Loading…
The patient's agenda: nurses’ experience of learning and using guided self‐determination
Objectives Health care has seen a shift towards person‐centred care to encompass the entirety of a person's needs and preferences, but research is sparse on healthcare professionals learning and using person‐centred care. Aim To investigate nurses’ experiences of learning and using the person‐c...
Saved in:
Published in: | Scandinavian journal of caring sciences 2022-03, Vol.36 (1), p.120-130 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3539-37aebc2c9695cc126caeb461b1c46ab0263d774a6f78010c3087c395919024893 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3539-37aebc2c9695cc126caeb461b1c46ab0263d774a6f78010c3087c395919024893 |
container_end_page | 130 |
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 120 |
container_title | Scandinavian journal of caring sciences |
container_volume | 36 |
creator | Dehn, Pernille Strømberg, Charlotte Linnet Olesen, Mette |
description | Objectives
Health care has seen a shift towards person‐centred care to encompass the entirety of a person's needs and preferences, but research is sparse on healthcare professionals learning and using person‐centred care.
Aim
To investigate nurses’ experiences of learning and using the person‐centred method guided self‐determination (GSD) in three different gynaecological settings and to determine whether, and potentially, how new tasks introduced by the GSD method influence their professional identity.
Design
A qualitative interview study conducted between January 2019 and January 2020.
Method
We conducted 16 semi‐structured interviews with nurses educated in using GSD. Applying inductive and deductive reasoning, we analysed the interviews using thematic analysis. The study was registered with the Danish Data Protection Agency (file no.: VD‐2018‐445, I‐Suite no.: 6700).
Results
The analysis generated three main themes with two subthemes each: (a) prerequisites and barriers to learning and using GSD in terms of personal factors and organisational and method‐related factors; (b) new knowledge and understanding of illness with the subthemes expanded understanding of illness and a different relationship; and (c) nursing undergoing change with the subthemes, a new role and a professional self shaped through interaction with other professions.
Conclusions
Although other professionals may have either supported or challenged the use of GSD, most nurses indicated that it supplemented their professional role and identity as they gained new knowledge about person‐centred challenges and felt more confident. When introducing GSD in nursing, the organisation must not only consider individual characteristics, multidisciplinary collaboration and communication but also plan individual education and supervision. This is necessary because all these factors affect how a new professional role is constructed and adopted, not to mention how it influences the nurses’ perception of their professional identity and use of GSD. Establishing a helpful person‐centred environment must also be considered. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/scs.12969 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2488569512</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2488569512</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3539-37aebc2c9695cc126caeb461b1c46ab0263d774a6f78010c3087c395919024893</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kM1KAzEQx4MoWqsHX0ACHtTDaj42ya43KX5BwYN6E0Kana1bttmadNHe-ghefb0-iamtHgTnMhPy48fMH6EDSs5orPNgwxllucw3UIemiiZSUbaJOoRlPMk5zXbQbggjQogQhG6jHc6FIoyoDnp-fAE8MdMK3PQ4YDMEV5gL7FofICzmnxjeJ-DjrwXclLgG413lhti4ArdhOQ3bqoACB6jLxfyjgCn4ceWisXF7aKs0dYD9de-ip-urx95t0r-_uetd9hPLBc8TrgwMLLPxAGEtZdLGdyrpgNpUmgFhkhdKpUaWKiOUWE4yZXkucpoTlmY576KTlXfim9cWwlSPq2Chro2Dpg06QpmIcsoievQHHTWtd3E7zSSTkotULIWnK8r6JgQPpZ74amz8TFOil5HrGLn-jjyyh2tjOxhD8Uv-ZByB8xXwVtUw-9-kH3oPK-UXDL6LbA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2626635459</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The patient's agenda: nurses’ experience of learning and using guided self‐determination</title><source>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>Wiley</source><creator>Dehn, Pernille ; Strømberg, Charlotte ; Linnet Olesen, Mette</creator><creatorcontrib>Dehn, Pernille ; Strømberg, Charlotte ; Linnet Olesen, Mette</creatorcontrib><description>Objectives
Health care has seen a shift towards person‐centred care to encompass the entirety of a person's needs and preferences, but research is sparse on healthcare professionals learning and using person‐centred care.
Aim
To investigate nurses’ experiences of learning and using the person‐centred method guided self‐determination (GSD) in three different gynaecological settings and to determine whether, and potentially, how new tasks introduced by the GSD method influence their professional identity.
Design
A qualitative interview study conducted between January 2019 and January 2020.
Method
We conducted 16 semi‐structured interviews with nurses educated in using GSD. Applying inductive and deductive reasoning, we analysed the interviews using thematic analysis. The study was registered with the Danish Data Protection Agency (file no.: VD‐2018‐445, I‐Suite no.: 6700).
Results
The analysis generated three main themes with two subthemes each: (a) prerequisites and barriers to learning and using GSD in terms of personal factors and organisational and method‐related factors; (b) new knowledge and understanding of illness with the subthemes expanded understanding of illness and a different relationship; and (c) nursing undergoing change with the subthemes, a new role and a professional self shaped through interaction with other professions.
