete remission of lower leg numbness or low back pain may occur after spine surgery. The purpose was to elucidate the pattern of residual symptoms 5 years after minimally invasive lumbar decompression surgery using a cluster analysis. Methods The study comprised 193 patients with lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) (108 men, 85 women) ranging in age from 40 to 86 years (mean, 67.9 years). Each patient underwent 5-year follow-up. The Japanese Orthopedic Association score and visual analog scale scores for low back pain, leg pain, and leg numbness at 5 years were entered into the cluster analysis to characterize postoperative residual symptoms. Other clinical data were analyzed to detect the factors significantly related to each cluster. Results The analysis yielded four clusters representing different patterns of residual symptoms. Patients in cluster 1 (57.0%) were substantially improved and had few residual symptoms of LSS. Patients in cluster 2 (11.4%) were poorly improved and had major residual symptoms. Patients in cluster 3 (17.6%) were greatly improved but had mild residual low back pain. Patients in cluster 4 (14.0%) were improved but had severe residual leg numbness. Prognostic factors of cluster 2 were a short maximum walking distance, motor weakness, resting lower leg numbness, cofounding scoliosis, and high sagittal vertical axis. Conclusions This is the first study to identify specific patterns of residual symptoms of LSS after decompression surgery. Our results will contribute to acquisition of preoperative informed consent and identification of patients with the best chance of postoperative improvement.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s00586-021-06754-y
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2487430568</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2487430568</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c463t-360515136a5db8009c7397820622cc15c1f5c71b4e717b32c09ffb5f1b50e8a13</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kcGO1SAUhonROHdGX8CFIXHjBj2UAq07c6OOySRudN1QClcmtFw5ZUxfyaeU6x01ceGKBL7_J-d8hDzj8IoD6NcIIDvFoOEMlJYt2x6QHW9Fw6AXzUOyg74FpjTvL8gl4i0Alz2ox-RCCCmlUGpHfuyjQQw-WLOGtFCzTPSY02FJuAZLvbFrykiTp9lhmIqJFLf5uKYZqfGry3QOS5hNjBsNy53BcOdoLPNoMp2cTfOx5vDUjCUfXN5owbAcqKE2FjzlzWLihgHf1DvJNleDPsWYvrNypDZ9TXmluJZpe0IeeRPRPb0_r8iX9-8-76_ZzacPH_dvb5htlViZUCC55EIZOY0dQG-16HXXgGoaa7m03Eur-dg6zfUoGgu996P0fJTgOsPFFXl57q17-FYcrsMc0LoYzeJSwaFpO90KkKqr6It_0NtUch2oUhJ0V_20faWaM2VzQszOD8dcV5a3gcNwMjmcTQ7V5PDL5LDV0PP76jLObvoT-a2uAuIMYH1a6mr__v2f2p-vu61n</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2507805849</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Classification and prognostic factors of residual symptoms after minimally invasive lumbar decompression surgery using a cluster analysis: a 5-year follow-up cohort study</title><source>Springer Nature</source><creator>Toyoda, Hiromitsu ; Yamada, Kentaro ; Terai, Hidetomi ; Hoshino, Masatoshi ; Suzuki, Akinobu ; Takahashi, Shinji ; Tamai, Koji ; Ohyama, Shoichiro ; Hori, Yusuke ; Yabu, Akito ; Salimi, Hamidullah ; Nakamura, Hiroaki</creator><creatorcontrib>Toyoda, Hiromitsu ; Yamada, Kentaro ; Terai, Hidetomi ; Hoshino, Masatoshi ; Suzuki, Akinobu ; Takahashi, Shinji ; Tamai, Koji ; Ohyama, Shoichiro ; Hori, Yusuke ; Yabu, Akito ; Salimi, Hamidullah ; Nakamura, Hiroaki</creatorcontrib><description>Purpose Residual symptoms indicating incomplete remission of lower leg numbness or low back pain may occur after spine surgery. The purpose was to elucidate the pattern of residual symptoms 5 years after minimally invasive lumbar decompression surgery using a cluster analysis. Methods The study comprised 193 patients with lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) (108 men, 85 women) ranging in age from 40 to 86 years (mean, 67.9 years). Each patient underwent 5-year follow-up. The Japanese Orthopedic Association score and visual analog scale scores for low back pain, leg pain, and leg numbness at 5 years were entered into the cluster analysis to characterize postoperative residual symptoms. Other clinical data were analyzed to detect the factors significantly related to each cluster. Results The analysis yielded four clusters representing different patterns of residual symptoms. Patients in cluster 1 (57.0%) were substantially improved and had few residual symptoms of LSS. Patients in cluster 2 (11.4%) were poorly improved and had major residual symptoms. Patients in cluster 3 (17.6%) were greatly improved but had mild residual low back pain. Patients in cluster 4 (14.0%) were improved but had severe residual leg numbness. Prognostic factors of cluster 2 were a short maximum walking distance, motor weakness, resting lower leg numbness, cofounding scoliosis, and high sagittal vertical axis. Conclusions This is the first study to identify specific patterns of residual symptoms of LSS after decompression surgery. Our results will contribute to acquisition of preoperative informed consent and identification of patients with the best chance of postoperative improvement.