Loading…
Measuring adolescents’ beliefs in conspiracy theories: Development and validation of the Adolescent Conspiracy Beliefs Questionnaire (ACBQ)
Four studies (total n = 961) developed and validated the Adolescent Conspiracy Beliefs Questionnaire (ACBQ). Initial items were developed in collaboration with teachers. An exploratory factor analysis (Study 1, n = 208, aged 11–14) and a student focus group (N = 3, aged 11) enabled us to establish t...
Saved in:
Published in: | British journal of developmental psychology 2021-09, Vol.39 (3), p.499-520 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3938-8c340a4a56743dbc70a173627197289ff2a050480c895d0d22249b06d981fdbc3 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3938-8c340a4a56743dbc70a173627197289ff2a050480c895d0d22249b06d981fdbc3 |
container_end_page | 520 |
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 499 |
container_title | British journal of developmental psychology |
container_volume | 39 |
creator | Jolley, Daniel Douglas, Karen M. Skipper, Yvonne Thomas, Eleanor Cookson, Darel |
description | Four studies (total n = 961) developed and validated the Adolescent Conspiracy Beliefs Questionnaire (ACBQ). Initial items were developed in collaboration with teachers. An exploratory factor analysis (Study 1, n = 208, aged 11–14) and a student focus group (N = 3, aged 11) enabled us to establish the factor structure of a 9‐item scale. This was replicated via confirmatory factor analysis in Study 2 (N = 178, aged 11–17), and the scale displayed good convergent (i.e., relationship with paranoia and mistrust) and discriminant validity (i.e., no relationship with extraversion). Study 3a (N = 257) further tested convergent validity with a sample of 18‐year‐olds (i.e., relationship with adult‐validated measures of conspiracy beliefs) and demonstrated strong test–retest reliability. Study 3b (N = 318) replicated these findings with a mixed‐age adult sample. The ACBQ will allow researchers to explore the psychological antecedents and consequences of conspiracy thinking in young populations. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/bjdp.12368 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2487745418</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2487745418</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3938-8c340a4a56743dbc70a173627197289ff2a050480c895d0d22249b06d981fdbc3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp90U1u1DAch2ELUbVD2w0HQJbYlEop_kzs7mam0A-1gkogdWc5sQMeZexgT4pmxwV6AK7HSXA6Q5FYkI03j179lR8ALzE6wfl7Wy9Mf4IJLcUzMCGIsUJQfvccTBApccExutsDL1JaIIQpRWwX7FHKeSklmoCHG6vTEJ3_ArUJnU2N9av068dPWNvO2TZB52ETfOpd1M0arr7aEJ1Np_DM3tsu9MvsofYG3uvOGb1ywcPQjg5On4Jw_rcw23ZvB5tG7bWLFh5N57PbNwdgp9Vdsofbdx98fv_u0_yiuP5wfjmfXhcNlVQUoqEMaaZ5WTFq6qZCGle0JBWWFRGybYlGHDGBGiG5QYYQwmSNSiMFbrOn--Bo0-1j-DbeoZYuH9p12tswJEWYqCrGGRaZvv6HLsIQfb5OEc5l_qcV51kdb1QTQ0rRtqqPbqnjWmGkxpHUOJJ6HCnjV9vkUC-teaJ_VskAb8B319n1f1JqdnX2cRP9DfOqndU</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2559001755</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Measuring adolescents’ beliefs in conspiracy theories: Development and validation of the Adolescent Conspiracy Beliefs Questionnaire (ACBQ)</title><source>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</source><source>Wiley-Blackwell Read & Publish Collection</source><creator>Jolley, Daniel ; Douglas, Karen M. ; Skipper, Yvonne ; Thomas, Eleanor ; Cookson, Darel</creator><creatorcontrib>Jolley, Daniel ; Douglas, Karen M. ; Skipper, Yvonne ; Thomas, Eleanor ; Cookson, Darel</creatorcontrib><description>Four studies (total n = 961) developed and validated the Adolescent Conspiracy Beliefs Questionnaire (ACBQ). Initial items were developed in collaboration with teachers. An exploratory factor analysis (Study 1, n = 208, aged 11–14) and a student focus group (N = 3, aged 11) enabled us to establish the factor structure of a 9‐item scale. This was replicated via confirmatory factor analysis in Study 2 (N = 178, aged 11–17), and the scale displayed good convergent (i.e., relationship with paranoia and mistrust) and discriminant validity (i.e., no relationship with extraversion). Study 3a (N = 257) further tested convergent validity with a sample of 18‐year‐olds (i.e., relationship with adult‐validated measures of conspiracy beliefs) and demonstrated strong test–retest reliability. Study 3b (N = 318) replicated these findings with a mixed‐age adult sample. The ACBQ will allow researchers to explore the psychological antecedents and consequences of conspiracy thinking in young populations.