Conclusions
Although other professionals may have either supported or challenged the use of GSD, most nurses indicated that it supplemented their professional role and identity as they gained new knowledge about person‐centred challenges and felt more confident. When introducing GSD in nursing, the organisation must not only consider individual characteristics, multidisciplinary collaboration and communication but also plan individual education and supervision. This is necessary because all these factors affect how a new professional role is constructed and adopted, not to mention how it influences the nurses’ perception of their professional identity and use of GSD. Establishing a helpful person‐centred environment must also be considered.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0283-9318</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1471-6712</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/scs.12969</identifier><identifier>PMID: 33570207</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Sweden: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</publisher><subject>Communication ; Data integrity ; Deductive reasoning ; guided self‐determination ; Health care ; Humans ; Interviews ; Learning ; Medical personnel ; Nurses ; Nursing ; nursing role ; Occupational roles ; Patient-centered care ; Personal Autonomy ; person‐centred care ; Professional identity ; Qualitative Research ; Roles</subject><ispartof>Scandinavian journal of caring sciences, 2022-03, Vol.36 (1), p.120-130</ispartof><rights>2021 Nordic College of Caring Science</rights><rights>2021 Nordic College of Caring Science.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2022 Nordic College of Caring Science</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3539-37aebc2c9695cc126caeb461b1c46ab0263d774a6f78010c3087c395919024893</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3539-37aebc2c9695cc126caeb461b1c46ab0263d774a6f78010c3087c395919024893</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-3243-9387</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,30999</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33570207$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Dehn, Pernille</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Strømberg, Charlotte</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Linnet Olesen, Mette</creatorcontrib><title>The patient's agenda: nurses’ experience of learning and using guided self‐determination</title><title>Scandinavian journal of caring sciences</title><addtitle>Scand J Caring Sci</addtitle><description>Objectives
Health care has seen a shift towards person‐centred care to encompass the entirety of a person's needs and preferences, but research is sparse on healthcare professionals learning and using person‐centred care.
Aim
To investigate nurses’ experiences of learning and using the person‐centred method guided self‐determination (GSD) in three different gynaecological settings and to determine whether, and potentially, how new tasks introduced by the GSD method influence their professional identity.
Design
A qualitative interview study conducted between January 2019 and January 2020.
Method
We conducted 16 semi‐structured interviews with nurses educated in using GSD. Applying inductive and deductive reasoning, we analysed the interviews using thematic analysis. The study was registered with the Danish Data Protection Agency (file no.: VD‐2018‐445, I‐Suite no.: 6700).
Results
The analysis generated three main themes with two subthemes each: (a) prerequisites and barriers to learning and using GSD in terms of personal factors and organisational and method‐related factors; (b) new knowledge and understanding of illness with the subthemes expanded understanding of illness and a different relationship; and (c) nursing undergoing change with the subthemes, a new role and a professional self shaped through interaction with other professions.
Conclusions
Although other professionals may have either supported or challenged the use of GSD, most nurses indicated that it supplemented their professional role and identity as they gained new knowledge about person‐centred challenges and felt more confident. When introducing GSD in nursing, the organisation must not only consider individual characteristics, multidisciplinary collaboration and communication but also plan individual education and supervision. This is necessary because all these factors affect how a new professional role is constructed and adopted, not to mention how it influences the nurses’ perception of their professional identity and use of GSD. Establishing a helpful person‐centred environment must also be considered.</description><subject>Communication</subject><subject>Data integrity</subject><subject>Deductive reasoning</subject><subject>guided self‐determination</subject><subject>Health care</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Interviews</subject><subject>Learning</subject><subject>Medical personnel</subject><subject>Nurses</subject><subject>Nursing</subject><subject>nursing role</subject><subject>Occupational roles</subject><subject>Patient-centered care</subject><subject>Personal Autonomy</subject><subject>person‐centred care</subject><subject>Professional identity</subject><subject>Qualitative Research</subject><subject>Roles</subject><issn>0283-9318</issn><issn>1471-6712</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kM1KAzEQx4MoWqsHX0ACHtTDaj42ya43KX5BwYN6E0Kana1bttmadNHe-ghefb0-iamtHgTnMhPy48fMH6EDSs5orPNgwxllucw3UIemiiZSUbaJOoRlPMk5zXbQbggjQogQhG6jHc6FIoyoDnp-fAE8MdMK3PQ4YDMEV5gL7FofICzmnxjeJ-DjrwXclLgG413lhti4ArdhOQ3bqoACB6jLxfyjgCn4ceWisXF7aKs0dYD9de-ip-urx95t0r-_uetd9hPLBc8TrgwMLLPxAGEtZdLGdyrpgNpUmgFhkhdKpUaWKiOUWE4yZXkucpoTlmY576KTlXfim9cWwlSPq2Chro2Dpg06QpmIcsoievQHHTWtd3E7zSSTkotULIWnK8r6JgQPpZ74amz8TFOil5HrGLn-jjyyh2tjOxhD8Uv-ZByB8xXwVtUw-9-kH3oPK-UXDL6LbA</recordid><startdate>202203</startdate><enddate>202203</enddate><creator>Dehn, Pernille</creator><creator>Strømberg, Charlotte</creator><creator>Linnet