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0940-6719</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1432-0932</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s00586-021-06754-y</identifier><identifier>PMID: 33555366</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg</publisher><subject>Back pain ; Bone surgery ; Cluster analysis ; Cohort analysis ; Decompression ; Leg ; Low back pain ; Medicine ; Medicine &amp; Public Health ; Neck ; Neurosurgery ; Original Article ; Patients ; Remission ; Scoliosis ; Spinal stenosis ; Spine (lumbar) ; Surgery ; Surgical Orthopedics ; Walking</subject><ispartof>European spine journal, 2021-04, Vol.30 (4), p.918-927</ispartof><rights>The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH, DE part of Springer Nature 2021</rights><rights>The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH, DE part of Springer Nature 2021.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c463t-360515136a5db8009c7397820622cc15c1f5c71b4e717b32c09ffb5f1b50e8a13</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c463t-360515136a5db8009c7397820622cc15c1f5c71b4e717b32c09ffb5f1b50e8a13</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-3126-0046</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27923,27924</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33555366$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Toyoda, Hiromitsu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yamada, Kentaro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Terai, Hidetomi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hoshino, Masatoshi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Suzuki, Akinobu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Takahashi, Shinji</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tamai, Koji</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ohyama, Shoichiro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hori, Yusuke</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yabu, Akito</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Salimi, Hamidullah</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nakamura, Hiroaki</creatorcontrib><title>Classification and prognostic factors of residual symptoms after minimally invasive lumbar decompression surgery using a cluster analysis: a 5-year follow-up cohort study</title><title>European spine journal</title><addtitle>Eur Spine J</addtitle><addtitle>Eur Spine J</addtitle><description>Purpose Residual symptoms indicating incomplete remission of lower leg numbness or low back pain may occur after spine surgery. The purpose was to elucidate the pattern of residual symptoms 5 years after minimally invasive lumbar decompression surgery using a cluster analysis. Methods The study comprised 193 patients with lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) (108 men, 85 women) ranging in age from 40 to 86 years (mean, 67.9 years). Each patient underwent 5-year follow-up. The Japanese Orthopedic Association score and visual analog scale scores for low back pain, leg pain, and leg numbness at 5 years were entered into the cluster analysis to characterize postoperative residual symptoms. Other clinical data were analyzed to detect the factors significantly related to each cluster. Results The analysis yielded four clusters representing different patterns of residual symptoms. Patients in cluster 1 (57.0%) were substantially improved and had few residual symptoms of LSS. Patients in cluster 2 (11.4%) were poorly improved and had major residual symptoms. Patients in cluster 3 (17.6%) were greatly improved but had mild residual low back pain. Patients in cluster 4 (14.0%) were improved but had severe residual leg numbness. Prognostic factors of cluster 2 were a short maximum walking distance, motor weakness, resting lower leg numbness, cofounding scoliosis, and high sagittal vertical axis. Conclusions This is the first study to identify specific patterns of residual symptoms of LSS after decompression surgery. Our results will contribute to acquisition of preoperative informed consent and identification of patients with the best chance of postoperative improvement.