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0261-510X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2044-835X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/bjdp.12368</identifier><identifier>PMID: 33556990</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</publisher><subject>adolescence ; Adolescents ; Confirmatory factor analysis ; Conspiracy ; conspiracy beliefs ; conspiracy theories ; Convergent validity ; Discriminant validity ; Exploratory factor analysis ; Extraversion ; Paranoia ; Questionnaires ; Reliability ; sale construction ; Teachers ; validation</subject><ispartof>British journal of developmental psychology, 2021-09, Vol.39 (3), p.499-520</ispartof><rights>2021 The Authors. published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of British Psychological Society.</rights><rights>2021 The Authors. British Journal of Developmental Psychology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of British Psychological Society.</rights><rights>2021. This article is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3938-8c340a4a56743dbc70a173627197289ff2a050480c895d0d22249b06d981fdbc3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3938-8c340a4a56743dbc70a173627197289ff2a050480c895d0d22249b06d981fdbc3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-0381-6924 ; 0000-0001-7011-3439 ; 0000-0001-7232-8599</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,30999,33223</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33556990$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Jolley, Daniel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Douglas, Karen M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Skipper, Yvonne</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thomas, Eleanor</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cookson, Darel</creatorcontrib><title>Measuring adolescents’ beliefs in conspiracy theories: Development and validation of the Adolescent Conspiracy Beliefs Questionnaire (ACBQ)</title><title>British journal of developmental psychology</title><addtitle>Br J Dev Psychol</addtitle><description>Four studies (total n = 961) developed and validated the Adolescent Conspiracy Beliefs Questionnaire (ACBQ). Initial items were developed in collaboration with teachers. An exploratory factor analysis (Study 1, n = 208, aged 11–14) and a student focus group (N = 3, aged 11) enabled us to establish the factor structure of a 9‐item scale. This was replicated via confirmatory factor analysis in Study 2 (N = 178, aged 11–17), and the scale displayed good convergent (i.e., relationship with paranoia and mistrust) and discriminant validity (i.e., no relationship with extraversion). Study 3a (N = 257) further tested convergent validity with a sample of 18‐year‐olds (i.e., relationship with adult‐validated measures of conspiracy beliefs) and demonstrated strong test–retest reliability. Study 3b (N = 318) replicated these findings with a mixed‐age adult sample. The ACBQ will allow researchers to explore the psychological antecedents and consequences of conspiracy thinking in young populations.</description><subject>adolescence</subject><subject>Adolescents</subject><subject>Confirmatory factor analysis</subject><subject>Conspiracy</subject><subject>conspiracy beliefs</subject><subject>conspiracy theories</subject><subject>Convergent validity</subject><subject>Discriminant validity</subject><subject>Exploratory factor analysis</subject><subject>Extraversion</subject><subject>Paranoia</subject><subject>Questionnaires</subject><subject>Reliability</subject><subject>sale construction</subject><subject>Teachers</subject><subject>validation</subject><issn>0261-510X</issn><issn>2044-835X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>24P</sourceid><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><sourceid>8BJ</sourceid><recordid>eNp90U1u1DAch2ELUbVD2w0HQJbYlEop_kzs7mam0A-1gkogdWc5sQMeZexgT4pmxwV6AK7HSXA6Q5FYkI03j179lR8ALzE6wfl7Wy9Mf4IJLcUzMCGIsUJQfvccTBApccExutsDL1JaIIQpRWwX7FHKeSklmoCHG6vTEJ3_ArUJnU2N9av068dPWNvO2TZB52ETfOpd1M0arr7aEJ1Np_DM3tsu9MvsofYG3uvOGb1ywcPQjg5On4Jw_rcw23ZvB5tG7bWLFh5N57PbNwdgp9Vdsofbdx98fv_u0_yiuP5wfjmfXhcNlVQUoqEMaaZ5WTFq6qZCGle0JBWWFRGybYlGHDGBGiG5QYYQwmSNSiMFbrOn--Bo0-1j-DbeoZYuH9p12tswJEWYqCrGGRaZvv6HLsIQfb5OEc5l_qcV51kdb1QTQ0rRtqqPbqnjWmGkxpHUOJJ6HCnjV9vkUC-teaJ_VskAb8B319n1f1JqdnX2cRP9DfOqndU</recordid><startdate>202109</startdate><enddate>202109</enddate><creator>Jolley, Daniel</creator><creator>Douglas, Karen M.