Olesen, Mette</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>ASE</scope><scope>FPQ</scope><scope>K6X</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3243-9387</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202203</creationdate><title>The patient's agenda: nurses’ experience of learning and using guided self‐determination</title><author>Dehn, Pernille ; Strømberg, Charlotte ; Linnet Olesen, Mette</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3539-37aebc2c9695cc126caeb461b1c46ab0263d774a6f78010c3087c395919024893</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Communication</topic><topic>Data integrity</topic><topic>Deductive reasoning</topic><topic>guided self‐determination</topic><topic>Health care</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Interviews</topic><topic>Learning</topic><topic>Medical personnel</topic><topic>Nurses</topic><topic>Nursing</topic><topic>nursing role</topic><topic>Occupational roles</topic><topic>Patient-centered care</topic><topic>Personal Autonomy</topic><topic>person‐centred care</topic><topic>Professional identity</topic><topic>Qualitative Research</topic><topic>Roles</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Dehn, Pernille</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Strømberg, Charlotte</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Linnet Olesen, Mette</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><collection>British Nursing Index (BNI) (1985 to Present)</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Scandinavian journal of caring sciences</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Dehn, Pernille</au><au>Strømberg, Charlotte</au><au>Linnet Olesen, Mette</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The patient's agenda: nurses’ experience of learning and using guided self‐determination</atitle><jtitle>Scandinavian journal of caring sciences</jtitle><addtitle>Scand J Caring Sci</addtitle><date>2022-03</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>36</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>120</spage><epage>130</epage><pages>120-130</pages><issn>0283-9318</issn><eissn>1471-6712</eissn><abstract>Objectives
Health care has seen a shift towards person‐centred care to encompass the entirety of a person's needs and preferences, but research is sparse on healthcare professionals learning and using person‐centred care.
Aim
To investigate nurses’ experiences of learning and using the person‐centred method guided self‐determination (GSD) in three different gynaecological settings and to determine whether, and potentially, how new tasks introduced by the GSD method influence their professional identity.
Design
A qualitative interview study conducted between January 2019 and January 2020.
Method
We conducted 16 semi‐structured interviews with nurses educated in using GSD. Applying inductive and deductive reasoning, we analysed the interviews using thematic analysis. The study was registered with the Danish Data Protection Agency (file no.: VD‐2018‐445, I‐Suite no.: 6700).
Results
The analysis generated three main themes with two subthemes each: (a) prerequisites and barriers to learning and using GSD in terms of personal factors and organisational and method‐related factors; (b) new knowledge and understanding of illness with the subthemes expanded understanding of illness and a different relationship; and (c) nursing undergoing change with the subthemes, a new role and a professional self shaped through interaction with other professions.
Conclusions
Although other professionals may have either supported or challenged the use of GSD, most nurses indicated that it supplemented their professional role and identity as they gained new knowledge about person‐centred challenges and felt more confident. When introducing GSD in nursing, the organisation must not only consider individual characteristics, multidisciplinary collaboration and communication but also plan individual education and supervision. This is necessary because all these factors affect how a new professional role is constructed and adopted, not to mention how it influences the nurses’ perception of their professional identity and use of GSD. Establishing a helpful person‐centred environment must also be considered.</abstract><cop>Sweden</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</pub><pmid>33570207</pmid><doi>10.1111/scs.12969</doi><tpages>11</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3243-9387</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0283-9318 |
ispartof | Scandinavian journal of caring sciences, 2022-03, Vol.36 (1), p.120-130 |
issn | 0283-9318 1471-6712 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2488569512 |
source | Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); Wiley |
subjects | Communication Data integrity Deductive reasoning guided self‐determination Health care Humans Interviews Learning Medical personnel Nurses Nursing nursing role Occupational roles Patient-centered care Personal Autonomy person‐centred care Professional identity Qualitative Research Roles |
title | The patient's agenda: nurses’ experience of learning and using guided self‐determination |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-02T18%3A50%3A25IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20patient's%20agenda:%20nurses%E2%80%99%20experience%20of%20learning%20and%20using%20guided%20self%E2%80%90determination&rft.jtitle=Scandinavian%20journal%20of%20caring%20sciences&rft.au=Dehn,%20Pernille&rft.date=2022-03&rft.volume=36&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=120&rft.epage=130&rft.pages=120-130&rft.issn=0283-9318&rft.eissn=1471-6712&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/scs.12969&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2488569512%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3539-37aebc2c9695cc126caeb461b1c46ab0263d774a6f78010c3087c395919024893%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2626635459&rft_id=info:pmid/33570207&rfr_iscdi=true |