</description><subject>Back pain</subject><subject>Bone surgery</subject><subject>Cluster analysis</subject><subject>Cohort analysis</subject><subject>Decompression</subject><subject>Leg</subject><subject>Low back pain</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine &amp; Public Health</subject><subject>Neck</subject><subject>Neurosurgery</subject><subject>Original Article</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Remission</subject><subject>Scoliosis</subject><subject>Spinal stenosis</subject><subject>Spine (lumbar)</subject><subject>Surgery</subject><subject>Surgical Orthopedics</subject><subject>Walking</subject><issn>0940-6719</issn><issn>1432-0932</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kcGO1SAUhonROHdGX8CFIXHjBj2UAq07c6OOySRudN1QClcmtFw5ZUxfyaeU6x01ceGKBL7_J-d8hDzj8IoD6NcIIDvFoOEMlJYt2x6QHW9Fw6AXzUOyg74FpjTvL8gl4i0Alz2ox-RCCCmlUGpHfuyjQQw-WLOGtFCzTPSY02FJuAZLvbFrykiTp9lhmIqJFLf5uKYZqfGry3QOS5hNjBsNy53BcOdoLPNoMp2cTfOx5vDUjCUfXN5owbAcqKE2FjzlzWLihgHf1DvJNleDPsWYvrNypDZ9TXmluJZpe0IeeRPRPb0_r8iX9-8-76_ZzacPH_dvb5htlViZUCC55EIZOY0dQG-16HXXgGoaa7m03Eur-dg6zfUoGgu996P0fJTgOsPFFXl57q17-FYcrsMc0LoYzeJSwaFpO90KkKqr6It_0NtUch2oUhJ0V_20faWaM2VzQszOD8dcV5a3gcNwMjmcTQ7V5PDL5LDV0PP76jLObvoT-a2uAuIMYH1a6mr__v2f2p-vu61n</recordid><startdate>20210401</startdate><enddate>20210401</enddate><creator>Toyoda, Hiromitsu</creator><creator>Yamada, Kentaro</creator><creator>Terai, Hidetomi</creator><creator>Hoshino, Masatoshi</creator><creator>Suzuki, Akinobu</creator><creator>Takahashi, Shinji</creator><creator>Tamai, Koji</creator><creator>Ohyama, Shoichiro</creator><creator>Hori, Yusuke</creator><creator>Yabu, Akito</creator><creator>Salimi, Hamidullah</creator><creator>Nakamura, Hiroaki</creator><general>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3126-0046</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20210401</creationdate><title>Classification and prognostic factors of residual symptoms after minimally invasive lumbar decompression surgery using a cluster analysis: a 5-year follow-up cohort study</title><author>Toyoda, Hiromitsu ; Yamada, Kentaro ; Terai, Hidetomi ; Hoshino, Masatoshi ; Suzuki, Akinobu ; Takahashi, Shinji ; Tamai, Koji ; Ohyama, Shoichiro ; Hori, Yusuke ; Yabu, Akito ; Salimi, Hamidullah ; Nakamura, Hiroaki</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c463t-360515136a5db8009c7397820622cc15c1f5c71b4e717b32c09ffb5f1b50e8a13</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Back pain</topic><topic>Bone surgery</topic><topic>Cluster analysis</topic><topic>Cohort analysis</topic><topic>Decompression</topic><topic>Leg</topic><topic>Low back pain</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine &amp; Public Health</topic><topic>Neck</topic><topic>Neurosurgery</topic><topic>Original Article</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Remission</topic><topic>Scoliosis</topic><topic>Spinal stenosis</topic><topic>Spine (lumbar)</topic><topic>Surgery</topic><topic>Surgical Orthopedics</topic><topic>Walking</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Toyoda, Hiromitsu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yamada, Kentaro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Terai, Hidetomi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hoshino, Masatoshi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Suzuki, Akinobu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Takahashi, Shinji</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tamai, Koji</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ohyama, Shoichiro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hori, Yusuke</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yabu, Akito</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Salimi, Hamidullah</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nakamura, Hiroaki</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Calcium &amp; Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>European spine