Loading…

Measuring adolescents’ beliefs in conspiracy theories: Development and validation of the Adolescent Conspiracy Beliefs Questionnaire (ACBQ)

Four studies (total n = 961) developed and validated the Adolescent Conspiracy Beliefs Questionnaire (ACBQ). Initial items were developed in collaboration with teachers. An exploratory factor analysis (Study 1, n = 208, aged 11–14) and a student focus group (N = 3, aged 11) enabled us to establish t...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:British journal of developmental psychology 2021-09, Vol.39 (3), p.499-520
Main Authors: Jolley, Daniel, Douglas, Karen M., Skipper, Yvonne, Thomas, Eleanor, Cookson, Darel
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3938-8c340a4a56743dbc70a173627197289ff2a050480c895d0d22249b06d981fdbc3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3938-8c340a4a56743dbc70a173627197289ff2a050480c895d0d22249b06d981fdbc3
container_end_page 520
container_issue 3
container_start_page 499
container_title British journal of developmental psychology
container_volume 39
creator Jolley, Daniel
Douglas, Karen M.
Skipper, Yvonne
Thomas, Eleanor
Cookson, Darel
description Four studies (total n = 961) developed and validated the Adolescent Conspiracy Beliefs Questionnaire (ACBQ). Initial items were developed in collaboration with teachers. An exploratory factor analysis (Study 1, n = 208, aged 11–14) and a student focus group (N = 3, aged 11) enabled us to establish the factor structure of a 9‐item scale. This was replicated via confirmatory factor analysis in Study 2 (N = 178, aged 11–17), and the scale displayed good convergent (i.e., relationship with paranoia and mistrust) and discriminant validity (i.e., no relationship with extraversion). Study 3a (N = 257) further tested convergent validity with a sample of 18‐year‐olds (i.e., relationship with adult‐validated measures of conspiracy beliefs) and demonstrated strong test–retest reliability. Study 3b (N = 318) replicated these findings with a mixed‐age adult sample. The ACBQ will allow researchers to explore the psychological antecedents and consequences of conspiracy thinking in young populations.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/bjdp.12368
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2487745418</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2487745418</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3938-8c340a4a56743dbc70a173627197289ff2a050480c895d0d22249b06d981fdbc3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp90U1u1DAch2ELUbVD2w0HQJbYlEop_kzs7mam0A-1gkogdWc5sQMeZexgT4pmxwV6AK7HSXA6Q5FYkI03j179lR8ALzE6wfl7Wy9Mf4IJLcUzMCGIsUJQfvccTBApccExutsDL1JaIIQpRWwX7FHKeSklmoCHG6vTEJ3_ArUJnU2N9av068dPWNvO2TZB52ETfOpd1M0arr7aEJ1Np_DM3tsu9MvsofYG3uvOGb1ywcPQjg5On4Jw_rcw23ZvB5tG7bWLFh5N57PbNwdgp9Vdsofbdx98fv_u0_yiuP5wfjmfXhcNlVQUoqEMaaZ5WTFq6qZCGle0JBWWFRGybYlGHDGBGiG5QYYQwmSNSiMFbrOn--Bo0-1j-DbeoZYuH9p12tswJEWYqCrGGRaZvv6HLsIQfb5OEc5l_qcV51kdb1QTQ0rRtqqPbqnjWmGkxpHUOJJ6HCnjV9vkUC-teaJ_VskAb8B319n1f1JqdnX2cRP9DfOqndU</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2559001755</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Measuring adolescents’ beliefs in conspiracy theories: Development and validation of the Adolescent Conspiracy Beliefs Questionnaire (ACBQ)</title><source>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</source><source>Wiley-Blackwell Read &amp; Publish Collection</source><creator>Jolley, Daniel ; Douglas, Karen M. ; Skipper, Yvonne ; Thomas, Eleanor ; Cookson, Darel</creator><creatorcontrib>Jolley, Daniel ; Douglas, Karen M. ; Skipper, Yvonne ; Thomas, Eleanor ; Cookson, Darel</creatorcontrib><description>Four studies (total n = 961) developed and validated the Adolescent Conspiracy Beliefs Questionnaire (ACBQ). Initial items were developed in collaboration with teachers. An exploratory factor analysis (Study 1, n = 208, aged 11–14) and a student focus group (N = 3, aged 11) enabled us to establish the factor structure of a 9‐item scale. This was replicated via confirmatory factor analysis in Study 2 (N = 178, aged 11–17), and the scale displayed good convergent (i.e., relationship with paranoia and mistrust) and discriminant validity (i.e., no relationship with extraversion). Study 3a (N = 257) further tested convergent validity with a sample of 18‐year‐olds (i.e., relationship with adult‐validated measures of conspiracy beliefs) and demonstrated strong test–retest reliability. Study 3b (N = 318) replicated these findings with a mixed‐age adult sample. The ACBQ will allow researchers to explore the psychological antecedents and consequences of conspiracy thinking in young populations.