</creator><creator>Skipper, Yvonne</creator><creator>Thomas, Eleanor</creator><creator>Cookson, Darel</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>24P</scope><scope>WIN</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0381-6924</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7011-3439</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7232-8599</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202109</creationdate><title>Measuring adolescents’ beliefs in conspiracy theories: Development and validation of the Adolescent Conspiracy Beliefs Questionnaire (ACBQ)</title><author>Jolley, Daniel ; Douglas, Karen M. ; Skipper, Yvonne ; Thomas, Eleanor ; Cookson, Darel</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3938-8c340a4a56743dbc70a173627197289ff2a050480c895d0d22249b06d981fdbc3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>adolescence</topic><topic>Adolescents</topic><topic>Confirmatory factor analysis</topic><topic>Conspiracy</topic><topic>conspiracy beliefs</topic><topic>conspiracy theories</topic><topic>Convergent validity</topic><topic>Discriminant validity</topic><topic>Exploratory factor analysis</topic><topic>Extraversion</topic><topic>Paranoia</topic><topic>Questionnaires</topic><topic>Reliability</topic><topic>sale construction</topic><topic>Teachers</topic><topic>validation</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Jolley, Daniel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Douglas, Karen M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Skipper, Yvonne</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thomas, Eleanor</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cookson, Darel</creatorcontrib><collection>Wiley Online Library Open Access</collection><collection>Wiley Open Access</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>British journal of developmental psychology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Jolley, Daniel</au><au>Douglas, Karen M.</au><au>Skipper, Yvonne</au><au>Thomas, Eleanor</au><au>Cookson, Darel</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Measuring adolescents’ beliefs in conspiracy theories: Development and validation of the Adolescent Conspiracy Beliefs Questionnaire (ACBQ)</atitle><jtitle>British journal of developmental psychology</jtitle><addtitle>Br J Dev Psychol</addtitle><date>2021-09</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>39</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>499</spage><epage>520</epage><pages>499-520</pages><issn>0261-510X</issn><eissn>2044-835X</eissn><abstract>Four studies (total n = 961) developed and validated the Adolescent Conspiracy Beliefs Questionnaire (ACBQ). Initial items were developed in collaboration with teachers. An exploratory factor analysis (Study 1, n = 208, aged 11–14) and a student focus group (N = 3, aged 11) enabled us to establish the factor structure of a 9‐item scale. This was replicated via confirmatory factor analysis in Study 2 (N = 178, aged 11–17), and the scale displayed good convergent (i.e., relationship with paranoia and mistrust) and discriminant validity (i.e., no relationship with extraversion). Study 3a (N = 257) further tested convergent validity with a sample of 18‐year‐olds (i.e., relationship with adult‐validated measures of conspiracy beliefs) and demonstrated strong test–retest reliability. Study 3b (N = 318) replicated these findings with a mixed‐age adult sample. The ACBQ will allow researchers to explore the psychological antecedents and consequences of conspiracy thinking in young populations.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</pub><pmid>33556990</pmid><doi>10.1111/bjdp.12368</doi><tpages>22</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0381-6924</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7011-3439</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7232-8599</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0261-510X |
ispartof | British journal of developmental psychology, 2021-09, Vol.39 (3), p.499-520 |
issn | 0261-510X 2044-835X |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2487745418 |
source | Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS); Wiley-Blackwell Read & Publish Collection |
subjects | adolescence Adolescents Confirmatory factor analysis Conspiracy conspiracy beliefs conspiracy theories Convergent validity Discriminant validity Exploratory factor analysis Extraversion Paranoia Questionnaires Reliability sale construction Teachers validation |
title | Measuring adolescents’ beliefs in conspiracy theories: Development and validation of the Adolescent Conspiracy Beliefs Questionnaire (ACBQ) |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-02T12%3A42%3A39IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Measuring%20adolescents%E2%80%99%20beliefs%20in%20conspiracy%20theories:%20Development%20and%20validation%20of%20the%20Adolescent%20Conspiracy%20Beliefs%20Questionnaire%20(ACBQ)&rft.jtitle=British%20journal%20of%20developmental%20psychology&rft.au=Jolley,%20Daniel&rft.date=2021-09&rft.volume=39&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=499&rft.epage=520&rft.pages=499-520&rft.issn=0261-510X&rft.eissn=2044-835X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/bjdp.12368&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2487745418%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3938-8c340a4a56743dbc70a173627197289ff2a050480c895d0d22249b06d981fdbc3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2559001755&rft_id=info:pmid/33556990&rfr_iscdi=true |