Loading…

The patient's agenda: nurses’ experience of learning and using guided self‐determination

Objectives Health care has seen a shift towards person‐centred care to encompass the entirety of a person's needs and preferences, but research is sparse on healthcare professionals learning and using person‐centred care. Aim To investigate nurses’ experiences of learning and using the person‐c...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Scandinavian journal of caring sciences 2022-03, Vol.36 (1), p.120-130
Main Authors: Dehn, Pernille, Strømberg, Charlotte, Linnet Olesen, Mette
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3539-37aebc2c9695cc126caeb461b1c46ab0263d774a6f78010c3087c395919024893
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3539-37aebc2c9695cc126caeb461b1c46ab0263d774a6f78010c3087c395919024893
container_end_page 130
container_issue 1
container_start_page 120
container_title Scandinavian journal of caring sciences
container_volume 36
creator Dehn, Pernille
Strømberg, Charlotte
Linnet Olesen, Mette
description Objectives Health care has seen a shift towards person‐centred care to encompass the entirety of a person's needs and preferences, but research is sparse on healthcare professionals learning and using person‐centred care. Aim To investigate nurses’ experiences of learning and using the person‐centred method guided self‐determination (GSD) in three different gynaecological settings and to determine whether, and potentially, how new tasks introduced by the GSD method influence their professional identity. Design A qualitative interview study conducted between January 2019 and January 2020. Method We conducted 16 semi‐structured interviews with nurses educated in using GSD. Applying inductive and deductive reasoning, we analysed the interviews using thematic analysis. The study was registered with the Danish Data Protection Agency (file no.: VD‐2018‐445, I‐Suite no.: 6700). Results The analysis generated three main themes with two subthemes each: (a) prerequisites and barriers to learning and using GSD in terms of personal factors and organisational and method‐related factors; (b) new knowledge and understanding of illness with the subthemes expanded understanding of illness and a different relationship; and (c) nursing undergoing change with the subthemes, a new role and a professional self shaped through interaction with other professions. Conclusions Although other professionals may have either supported or challenged the use of GSD, most nurses indicated that it supplemented their professional role and identity as they gained new knowledge about person‐centred challenges and felt more confident. When introducing GSD in nursing, the organisation must not only consider individual characteristics, multidisciplinary collaboration and communication but also plan individual education and supervision. This is necessary because all these factors affect how a new professional role is constructed and adopted, not to mention how it influences the nurses’ perception of their professional identity and use of GSD. Establishing a helpful person‐centred environment must also be considered.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/scs.12969
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2488569512</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2488569512</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3539-37aebc2c9695cc126caeb461b1c46ab0263d774a6f78010c3087c395919024893</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kM1KAzEQx4MoWqsHX0ACHtTDaj42ya43KX5BwYN6E0Kana1bttmadNHe-ghefb0-iamtHgTnMhPy48fMH6EDSs5orPNgwxllucw3UIemiiZSUbaJOoRlPMk5zXbQbggjQogQhG6jHc6FIoyoDnp-fAE8MdMK3PQ4YDMEV5gL7FofICzmnxjeJ-DjrwXclLgG413lhti4ArdhOQ3bqoACB6jLxfyjgCn4ceWisXF7aKs0dYD9de-ip-urx95t0r-_uetd9hPLBc8TrgwMLLPxAGEtZdLGdyrpgNpUmgFhkhdKpUaWKiOUWE4yZXkucpoTlmY576KTlXfim9cWwlSPq2Chro2Dpg06QpmIcsoievQHHTWtd3E7zSSTkotULIWnK8r6JgQPpZ74amz8TFOil5HrGLn-jjyyh2tjOxhD8Uv-ZByB8xXwVtUw-9-kH3oPK-UXDL6LbA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2626635459</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The patient's agenda: nurses’ experience of learning and using guided self‐determination</title><source>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>Wiley</source><creator>Dehn, Pernille ; Strømberg, Charlotte ; Linnet Olesen, Mette</creator><creatorcontrib>Dehn, Pernille ; Strømberg, Charlotte ; Linnet Olesen, Mette</creatorcontrib><description>Objectives Health care has seen a shift towards person‐centred care to encompass the entirety of a person's needs and preferences, but research is sparse on healthcare professionals learning and using person‐centred care. Aim To investigate nurses’ experiences of learning and using the person‐centred method guided self‐determination (GSD) in three different gynaecological settings and to determine whether, and potentially, how new tasks introduced by the GSD method influence their professional identity. Design A qualitative interview study conducted between January 2019 and January 2020. Method We conducted 16 semi‐structured interviews with nurses educated in using GSD. Applying inductive and deductive reasoning, we analysed the interviews using thematic analysis. The study was registered with the Danish Data Protection Agency (file no.: VD‐2018‐445, I‐Suite no.: 6700). Results The analysis generated three main themes with two subthemes each: (a) prerequisites and barriers to learning and using GSD in terms of personal factors and organisational and method‐related factors; (b) new knowledge and understanding of illness with the subthemes expanded understanding of illness and a different relationship; and (c) nursing undergoing change with the subthemes, a new role and a professional self shaped through interaction with other professions. Conclusions Although other professionals may have either supported or challenged the use of GSD, most nurses indicated that it supplemented their professional role and identity as they gained new knowledge about person‐centred challenges and felt more confident. When introducing GSD in nursing, the organisation must not only consider individual characteristics, multidisciplinary collaboration and communication but also plan individual education and supervision. This is necessary because all these factors affect how a new professional role is constructed and adopted, not to mention how it influences the nurses’ perception of their professional identity and use of GSD. Establishing a helpful person‐centred environment must also be considered.