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0261-510X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2044-835X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/bjdp.12368</identifier><identifier>PMID: 33556990</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</publisher><subject>adolescence ; Adolescents ; Confirmatory factor analysis ; Conspiracy ; conspiracy beliefs ; conspiracy theories ; Convergent validity ; Discriminant validity ; Exploratory factor analysis ; Extraversion ; Paranoia ; Questionnaires ; Reliability ; sale construction ; Teachers ; validation</subject><ispartof>British journal of developmental psychology, 2021-09, Vol.39 (3), p.499-520</ispartof><rights>2021 The Authors. published by John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd on behalf of British Psychological Society.</rights><rights>2021 The Authors. British Journal of Developmental Psychology published by John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd on behalf of British Psychological Society.</rights><rights>2021. This article is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3938-8c340a4a56743dbc70a173627197289ff2a050480c895d0d22249b06d981fdbc3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3938-8c340a4a56743dbc70a173627197289ff2a050480c895d0d22249b06d981fdbc3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-0381-6924 ; 0000-0001-7011-3439 ; 0000-0001-7232-8599</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,30999,33223</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33556990$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Jolley, Daniel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Douglas, Karen M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Skipper, Yvonne</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thomas, Eleanor</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cookson, Darel</creatorcontrib><title>Measuring adolescents’ beliefs in conspiracy theories: Development and validation of the Adolescent Conspiracy Beliefs Questionnaire (ACBQ)</title><title>British journal of developmental psychology</title><addtitle>Br J Dev Psychol</addtitle><description>Four studies (total n = 961) developed and validated the Adolescent Conspiracy Beliefs Questionnaire (ACBQ). Initial items were developed in collaboration with teachers. An exploratory factor analysis (Study 1, n = 208, aged 11–14) and a student focus group (N = 3, aged 11) enabled us to establish the factor structure of a 9‐item scale. This was replicated via confirmatory factor analysis in Study 2 (N = 178, aged 11–17), and the scale displayed good convergent (i.e., relationship with paranoia and mistrust) and discriminant validity (i.e., no relationship with extraversion). Study 3a (N = 257) further tested convergent validity with a sample of 18‐year‐olds (i.e., relationship with adult‐validated measures of conspiracy beliefs) and demonstrated strong test–retest reliability. Study 3b (N = 318) replicated these findings with a mixed‐age adult sample. The ACBQ will allow researchers to explore the psychological antecedents and consequences of conspiracy thinking in young populations.</description><subject>adolescence</subject><subject>Adolescents</subject><subject>Confirmatory factor analysis</subject><subject>Conspiracy</subject><subject>conspiracy beliefs</subject><subject>conspiracy theories</subject><subject>Convergent validity</subject><subject>Discriminant validity</subject><subject>Exploratory factor analysis</subject><subject>Extraversion</subject><subject>Paranoia</subject><subject>Questionnaires</subject><subject>Reliability</subject><subject>sale construction</subject><subject>Teachers</subject><subject>validation</subject><issn>0261-510X</issn><issn>2044-835X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>24P</sourceid><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><sourceid>8BJ</sourceid><recordid>eNp90U1u1DAch2ELUbVD2w0HQJbYlEop_kzs7mam0A-1gkogdWc5sQMeZexgT4pmxwV6AK7HSXA6Q5FYkI03j179lR8ALzE6wfl7Wy9Mf4IJLcUzMCGIsUJQfvccTBApccExutsDL1JaIIQpRWwX7FHKeSklmoCHG6vTEJ3_ArUJnU2N9av068dPWNvO2TZB52ETfOpd1M0arr7aEJ1Np_DM3tsu9MvsofYG3uvOGb1ywcPQjg5On4Jw_rcw23ZvB5tG7bWLFh5N57PbNwdgp9Vdsofbdx98fv_u0_yiuP5wfjmfXhcNlVQUoqEMaaZ5WTFq6qZCGle0JBWWFRGybYlGHDGBGiG5QYYQwmSNSiMFbrOn--Bo0-1j-DbeoZYuH9p12tswJEWYqCrGGRaZvv6HLsIQfb5OEc5l_qcV51kdb1QTQ0rRtqqPbqnjWmGkxpHUOJJ6HCnjV9vkUC-teaJ_VskAb8B319n1f1JqdnX2cRP9DfOqndU</recordid><startdate>202109</startdate><enddate>202109</enddate><creator>Jolley, Daniel</creator><creator>Douglas, Karen M.