journal</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Toyoda, Hiromitsu</au><au>Yamada, Kentaro</au><au>Terai, Hidetomi</au><au>Hoshino, Masatoshi</au><au>Suzuki, Akinobu</au><au>Takahashi, Shinji</au><au>Tamai, Koji</au><au>Ohyama, Shoichiro</au><au>Hori, Yusuke</au><au>Yabu, Akito</au><au>Salimi, Hamidullah</au><au>Nakamura, Hiroaki</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Classification and prognostic factors of residual symptoms after minimally invasive lumbar decompression surgery using a cluster analysis: a 5-year follow-up cohort study</atitle><jtitle>European spine journal</jtitle><stitle>Eur Spine J</stitle><addtitle>Eur Spine J</addtitle><date>2021-04-01</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>30</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>918</spage><epage>927</epage><pages>918-927</pages><issn>0940-6719</issn><eissn>1432-0932</eissn><abstract>Purpose Residual symptoms indicating incomplete remission of lower leg numbness or low back pain may occur after spine surgery. The purpose was to elucidate the pattern of residual symptoms 5 years after minimally invasive lumbar decompression surgery using a cluster analysis. Methods The study comprised 193 patients with lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) (108 men, 85 women) ranging in age from 40 to 86 years (mean, 67.9 years). Each patient underwent 5-year follow-up. The Japanese Orthopedic Association score and visual analog scale scores for low back pain, leg pain, and leg numbness at 5 years were entered into the cluster analysis to characterize postoperative residual symptoms. Other clinical data were analyzed to detect the factors significantly related to each cluster. Results The analysis yielded four clusters representing different patterns of residual symptoms. Patients in cluster 1 (57.0%) were substantially improved and had few residual symptoms of LSS. Patients in cluster 2 (11.4%) were poorly improved and had major residual symptoms. Patients in cluster 3 (17.6%) were greatly improved but had mild residual low back pain. Patients in cluster 4 (14.0%) were improved but had severe residual leg numbness. Prognostic factors of cluster 2 were a short maximum walking distance, motor weakness, resting lower leg numbness, cofounding scoliosis, and high sagittal vertical axis. Conclusions This is the first study to identify specific patterns of residual symptoms of LSS after decompression surgery. Our results will contribute to acquisition of preoperative informed consent and identification of patients with the best chance of postoperative improvement.</abstract><cop>Berlin/Heidelberg</cop><pub>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</pub><pmid>33555366</pmid><doi>10.1007/s00586-021-06754-y</doi><tpages>10</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3126-0046</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0940-6719
ispartof European spine journal, 2021-04, Vol.30 (4), p.918-927
issn 0940-6719
1432-0932
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2487430568
source Springer Nature
subjects Back pain
Bone surgery
Cluster analysis
Cohort analysis
Decompression
Leg
Low back pain
Medicine
Medicine & Public Health
Neck
Neurosurgery
Original Article
Patients
Remission
Scoliosis
Spinal stenosis
Spine (lumbar)
Surgery
Surgical Orthopedics
Walking
title Classification and prognostic factors of residual symptoms after minimally invasive lumbar decompression surgery using a cluster analysis: a 5-year follow-up cohort study
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-08T18%3A38%3A37IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Classification%20and%20prognostic%20factors%20of%20residual%20symptoms%20after%20minimally%20invasive%20lumbar%20decompression%20surgery%20using%20a%20cluster%20analysis:%20a%205-year%20follow-up%20cohort%20study&rft.jtitle=European%20spine%20journal&rft.au=Toyoda,%20Hiromitsu&rft.date=2021-04-01&rft.volume=30&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=918&rft.epage=927&rft.pages=918-927&rft.issn=0940-6719&rft.eissn=1432-0932&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s00586-021-06754-y&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2487430568%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c463t-360515136a5db8009c7397820622cc15c1f5c71b4e717b32c09ffb5f1b50e8a13%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2507805849&rft_id=info:pmid/33555366&rfr_iscdi=true