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0283-9318</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1471-6712</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/scs.12969</identifier><identifier>PMID: 33570207</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Sweden: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</publisher><subject>Communication ; Data integrity ; Deductive reasoning ; guided self‐determination ; Health care ; Humans ; Interviews ; Learning ; Medical personnel ; Nurses ; Nursing ; nursing role ; Occupational roles ; Patient-centered care ; Personal Autonomy ; person‐centred care ; Professional identity ; Qualitative Research ; Roles</subject><ispartof>Scandinavian journal of caring sciences, 2022-03, Vol.36 (1), p.120-130</ispartof><rights>2021 Nordic College of Caring Science</rights><rights>2021 Nordic College of Caring Science.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2022 Nordic College of Caring Science</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3539-37aebc2c9695cc126caeb461b1c46ab0263d774a6f78010c3087c395919024893</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3539-37aebc2c9695cc126caeb461b1c46ab0263d774a6f78010c3087c395919024893</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-3243-9387</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,30999</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33570207$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Dehn, Pernille</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Strømberg, Charlotte</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Linnet Olesen, Mette</creatorcontrib><title>The patient's agenda: nurses’ experience of learning and using guided self‐determination</title><title>Scandinavian journal of caring sciences</title><addtitle>Scand J Caring Sci</addtitle><description>Objectives Health care has seen a shift towards person‐centred care to encompass the entirety of a person's needs and preferences, but research is sparse on healthcare professionals learning and using person‐centred care. Aim To investigate nurses’ experiences of learning and using the person‐centred method guided self‐determination (GSD) in three different gynaecological settings and to determine whether, and potentially, how new tasks introduced by the GSD method influence their professional identity. Design A qualitative interview study conducted between January 2019 and January 2020. Method We conducted 16 semi‐structured interviews with nurses educated in using GSD. Applying inductive and deductive reasoning, we analysed the interviews using thematic analysis. The study was registered with the Danish Data Protection Agency (file no.: VD‐2018‐445, I‐Suite no.: 6700). Results The analysis generated three main themes with two subthemes each: (a) prerequisites and barriers to learning and using GSD in terms of personal factors and organisational and method‐related factors; (b) new knowledge and understanding of illness with the subthemes expanded understanding of illness and a different relationship; and (c) nursing undergoing change with the subthemes, a new role and a professional self shaped through interaction with other professions. Conclusions Although other professionals may have either supported or challenged the use of GSD, most nurses indicated that it supplemented their professional role and identity as they gained new knowledge about person‐centred challenges and felt more confident. When introducing GSD in nursing, the organisation must not only consider individual characteristics, multidisciplinary collaboration and communication but also plan individual education and supervision. This is necessary because all these factors affect how a new professional role is constructed and adopted, not to mention how it influences the nurses’ perception of their professional identity and use of GSD. Establishing a helpful person‐centred environment must also be considered.</description><subject>Communication</subject><subject>Data integrity</subject><subject>Deductive reasoning</subject><subject>guided self‐determination</subject><subject>Health care</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Interviews</subject><subject>Learning</subject><subject>Medical personnel</subject><subject>Nurses</subject><subject>Nursing</subject><subject>nursing role</subject><subject>Occupational roles</subject><subject>Patient-centered care</subject><subject>Personal Autonomy</subject><subject>person‐centred care</subject><subject>Professional identity</subject><subject>Qualitative Research</subject><subject>Roles</subject><issn>0283-9318</issn><issn>1471-6712</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kM1KAzEQx4MoWqsHX0ACHtTDaj42ya43KX5BwYN6E0Kana1bttmadNHe-ghefb0-iamtHgTnMhPy48fMH6EDSs5orPNgwxllucw3UIemiiZSUbaJOoRlPMk5zXbQbggjQogQhG6jHc6FIoyoDnp-fAE8MdMK3PQ4YDMEV5gL7FofICzmnxjeJ-DjrwXclLgG413lhti4ArdhOQ3bqoACB6jLxfyjgCn4ceWisXF7aKs0dYD9de-ip-urx95t0r-_uetd9hPLBc8TrgwMLLPxAGEtZdLGdyrpgNpUmgFhkhdKpUaWKiOUWE4yZXkucpoTlmY576KTlXfim9cWwlSPq2Chro2Dpg06QpmIcsoievQHHTWtd3E7zSSTkotULIWnK8r6JgQPpZ74amz8TFOil5HrGLn-jjyyh2tjOxhD8Uv-ZByB8xXwVtUw-9-kH3oPK-UXDL6LbA</recordid><startdate>202203</startdate><enddate>202203</enddate><creator>Dehn, Pernille</creator><creator>Strømberg, Charlotte</creator><creator>Linnet