</creator><creator>Skipper, Yvonne</creator><creator>Thomas, Eleanor</creator><creator>Cookson, Darel</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>24P</scope><scope>WIN</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0381-6924</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7011-3439</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7232-8599</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202109</creationdate><title>Measuring adolescents’ beliefs in conspiracy theories: Development and validation of the Adolescent Conspiracy Beliefs Questionnaire (ACBQ)</title><author>Jolley, Daniel ; Douglas, Karen M. ; Skipper, Yvonne ; Thomas, Eleanor ; Cookson, Darel</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3938-8c340a4a56743dbc70a173627197289ff2a050480c895d0d22249b06d981fdbc3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>adolescence</topic><topic>Adolescents</topic><topic>Confirmatory factor analysis</topic><topic>Conspiracy</topic><topic>conspiracy beliefs</topic><topic>conspiracy theories</topic><topic>Convergent validity</topic><topic>Discriminant validity</topic><topic>Exploratory factor analysis</topic><topic>Extraversion</topic><topic>Paranoia</topic><topic>Questionnaires</topic><topic>Reliability</topic><topic>sale construction</topic><topic>Teachers</topic><topic>validation</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Jolley, Daniel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Douglas, Karen M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Skipper, Yvonne</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thomas, Eleanor</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cookson, Darel</creatorcontrib><collection>Wiley Online Library Open Access</collection><collection>Wiley Open Access</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>British journal of developmental psychology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Jolley, Daniel</au><au>Douglas, Karen M.</au><au>Skipper, Yvonne</au><au>Thomas, Eleanor</au><au>Cookson, Darel</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Measuring adolescents’ beliefs in conspiracy theories: Development and validation of the Adolescent Conspiracy Beliefs Questionnaire (ACBQ)</atitle><jtitle>British journal of developmental psychology</jtitle><addtitle>Br J Dev Psychol</addtitle><date>2021-09</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>39</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>499</spage><epage>520</epage><pages>499-520</pages><issn>0261-510X</issn><eissn>2044-835X</eissn><abstract>Four studies (total n = 961) developed and validated the Adolescent Conspiracy Beliefs Questionnaire (ACBQ). Initial items were developed in collaboration with teachers. An exploratory factor analysis (Study 1, n = 208, aged 11–14) and a student focus group (N = 3, aged 11) enabled us to establish the factor structure of a 9‐item scale. This was replicated via confirmatory factor analysis in Study 2 (N = 178, aged 11–17), and the scale displayed good convergent (i.e., relationship with paranoia and mistrust) and discriminant validity (i.e., no relationship with extraversion). Study 3a (N = 257) further tested convergent validity with a sample of 18‐year‐olds (i.e., relationship with adult‐validated measures of conspiracy beliefs) and demonstrated strong test–retest reliability. Study 3b (N = 318) replicated these findings with a mixed‐age adult sample. The ACBQ will allow researchers to explore the psychological antecedents and consequences of conspiracy thinking in young populations.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</pub><pmid>33556990</pmid><doi>10.1111/bjdp.12368</doi><tpages>22</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0381-6924</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7011-3439</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7232-8599</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0261-510X
ispartof British journal of developmental psychology, 2021-09, Vol.39 (3), p.499-520
issn 0261-510X
2044-835X
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2487745418
source Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS); Wiley-Blackwell Read & Publish Collection
subjects adolescence
Adolescents
Confirmatory factor analysis
Conspiracy
conspiracy beliefs
conspiracy theories
Convergent validity
Discriminant validity
Exploratory factor analysis
Extraversion
Paranoia
Questionnaires
Reliability
sale construction
Teachers
validation
title Measuring adolescents’ beliefs in conspiracy theories: Development and validation of the Adolescent Conspiracy Beliefs Questionnaire (ACBQ)
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-02T12%3A42%3A39IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Measuring%20adolescents%E2%80%99%20beliefs%20in%20conspiracy%20theories:%20Development%20and%20validation%20of%20the%20Adolescent%20Conspiracy%20Beliefs%20Questionnaire%20(ACBQ)&rft.jtitle=British%20journal%20of%20developmental%20psychology&rft.au=Jolley,%20Daniel&rft.date=2021-09&rft.volume=39&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=499&rft.epage=520&rft.pages=499-520&rft.issn=0261-510X&rft.eissn=2044-835X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/bjdp.12368&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2487745418%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3938-8c340a4a56743dbc70a173627197289ff2a050480c895d0d22249b06d981fdbc3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2559001755&rft_id=info:pmid/33556990&rfr_iscdi=true