Olesen, Mette</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>ASE</scope><scope>FPQ</scope><scope>K6X</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3243-9387</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202203</creationdate><title>The patient's agenda: nurses’ experience of learning and using guided self‐determination</title><author>Dehn, Pernille ; Strømberg, Charlotte ; Linnet Olesen, Mette</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3539-37aebc2c9695cc126caeb461b1c46ab0263d774a6f78010c3087c395919024893</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Communication</topic><topic>Data integrity</topic><topic>Deductive reasoning</topic><topic>guided self‐determination</topic><topic>Health care</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Interviews</topic><topic>Learning</topic><topic>Medical personnel</topic><topic>Nurses</topic><topic>Nursing</topic><topic>nursing role</topic><topic>Occupational roles</topic><topic>Patient-centered care</topic><topic>Personal Autonomy</topic><topic>person‐centred care</topic><topic>Professional identity</topic><topic>Qualitative Research</topic><topic>Roles</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Dehn, Pernille</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Strømberg, Charlotte</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Linnet Olesen, Mette</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><collection>British Nursing Index (BNI) (1985 to Present)</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Scandinavian journal of caring sciences</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Dehn, Pernille</au><au>Strømberg, Charlotte</au><au>Linnet Olesen, Mette</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The patient's agenda: nurses’ experience of learning and using guided self‐determination</atitle><jtitle>Scandinavian journal of caring sciences</jtitle><addtitle>Scand J Caring Sci</addtitle><date>2022-03</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>36</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>120</spage><epage>130</epage><pages>120-130</pages><issn>0283-9318</issn><eissn>1471-6712</eissn><abstract>Objectives Health care has seen a shift towards person‐centred care to encompass the entirety of a person's needs and preferences, but research is sparse on healthcare professionals learning and using person‐centred care. Aim To investigate nurses’ experiences of learning and using the person‐centred method guided self‐determination (GSD) in three different gynaecological settings and to determine whether, and potentially, how new tasks introduced by the GSD method influence their professional identity. Design A qualitative interview study conducted between January 2019 and January 2020. Method We conducted 16 semi‐structured interviews with nurses educated in using GSD. Applying inductive and deductive reasoning, we analysed the interviews using thematic analysis. The study was registered with the Danish Data Protection Agency (file no.: VD‐2018‐445, I‐Suite no.: 6700). Results The analysis generated three main themes with two subthemes each: (a) prerequisites and barriers to learning and using GSD in terms of personal factors and organisational and method‐related factors; (b) new knowledge and understanding of illness with the subthemes expanded understanding of illness and a different relationship; and (c) nursing undergoing change with the subthemes, a new role and a professional self shaped through interaction with other professions. Conclusions Although other professionals may have either supported or challenged the use of GSD, most nurses indicated that it supplemented their professional role and identity as they gained new knowledge about person‐centred challenges and felt more confident. When introducing GSD in nursing, the organisation must not only consider individual characteristics, multidisciplinary collaboration and communication but also plan individual education and supervision. This is necessary because all these factors affect how a new professional role is constructed and adopted, not to mention how it influences the nurses’ perception of their professional identity and use of GSD. Establishing a helpful person‐centred environment must also be considered.</abstract><cop>Sweden</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</pub><pmid>33570207</pmid><doi>10.1111/scs.12969</doi><tpages>11</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3243-9387</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0283-9318
ispartof Scandinavian journal of caring sciences, 2022-03, Vol.36 (1), p.120-130
issn 0283-9318
1471-6712
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2488569512
source Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); Wiley
subjects Communication
Data integrity
Deductive reasoning
guided self‐determination
Health care
Humans
Interviews
Learning
Medical personnel
Nurses
Nursing
nursing role
Occupational roles
Patient-centered care
Personal Autonomy
person‐centred care
Professional identity
Qualitative Research
Roles
title The patient's agenda: nurses’ experience of learning and using guided self‐determination
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-02T18%3A50%3A25IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20patient's%20agenda:%20nurses%E2%80%99%20experience%20of%20learning%20and%20using%20guided%20self%E2%80%90determination&rft.jtitle=Scandinavian%20journal%20of%20caring%20sciences&rft.au=Dehn,%20Pernille&rft.date=2022-03&rft.volume=36&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=120&rft.epage=130&rft.pages=120-130&rft.issn=0283-9318&rft.eissn=1471-6712&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/scs.12969&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2488569512%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3539-37aebc2c9695cc126caeb461b1c46ab0263d774a6f78010c3087c395919024893%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2626635459&rft_id=info:pmid/33570207&rfr_iscdi=true